Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:30:36 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ambrisko@whistle.com Subject: Re: Changing the load address of the kernel? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.981123102904.7263C-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199811230844.KAA12135@ceia.nordier.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
check with ambrisko@whistle.com he's done a lot with netbooting. On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Robert Nordier wrote: > > We do need a more capable netboot replacement, and if Lanworks is > as responsive as they appear to be, then supporting their product > may be an easy route to satisfying this requirement. > > It might be a reasonable solution to make something like this > available as a port; after all, the boot blocks are *expected* to > be somewhat out of sync with kernel development. > > Though I'd quite like to see it working with the new boot1/boot2 > and boot/loader code, in some form, now that Oliver has shown the > way. > julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.981123102904.7263C-100000>