From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 11:41:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A72D1065677 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDBD8FC1E for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFDC5C28 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:54:52 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 468C15C22 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:54:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F54A530.90904@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:36:16 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F53CB2A.4070901@mac.com> <4F53F30D.9060201@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F548CCF.1080200@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F548CCF.1080200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:41:29 -0000 On 03/05/12 19:52, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: >>> That's also an obligation to test it. >>> PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on >>> them. >> PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them >> a private company. > No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful lot > in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While > PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project > founder and lead developer specifically to work on PC-BSD. Click on the > 'Professional PC-BSD Support' link of the PC-BSD menu on the pcbsd.org > site, and you will see who it is that provides the paid-for support. Yes, but that is sponsorship. That doesn't make it a company. They don't own it. Unlike Oracle with MySQL, Java, and VBox... Or Citrix and Xen...