Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:16:41 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shells Message-ID: <20000417011641.C3064@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <27309.955883220@zippy.cdrom.com>; from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com on Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 04:07:00AM -0700 References: <200004160306.VAA30436@harmony.village.org> <27309.955883220@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 04:07:00AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > sh scripts run fine on bash and I'll certainly challenge anyone to > find me a /bin/sh script which behaves differently when fed to our > 5.0-current ash shell vs bash 2.03. Funny that last time I proposed to replace ash with pdksh, way to many people claimed all our /etc/ scripts would break. Now people feel that our /etc/ scripts are fully executable by a shell other than ash. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000417011641.C3064>