From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 08:40:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D93937B404; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAEC43FAF; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3UFe6Nj012344; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:40:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: "Kenneth D. Merry" From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:20:41 MDT." <20030430092040.A2864@panzer.kdm.org> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:40:06 +0200 Message-ID: <12343.1051717206@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:40:13 -0000 In message <20030430092040.A2864@panzer.kdm.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: >> >Oops. I did a 'make universe', but wrongly assumed that it would stop on >> >any errors. >> >> No, universe chugs, based on the philosophy that it probably ran for >> N hours already, and you might be after somethinn else entirely... > >True, I suppose it would be a major pain to blow up a make universe. With >the failures, it took 8.5 hours on my box, and probably would have taken >a bit longer if the 64 bit kernel builds had succeeded. It's the kind of thing I usually kick off when I go to bed :-) >> Well, if you just look at the stdout/stderr from the make universe, it >> should say that something failed, you can then traverse the relevant >> log file for what exactly failed. > >It didn't mention any failures. (output attached) Actually, that's interesting. I seem to have caught it in my private extension of universe: I build a native and a sparc64 cross release. I'm sure there is a good explanation why it breaks the kernel in the cross-release but not in the cross-world... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.