Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 12:56:46 -0700 From: Michael Oski <oski@pacbell.net> To: Andrew Short <Ashort@concentric.net> Cc: john <john@unt.edu>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel Pro/100+ Message-ID: <35A12BFE.BC982FE1@pacbell.net> References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.980706075531.22254H-100000@mariner.cris.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Actually, I have a mix of both 100/B and 100+ all at 100Mb (half-duplex {or
wouldnt that be simplex?}). Anyway - I have not had any problem whatsoever
with these cards! I've used them at a prior job at 100(FD) running Novell & MS
stuff - they are one of the best cost/performance/stability purchases you can
make.
Strange... I suddenly feel like I should be on Intel payroll :-) - Oh well.
MO
Andrew Short wrote:
> > Speaking of this, is there work in progress for support of the new Intel
> > card that replaces the 10/100B--the Pro 100+? Intels page says that the
> > new card is driver compatible--anyone using the new card?
>
> I am using the Pro 100+ right now on the fxp0 driver. Autodetected just
> fine and I have been using it at shared 10 on an el cheapo hub. Can't
> comment on the duplexing or running it at 100 megs, but as far as I have
> experienced it, no work needs to be done.
>
> Anyone else?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Andrew Short Colossians 3:23
> http://www.concentric.net/~ashort/
> ashort@concentric.net "Have fun stormin' da castle!" --Miracle Max
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35A12BFE.BC982FE1>