From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 10:20:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F141065673 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4228FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so578679fgb.35 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:20:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Gp9ZgyR5IOHVBiJkFuWTSBTzfQnchgSWX39fyDKzSTk=; b=AIs5KWhKtQQ/IlBOX413HSSrqZ0enOiuO+JEnFF9GW5dPeJp1oVDWLF07r9mfC7f2X Why0DM29OlilaTgMK65PPqltuZt4GezBJy54kOXPZ+IbA/vFhz1pQw8ZF1bBg9xCCpD0 WAQxbpntCoJrrq0vL6wQMMlv2iWe7qr1C9zak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YDeOWRvQLgRUa95XqbEoDIsnR0iCYh8BqdJ3FmSUjK0g4KK2ojdDDYqH3KH2gHHrOq BPzCQ1RldBG9k5PMFpLMHfDXnR+ewJxq+75pwLw9gBUgKgDknc0VBWWoDxZoJkYO9GfI XsQpOd3sFpR3IJOJFRtIxiCBPncTLs0RM5/T8= Received: by 10.181.199.11 with SMTP id b11mr2293323bkq.127.1227781239206; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:20:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.49.2 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:20:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9bbcef730811270220h1a7f812k2ba340737132ff82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:20:39 +0100 From: "Ivan Voras" To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20081127.000621.1413927847.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200811270219.mAR2Ji2M073024@svn.freebsd.org> <20081126213204.14db9a63@kan.dnsalias.net> <20081127.000621.1413927847.imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r185356 - head/sys/dev/ixgbe X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:20:41 -0000 2008/11/27 M. Warner Losh : > In message: <20081126213204.14db9a63@kan.dnsalias.net> > Alexander Kabaev writes: > : Is C99 construct here intentional? If so, when did we agree on using > : only C99 compilers on our code base? > > I'm not sure about *THIS* c99 construct, but we've been heavily > relying on the field name initializer stuff for a couple of years now. And at least the newer GEOM code also uses c99 variable declarations (not only for initializers - they were c99 from the start).