Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:15:07 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, rtdean@cytherianage.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports Message-ID: <E14F38B2-B1AF-415F-AE6B-A4BE6330A83D@opensail.org> In-Reply-To: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 14, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi eclipse and eclipse related ports maintainers and users!
>
> Some time ago, someone suggested that eclipse and eclipse
> related ports should be located on proper categories. I
> think so. So I suggest following repocopy list. Anyone,
> do you have any idea?
>
> java/eclipse -> devel/eclipse
> java/eclipse-EPIC -> editors/eclipse-EPIC
> java/eclipse-cdt -> editors/eclipse-cdt
> java/eclipse-checkstyle -> devel/eclipse-checkstyle
> java/eclipse-clay-core -> databases/eclipse-clay-core
> java/eclipse-devel -> devel/eclipse-devel
> java/eclipse-emf -> devel/eclipse-emf
> java/eclipse-examples -> devel/eclipse-examples
> java/eclipse-gef -> graphics/eclipse-gef
> java/eclipse-gef-examples -> graphics/eclipse-gef-examples
> java/eclipse-langpack -> devel/eclipse-langpack
> java/eclipse-log4e -> devel/eclipse-log4e
> java/eclipse-lomboz -> devel/eclipse-lomboz
> java/eclipse-pmd -> devel/eclipse-pmd
> java/eclipse-quantum -> databases/eclipse-quantum
> java/eclipse-sqlexplorer -> databases/eclipse-sqlexplorer
> java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat -> www/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat
> java/eclipse-uml -> devel/eclipse-uml
> java/eclipse-v4all -> devel/eclipse-v4all
> java/eclipse-vep -> devel/eclipse-vep
> java/eclipse-vep-examples -> devel/eclipse-vep-examples
> java/eclipse-viplugin -> editors/eclipse-viplugin
> java/eclipseme -> devel/eclipseme
> java/phpeclipse -> editors/phpeclipse
>
I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the
other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be
classified along with eclipse.
In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT and
phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a
graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a
development tool.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters
wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E14F38B2-B1AF-415F-AE6B-A4BE6330A83D>