Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 08:13:29 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new gadget - Doro 212IPC usb telephone Message-ID: <20050521081329.425bf45b.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20050520192946.GN10648@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <20050519231916.78772610.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20050520150248.GJ10648@cnd.mcgill.ca> <428E1197.6050606@elischer.org> <20050520211602.770979d3.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20050520192946.GN10648@cnd.mcgill.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:29:46 -0400 Mathew Kanner <mat@cnd.mcgill.ca> wrote: > Don't load the UHID driver, let ugen get the device. In > theory it would be nice to have dual devices, that is, a ugen and a > uhid/umass/whatever at the same time for the device. Hmm, I'm just brainstorming here. For the 'udesc_dump' case, wouldn't that just mean that uhid (and other u* (usb) drivers) would have sort of a "fall through" to ugen (or at least ugen functionality)? I mean, the device descriptor is supported on all devices, right? So uhid and other usb drivers would pass any requests they don't support natively to ugen. Oh well, it probably would complicate things in the usb drivers. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050521081329.425bf45b.torfinn.ingolfsen>