From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 19:40:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D03016A4BF; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u173n10.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AABA43FEC; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:40:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B49C34396; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 23:47:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A348342F6; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 23:47:10 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 23:47:10 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: David Schultz In-Reply-To: <20030905015627.GB14776@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Message-ID: <20030904234610.G51587@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20030612154312.J80219@hub.org> <20030623081927.GC27017@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20030905015627.GB14776@HAL9000.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unionfs related patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 02:40:14 -0000 On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, David Schultz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > Hello, Alexandr Kovalenko! > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:19:27AM +0300, you wrote: > > > > > > David Schultz, in his spare time, has been working through some of the > > > > issues I've been able to 'tweak' in the unionfs code ... as he is > > > > currently working on forward-patching it to -CURRENT right now, he can't > > > > commit the code to the -STABLE tree ... in order to allow others using > > > > unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very > > > > heavily loaded system), with his permission, I've posted the patch for > > > > download at: > > > > > > > > http://www.hub.org/~scrappy/unionfs > > > > > > Looks like it pretty stable. I'm running ~10 days with this patch - no > > > even single panic. Thank you! > > > > I was too optimistic. It panics on high loads after 3-10 days. > > Is there any progress in work on this patch? > > The only thing I know to be wrong with the patch is that it looks > like I forgot to MFC it. Oops. Unfortunately, there's plenty > wrong with unionfs, even with the patch. Huh? You MFC'd it ... -STABLE from Saturday has the memory allocation stuff still in it: UNION mount 29 1K 1K204800K 30 0 0 32 undcac 0 0K 1K204800K 28159584 0 0 16 unpath 6086 104K 1853K204800K 26015006 0 0 16,32,64,128