Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:30:52 -0000 (WET)
From:      "Rui Lopes" <rui@ruilopes.com>
To:        <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        <billf@mu.org>, <kkuehl@cisco.com>, <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: ethereal-0.9.7
Message-ID:  <49676.217.129.151.119.1045776652.squirrel@webmail>
In-Reply-To: <1045775078.472.18.camel@gyros>
References:  <001501c2d761$f9e92180$0601a8c0@amer.cisco.com> <20030218210457.GC20055@elvis.mu.org> <1045771765.375.23.camel@gyros> <49649.217.129.151.119.1045774480.squirrel@webmail> <49658.217.129.151.119.1045774971.squirrel@webmail> <1045775078.472.18.camel@gyros>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:02, Rui Lopes wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 16:04, Bill Fumerola wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 07:25:32AM -0800, Kirby Kuehl (kkuehl)
>> wrote:
>> >>> > Ethereal 0.9.9 is out, I would be sending you a patch, but all I
>> >>> had
>> >>> to do was change PORTVERSION= 0.9.9
>> >>> > and do make makesum
>> >>>
>> >>> just because something builds doesn't mean it's ready to go.
>> >>>
>> >>> see the thread beginning at:
>> >>> 	http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200302/msg00062.html
>> >>>
>> >>> and then you can send me a patch.  i haven't really spent much
>> time figuring out if this is bsd.port.mk magic or something new
>> that ethereal is doing.
>> >>
>> >> Bill, here is a patch that upgrades ethereal to 0.9.9.  It fixes
>> the weird binary tagging, adds support for net-snmp instead of
>> ucd-snmp since the latter doesn't work with OpenSSL 0.9.7, and is
>> no longer maintained, and de-pkg-comments the port (thus you need
>> to remove pkg-comment upon commit).  It also adds new plist items.
>> >
>> > I would try using,
>> >
>> > CONFIGURE_TARGET= --build=${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL}
>> >
>> > instead of,
>> >
>> > CONFIGURE_ARGS=	--program-transform-name=""
>> > CONFIGURE_TARGET=	--target=${MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-freebsd${OSREL}
>
> Yes, this works as well.

yes it works, but IMHO "--build" is a better choice. don't you think so?


>> oh, I forget, make sure you add,
>> GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
>>
>> to the port Makefile
>
> You don't need this.  USE_LIBTOOL implies GNU_CONFIGURE.

yes, you are right, i've failed to see the USE_LIBTOOL in your .diff file,
shame on me.. :(


-- Rui Lopes



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49676.217.129.151.119.1045776652.squirrel>