From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 7 10:36:14 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA19053 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:36:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bright.fx.genx.net (bright.fx.genx.net [206.64.4.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA19045 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by bright.fx.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA57590; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:40:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bright.fx.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:40:04 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@bright.fx.genx.net To: Cejka Rudolf cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Why doscmd isn't builded by default? In-Reply-To: <199901071830.TAA26342@kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > I'm looking into -CURRENT src/usr.bin/Makefile and there isn't any > information about doscmd so it isn't builded by default. > Is there any reason not to build doscmd by default? It requires X. -Alfred > > --=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=-- > Rudolf Cejka (cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz; http://www.fee.vutbr.cz/~cejkar) > Technical University of Brno, Faculty of El. Engineering and Comp. Science > Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message