Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:47:52 -0800
From:      "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>, doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Documenting FreeBSD Officers, Hats, and Working Groups
Message-ID:  <20030211204752.GA22890@intruder.bmah.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030209045440.2ac4aa62.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20030206221455.GC17028@submonkey.net> <20030206174120.0075fcd5.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030206230229.GD18106@submonkey.net> <20030206184047.4b08943a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030207005155.GA67667@intruder.bmah.org> <20030206202110.76ae4e7e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030207013803.GA68113@intruder.bmah.org> <20030206205228.42486a38.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030209021707.GA94205@intruder.bmah.org> <20030209045440.2ac4aa62.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:17:07 -0800
> "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:

> > 1.  Why is your entity definition file called "hats.ent" and not
> > "hats.sgml"?  File defining entities in the www/ tree seem to have
> > *.sgml extensions (see developers.sgml).  I tried to ask you this in a
> > prior message, but apparently I didn't ask very clearly.
>=20
> Well, because it is not really an sgml file, and isn't really anything
> like developers.sgml and includes.sgml.

It's not?  Are we looking at the same file?  I'm saying that the
function and structure of www/en/developers.sgml and www/en/hats.ent
are very similar.  (I'm pushing for following the existing naming
convention even though it may or may not be correct.)

> If this is a large deal, I'll
> fix by either a repcopy or cvs add/remove.

Hmmm.  Not calling for that...still trying to understand the Grand
Scheme o' Things here.

> > 2.  Why did you define b.* entities for names of developers, rather
> > than use the existing a.* entities defined in developers.sgml?  (Yes,
> > I know you added links to email addresses, but you could easily add
> > that to the existing entities too.)
>=20
> I did this for two reasons:
>=20
> 1: So developers would not get confused and/or it can be used with
> the developers.sgml and cause no problems.

I think it's way more confusing to define very similar entities for
developers in two different files.

> 2: I could have added email addresses to the developers.sgml file but
> then I'm either going to mess up several tables throughout the www/
> tree (ie: the tables will expand beyond a resonable limit.)  Along
> with putting people through alot of work when they add developers,
> some people may just want names.  I hope this is ok.

I think there should be exactly one file that defines the developer
entities.  If somebody wants his/her email address listed in her
entity, he/she can add it in *that* one file.

If It Were Up To Me: I'd get rid of all the "Hat Owners" in hats.ent,
and make all of the other entities refer to the &a.* entities that are
already defined in developers.sgml.

[snip]

> > PS.  OK, this one *is* a criticism.  Did you do a case-insensitive
> > search-and-replace to change "a." to "b."?  If so, consider that=20
> > "a." (or "A.") occurs in other places than entity names.  Ahem.  :-)
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
> Nope.  I tried to keep away from all the other entities, and to make
> an attempt at keeping them less confusing.  Anyway, its 5:00AM EST and
> I'm going to sleep now.  Enjoy!

I'll go fix it myself in a minute.  It'll be obvious.  :-)

Bruce.

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+SWF22MoxcVugUsMRAhWLAJ0dsq6+Y9s0h4/FWjo6LGIh8/8iUACg/ny3
JfHign0v8yXAXXH3YJuN0TY=
=NFF6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030211204752.GA22890>