Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:15:23 +0300
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/wmauda Makefile ports/audio/xmp Makefile ports/audio/mp3splt-gtk Makefile ports/audio/audacious-dumb Makefile ports/multimedia/tunapie Makefile ports/multimedia/xfce4-xmms-plugin Makefile ports/sysutils/conky ...
Message-ID:  <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net> (Oliver Lehmann's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 %2B0100")
References:  <201103041043.p24AhwQ8023264@repoman.freebsd.org> <28478789@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Oliver,

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote:
> >
> > Was PORTREVISION bump really needed for those ports?

> They have a hard or optional dependency to audacious so in my opinion - yes.

I'm not sure what you do mean. What's the "hard" and "optional"
dependency? And what changed at the main port that those dependent
ports in your opinion should be bumped?

-- 
WBR, bsam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58879204>