Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:22:45 -0700 From: Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org> To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync or cvsup? Message-ID: <200406020922.52320.Peter_Losher@isc.org> In-Reply-To: <40BD8E7A.12894.2D858552@localhost> References: <40BD8E7A.12894.2D858552@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_c7fvAQHkPBmAuUe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 02 June 2004 05:23 am, Dan Langille wrote: > At present, it cvsup's from cvsup-master.freebsd.org. Is the latest > thinking to use rsync or cvsup? CVSup - rsync is only used for legacy connections and is highly=20 discouraged (I was told when I set up cvsup4.us that each rsync=20 connection takes over 100M in RAM) I believe that ftp-master is =20 limited to 1 concurrent rsync connection just for that reason. =2DPeter =2D-=20 Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP Key E8048D08 | "The bits must flow" --Boundary-02=_c7fvAQHkPBmAuUe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAvf7cPtVx9OgEjQgRAjScAKDD/3XXckzFZAKdKWOlgeROLHKlSgCfT00v RBUML6LCNMASbUFx5GRXGIE= =I71R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_c7fvAQHkPBmAuUe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406020922.52320.Peter_Losher>