Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:27:28 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: "Chuck Robey" <chuckr@mat.net>, "Peter Wemm" <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Building klds (was: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include param.hsrc/sys/alpha/include param.h src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/conf LINT) Message-ID: <000201bf05d8$25511990$021d85d1@youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909231101470.312-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is interesting ... I was under the impression that the idea of having > hte kernel dynamically load things was more than just a kernel > space-saver, it was supposed to be a way to have one set of code be able > to adapt to any user's machine environment, even if it changes on > the fly. > Your statement makes me think that you intend that the road ahead holds > modules that are customized in such a way that no such real portable > adaptability is in our future. Would not the "one set of code" of which you speak be a kernel and a set of modules compiled as a unit for the purpose of being such a set? DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000201bf05d8$25511990$021d85d1>