From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 27 07:20:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B69216A70F for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 07:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [209.89.70.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CD143D4C for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 07:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4R7KDp3023883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 27 May 2006 01:20:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 01:20:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: Steve Kargl In-Reply-To: <20060527042517.GA3503@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Message-ID: <20060527011519.P23860@orthanc.ca> References: <20060527024407.GA2525@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060527035306.GH744@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <672BC9B0-5BE8-41CF-B5F0-5E00DD686A54@orthanc.ca> <20060527042517.GA3503@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on orthanc.ca Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 07:20:23 -0000 > g77 is dead, gone, not available with GCC 4.1.1. gfortran is > is, IMHO, a good compiler but it has warts and bugs. Maintaining > it in the tree will slow down the availability of bug fixes. > Relegating it to ports will allow patches and bug fixes to be > incorporate at a much higher rate. Okay, this I can buy. How does GCC 4.1 get along with the output of f2c? While it's not optimal, an f77 built on it would preserve the existing functionality if g77 dies. --lyndon