From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 23:32:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E64216A417; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043F513C46C; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from ap-h.matik.com.br (ap-h.matik.com.br [200.152.83.36]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7VNWAEk090263; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:32:10 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:32:20 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <200708300859.13098.joao@matik.com.br> <53349.192.168.1.2.1188538732.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> In-Reply-To: <53349.192.168.1.2.1188538732.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708312032.21574.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Roman Divacky , pluknet , current@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:32:25 -0000 On Friday 31 August 2007 02:38:52 Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > JoaoBR wrote: > > but athlon64-x2 for S940 and athlon64-am2 for sse3 capable cpus would be > > kind of understandable for all > > [...] > > venice as said in another mail is not clear for all people and certainly > > it does not appear on the box or elsewhere > > I think the names "athlon64-x2" and "athlon64-am2" would be most confusing > and ambiguous, because the socket has nothing to do with the feature set > of the CPU. Athlon64 X2 CPUs are not only available for socket 940, but > also for AM2 and 939. There are SSE3 CPUs that fit into 940, AM2 and 939. > well, the x2 thing I wasn't thinking it through and you are right, what I= =20 meant to say that so far as I know all S939-X2 are SSE3 capable and rev-E a= t=20 least as all am2 are so eventually, athlon64-E would be more appropriate (with proper man make.c= onf=20 explanation) opterons are not easy but it is already kind of advanced cpu so could be=20 expected more knowledge from the user and that he 'eventually'=20 read /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf ... or not (if there were something= =20 about sse3) but in any case opteron and additional opteron-E also would do= =20 it ... =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br