From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jan  5  7:54:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA6C153DF
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Jan 2000 07:54:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org)
Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)
	by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA08823;
	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:54:09 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mwlucas)
From: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Message-Id: <200001051554.KAA08823@blackhelicopters.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Any Ideas When We're Going to See 4.0-RELEASE?
In-Reply-To: <0025685D.0055F508.00@rslhub.raytheon.co.uk> from "Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk" at "Jan 5, 2000  3:38:24 pm"
To: Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:54:09 -0500 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Thanks for the advice.  If .0 releases are that bad then I'll keep to 3.4
> for a bit.  The 3.4 CDs are now in the post!
> 
> Chris Smith
> Raytheon Systems Limited

Well, *bad* is a relative term.

I'd take a FreeBSD *.0 release over a fully patched MS *anything.*

But for vital production systems that you don't want to sup && make
world, x.0 is probably not a good idea.

==ml


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message