From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 27 13:30:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE78106566B for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 13:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEF78FC0C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 13:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4RDUG9c020151 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 13:30:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4RDUG9C020143; Fri, 27 May 2011 13:30:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:30:16 GMT Message-Id: <201105271330.p4RDUG9C020143@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org From: Adrian Chadd Cc: Subject: Re: kern/140796: [ath] [panic] Cannot attach (unable to attach hardware; HAL status 3) under 8, panic in 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adrian Chadd List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:30:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/140796; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adrian Chadd To: Dalibor Gudzic Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/140796: [ath] [panic] Cannot attach (unable to attach hardware; HAL status 3) under 8, panic in 7.x Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:29:33 +0800 On 27 May 2011 21:25, Dalibor Gudzic wrote: > Ah, I haven't been using FreeBSD for some time now... I see things > have changed in 7.x. :) Card is WORKING properly now. I tried setting > and address and listening on it. I will test further today and see if > there are any problems. > Anyway, is there a chance for a patch downstream to STABLE? Or change > is already there? > > Again, thank a lot for your time and effort on this issue. Hi! I don't even know what the underlying bus issue in earlier versions. I just know that there's been some bugfixes with the bus resource allocation code. I don't even know what to port over. :) I'm just glad it works. :) Adrian