From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 3 13: 0: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F26B37B400 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE81143E65 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.2.1.0] (vpn-client-0.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.0]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g83JwPix054400 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:58:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Subject: RFC: Putting mozilla-1.0 back in the tree From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 03 Sep 2002 15:59:49 -0400 Message-Id: <1031083190.330.3.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm in the process of putting Mozilla 1.0 back in the tree as www/mozilla, and moving Mozilla 1.1 to www/mozilla-devel. It seems from the Mozilla release cycle diagram that they are planning a Mozilla 1.0.1 and, if necessary, a 1.0.2 release, and 1.1 is still "bleeding edge." To that end, I have a question. Should I bump the PORTEPOCH of www/mozilla again, or just nudge people who upgraded to change the origin of mozilla 1.1 to mozilla-devel? I think the latter, but I wanted to get some feedback on this. Thanks. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message