Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:14:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeco <freeco@inbox.lv> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC Message-ID: <25508442.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca> References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com> <20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org> <25504647.post@talk.nabble.com> <200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So it means that i will need 2 more NIC's in my gateway?
|---------<pc>
|
ISP>-----------<Gateway>-----<Switch>-----<pc>
|
|_________<pc>
Why all pc's can't be in one subnet? I'll be happy with one subnet, i don't
need more. I tried this:
ISP x.x.88.17>-----------<x.x.88.20 Gateway 192.168.1.2>----------<pc cable
unplugged 192.168.1.7>?
I want to use this one:
|---------<pc 192.168.1.5>
|
ISP x.x.88.17>-----------<x.x.88.20 Gateway
192.168.1.2>-----<Switch>-----<pc 192.168.1.6>
|
|_________<pc 192.168.1.7>
The gateway will work like firewall and nat. Maybe i have wrong settings on
my pc?
----PC Settings----
IP: 192.168.1.7
Mask: 255.255.255.128 (same in rc.conf)
Gateway: 192.168.1.2
Dns: x.x.88.17
Dns: 192.168.1.2
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25508442.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25508442.post>