From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 19 08:31:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA23259 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 08:31:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from scam.xcf.berkeley.edu (scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA23254 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 08:31:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nordwick@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU) Message-Id: <199812191631.IAA23254@hub.freebsd.org> Received: (qmail 4225 invoked by uid 27268); 19 Dec 1998 16:33:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU) (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Dec 1998 16:33:00 -0000 To: Matthew Dillon To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I almost hate to suggest this... In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Dec 1998 01:55:09 PST." <199812190955.BAA07155@apollo.backplane.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4222.914085179.1@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 08:33:00 -0800 From: "Jay Nordwick" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > When someone has time available, making a separate mount_ufs > and rewriting mount itself to always exec a sub-mount binary > would be even better. But as a poor-man's fix the above > would work fine. > > -Matt > This was embarrasingly easy. I just got the binaries done in about 2 minutes, but didn't do anything to the man pages. I can send a patch, but sense I don't know where to even begin on hacking the man pages, I didn't think that it was useful. It looks like it might have been a seperate executable originally. -jay (P.S., for somebody who can fix the man page, here is how to do the rest: in mount.c get rid of the 2 line test to see if type is ufs, in mount_ufs.c change mount_ufs(int,char*[]) to main(int,char*[]), of course fix the makefiles) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message