From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 19:14:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CC216A403 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1273613C4DB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1KJAHOa056974; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:10:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m1KJAHxC056973; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:10:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:10:17 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Brian A. Seklecki" Message-ID: <20080220191017.GA56942@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4bded9640802191245q20832a83j31723763ab21a940@mail.gmail.com> <20080219213254.GB47232@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <1203533333.10391.49.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1203533333.10391.49.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister , Jeff Gold , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diskLabelCommit fails within a sysinstall script? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:14:31 -0000 On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:48:53PM -0500, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:32 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > I don't know about all you ask, but the 'c' partition should always > > be there and be set to identify the whole slice eg start at 0 and > > the size be the size of the slice. The system uses it to identify > > its a damn shame that this is still the case. defeats / undermines the > whole purpose of /dev/[as][d##][s#][a-z] > > /dev/[as][d##][s#] alone can represent entire BIOS partitions > /dev/[as][d##] alone can represent entire disk > > Not sure why we still need a 'c' slice for legacy ?! Probably. I don't really know how it gets used, but the system still seems to expect it somewhere. ////jerry > -- > Brian A. Seklecki > Collaborative Fusion, Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"