From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  4 21:52:57 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A3F2637B401; Sun,  4 May 2003 21:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com
	[65.86.180.18])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 10ED543FAF; Sun,  4 May 2003 21:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) id h454queX004318;
	Sun, 4 May 2003 21:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from murray)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 21:52:56 -0700
From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org>
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20030504215256.E3018@freebsdmall.com>
References: <200305042135.h44LZfXW092536@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20030505044601.GA4947@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030505044601.GA4947@HAL9000.homeunix.com>;
	from das@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, May 04, 2003 at 09:46:01PM -0700
X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B  3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 04:52:58 -0000

On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 09:46:01PM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> >   Note that the idletime setting is not enforced.
> 
> This is redundant in -CURRENT; nothing in the section under which
> idletime appears is implemented at all, as the section header

Ok, yes it is redundant in -CURRENT, and I will back it out there.
Any reason not to commit this to RELENG_4?

    - Murray