Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 1998 23:47:42 +0000
From:      Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
To:        Shawn Ramsey <shawn@luke.cpl.net>
Cc:        Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, stephen farrell <stephen@farrell.org>, michael dorin <mike@chaski.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: smtp restarting after changes to sendmail.* 
Message-ID:  <199801142347.XAA21513@awfulhak.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jan 1998 15:32:04 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.980114153100.26691B-100000@luke.cpl.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Unless I'm sadly mistaken and need to take myself out and shoot
> > > myself, under freebsd you need to (a) ps -auxx and find the sendmail
> > > process and kill it (or use killall, which I never think of b/c I use
> > > solaris so much, and killall in solaris does something totally
> > > immoral) (b) check the flags for sendmail in /etc/rc.conf, and then
> > > (c) run sendmail (which is in /usr/sbin) with those flags.  (of course
> > > you quickly learn /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q1h).
> > 
> > Or you can just type "killall -1 sendmail" because you quickly learn 
> > that FreeBSD ain't Slowaris :-)
> > 
> > IMO, this is a benefit of the FreeBSD way of doing things over SysV.  
> > It also means that you don't refuse smtp connections between the stop 
> > and start.
> 
> Can't you just HUP it? (newer versions?). In that case you could also cat
> the pid file and hup it.

Yeah.  That's the same as the -1.  I find `killall' easier 'cos 
there's fewer characters :-)

-- 
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <brian@OpenBSD.org>
      <http://www.Awfulhak.org>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801142347.XAA21513>