From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 8 10:55:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA04981 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 10:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rwth-aachen.de (mail.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA04959 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 1996 10:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de) by mail.rwth-aachen.de (PMDF V5.0-4 #13110) id <01I23WJ5ARC0000CVA@mail.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org; Fri, 08 Mar 1996 19:59:00 +0100 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA05059 for freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com; Fri, 08 Mar 1996 20:02:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 20:02:07 +0100 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" Subject: disklabel and newfs options for quantum atlas To: freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org Message-id: <199603081902.UAA05059@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Anybody out there having a disktab entry (don't have the new disklabel program here handy which builds disklabels from the in core disklabel) for a QUANTUM ATLAS 2GB SCSI disk and perhaps newfs options for best speed. Or can I assume that a newfs without any options always builds the optimum FS layout for a disk? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de