Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:20:48 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To:        Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk>, <xen@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Boot FreeBSD 10 in HVM mode under Xen?
Message-ID:  <55C35F30.8020309@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6E8E187709040F3CEAD6F74@[10.12.30.106]>
References:  <D313A9262AEA2AC29FCC4A1C@[10.12.30.106]> <55BB8392.4050000@citrix.com> <DA1AF0173D2A62540BEEF420@[10.12.30.106]> <55BB8DB2.6040705@citrix.com> <3544DE5D0E56BBBE05C573B4@[10.12.30.106]> <55C34932.10307@citrix.com> <F6E8E187709040F3CEAD6F74@[10.12.30.106]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 06/08/15 a les 15.06, Karl Pielorz ha escrit:
> 
> --On 06 August 2015 13:46 +0200 Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, as usual I've been busy with a bunch of other
>> stuff. You can find the patch against HEAD here:
>>
>> https://people.freebsd.org/~royger/0001-xen-allow-disabling-PV-disks-and-
>> nics.patch
>>
>> The description is self-explanatory I think. I've not tried to apply it
>> to stable-10, but I don't think there have been many changes in this
>> area in general. If you need help backporting it ping me and I will
>> provide a suitable version.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the patch! - I couldn't apply it automatically (not entirely
> sure what to do with a git diff like that :) - and, the hvm.c part of
> patch wouldn't apply cleanly anyway (too much difference).
> 
> *Having said that* - I applied it by hand to my 10.1-R system, and it
> seems to work perfectly. I've put the XENHVM and xenpci back in the
> kernel, re-enabled veridian for that VM, and put
> 'hw.xen.disable_pv_nics=1' in boot loader.
> 
> I now have a PV disk, but HVM NIC (re0) based machine - that's agile,
> and works with OpenVPN and inter-VM routing.
> 
> I can post the standard 'diff -u' patchset against 10.1 back to the list
> if needed (I know other people had PV NIC issues and were using the same
> non-agile "boot as HVM" fix for it).

I'm going to let the patch sit here for a while so people can
test/comment. Since I'm going on vacations next week, if there are no
complains I'm planning to apply it when I'm back on the 17th.

Roger.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55C35F30.8020309>