Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:04:17 -0700
From:      Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To:        Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: adding drive to raidz1
Message-ID:  <m2ws79590u.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906181941130.10212@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet>
References:  <m2bpol6v8r.wl%randy@psg.com> <4A3ABF76.3020905@modulus.org> <cf9b1ee00906181540w746edafi4a560b0925b14e27@mail.gmail.com> <m28wjp6tp2.wl%randy@psg.com> <4A3AC5B2.9010607@modulus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906181941130.10212@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The only way to "fix" this is just what everyone has said... Back up the 
> data, destroy the pool and recreate.

done.  worked.  luckily this was a system in build.

> When you do this, if you don't want to be using slices

i have nothing against slices

> zpool create raidz somethingbesidestankfortheloveofgod ad4 ad5 ad6 ad7

she really does not care about the pool name. :)

> And you'll be set. But you're using ad5s3 and ad6s3, are the first two 
> slices in use?

on the two bootables
    s1 is a small gmirroed boot
    s2 is a non-mirrored swap
    s3 is pool

randy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2ws79590u.wl%randy>