From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 6 9:46:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from yowie.cc.uq.edu.au (yowie.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D0B37B718 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:46:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from s337240@student.uq.edu.au) Received: from student.uq.edu.au (s337240@student.uq.edu.au [130.102.87.136]) by yowie.cc.uq.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA10493; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 03:45:01 +1000 (GMT+1000) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 03:45:01 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: Trent Waddington To: Brett Glass Cc: Rahul Siddharthan , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , David Johnson , Subject: Re: Stallman stalls again In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010306010616.046d6320@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I suggest you read the essay again. On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Brett Glass wrote: > At 01:04 PM 3/5/2001, Trent Waddington wrote: > > >fine. Let's say I buy you're theory of "balance", here's an essay by RMS > >calling for a new copyright proposal. Not for the outright abolishment of > >copyright, just simply for a new "copyright deal". > > Not true at all. In that essay, Stallman says that if users want to do > ANYTHING that is prohibited by copyright laws, the prohiibition should > be removed. This would amount to abolishing copyright altogether, which > is what Stallman has always stated that he wants. > > This is no compromise. It is the equivalent of saying, "Sure, we'll > compromise, and here are our terms: unconditional surrender." > > This is "compromise" a la Yasser Arafat. > > --Brett > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message