From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 1 22:56:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB36337B720; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:56:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (Studded@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA71626; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:56:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3AC8147C.2AABBF65@DougBarton.net> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 22:56:12 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -pthread cleanup [megapatch] References: <3AC31847.C28A26EB@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I would like to put attached patch for testing on bento/beta to check > that there are no undesirable side affects. Also I would like to ask > maintainers of individual ports listed here to avoid tweaking -pthread > in their ports until this patch has been committed to avoid merging > conflicts. First off, in the future please put patches of this size on your web space on people.freebsd.org. 111+k e-mails are not bandwidth friendly. Second, what will the content of ${PTHREAD_LIBS} be? It's hard to tell whether this change will work for my port or not without that information. Doug -- Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant simply because they are their opinions. Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message