From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 23:48:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A291065671 for ; Sun, 11 May 2008 23:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from angel.comcen.com.au (angel.comcen.com.au [203.23.236.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645D18FC1A for ; Sun, 11 May 2008 23:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.198] (202-172-126-254.cpe.qld-1.comcen.com.au [202.172.126.254] (may be forged)) by angel.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m4BNkdRH094013 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 09:46:41 +1000 (EST) From: Da Rock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:46:31 +1000 Message-Id: <1210549591.26533.16.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-4.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-16.384, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.42, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au Subject: Imagemagick port seems broken - jp2.c patch fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 23:48:04 -0000 I may be not thinking straight due to a head cold- in which case just tell me so- but building Imagemagick-6.4.0.7 from ports is failing. It attempts to find Imagemagick folder in the work folder but cannot do so. I ran ls but all it has is .extract.imagemagick._usr_local or the like (the exact message is on another system atm). All I want is to install lives, but this has killed that. Any ideas what I can do? Or is this something to send to the ports list? Time is of the essence here, so thats why I thought somebody here might be able to find a workaround so I can continue for now and post to ports later. Cheers