Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <1338829386082-5714969.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1338828472.30383.YahooMailClassic@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References:  <4FCA20C5.6010901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <2421561.4aJcXPZZxh@x220.ovitrap.com> <3851080.JQJobqxLc8@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FCBCF49.1010206@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20120604152431.GD73254@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <1338825238124-5714951.post@n5.nabble.com> <1338828472.30383.YahooMailClassic@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I saw LibreOffice as "cleaning-up" *office effort, maybe my hopes
were displaced, maybe not. 

I personally do not care if it will be LibreOffice or Apache OpenOffice 
as long as it's working and not pulling in KDE4/QT4/GTK (most people/linux
distros are abandoning OO for Libre though it appears), but if human 
resources are scarce, shouldn't we (who?) decide that one big editor 
(tm) is plenty?

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Re-Why-Are-You-NOT-Using-FreeBSD-tp5714253p5714969.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1338829386082-5714969.post>