From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 00:44:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF316A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-f40.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.185.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E176543D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:44:56 -0700 Received: from 211.30.218.106 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [211.30.218.106] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:44:56 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2004 00:44:56.0817 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7E71E10:01C45BDF] Subject: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:44:57 -0000 I am running FreeBSD-STABLE (4.10) and have been using ports/pkg_add/portupgrade/cvsup to stay current with most programs. however there are two things that i'm having trouble with, and i'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction: 1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) from one of the developers, how can i compile this new code into the binary? 2) this question may be answered by any information provided in answer to my first question, but how can i upgrade specific components of KDE (such as Kate) without upgrading the entire KDE installation (which takes a couple of days) and lastly, a quality of life question: 3) Is it safe to do a portupgrade of KDE whilst KDE is still running? thanks very much, Iain Dooley _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 01:32:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5E516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:32:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6878743D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from reichlieu.lan ([68.6.195.68]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040627013211.MDUR26142.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@reichlieu.lan>; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:32:11 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reichlieu.lan (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5R1WCFm047017; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:32:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Message-ID: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:32:12 -0700 From: Matt Navarre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iain Dooley References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Scanned: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:32:13 -0000 Iain Dooley wrote: > I am running FreeBSD-STABLE (4.10) and have been using > ports/pkg_add/portupgrade/cvsup to stay current with most programs. > however there are two things that i'm having trouble with, and i'm > hoping someone can point me in the right direction: > > 1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) from one > of the developers, how can i compile this new code into the binary? You could run make extract from whichever kde* port Kate is installed from (kdebase, I think), cd into the work directory, apply the patch, and then run make install clean as normal. It should work if the patch applies cleanly. I think you can also put the patch in the files directory (in the port's dir), and give it the right naming convention and the ports magic will apply it. See the Porters Handbook for more info. It would be cool if there was an easy way to apply a local hack to a port auto-magicaly. > > 2) this question may be answered by any information provided in answer > to my first question, but how can i upgrade specific components of KDE > (such as Kate) without upgrading the entire KDE installation (which > takes a couple of days) , Wish I knew. It would be nice if KDE packaged stuff in smaller chunks than they do, but.... > > > and lastly, a quality of life question: > > 3) Is it safe to do a portupgrade of KDE whilst KDE is still running? I've had mixed results doing this, usually it works fine, but sometimes I've gotten anything from random crashy baddness to weird configuration glitches. I've taken to either killing X and upgrading KDE or changing .xinitrc to start FVWM and rebuild KDE. I usually go with killing X if I know the portupgrade -R is going to end up rebuilding X with everything else. It'll *probably* work fine without being paranoid, but why tempt fate? > > thanks very much, > > Iain Dooley > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 02:19:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC21216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:19:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EA9F43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:19:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 43502 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jun 2004 02:18:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:18:41 +0200 From: Michal Pasternak To: David O'Brien , Remi , questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:19:28 -0000 David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]: > You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, > right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 > 2.8GHz running the same OS. ... but will it outperform it also by heat dissipation? -- m From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 02:29:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:29:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD8743D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) Received: from dhcp13.home.jcdurham.com (18.gibs5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.184.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5R2SeBK068320; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:28:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) From: Jim Durham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:28:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040626143912.24ea4d67.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> In-Reply-To: <20040626143912.24ea4d67.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406262228.34997.durham@jcdurham.com> cc: Robert Storey Subject: Re: Centrino - Made for Microsoft Windows XP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:29:14 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 02:39 am, Robert Storey wrote: > I recently purchased a new laptop, an IBM X31 ThinkPad, which uses the > Centrino processor. I had high expectations for this machine. > > Alas, my expectations have been shattered. All attempts at installing > FreeBSD 5.2.1 quickly end with a crash. Interestingly, I have an old FBSD > 4.8 CD - that installs fine. Lest anybody think my 5.2.1 CDR is bad, I went > and downloaded it a second time, plus I also tried a network install. > Failure every time. > > Nor is the problem limited to FreeBSD. MEPIS Linux crashes during the > install as well. Knoppix Linux installed but dmesg was putting out lots of > error messages (for example, it could not mount a journaled ext3 partition, > so it mounted as ext2). In the end, I got Knoppix to install and run > reliably only by using the older 2.4.26 kernel and by disabling APIC. > > After doing some Googling and seeing that others were having issues, my > suspicion is that Centrino's power management features are to blame. But I > could be wrong. > > So I guess my question is this: Has anybody here gotten FreeBSD 5.2.1 to > install on a Centrino laptop? If so, did you need to do anything special to > make it work? Any tips, tricks or hints I should try? Or should I just wait > for FreeBSD 5.3 to come out and hope it works? Or should I file a PR? > > If others are not having problems with the Centrino chip, I might to back > to IBM and demand that they replace the motherboard, but I tend to think > they'll just tell me to reinstall Windows XP and all will be well. There is > indeed a sticker on the laptop saying "Made for Microsoft Windows XP" > (well, there was, I ripped the sticker off, but I still can't install > FreeBSD). 5.2.1 Here on a Dell Inspiron 600M with Centrino. All OK ACPI-wise. Won't talk to my SCSI Adaptec 1460 card and won't talk to the internal wireless adapter. No special setup on 5.2.1. I had a Dell Inspiron 4000 before and lots of ACPI troubles. I had to select the #2 choice on the boot menu to even boot it. -- -Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 02:48:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFF916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:48:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pinky.otenet.gr (pinky.otenet.gr [195.170.0.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FFD43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:48:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a032.otenet.gr [212.205.215.32]) i5R2lkk5013794; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:53 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5R2lYwc003280; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R2lTQq003279; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:47:29 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Matt Navarre Message-ID: <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> cc: Iain Dooley cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:48:28 -0000 On 2004-06-26 18:32, Matt Navarre wrote: > Iain Dooley wrote: > > > >1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) from > >one of the developers, how can i compile this new code into the binary? > > You could run make extract from whichever kde* port Kate is installed > from (kdebase, I think), cd into the work directory, apply the patch, > and then run make install clean as normal. It should work if the patch > applies cleanly. > > I think you can also put the patch in the files directory (in the > port's dir), and give it the right naming convention and the ports > magic will apply it. See the Porters Handbook for more info. If the patch has been prepared to apply cleanly from the top level directory of the extracted source tree, than putting it in files/patch-zz-local or something like that will let the ports "magic" find it and apply it as part of the port build process. > It would be cool if there was an easy way to apply a local hack to a > port auto-magicaly. There is... just put your patches in files/patch-* files. Make sure that if they are sorted alphabetically, their order is correct, i.e. if you have two patches name them patch-zz-local-1 and patch-zz-local-2 or similar -- this way they will be applied *after* any existing port patches (because of the -zz- part) and local-1 will be applied before local-2 ensuring the order you want to use. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:23:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3392B16A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:23:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E437943D2F; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:23:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5R3N2ji043733; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:53:03 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:53:01 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271253.01432.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -4.9 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:23:29 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: > > I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one > > would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be > > easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 > > FreeBSD version? > > You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, > right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 > 2.8GHz running the same OS. A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. =46or raw performance it's "pretty nice" though :) =2D --=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3j2V5ZPcIHs/zowRAoZpAKCnZMb/Kxk9wElcBhktj9NPDPsPggCgh6b2 iasKpu5F998wHLaC5flWA+E=3D =3DQBEE =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:35:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CD416A4D6 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:35:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B8943D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:35:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-240.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.240])i5R3ZLHY026426; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:05:22 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: antenneX , "Giorgos Keramidas" Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:05:21 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <00ce01c45ba0$343ffc00$0200000a@SAGEAME> <20040626184008.GB1016@gothmog.gr> <00da01c45bcb$b1381d70$0200000a@SAGEAME> In-Reply-To: <00da01c45bcb$b1381d70$0200000a@SAGEAME> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271305.21121.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A SED script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:35:52 -0000 On Sunday 27 June 2004 07:49, antenneX wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > To: "antenneX" > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:40 PM > Subject: Re: A SED script > > > On 2004-06-26 12:08, antenneX wrote: > > > I cannot get it to work on another file (perl.pl file) to change the > > line: > > > $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX060"; to $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX070"; > > > > > > I suspect I'm not handling the quotes or other operators correctly > > and it > > > > just ignores the change. > > > > > > Here's the snippet of the script I'm trying to use: > > > #!/bin/sh > > > new=`grep -i new /path/to/newfile` > > > old=`grep -i new /path/to/oldfile` It would seem that the variables new and old will both be set to something containing 'new' (perhaps not in lower case). How does this relate to "ATX060" and "ATX070"? > > > sed -i.bak -e "s/$old/$new/" /path/to/myfile > > > > The results depend heavily on the existence and contents of the two > > files > > > named /path/to/{old,new}file. I'm sure if you change the sed line to: > > > > sed -i.bak -e 's/ATX060/ATX070/' /path/to/myfile > > > > it will all work fine. > > Indeed, this works fine. The old/new files are needed to set the > varibles to hold the new number for the next time as this is run via > cron. > You've still not shown us the relevant lines of /path/to/newfile or /path/to/oldfile > old = ATX060 > new = ATX070 What are these? The contents of /path/to/{new,old}file? If so sed will be looking to change the string "old = ATX060" to "new = ATX070". Or do the files simply consist of ATX060 and ATX070 ? If so then grep is not the right command to load the variables old and new. Try: new=`cat /path/to/newfile` old=`cat /path/to/oldfile` Malcolm > > ....then, after the script changes the line in the perl script, it needs > to pipe (echo/cat) in the new file contents to the old: > cat newfile > oldfile ---> which is now ATX070 for oldfile > ...then incremement the newfile to become "ATX080" and so on.... > > Now, got to figure out how to increment number up. It is an invoice > prefix number that contains the month # and must modify the perl file > that is part of a custom order set of scripts..... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:43:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE3816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (mail5.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D04843D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmlewis@dslextreme.com) Received: (qmail 30933 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 03:43:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.92) by 192.168.8.93 with SMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:46 +0000 Message-ID: <1fdf4a4cc86a78ba4a69464a.20040626204346.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> In-Reply-To: <001001c45bdd$ff276b50$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <1776a3885a58dea4d7ea.20040626010713.wzyrjvf@www.dslextreme.com> <001001c45bdd$ff276b50$0200a8c0@satellite> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:43:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joshua Lewis" To: "dave" User-Agent: DSL Extreme Webmail (www.dslextreme.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmlewis@dslextreme.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:43:47 -0000 The MTA is PostFix http://bsdhound.com/downloads/Creating_a_Stable_Secure_FreeBSD_Mailserver.pdf Document date is 10/17/2003 So it is not to old. So far it is pretty accurate. Thank you, Joshua Lewis dave > Hi, > What mail server was this doc dealing with and can you give me the > address? Some clues as to the age is what version of fbsd was being > discussed, currently 4.10 is production stable while 5.2.1 is new > technology, even though i use that on my production systems. > Not sure as to the difference between md5 and blf password hashing, i > do > know that they both are methods of encrypting a password and supposedly > blf > is more secure but it also doesn't have compatibility with anything else. > HTH. > Dave. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:44:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C17E16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:44:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C4243D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 11709 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 03:44:01 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 03:44:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 19718 invoked by uid 555); 27 Jun 2004 03:45:07 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.247) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088307907-19698 for barbish3@adelphia.net; Sun, 27 Jun 07:45:07 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 182EB180; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:44:51 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:44:51 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: JJB Message-ID: <20040627034451.GB367@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , JJB , MICSKO Viktor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: MICSKO Viktor cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting a disk read only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:44:58 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 08:36:49AM -0400, JJB probably wrote: > Security Paranoia > It's very important that you completely understand the impact of > using the following command will have on your ability to make > changes to your system. >=20 > The simplest thing you can do is set the immutable flag on all > system binaries and /etc config files with: >=20 > chflags schg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) > /etc/*(*) >=20 > Setting the immutable flag on, means the files are marked as being > protected from being written over. Once you execute the above > command, no process can over write those files thus increasing the > level of difficulty for the attacker and increasing the odds in your > favor of the attacker leaving error messages in the system log. On > the other hand you as root user can not make any changes to those > file so marked either. Only if you can't remove that flags (that is, only if you're running at a securelevel>0). --=20 DoubleF If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. -- Maslow --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3kKywo7hT/9lVdwRAno4AJ4lEbqnzv3oQVE7Gao9/qh9Y0UW5gCfdCvX ayLRyrDUvUCPQEEVoA4yzCY= =A6lx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:45:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF73616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:45:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D443D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-240.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.240])i5R3j6HY028449; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:15:07 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Dan Finn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:15:05 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <89ceee704062312022da2887a@mail.gmail.com> <20040626012254.GA98588@math.uic.edu> <89ceee704062611583b2ffed2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <89ceee704062611583b2ffed2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271315.05991.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: burncd is unable to fixate on Dell Inpiron 2650 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:45:08 -0000 On Sunday 27 June 2004 04:28, Dan Finn wrote: > That did it. Why is it neccisary to specify the block size? Because the default block of 512 used by dd is not big enough to hold a cd block. Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 03:56:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C6B16A4D1 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:56:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3424A43D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (sheba.polands.org [172.16.1.33]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5R439Gk080479; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:03:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sheba.polands.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5R3txDi002440; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:55:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@sheba.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by sheba.polands.org (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i5R3tn80002439; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:55:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:55:49 -0500 From: Doug Poland To: Shaun Friedle Message-ID: <20040627035549.GA2414@polands.org> References: <1088268927.734.16.camel@localhost> <20040626174214.GA263@polands.org> <1088291718.1018.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1088291718.1018.2.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Asus P4S800D-E Deluxe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:56:51 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Shaun Friedle wrote: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42, Doug Poland wrote: > > > I currently have an Asus P4C800 Deluxe which is okay - until I turn off > > > ACPI and then I get a "Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while is > > > kernel mode" while booting. I need to be able to turn off ACPI as the > > > nvidia driver doesn't work with it on. > > > > > > The P4S800D-E Deluxe is very similar is features to the P4C800 Deluxe > > > and I want to make sure that it doesn't suffer from the same problem > > > before I buy it. > > > > > Sorry, it does suffer the same problem. I've got an nVidia 5700 > > that's running the XFree86 nv driver because of this issue. > > Hi, > It's a good job I checked first then. Do you know of any boards that > offer similar features, but don't have this problem? > No, I don't. Someone created a webapp that attempted to "rate" the performance of mobos for FBSD. The URL is: http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ I just checked it out and it seems to be stale now. There's a MySQL connect error visible on the page. Also, it didn't rate ACPI compatibility/performance which is something you really want to know. -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 04:07:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E07916A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D5A143D54 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so338379cwb for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.181.47 with SMTP id d47mr135356rnf; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 21:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:07:32 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Dancho Penev In-Reply-To: <20040626171145.GB900@freebsd.vmware.dpsca.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040626171145.GB900@freebsd.vmware.dpsca.bg> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to boot FreeBSD (dual-boot) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:37 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:11:45 +0300, Dancho Penev wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:25:24AM +1000, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > >I have a dual boot with Windows 2000 (ad0s1 is windows, ad0s2 is > >FreeBSD 5.2.1). I trashed a working dual-boot somehow. Now the > >problem is, I get the boot menu listing both Windows and FreeBSD, > >but only Windows boots (with F1). Pressing F2 for FreeBSD just > >gives a beep.I booted from the fixit cd and ran the commands seen > >in the handbook: > > > ># fdisk -B -b /hd/boot/boot0 /dev/ad0 > ># disklabel -B -b /hd/boot/boot0 /dev/ad0s2 > > For label use /boot/boot file, /boot/boot0 is for mbr. > > > > >/hd is the temporary directory I created to mount /dev/ad0s2a, > >so I guess my slice is still ok. Does not help! I even tried "disklabel -B /dev/ad0s2" because a diff between /hd/boot/boot and /boot/boot on the fixit yielded nothing. # disklabel /dev/ad0s2 lists the various partitions properly. I do have an MBR because I get a boot menu. Just can't get the MBR to talk to boot1 and boot2... Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 04:38:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C4C16A4CF; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:38:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE30D43D5C; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:38:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5R4cAfj044803; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:11 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:06 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> In-Reply-To: <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271408.06114.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -5.2 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: pirat cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can not make ltmdm ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:38:55 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:05, pirat wrote: > my laptop is dell inspiron 1100 with Conexant D480 MDC modem controller. > i tried to compile ltmdm from ports but strange enough, it failed. i spe= nt > about 2 months in looking or searching from internet if there were > any one else can use that modem in that machin with freebsd. That modem isn't supported by the ltmdm port (and never will be) > finally, i have to come back to my box and decide to make from ports. > as mentioned above, make failed. can any one please helps me or explains > me why do make failed ? Recent changes to the kernel broke it, I have a patch, but as I said above = it=20 won't help you anyway. PS if you'd asked me (as the port maintainer) directly I could have answere= d=20 it faster. =2D --=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3k8u5ZPcIHs/zowRAt0oAJ93vhTj91IGFeFeouKVcDv56JL1WQCeJRWN GuNMhQNspGiSMpw3/ScRJBk=3D =3DAuJh =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:03:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ADC16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:03:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00A643D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5R52UJW020058 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:02:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:53:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: tripwire on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:03:59 -0000 Hello, A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:22:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FF916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:22:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45C243D4C for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) i5R5QLtg002093; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:26:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5R5QLh9002092; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:26:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:26:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:22:52 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 09:47 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > There is... just put your patches in files/patch-* files. Make sure > that if they are sorted alphabetically, their order is correct, i.e. if > you have two patches name them patch-zz-local-1 and patch-zz-local-2 or > similar -- this way they will be applied *after* any existing port > patches (because of the -zz- part) and local-1 will be applied before > local-2 ensuring the order you want to use. stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the patches merged? Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:25:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785D16A4D5 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:25:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3C243D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:25:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by ns1.thought.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5R5OnRA073301 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.9p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i5R5OlKl089087 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R5Ola1089086 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:25:18 -0000 Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one with the ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to ethernet networks.'' In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. Can anybody help me? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 05:28:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B9C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:28:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1CE43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i5R5Re6j003909 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HZY00B9BCI4FD@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.201] (Forwarded-For: [68.8.243.244]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:27:40 -1000 Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:27:40 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: Scott Mitchell Message-id: <121731c12180f4.12180f4121731c@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing cards in a reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:28:13 -0000 On Saturday, June 26, 2004 12:56 pm Scott Mitchell responded thusly > On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:39:25AM -1000, hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com wrote: > > Aloha > > > > Hopefully this is a simple question. FreeBSD does not support my > > Olympus C-3000 Zoom camera so I bought a card reader (usb). It has > > 4 slots and when I boot or just plug it in I get 4 drives > > (da0, da1, da2, & da3). If I have a SmartMedia card installed I > > also see da2s1. > > > > da2s1 mounts fine and I am able to see and use all of the photo > files.> > > I have additional SM cards and would like to change the installed > card at > > will. If I do a umount and replace the card and try to mount > again I > > get an error "mount_msdosfs: /dev/da2s1: Invalid argument". I > should> say that the cards are different sizes. In order to mount > another card > > I have to unplug the usb cable and re-plug it in with the new > card in > > the slot. > > > > I have read man camcontrol and do not see an option I can use. > > > > Is there a way to do this without unplugging and re-plugging the > cable? > Try this (as root): > > # camcontrol devlist > > to find out which CAM device da2 belongs to. On this machine I get: > > <337 COMB > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > (pass0,da2) at scbus2 target 0 > lun 0 (pass1,da4) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 1 > (da5,pass2) at scbus2 target 0 > lun 2 (da6,pass3) > at scbus2 target 0 lun 3 > (da7,pass4) > My SmartMedia slot happens to be da5, which is device 2:0:1. After > unmounting the card, you should be able to: > > # camcontrol eject 2:0:1 > > using the appropriate device number for your system, of course. > Then swap > cards and do: > > # camcontrol rescan 2:0:1 > > which should generate some lines in /var/log/messages telling you > about the > size of the new card. > > You might want to look into setting up the automounter to do the > rescan and > eject automatically when cards are mounted and unmounted, > respectively. > Cheers, > > Scott > Aloha Scott and thanks for staying awake and responding. I thought I had tried all of that camcontrol stuff before I posted but I am getting old so I tried what you suggested. Alas, it did not seem to help. Here is the output of the attempt: Boot with 128MB card installed. hp# ls -l /dev/da* crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 22 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 24 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 23 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da3 hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus total 16 drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16384 Jan 13 2003 dcim hp# camcontrol devlist at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (da0,pass0) at scbus0 target 0 lun 1 (da1,pass1) at scbus0 target 0 lun 2 (da2,pass2) at scbus0 target 0 lun 3 (da3,pass3) hp# umount /mnt/olympus hp# camcontrol eject 0:0:2 Unit stopped successfully, Media ejected Remove 128MB card and insert 8MB card hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus mount_msdosfs: /dev/da2s1: Invalid argument Unplug and replug usb cable and then hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus total 16 drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Jun 26 14:24 dcim drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 1 1980 imolym Any other suggestions. (I hope :o)) Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 06:37:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4001616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:37:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0202A43D48 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 57679 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26752 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.014703 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15609 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:37:42 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:37:41 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:22:41 +0545) From: Bikrant To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:22:37 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Subject: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:37:56 -0000 Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Thanks, Bikrant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 06:44:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5329916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:44:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01B043D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:44:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-240.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.240])i5R6i7HY063098; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:14:07 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Barbish3@adelphia.net, "MICSKO Viktor" Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:14:06 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271614.06896.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting a disk read only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:44:28 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 22:06, JJB wrote: > Security Paranoia > It's very important that you completely understand the impact of > using the following command will have on your ability to make > changes to your system. > > The simplest thing you can do is set the immutable flag on all > system binaries and /etc config files with: > > chflags schg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) > /etc/*(*) > It seems to me that mounting all partitions from the disk as read only would achieve rather more; and more simply. But neither protects against direct writes to the raw device. And if you are really paranoid about this I think the only solution is a hardware switch. I suspect the linux 'hdparm' also has its limitations; only a hardware switch can protect against software bugs or a successful invasion. > Setting the immutable flag on, means the files are marked as being > protected from being written over. Once you execute the above > command, no process can over write those files thus increasing the > level of difficulty for the attacker and increasing the odds in your > favor of the attacker leaving error messages in the system log. On > the other hand you as root user can not make any changes to those > file so marked either. > > Ever time you want to make changes you have to issue the command to > turn off the immutable flag on all the same files. Use this command > to do that: > > chflags noschg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) > /etc/*(*) > > You can use "ls -lo" command to see the immutable flags of existing > > You could do this to any slice with chflags noschg /*(*) /usr/*(*) > what ever > Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 07:10:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DF616A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B0343D3F; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E286FAE06D; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34940-02; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3FB5EAE025; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040627071005.3FB5EAE025@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-06-06 - 2004-06-26 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:10:18 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 23-Jun : USENIX'04 ATC I'll be there! http://freebsddiary.org/usenix-atc-2004.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 07:18:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD61916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:18:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55F8E43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 18650 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 07:17:19 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 07:17:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 73902 invoked by uid 555); 27 Jun 2004 07:18:26 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.202) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088320706-73858 for keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; Sun, 27 Jun 11:18:26 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C183E398; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:18:08 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:18:08 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Jay Moore Message-ID: <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Jay Moore , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:18:16 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: >=20 > stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the > patches merged? >=20 By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. --=20 DoubleF "We are on the verge: Today our program proved Fermat's next-to-last theorem." -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3nSvwo7hT/9lVdwRAgNSAJ4+5LXFF+aa4+Roa7M/aQBFGKqlQgCbBnEm 3xq54p8TjgCJuNlGh5SwjAU= =CFVJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 07:39:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E7916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:39:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F9743D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@toyingwithfate.com) Received: from toyingwithfate.com (66-108-61-89.nyc.rr.com [66.108.61.89]) i5R7d2S6003893 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:39:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toyingwithfate.com (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5R7admN013983 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:37:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@toyingwithfate.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:36:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200406270737.i5R7admN013983@toyingwithfate.com> From: Will McCutcheon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on toyingwithfate.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: /boot/loader freezing up? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:39:06 -0000 I just installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 (from the ISO, not the latest patch level in CVS) and quickly ran into a problem related to the serial console. I dropped "-h" (sans-quotes, of course) into /boot.config so that it would boot with output going to the serial console, as I've done many times with older versions of FreeBSD on other systems. However, all startups after doing this freeze. I get the "F1 FreeBSD, F5 Drive 1, Default F1" prompt as usual, then get: /boot.config: -h BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 .. and nothing more. Nothing ever comes out the serial port and the system never finishes booting. This install was working fine until I tried getting it to boot through the serial console. Furthermore, because I never get to the point of the prompt to boot into single user mode, I can't figure out how to get in and remove /boot.config so that I can at least start up properly, if not with serial console support. Any clues as to how to hose that file, or better yet, how to get it to stop seizing up during bootup? Thanks for your time! W From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:07:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC3116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:07:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.sch.bme.hu (kaa.sch.bme.hu [152.66.208.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE943D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:07:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tamas@bazmag.hu) Received: by lists.sch.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 102) id E675C858194; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ural14.sch.bme.hu [152.66.211.76]) by lists.sch.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC24D858161 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DE8064.1030705@bazmag.hu> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:08:04 +0200 From: MEZEI Tamas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: zorp and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:07:33 -0000 Hi, is there any way to do "transparent proxying" in FreeBSD? I'd be happy to have a fully functional Zorp server based on FreeBSD. Transparent proxying is working on Linux via the TPROXY patch, but ipf rdr methods are not really the same. Is there any way to implement that transparent stuff in FreeBSD? Are there any "unofficial" modifications (don't slap me please ;)? Thanks, Tamas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:20:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2E016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:20:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C083943D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 363 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jun 2004 08:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.10.35) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 08:20:24 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:19:09 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> References: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> Message-Id: <20040627171655.3372.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:20:41 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 Gary Kline granted us these pearls of wisdom: > > Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one > with the > > ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to > ethernet networks.'' > > In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. > > Can anybody help me? > > gary I have Thinkpad X30 which runs 4.9-p10 currently and I have had no real issues in setting it up. Mine has inbuilt NIC's though and there were no issues at all in recognising the ethernet or wireless NIC. X was really easy to setup and it's been really reliable since day1. HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:43:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:43:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6836C43D45 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA8F10685E; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:42:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DE8885.3080708@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:42:45 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave References: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tripwire on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:43:19 -0000 Hi Dave, dave wrote: > Hello, > A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as > broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? > Thanks. > Dave. > Well, i am not going to answer your question since i dont run tripwire... What i do run is AIDE, which does the same (keeps checksums of files in a db and checks them).. I don't know if you want to run it, but here it is /usr/ports/security/aide Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:47:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC82516A4CE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:47:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7825F43D2D; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip07.cluster1.charter.net (mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.137])i5R8728I063902; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 04:07:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from unknown (HELO nacho) (68.189.127.165) by mxip07.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2004 04:07:02 -0400 Message-Id: <36u63c$1uk902@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> From: "Remi" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:06:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <200406271253.01432.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRb9mPwKJUXN0hUT1amNVISXHAuogAJzyKw cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:47:28 -0000 See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:doconnor@gsoft.com.au] Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Remi; questions@freebsd.org; current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: > > I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one > > would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be > > easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 > > FreeBSD version? > > You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, > right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 > 2.8GHz running the same OS. A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. For raw performance it's "pretty nice" though :) - -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3j2V5ZPcIHs/zowRAoZpAKCnZMb/Kxk9wElcBhktj9NPDPsPggCgh6b2 iasKpu5F998wHLaC5flWA+E= =QBEE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D08D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5184143D4C for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 11267 invoked by uid 65534); 27 Jun 2004 08:53:02 -0000 Received: from p5090C460.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO gmx.de) (80.144.196.96) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 10:53:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <40DE8AC4.4060305@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:52:20 +0200 From: Phil Schulz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040520 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bikrant References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:05 -0000 Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 > for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > I'm not sure about this. But to me it doesn't look like this is added by fetchmail but rather by sendmail. Below you find the header which was added to your original email by fetchmail on my box. Note the difference in the 'from' part. Also I don't think that fetchmail 'speaks' (E)SMTP. Phil. > Received: from pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] > by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.0) > for schulzp@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:25:38 +0200 (CEST) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:53:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D513716A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666DC43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVPV-0003B4-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:13 +0200 Received: from [217.1.218.211] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVPT-0004VX-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:12 +0200 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5R8r86G006599verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:08 +0200 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i5R8r6Pa006597 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:06 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:53:06 +0200 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627085306.GC6447@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:53:15 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 > for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > > I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to > root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original > recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Hi, if you count all the RECEIVED: headers you will find that using the --invisible option fetchmail suppresses the fetchmail added RECEIVED: header ... all the others are added by sendmail Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:54:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D839F16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digitalpath.net (ns1.digitalpath.net [65.164.104.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3989843D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rholmes@digitalpath.net) Received: (qmail 17592 invoked by uid 1546); 27 Jun 2004 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from rholmes@digitalpath.net by pop by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.65. Clear:RC:1(12.25.190.12):. Processed in 0.160371 secs); 27 Jun 2004 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from 12-25-190-12.roseville.ca.digitalpath.net (HELO guppy) (12.25.190.12) by ns1.digitalpath.net with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 08:54:18 -0000 Message-ID: <000301c45c24$b5a3de90$0a00a8c0@guppy> From: "Richard Holmes" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:57:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: terabyte limit problem with vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:20 -0000 Shawn, Did you ever find a solution to the terabyte limit problem you reported last year on FreeBSD.Questions (09/06/2003 and 01/12/2004). I'm having exactly the same problem. I've got eight Maxtor 250GB SATA drives ganged together into one big RAID5 volume with a net size of 1636GB. Everything is fine until "newfs -U -O2 /dev/vinum/..." gives the "can't read old UFS1 superblock" error. I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 csvup'd to REL_ENG_5_2 in mid June 2004. Thanks, Richard Holmes Lambda Software Development Rocklin, CA (916) 390-2057 (cell) rholmes@midtown.net rholmes@digitalpath.net (soon to be discontinued) P.S. I've also been having some other problems with vinum. "vinum resetconfig" doesn't always wipe out all of the vinum drives and seems to not reliably erase the vinum database from all of the drives. After resetconfig, "vinum list" may show one or two drives remaining. To get rid of them all, I need to do multiple cycles of "vinum rm -f -r", "vinum stop" and "vinum start". Have also had problems with empty vinum volumes being corrupted after reboot (remember "newfs" failed, so nothing was ever written to the volume). After successfully creating and initializing the vinum RAID5 volume, I "stop" it, then reboot. After reboot, vinum insists on reinitializing the entire volume (an 8 hour process). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 08:54:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED8416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F19343D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVR9-0003OK-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:55 +0200 Received: from [217.1.218.211] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BeVR6-0001kP-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:52 +0200 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5R8sm6G006677verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:49 +0200 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i5R8smhx006675 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:54:48 +0200 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040627085447.GA6609@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200406260041.RAA20032@Hercules.ceosoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406260041.RAA20032@Hercules.ceosoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: Re: Sendmail permission problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:54:56 -0000 On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Jamie LaPointe wrote: > I am having problems with a Perl based application (Bugzilla 2.16.5) that > uses Sendmail. I recently upgraded from Sendmail version 8.9.3 to 8.12.10 > and am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release. I installed this version of Sendmail > from the Ports collection from the FreeBSD FTP site. Ever since I upgraded > to this new version I have been having the following problem when attempting > to send an email via Bugzilla (the following error is from the mailog): > > Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-mta[539]: starting daemon (8.12.10): > SMTP+queuei > > ng@00:30:00 > > Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-msp-queue[542]: starting daemon (8.12.10): > queue > > ing@00:30:00 > > Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-msp-queue[547]: starting daemon (8.12.10): > queue > > ing@00:30:00 > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: SYSERR(apache): > coll > > ect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4fA000630 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permission de > > nied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: from=apache, > size=46 > > 8, class=0, nrcpts=0, relay=apache@localhost > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: i5Q0C4fB000630: > DSN: > > collect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4fA000630 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permissi > > on denied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fB000630: SYSERR(apache): > queu > > eup: cannot create queue file ./qfi5Q0C4fB000630, euid=1003: Permission > denied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: SYSERR(apache): > coll > > ect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4K8000631 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permission de > > nied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: from=apache, > size=45 > > 9, class=0, nrcpts=0, relay=apache@localhost > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: i5Q0C4K9000631: > DSN: > > collect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4K8000631 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): > Permissi > > on denied > > Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K9000631: SYSERR(apache): > queu > > eup: cannot create queue file ./qfi5Q0C4K9000631, euid=1003: Permission > denied > > > > It sure appears that something is screwed up with Permissions, yet > /var/spool/clientmqueue has the following permission: > > -bash-2.05b# ls -l > > total 32 > > drwxrwx--- 2 smmsp smmsp 512 Jun 25 12:09 clientmqueue > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 512 Apr 6 08:53 cups > > drwxrwxr-x 2 uucp dialer 512 Jun 25 17:11 lock > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root daemon 512 Feb 23 12:41 lpd > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 16384 Jun 25 15:17 mqueue > > drwx------ 2 root daemon 512 Feb 23 12:41 opielocks > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 512 Feb 23 12:41 output > > drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 512 Jun 25 11:48 postfix > > drwxrwxrwt 2 root wheel 512 Apr 6 08:53 samba > > > > >From everything that I have read this is correct. I also checked the > permission for the sendmail binary and it has the following permission: > > -bash-2.05b# ls -l /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail > > -r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 635864 Feb 23 12:42 sendmail A look at SECURITY doc in /usr/local/share/doc/sendmail gives me: -r-xr-sr-x root smmsp ... /PATH/TO/sendmail drwxrwx--- smmsp smmsp ... /var/spool/clientmqueue drwx------ root wheel ... /var/spool/mqueue -r--r--r-- root wheel ... /etc/mail/sendmail.cf -r--r--r-- root wheel ... /etc/mail/submit.cf Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:09:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:09:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AAD43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:09:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by ns1.thought.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5R993RA073624; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.9p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i5R991Kl089625; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R990oU089624; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:09:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Luke Kearney Message-ID: <20040627090900.GA89574@tao.thought.org> References: <20040627052447.GA89069@tao.thought.org> <20040627171655.3372.LUKEK@meibin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627171655.3372.LUKEK@meibin.net> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Gary Kline cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:09:17 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Luke Kearney wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 > Gary Kline granted us these pearls of wisdom: > > > > > Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one > > with the > > > > ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to > > ethernet networks.'' > > > > In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. > > > > Can anybody help me? > > > > gary > > I have Thinkpad X30 which runs 4.9-p10 currently and I have had no real > issues in setting it up. Mine has inbuilt NIC's though and there were no > issues at all in recognising the ethernet or wireless NIC. X was really > easy to setup and it's been really reliable since day1. > > HTH > It helps to a point. The thing is that my budget is limited to th $200-$300 range. I'm not looking for anything fast ... just smething solid with a good drive and CDROM. And a NC that just-works. I've been checking the freebsd laptop list and working from these, but still flying blind pretty much. Anybody else have laptop success stories to share in the 266-400MHz range?? thanks to all, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:17:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3477616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:17:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18BC743D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:17:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 73258 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10380 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.78):. Processed in 0.010958 secs); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from smtp3.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.78) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 19872 invoked by uid 514); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:35 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp3.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:34 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:34 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:32 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271502.32319.bikrant@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp3.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 cc: Oliver Fuchs cc: Phil Schulz Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:17:44 -0000 Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) and this one is the full header =46rom bikrant@wlink.com.np Sun Jun 27 00:32:39 2004 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr0305= 63 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 Delivered-To: bikrant@wlink.com.np Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 86161 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 10= 02=20 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.607579 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np= =20 (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004=20 11:50:01 +0545) You can see that mail is to be delivered to bikrant@wlink.com.np but when i= t=20 is fetched by fetchmail it is changed to root@localhost. regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 12:22, Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header = in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id > i5QIldIr030563 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > > I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to > root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original > recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. > > Thanks, > Bikrant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:18:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584D016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6446543D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 73285 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 10738 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.78):. Processed in 0.010929 secs); 27 Jun 2004 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from smtp3.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.78) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20048 invoked by uid 514); 27 Jun 2004 09:17:59 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp3.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:17:59 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:59 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:57 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Organization: World Link Communications Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp3.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:08 -0000 Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) and this one is the full header =46rom bikrant@wlink.com.np Sun Jun 27 00:32:39 2004 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr0305= 63 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 Delivered-To: bikrant@wlink.com.np Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545=20 (NPT) Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 86161 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 10= 02=20 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.607579 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np= =20 (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 -0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004=20 11:50:01 +0545) You can see that mail is to be delivered to bikrant@wlink.com.np but when i= t=20 is fetched by fetchmail it is changed to root@localhost. regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 12:22, Bikrant wrote: > Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it > locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header = in > every messages that it retrives from the pop server. > > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id > i5QIldIr030563 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > > I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to > root@localhost. Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original > recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. > > Thanks, > Bikrant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:18:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB5016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bilbo.otenet.gr (bilbo.otenet.gr [195.170.0.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5512D43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a136.otenet.gr [212.205.215.136]) i5R9IeFr020446; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:44 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5R9IX4q019379; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5R9IXt8019378; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:18:33 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Sergey Zaharchenko Message-ID: <20040627091833.GA19300@gothmog.gr> References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> cc: Jay Moore cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:18:53 -0000 On 2004-06-27 11:18, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: > > stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the > > patches merged? > > By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. Just running `make patch' should be enough. The dependencies will take care of running `make fetch', `make checksum', `make extract' and *then* `make patch'. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 09:35:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:35:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743D543D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 24842 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 09:34:08 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 09:34:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 9440 invoked by uid 555); 27 Jun 2004 09:35:16 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.205) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088328915-9428 for keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; Sun, 27 Jun 13:35:15 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2A9B381; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:34:58 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:34:57 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20040627093457.GA7288@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Giorgos Keramidas , Sergey Zaharchenko , Jay Moore , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40DE239C.8090401@cox.net> <20040627024729.GA3240@gothmog.gr> <200406270026.20501.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <20040627071808.GA369@shark.localdomain> <20040627091833.GA19300@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627091833.GA19300@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Jay Moore cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:35:17 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:18:33PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas probably wrote: > On 2004-06-27 11:18, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: > > > stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the > > > patches merged? > > > > By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. >=20 > Just running `make patch' should be enough. The dependencies will take > care of running `make fetch', `make checksum', `make extract' and *then* > `make patch'. >=20 > - Giorgos >=20 True, but being more `verbose' and giving a more self-explanatory command sometimes helps to understand what it actually is going to do. BTW I still forgot to mention what seemed obvious --- the patched source will be in the working directory (/usr/ports/.../.../work if you didn't change anything in make.conf). --=20 DoubleF Aquadextrous, adj.: Possessing the ability to turn the bathtub faucet on and off with your toes. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets" --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3pTAwo7hT/9lVdwRAsurAJ9ASRfBnuKkpcgPHJaHT089xYCxGQCdGy/n 86eWgXrrjzfbqfTsG1IibA8= =MJP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 10:30:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D95116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52204.mail.yahoo.com (web52204.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1F6843D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdsys@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627103006.31532.qmail@web52204.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.5.254.248] by web52204.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:30:06 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:30:06 -0700 (PDT) From: bryan cassidy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: make index error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:08 -0000 Running 4.10. I ran a 'make index' in /usr/ports just now and i get the following error Generating INDEX - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02: "/usr/ports/japanese/tk80" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete ===> comms/tkscanfax failed *** Error code 1 1 error Thanks __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 10:35:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A485D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:35:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1662043D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040627103324.NVJE2927.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:33:24 +0100 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1BeX0J-0002Z9-73; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:19 +0100 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5RAZ9pm086787; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:09 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com Message-ID: <20040627103509.GB85115@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <121731c12180f4.12180f4121731c@socal.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <121731c12180f4.12180f4121731c@socal.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing cards in a reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:35:54 -0000 On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:27:40PM -1000, hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com wrote: > Aloha Scott and thanks for staying awake and responding. > > I thought I had tried all of that camcontrol stuff > before I posted but I am getting old so I tried what > you suggested. Alas, it did not seem to help. Here is > the output of the attempt: Hi Robert, Weird - that's what works for me, so I don't know how much more help I can offer, but here are a few suggestions that might help us figure out what's going on... > Boot with 128MB card installed. > > hp# ls -l /dev/da* > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da0 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 22 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 24 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2s1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 23 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da3 Ah... you're running FreeBSD 5 - it was pretty late when I wrote that first reply, so I didn't notice that immediately. Unlike FreeBSD 4, where stuff in /dev/ had to be created manually, FreeBSD 5 uses devfs to create the device nodes as needed, when devices come and go. I haven't actually used my card reader on 5 yet, so I could be missing something obvious here... > Remove 128MB card and insert 8MB card > > hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 > Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful What does 'fdisk da2' give you at this point? Do you get anything in /var/log/messages when you insert the new card? It might be worth doing a 'camcontrol start' after the rescan, just in case, but I don't really think that will make any difference. Since you're running FreeBSD 5, it might be worth re-porting your question to the freebsd-current mailing list, to see if anyone there can shed some light on this. Sorry I can't be more help, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 10:59:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B0516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:59:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cannabis.dataforce.net (cannabis.dataforce.net [195.42.160.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB0F43D45 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ky@df.ru) Received: from proxy.rostelekom.ru (proxy.rostelekom.ru [195.42.179.169]) by cannabis.dataforce.net (8.11.6p2-DF5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id i5RAx7X18545 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:59:07 +0400 From: "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> Subject: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ky@df.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:59:11 -0000 I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves almost imidiately after the change. Tried to find some ready solution but fails. There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly stat(2) calls). kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for file operations. So is there some other points to build a file replication? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 11:23:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A8816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:23:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF2A43D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:23:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 599 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jun 2004 11:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.8?) (192.168.10.8) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 11:22:44 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:20:26 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: ky@df.ru In-Reply-To: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> References: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> Message-Id: <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.01 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:23:01 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." spake thus: > I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. > > I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. > I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves > almost imidiately after the change. > Tried to find some ready solution but fails. > There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly > stat(2) calls). > kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. > So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for > file operations. > > So is there some other points to build a file replication? Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a cron job every N minutes. /usr/ports/net/rsync HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 17:54:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90B116A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8757C43D31 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganeshkini@comcast.net) Received: from vasudhalaptop (h0003476f5fee.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.61.157.96]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2004062617540501400kvkgge>; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:06 +0000 Message-ID: <001201c45ba6$90429d40$6701a8c0@vasudhalaptop> From: "Ganesh Kini" To: Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:53:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:10:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Gigafast usb wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:54:08 -0000 Is it possible to configure Gigafast wireless network card WF741-UIC on = x86 machine? Thanks Ganesh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 12:14:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4434516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:14:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp19.wxs.nl (smtp19.wxs.nl [195.121.6.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846F643D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:14:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marco@beishuizen.info) Received: from tsunami.bsd (ipd50a233c.speed.planet.nl [213.10.35.60]) by smtp19.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0HZY005JIVBDOK@smtp19.wxs.nl> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:14:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@tsunami.bsd To: FreeBSD questions mailing list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT FreeBSD: Homepage: Subject: Linux emulator core dumps at install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:14:37 -0000 I tried to install the Linux emulator from the ports on FreeBSD 4.10-stable (i386) but it crashes when it installs: ... ===> Installing for linux_base-7.1_7 ===> Generating temporary packing list kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 glibc-common-2.2.4-33.i386.rpm package glibc not listed in conflict index glibc-2.2.4-33.i386.rpm execution of glibc-2.2.4-33 script failed, exit status 0 *** Error code 1 ... Is there a solution for this? Thanks, Marco -- Blore's Razor: Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 12:33:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274B116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C508043D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w41so1126359cwb for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.1 with SMTP id b1mr66968rnc; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:33:05 +0200 From: Arjan Van Leeuwen To: Ganesh Kini In-Reply-To: <001201c45ba6$90429d40$6701a8c0@vasudhalaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001201c45ba6$90429d40$6701a8c0@vasudhalaptop> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gigafast usb wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:33:20 -0000 Hi, On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:53:53 -0400, Ganesh Kini wrote: > > Is it possible to configure Gigafast wireless network card WF741-UIC on x86 machine? Check the atuwi project (http://vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/), it might work with this card. Arjan > > Thanks > Ganesh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 12:49:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796E416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pinky.otenet.gr (pinky.otenet.gr [195.170.0.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CBF43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i5RCn91Z025875; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:49:10 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion.daedalusnetworks.priv [127.0.0.1])i5RCoaUi001860; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:50:46 +0300 Received: (from keramida@localhost)i5RCoQhD001859; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:50:26 +0300 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:50:26 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: antenneX Message-ID: <20040627125025.GA1850@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20040624190828.GA821@gothmog.gr> <007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:49:48 -0000 On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX wrote: > > Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup & I did change the IP for > server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight > though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and > apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on > server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent > over to server2. > > I'm still missing something here..... I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. Can you, please, show me what these commands print? server1# ifconfig -a server1# host server1.example.net server1# host server2.example.net server1# host -t mx example.net server2# ifconfig -a server2# host server1.example.net server2# host server2.example.net server2# host -t mx example.net A detailed description (including verbatim copies of the relevant files) of the Sendmail setup on each host would be very nice too. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:33:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE63216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:33:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8653443D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:33:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D4569A39; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:33:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:33:48 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Thomas Moyer" Message-Id: <20040627093348.211d0d7e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> References: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shared Partitions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:33:53 -0000 "Thomas Moyer" wrote: > I have a Fat32 partition that I use to share files between Windows and > FreeBSD. I have it mounted on /home and when it mounts the owner of all > the files is root and the group is wheel. Is there a way to change that > so it acts like a normal home partition? In other words the individual > directories and files are owned by the user etc. Unfortunately, no. This is because FAT doesn't support users and groups (or permissions for that matter) so the mount has to have everything owned by one user/group. Thus it won't work as a /home partition because each /home/ directory should be owned by the user. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:39:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD6C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584BF43D39 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i5RDe1pj013249; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:40:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i5RDdw80013243; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:39:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:39:58 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: Doug Poland In-Reply-To: <20040627035549.GA2414@polands.org> Message-ID: <20040627093830.H13090@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <1088268927.734.16.camel@localhost> <20040626174214.GA263@polands.org><20040627035549.GA2414@polands.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Asus P4S800D-E Deluxe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:36 -0000 I've noticed that many newer Asus boards have ACPI problems with FreeBSD. Its a shame because i have always bought asus boards since I learned of them. On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Doug Poland wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Shaun Friedle wrote: >> On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42, Doug Poland wrote: >>>> I currently have an Asus P4C800 Deluxe which is okay - until I turn off >>>> ACPI and then I get a "Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while is >>>> kernel mode" while booting. I need to be able to turn off ACPI as the >>>> nvidia driver doesn't work with it on. >>>> >>>> The P4S800D-E Deluxe is very similar is features to the P4C800 Deluxe >>>> and I want to make sure that it doesn't suffer from the same problem >>>> before I buy it. >>>> >>> Sorry, it does suffer the same problem. I've got an nVidia 5700 >>> that's running the XFree86 nv driver because of this issue. >> >> Hi, >> It's a good job I checked first then. Do you know of any boards that >> offer similar features, but don't have this problem? >> > No, I don't. Someone created a webapp that attempted to "rate" the > performance of mobos for FBSD. The URL is: > > http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ > > I just checked it out and it seems to be stale now. There's a MySQL > connect error visible on the page. Also, it didn't rate ACPI > compatibility/performance which is something you really want to know. > > -- > Regards, > Doug > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:41:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9B216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:41:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E4D43D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i5RDfitu013271; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i5RDfi1k013268; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:41:44 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: dave In-Reply-To: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: <20040627094033.F13090@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <000501c45c02$a2d4c6c0$0200a8c0@satellite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tripwire on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:41:16 -0000 I was able to get a really old version in ports to work, but not the most recent build. The old version occasionally crashed on me when running a check on the filesystem. I would look at some of the alternatives to tripwire in ports for a 5.x system. On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, dave wrote: > Hello, > A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as > broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? > Thanks. > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:43:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6C016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:43:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cannabis.dataforce.net (cannabis.dataforce.net [195.42.160.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A41E43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ky@df.ru) Received: from proxy.rostelekom.ru (proxy.rostelekom.ru [195.42.179.169]) by cannabis.dataforce.net (8.11.6p2-DF5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id i5RDgjb28451; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:42:46 +0400 From: "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." To: Luke Kearney Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:42:44 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> In-Reply-To: <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406271742.44298.ky@df.ru> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ky@df.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:43:23 -0000 On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:20, Luke Kearney wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 > > "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." spake thus: > > I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. > > > > I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files > > count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files > > to slaves almost imidiately after the change. > > Tried to find some ready solution but fails. > > There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes > > silly stat(2) calls). > > kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. > > So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls > > for file operations. > > > > So is there some other points to build a file replication? > > Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate > file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet > should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you > need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a > cron job every N minutes. > > /usr/ports/net/rsync Yes. I use rsync already and its a great tool. But actually its too slow with numbers of fles > 100k. Its takes more then 5mins to found just few files to update in list of 500k files. So I decide rsync to be a transport manager for my own replication tool. Right now I'm writing a kernel module that catches all file syscalls that can modify a file. Its almost done exept rmdir & unlink calls - I don't know how to get a cwd from a thread. Function kern___getcwd sometimes fails with "not a directory" error. BTW, whats a good place where can I ask about kernel programming? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:44:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E8B16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:44:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8C743D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8CA69A39; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:44:05 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: MEZEI Tamas Message-Id: <20040627094405.5f2ccc88.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <40DE8064.1030705@bazmag.hu> References: <40DE8064.1030705@bazmag.hu> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zorp and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:44:50 -0000 MEZEI Tamas wrote: > Hi, > > is there any way to do "transparent proxying" in FreeBSD? I'd be happy > to have a fully functional Zorp server based on FreeBSD. > > Transparent proxying is working on Linux via the TPROXY patch, but ipf > rdr methods are not really the same. Is there any way to implement that > transparent stuff in FreeBSD? Are there any "unofficial" modifications > (don't slap me please ;)? Never heard of "Zorp", but I've used Squid for transparent HTTP proxying, worked fine. If you're looking for an "overall" proxy, I don't know. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 13:56:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BD616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:56:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14922.mail.yahoo.com (web14922.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4997B43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.138.44.110] by web14922.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:55:32 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:55:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Paulo Roberto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:56:03 -0000 Hello, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. thanks, Paulo __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A286016A4D0 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9124243D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so349470cwb for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with SMTP id d15mr58059rng; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:55 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Bikrant Neupane In-Reply-To: <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:00:55 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:57 +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote: > > > Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( > Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. > > This is the one added by fetchmail > > Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] > by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) > for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 > (NPT) > Hello! Would you mind posting your .fetchmailrc here? I think it should have a "user1 there is user2 here" clause. poll server.host with proto POP3 user 'remoteuser' there is 'localuser' here options flush fetchall ssl So mail for remoteuser gets delivered to localuser. Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:04:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DF716A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:04:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14928.mail.yahoo.com (web14928.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA50C43D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:04:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627140416.93626.qmail@web14928.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.138.44.110] by web14928.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:04:16 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:04:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Paulo Roberto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: fbdev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:04:36 -0000 Hi, Second question in a row... I am trying to configure X to use the "linux frame buffer", but when I try to run X, it complains about no "fbdev" module. It seems X does not come with it installed. Any procedure on getting fbdev working on 4.10? thanks again, Paulo __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:08:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D4543D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@swbell.net) Received: from SAGEAME (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5RE6xdH003624; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00f601c45c50$3e268f30$0200000a@SAGEAME> From: "antenneX" To: "Malcolm Kay" , "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <00ce01c45ba0$343ffc00$0200000a@SAGEAME><20040626184008.GB1016@gothmog.gr> <00da01c45bcb$b1381d70$0200000a@SAGEAME> <200406271305.21121.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:08:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A SED script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antenneX List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:08:42 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Kay" To: "antenneX" ; "Giorgos Keramidas" Cc: Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 10:35 PM Subject: Re: A SED script > On Sunday 27 June 2004 07:49, antenneX wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > > To: "antenneX" > > Cc: > > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:40 PM > > Subject: Re: A SED script > > > > > On 2004-06-26 12:08, antenneX wrote: > > > > I cannot get it to work on another file (perl.pl file) to change the > > > > line: > > > > $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX060"; to $OrderNumPrefix = "ATX070"; > > > > > > > > I suspect I'm not handling the quotes or other operators correctly > > > > and it > > > > > > just ignores the change. > > > > > > > > Here's the snippet of the script I'm trying to use: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > new=`grep -i new /path/to/newfile` > > > > old=`grep -i new /path/to/oldfile` > > It would seem that the variables new and old will both be set to something > containing 'new' (perhaps not in lower case). > How does this relate to "ATX060" and "ATX070"? > > > > > sed -i.bak -e "s/$old/$new/" /path/to/myfile > > > > > > The results depend heavily on the existence and contents of the two > > > > files > > > > > named /path/to/{old,new}file. I'm sure if you change the sed line to: > > > > > > sed -i.bak -e 's/ATX060/ATX070/' /path/to/myfile > > > > > > it will all work fine. > > > > Indeed, this works fine. The old/new files are needed to set the > > varibles to hold the new number for the next time as this is run via > > cron. > > > > You've still not shown us the relevant lines of /path/to/newfile or > /path/to/oldfile > > > old = ATX060 > > new = ATX070 > > What are these? The contents of /path/to/{new,old}file? > If so sed will be looking to change the string "old = ATX060" to > "new = ATX070". > > Or do the files simply consist of > ATX060 > and > ATX070 > ? > If so then grep is not the right command to load the variables old and new. > Try: > new=`cat /path/to/newfile` > old=`cat /path/to/oldfile` > > Malcolm > I've solved the script ptoblem with a verbose run of the script & it told me exactly what was wrong -- the two varibles newfile & oldfile were not defined properly. Running this showed the error: /bin/sh -xv ./myscript Sorry I didn't think to do this in the first place. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:27:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC25416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gldis.ca (constans.gldis.ca [66.11.169.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7A43D45 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gldis.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with SMTP id i5REdSqi048347; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:39:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: gldis.ca: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol Message-ID: <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 From: Jeremy Faulkner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paulo Roberto References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:27 -0000 Paulo Roberto wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? > I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > > thanks, > > Paulo > .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert them to a standard ISO image. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 14:27:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130AA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282343D39 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FA969A39; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:27:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: ky@df.ru Message-Id: <20040627102731.63243d11.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200406271742.44298.ky@df.ru> References: <200406271348.07592.ky@df.ru> <20040627201809.B133.LUKEK@meibin.net> <200406271742.44298.ky@df.ru> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:27:52 -0000 "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." wrote: > On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:20, Luke Kearney wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 > > > > "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." spake thus: > > > I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. > > > > > > I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files > > > count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files > > > to slaves almost imidiately after the change. > > > Tried to find some ready solution but fails. > > > There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes > > > silly stat(2) calls). > > > kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch >= 500k files. > > > So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls > > > for file operations. > > > > > > So is there some other points to build a file replication? > > > > Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate > > file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet > > should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you > > need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a > > cron job every N minutes. > > > > /usr/ports/net/rsync > > Yes. I use rsync already and its a great tool. > But actually its too slow with numbers of fles > 100k. > Its takes more then 5mins to found just few files to update in list of 500k > files. > > So I decide rsync to be a transport manager for my own replication tool. > Right now I'm writing a kernel module that catches all file syscalls that can > modify a file. Its almost done exept rmdir & unlink calls - I don't know how > to get a cwd from a thread. Function kern___getcwd sometimes fails with "not > a directory" error. > BTW, whats a good place where can I ask about kernel programming? freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org is the best place I know of. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 15:00:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B286416A4F7 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:00:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E41443D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@swbell.net) Received: from SAGEAME (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5REwedH022496; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 07:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00fb01c45c57$75816160$0200000a@SAGEAME> From: "antenneX" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <20040624190828.GA821@gothmog.gr><007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> <20040627125025.GA1850@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:00:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antenneX List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:00:21 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "antenneX" Cc: Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:50 AM Subject: Re: Using sendmail > On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX wrote: > > > > Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup & I did change the IP for > > server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight > > though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and > > apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on > > server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent > > over to server2. > > > > I'm still missing something here..... > > I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and > IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. > > Can you, please, show me what these commands print? > Giorgos: Thanks for your patience and willingness to help. As far as sendmail (8.12.11) options, my configs are pretty much "out of the box" except for the spamassassin & majordomo addins. I believe below is all the pertinent info, but if I've missed anything needed, just let me know: server1 = franklin-belle.com (gateway/firewall/nat/router) server2 = antentop.com (server is on same LAN with NAT route from server1) sageame@franklin-belle:-) host franklin-belle.com franklin-belle.com has address 65.68.247.73 franklin-belle.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.franklin-belle.com sageame@franklin-belle:-) host antentop.com antentop.com has address 65.68.247.75 antentop.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.antentop.com sageame@franklin-belle:-) host -t mx franklin-belle.com franklin-belle.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.franklin-belle.com sageame@antentop:-) host -t mx antentop.com antentop.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.antentop.com local-host-names (franklin-belle.com) franklin-belle.com mail.franklin-belle.com local-host-names (antentop.com) antentop.com mail.antentop.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 15:06:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A197C16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC5643D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@swbell.net) Received: from SAGEAME (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5RF5HdH024322; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <012601c45c58$6230a890$0200000a@SAGEAME> From: "antenneX" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <20040624190828.GA821@gothmog.gr><007501c45ac6$ea2a6d50$0200000a@SAGEAME> <20040627125025.GA1850@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:06:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using sendmail - One more file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antenneX List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:57 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "antenneX" Cc: Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:50 AM Subject: Re: Using sendmail > On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX wrote: > > > > Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup & I did change the IP for > > server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight > > though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and > > apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on > > server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent > > over to server2. > > > > I'm still missing something here..... > > I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and > IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. > I forgot to include the mailertable from server1: mail.antentop.com esmtp.mail.antentop.com No mailertable on server2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:13:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E243C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:13:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from flock1.newmail.ru (morda.newmail.ru [212.48.140.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA34C43D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from EugeneIvanov@nm.ru) Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 16:07:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 213.177.101.92) (eugeneivanov.nm.ru@213.177.101.92) by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 16:07:35 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:13:01 +0400 From: Eugene Ivanov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Business Organization: Super Assembler Software X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1015758375.20040627201301@nm.ru> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Subject: why link broken?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugene Ivanov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:13:34 -0000 SGVsbG8sIGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zLg0KDQppIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIGEgZmlsZQ0KaHR0 cDovL2Z0cDkudXMuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvcHViL0ZyZWVCU0QvSVNPLUlNQUdFUy1pMzg2LzUu Mi4xLzUuMi4xLVJFTEVBU0UtaTM4Ni1kaXNjMS5pc28NCmFuZCAyMDAgTWIgaXMgbm93IHRv IG1lLCBidXQgZG9uJ3QgZG93bmxvYWQgOigNCg0Kd2h5PyENCg0KRXVnZW5lLg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:15:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C711F16A4D5 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:15:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9443443D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9373B34FEE; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:52 +0200 From: Miguel Mendez To: Jeremy Faulkner Message-Id: <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040617 (GTK+ 2.4.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5" cc: nirv199@yahoo.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:15:27 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 Jeremy Faulkner wrote: Hi, > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue > > files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert > them to a standard ISO image. Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 --Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA3vK6nLctrNyFFPERAtSlAJ9EtpZPUiKt41vip9uwNots/A6R9ACgpnws E3FIUl1KtFDg05TqnBwVFyk= =1Hz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__27_Jun_2004_18_15_52_+0200_WO4Kw1YhVpLOozz5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:19:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8349716A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:19:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A1943D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:19:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA13110685E; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:19:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DEF3AA.3020309@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:19:54 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Ivanov References: <1015758375.20040627201301@nm.ru> In-Reply-To: <1015758375.20040627201301@nm.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: why link broken?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:19:58 -0000 Eugene Ivanov wrote: > Hello, freebsd-questions. > > i downloading a file > http://ftp9.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.2.1/5.2.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > and 200 Mb is now to me, but don't download :( > > why?! > > Eugene. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Network problems might be the reason, did you try another host ? If not, please try another one, perhaps that does work. Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:21:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E060516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A1F43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5RGLQ0W064010; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:21:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5RGLQAe064009; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:21:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:21:25 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Paulo Roberto Message-ID: <20040627162125.GA58695@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:21:38 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:55:32AM -0700, Paulo Roberto wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? > I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > cdrdao does it. Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:34:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E4316A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out008.verizon.net (out008pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FCE43D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out008.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040627163426.JMDL27801.out008.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:34:26 -0500 Message-ID: <40DEF6FF.9030703@mac.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:34:07 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kai Grossjohann References: <40D33478.3060705@vo.lu> <86n02qm2q3.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> In-Reply-To: <86n02qm2q3.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out008.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:34:26 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any use to build from source? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:34:43 -0000 Kai Grossjohann wrote: > Charles Swiger writes: >> Oh, yes. The first time you run into a problem and fix it yourself, >> or make a change to the programs to add some feature that you want, >> you will discover the serious advantages. >> >> However, if you never try to fix bugs or write code for yourself, then >> you aren't going to gain nearly as much from using source compared >> with using precompiled binaries. > > How does one deal with local changes in the software when installing > as a port? One way is to put your local changes into files/patch-aa [1] using diff format. Other times it's as simple as defining some environment variables by passing them into make, via /etc/make.conf, etc. -- -Chuck [1]: Choose whatever name seems appropriate, perhaps files/patch-src-file.c; the patch-aa naming convention works fine but is depricated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 16:48:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F219543D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j.e.drews@att.net) Received: from 204.127.135.59 ([204.127.135.59]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <20040627164821113001motne>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:21 +0000 Received: from [64.105.56.145] by 204.127.135.59; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:26 +0000 From: j.e.drews@att.net To: Gary Kline Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:26 +0000 Message-Id: <062720041648.24888.40DEFA5A000B6F020000613821602806519C990A9D0BD20AD206@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (May 27 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: ai5lLmRyZXdzQGF0dC5uZXQ= cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: next question re the Thinkpad. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:48:32 -0000 Hi Gary: You can look here and see if your Thinkpad runs FreeBSD: The FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility List http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ This list is up to date. I had a 600E Thinkpad running 4.9. The USB printer, scanner and Lexar flash ram storage worked well on it. Kind regards, Jonathan > > Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one > with the > > ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to > ethernet networks.'' > > In LINT (4.10) I see "SMC 2202USB" listed. > > Can anybody help me? > > gary > > > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:13:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D204416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:13:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gldis.ca (constans.gldis.ca [66.11.169.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6128E43D31 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gldis.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with SMTP id i5RHPCqi051795; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:25:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: gldis.ca: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol Message-ID: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:16:43 -0400 From: Jeremy Faulkner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miguel Mendez References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' cc: nirv199@yahoo.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:13:22 -0000 Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > > Hi, > > >>>Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue >>>files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > > >>.bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert >>them to a standard ISO image. > > > Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), > and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. > > Cheers, What international standard describes their format? Windows is not a standard. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:14:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EF916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:14:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7036943D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:14:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945ED826A; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71388-06; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C358260; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:14:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DF0045.2030902@wcborstel.nl> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:13:41 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Sawyer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Cable management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:14:04 -0000 Bill Sawyer wrote: >>>>Jorn Argelo 06/26 3:25 PM >>> >>>> >>>> >Main point is, I want to get rid of VGA cables, power cables, PS2 >cables, USB cables etcetera. So I have more use of a big cable gutter >then a patch panel. > > > >Jorn, > >Sounds like you're a good candidate for a KVM switch, if you have more than one computer in the same workspace. I'd recommend looking on eBay for Cybex KVM switches. > >Bill Sawyer >Information Systems >Six Flags St. Louis >(636) 938-5300 x. 231 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I already have a KVM switch :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:25:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B5916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:25:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DAB43D1F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: by av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1F48837E45; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.177]) by av3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117CE37E59 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gadget (h130n1fls11o822.telia.com [213.64.66.130]) by smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503638015 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:42 +0200 (CEST) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:53 +0200 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:25:44 -0000 Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > What international standard describes their format? > > Windows is not a standard. Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a "real" standard. /Daniel Eriksson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:41:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7318C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:41:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD86F43D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040627174108.FLFU3317.out006.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:41:08 -0500 Message-ID: <40DF06A0.10801@mac.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:40:48 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 3BSD References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:41:07 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forgot to add... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:41:09 -0000 3BSD wrote: > One thing I forgot to add to be previous e-mail about hardware > compatibility was that I'm using the DVI port of my graphics card, > connected to an LCD display, will that pose any problems? Generally not. To the extent that your configuration of video card and monitor can be treated as a generic (s)VGA display, FreeBSD will be plug-and-play for text mode (booting, console), and will also work genericly under X11. Getting 3D hardware support going for fast OpenGL stuff, and/or doing a multimonitor display mode are more complicated questions, but generally one can get such things working after more tweaking and time spent on your part. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 17:45:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9BA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f127.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF1B43D2D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crollins666@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:45:08 -0700 Received: from 216.19.22.118 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:08 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.19.22.118] X-Originating-Email: [crollins666@hotmail.com] X-Sender: crollins666@hotmail.com From: "clayton rollins" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:08 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2004 17:45:08.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[7CF2C760:01C45C6E] cc: vk7juf@southcom.com.au Subject: [from newbies] RE: IPFW2 + 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:45:37 -0000 On June 28, 2004, Matt wrote: > >Hello freebsd-newbies, > > I am still fairly new at the BSD level, migrated from linux. The > question that I have is, is Version 4.10 kernel compiled with IPFW2, > I know the doc's say that CURRENT version has and that it was > implemented in 2002, yet the doc's say that STABLE does not have > it compiled into the kernel. > > Can some one please clarify > > -- >Best regards, > Matt mailto:vk7juf@southcom.com.au > Hi Matt, (Can't reply on -newbies, it's a list charter thing :).) 4.x versions come from the STABLE branch and, so, do not have ipfw2 compiled in the kernel by default. (Instead, they use the older, and more tested, ipfw.) If you want ipfw2, refer to 'man 8 ipfw', the section "using ipfw2 on freebsd-stable," for very good instructions. Regards, Clayton _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 15:11:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:11:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fe1.cluster1.echolabs.net (mail.atlanticbb.net [216.52.118.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD1143D2F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:11:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tommoyer@atlanticbb.net) Received: from [68.114.85.228] (HELO home) by fe1.cluster1.echolabs.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 3972964 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:11:33 -0400 From: "Thomas Moyer" To: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:11:32 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c45c59$082c4420$6601a8c0@home> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:31:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Shared Partitions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:11:34 -0000 Okay so using a FAT partition is not a good idea. What about the other way around. Share /home/ for Windows XP to access. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 18:37:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F3A16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.175.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 712B543D4C for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@70.240.249.252 with login) by smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E91861A2; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09350-03; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B086140; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5RIbh5u003533; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <40DF13F7.2000608@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:37:43 -0500 From: Jon Noack User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040624) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Remi References: <36u63c$1uk902@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> In-Reply-To: <36u63c$1uk902@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at noacks.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:37:46 -0000 On 06/27/04 03:06, Remi wrote: > See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So > what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:doconnor@gsoft.com.au] > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; obrien@freebsd.org > Cc: Remi; questions@freebsd.org; current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: >>> I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. >>> Which one would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the >>> i386 would be easier to run, so I guess my question is what is >>> the state of the AMD64 FreeBSD version? >> >> You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, >> right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 >> 2.8GHz running the same OS. > > A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) > > If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. > > For raw performance it's "pretty nice" though :) He said "Pentium-M". It's a completely different processor than the Pentium 4-M. Designed for mobile computing, it is best described as combining the best features of the Pentium 3 (short(er) pipeline, etc.) and the Pentium 4 (better branch predictor, etc.) with high-end power saving features to form a third processor far superior to the previous two. Here's a first look at the chip: http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/ Some benchmarks where a 1.6GHz Pentium-M destroys a 2.2GHz Pentium 4-M: http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/centrino-13.html http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/centrino-14.html Battery life in the 6+ hour range is common with Pentium-M laptops. Here's the first look results (note the Pentium 4-M had a battery with over 20% greater capacity!): http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20030205/centrino-17.html If you value battery life, go with the Pentium-M. If you *most highly* value performance, the Athlon64 is probably the way to go. Jon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 18:39:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D09616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:39:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F9843D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 25347936 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:24:59 -0700 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:39:09 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040627133909.53152dbf@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> References: <000001c45b97$725b6c80$6601a8c0@home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: Shared Partitions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:39:07 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:05:48 -0400 "Thomas Moyer" wrote: > I have a Fat32 partition that I use to share files between Windows > and FreeBSD. I have it mounted on /home and when it mounts the > owner of all the files is root and the group is wheel. Is there a > way to change that so it acts like a normal home partition? In other > words the individual directories and files are owned by the user > etc. Since FAT has no ability to permissions, it has to be mount as something... it defualts to root... check out the -g and -u switches for mount... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 19:23:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C001016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:23:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F1243D49 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:23:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i5RJNAXr000445 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HZZ006GZF6LMY@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.201] (Forwarded-For: [68.8.243.244]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:23:09 -1000 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:23:09 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: Scott Mitchell Message-id: <121e6dc121c660.121c660121e6dc@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: changing cards in a reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:23:43 -0000 Scott Mitchell wrote Hi Robert, Weird - that's what works for me, so I don't know how much more help I can offer, but here are a few suggestions that might help us figure out what's going on... > Boot with 128MB card installed. > > hp# ls -l /dev/da* > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da0 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 22 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 24 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2s1 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 23 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da3 Ah... you're running FreeBSD 5 - it was pretty late when I wrote that first reply, so I didn't notice that immediately. Unlike FreeBSD 4, where stuff in /dev/ had to be created manually, FreeBSD 5 uses devfs to create the device nodes as needed, when devices come and go. I haven't actually used my card reader on 5 yet, so I could be missing something obvious here... > Remove 128MB card and insert 8MB card > > hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 > Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful What does 'fdisk da2' give you at this point? Do you get anything in /var/log/messages when you insert the new card? It might be worth doing a 'camcontrol start' after the rescan, just in case, but I don't really think that will make any difference. Since you're running FreeBSD 5, it might be worth re-porting your question to the freebsd-current mailing list, to see if anyone there can shed some light on this. Sorry I can't be more help, Scott Aloha and mahalo Scott I had tried the "camcontrol start" before but I tried again without any good stuff. Fdisk seems to show the correct readings but I could use some help interpreting the output of "/var/log/messages". I am traveling now so I am using my laptop which is running current. When I return to Kona (7-6) I will try on one of my desktops that are running 5.2.1 Thanks again for helping. Robert hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus total 16 drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Jun 26 14:24 dcim drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 1 1980 imolym hp# umount /mnt/olympus hp# camcontrol eject 0:0:2 Unit stopped successfully, Media ejected Remove 8MB card and insert 128MB card hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful hp# fdisk da2 ******* Working on device /dev/da2 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=125 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=125 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 6 (0x06),(Primary 'big' DOS (>= 32MB)) start 47, size 255953 (124 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 16; end: cyl 499/ head 15/ sector 32 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: Jun 27 09:01:13 hp su: robert to root on /dev/ttyp0 Jun 27 09:03:01 hp kernel: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:2): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 27 09:03:01 hp kernel: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:2): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Jun 27 09:03:01 hp kernel: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:2): SCSI Status: Check Condition Jun 27 09:03:01 hp kernel: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:2): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 Jun 27 09:03:01 hp kernel: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:2): Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 27 09:03:01 hp kernel: (da2:umass-sim0:0:0:2): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) hp# hp# camcontrol start 0:0:2 Unit started successfully hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus mount_msdosfs: /dev/da2s1: Invalid argument hp# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 19:27:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4739416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com (tobor.hpl.hp.com [192.6.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3B743D58 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5RJPujq029534 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:25:56 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5RJPtS8029531; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:25:55 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:25:55 +0100 Message-Id: <200406271925.i5RJPtS8029531@tobor.hpl.hp.com> From: "MailScanner" To: questions@freebsd.org X-MailScanner: generated X-HP-Priority: Good [127.0.0.1] X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the helpdesk for more information X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: Subject: Warning: E-mail viruses detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:27:42 -0000 Our virus detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:- To: mjw@hplb.hpl.hp.com Subject: Information Date: Sun Jun 27 20:25:55 2004 One or more of the attachments (Important.txt .exe, Important.zip) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered. Consider renaming the files to avoid this constraint. The virus detector said this about the message: Report: MailScanner: Very long filenames are good signs of attacks against Microsoft e-mail packages (Important.txt .exe) No programs allowed (Important.txt .exe) Report: MailScanner: Very long filenames are good signs of attacks against Microsoft e-mail packages (Important.txt .exe) No programs allowed (Important.txt .exe) -- MailScanner Email Virus Scanner www.mailscanner.info MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 19:52:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9D216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:52:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6C143D39 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (pcp02025587pcs.plsntv01.nj.comcast.net[68.44.29.50]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040627195206016005qjb0e>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:52:07 +0000 Message-ID: <40DF26CC.9010503@atopia.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:58:04 -0400 From: Matt Juszczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040526) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: clayton rollins References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: vk7juf@southcom.com.au cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [from newbies] RE: IPFW2 + 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:52:17 -0000 Matt, IPFW2 is not compiled into 4.10 by default. At a shell, type "man ipfw", then a single forward slash (to bring up the search tool), then search for STABLE a couple of times .... directions are in there.... Here it is anyway.... USING IPFW2 IN FreeBSD-STABLE ipfw2 is standard in FreeBSD CURRENT, whereas FreeBSD STABLE still uses ipfw1 unless the kernel is compiled with options IPFW2, and /sbin/ipfw and /usr/lib/libalias are recompiled with -DIPFW2 and reinstalled (the same effect can be achieved by adding IPFW2=TRUE to /etc/make.conf before a buildworld). Hope that helps, Matt clayton rollins wrote: > > On June 28, 2004, Matt wrote: > >> >> Hello freebsd-newbies, >> >> I am still fairly new at the BSD level, migrated from linux. The >> question that I have is, is Version 4.10 kernel compiled with IPFW2, >> I know the doc's say that CURRENT version has and that it was >> implemented in 2002, yet the doc's say that STABLE does not have >> it compiled into the kernel. >> >> Can some one please clarify >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Matt mailto:vk7juf@southcom.com.au >> > > Hi Matt, > > (Can't reply on -newbies, it's a list charter thing :).) > > 4.x versions come from the STABLE branch and, so, do not > have ipfw2 compiled in the kernel by default. (Instead, they > use the older, and more tested, ipfw.) > > If you want ipfw2, refer to 'man 8 ipfw', the section "using > ipfw2 on freebsd-stable," for very good instructions. > > Regards, > Clayton > > _________________________________________________________________ > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:40df08f8545962012013677! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 20:03:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C586D16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:03:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A5B43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040627200329.GECF3317.out006.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:03:29 -0500 Message-ID: <40DF27FD.7000006@mac.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:03:09 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Pugh References: <7E6FF1F163744148A07484A490DEB01B165033@exchange.vortechexchange.com> In-Reply-To: <7E6FF1F163744148A07484A490DEB01B165033@exchange.vortechexchange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:03:29 -0500 cc: freebsd Questions Subject: Re: Mirrors needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:03:34 -0000 Brad Pugh wrote: > I just wanted to see if you guys in need of anymore mirrors for you're > downloads? > > If so how much space does you're downloads need? Thanks for your offer. Please refer to: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-requirements.html -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 21:03:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EAD16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:03:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from emr0.eu.uu.net (emr0.eu.uu.net [195.129.12.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E48A43D3F for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kai@emptydomain.de) Received: from imr1.eu.uu.net ([213.68.123.49]) by emr0.eu.uu.net with esmtp id 1BegUe-0005yl-JB; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by imr1.eu.uu.net with esmtp id 1BegUe-0004oq-9E; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:16 +0000 Received: from lgen1.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net ([62.191.128.29] helo=amr.eu.uu.net) by imr1.eu.uu.net with esmtp id 1BegUd-0004ok-P0; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:15 +0000 Received: from rumba.de.uu.net.mci.com (p5487C59A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.135.197.154]) by amr.eu.uu.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5RKhDMc000697; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:14 GMT SSL encryption with TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 SMTP AUTH used user=kgrossjo AuthMechanisms=LOGIN (envelope-from kai@emptydomain.de) To: Chuck Swiger References: <40D33478.3060705@vo.lu> <86n02qm2q3.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> <40DEF6FF.9030703@mac.com> From: Kai Grossjohann Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:43:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <40DEF6FF.9030703@mac.com> (Chuck Swiger's message of "Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:34:07 -0400") Message-ID: <86fz8g7mw0.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Kai Grossjohann cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any use to build from source? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:03:00 -0000 Chuck Swiger writes: > One way is to put your local changes into files/patch-aa [1] using > diff format. Other times it's as simple as defining some environment > variables by passing them into make, via /etc/make.conf, etc. But what happens to the file files/patch-aa after I do cd /usr/src make update ? (I use CVSup to keep current.) I'm sorry for not mentioning this at the beginning. Kai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 21:44:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2317C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:44:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [217.77.141.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C36043D1D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:44:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5RLiZVp051828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host 152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14] claimed to be [192.168.1.22] Message-ID: <40DF3FBF.8060400@whacky.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:31 +0200 From: Stephan van Beerschoten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on erg.verweg.com Subject: dhclient with reconfigured SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:44:49 -0000 Hi, Somebody on the block has recently bought him or herself WLAN hardware which interferes somewhat with mine. When my laptop (5-CURRENT) is booting, it requests a dhcp address and for that it needs to associate itself with a SSID. Unfortunately my card almost always connects to my neighbors AP. Why idea how I can preconfigure an SSID for dhclient ? Thanks, Stephan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 21:50:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0E916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [217.122.132.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DB43D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:50:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:50:11 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:50:11 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20040627215011.GA26845@nagual.st> References: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:50:30 -0000 On 27 Jun Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: >> What international standard describes their format? >> Windows is not a standard. > > Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a "real" > standard. That's precisely what M$ is aiming at. It's just a wrong attitude. A standard is a standard. "de-facto" does NOT equal "standard" The fact that a program can handle those non-standards is cool, but that's it. -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 21:53:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B30416A4CF; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:53:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A6D43D45; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:53:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id B661710A; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hachigo (hachigo [66.92.171.91]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:03:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:03:52 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Michal Pasternak References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> In-Reply-To: <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:53:30 -0000 Quoting Michal Pasternak : > David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]: >> You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, >> right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 >> 2.8GHz running the same OS. > > ... but will it outperform it also by heat dissipation? > > -- > m > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop, my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter... Ken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 23:02:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5104B16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:02:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C16F43D53 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:02:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by ns1.thought.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5RN1JRA075029 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:01:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.9p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i5RN1HKl018252 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:01:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5RN1H55018251 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:01:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:01:17 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040627230116.GA18229@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: what types of network cards work with thinkpads? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:02:45 -0000 Well, I'm seeing some promising thinkpads over on ebay. Some with "10/100 netword card", most without. Cann nybody clue me in on what types of laptop NICs work with FBSD? thanks muchly, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 23:44:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B99A16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21125.mail.yahoo.com (web21125.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 709FF43D2D for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21125.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:44:10 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:44:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:44:11 -0000 Hi, I'm having a problem with spontaneous restarts. This isn't a new problem, but I've done the obvious things and the problem hasn't gone away. I was thinking of asking on -hackers, but I'm trying here first. The system is a 4.8 with a mix of patches and port upgrades of various ages. I'm planning to rebuild the whole thing, bringing it up to date, but I'm hoping to be able to wait for a 5.x in STABLE; I don't want to do this twice, since I expect I'll have to dump and restore everything. The hardware is a 2.6 GHz P4 with 2 GByte of GEIL dual-channel memory. (The problem existed on the previous, somewhat slower, memory as well.) The box contains the processor and motherboard (Gigabyte GA-SINXP1394), two floppy drives, CD and CD/W drives, an HP DAT, three IBM/Hitachi 36G/10K SCSI drives, and one 120G IDE. The SCSI card is by Adaptec; the video card is a low-end NVidia, and I'm running their video driver. The PS is an Antec True380, which should be enough for the box, with something to spare. There are several extra, large fans, of which more later. The system, monitor, printer, and cable modem are all powered through an APC BACK-UPS 450, about 18 months old. It's shown in the last week that it can keep things up for more than an hour. The symptom is a restart that leaves no indication of how it happened. Recently, the system shut down (completely, and at the power supply) instead of restarting. In that case, the last deliberate shutdown was a `shutdown -h now'; it appears that in every other case, the last deliberate shutdown was a `-r now'. (Question: does the machine architecture have settings for reset-resume .vs. reset-halt, settings that might be remembered when a later action occurs?) It has subsequently shut down with an immediate restart. There are no failure indications in the /var/log/messages, nor reported by dmesg. (The console scrolls by very quickly.) The message sequence over the restart typically looks like this: ======================================================================= Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from 00:05:00:e7:17:44 t o 00:05:00:e7:17:57 on em0 Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from 00:05:00:e7:17:57 t o 00:05:00:e7:17:44 on em0 Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Network Number: 24.228.64.0 Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Broadcast Address: 255.255.255.255 Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 198 9, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 ======================================================================== The restart most often occurs AFTER X has been shut down (and often restarted) but sometimes when X has not been run. It most often occurs when the system is under heavy CPU load, but sometimes when the load has been light. I thought at one time it might be a thermal problem and undertook to fix that. (I am still working to get more cooling air over the disks.) Right now, I have 120 mm fans rated at 130-135 CFM (Panaflow and JMC) pushing air in and out of the box, and pressurizing a duct feeding the CPU cooler, which is now cool to the touch. The memory modules are cool to the touch. While the disks need a proper plenum to route more air over them, I no longer believe that there is a thermal problem. The vid card's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch; the northbridge's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch. (Some people commute to white-collar jobs in heavy pickups; I drive a small server as my PC. No chrome pipes.) So: what should I do next? Should I set the system up to go to the kernel debugger on panic, or even start it via the kernel debugger? (Where is the full documentation?) Should I shell out for an even bigger power supply? Is there another log that I should examine? A restart wire that I should check? A power bus I should scope? (I'll have to borrow a scope somewhere.) Is it time for an exorcist? Thanks for your help. Mark Terribile __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 01:06:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBD816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avas-mr02.fibertel.com.ar (avas-mr02.fibertel.com.ar [24.232.0.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A3943D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jramirez@bit2net.com) Received: from dsl53-97.sion.net ([200.69.53.97]:40964 "EHLO darkstar.example.net" smtp-auth: "jramirez.bit2net.com") by avas-mr02.fibertel.com.ar with ESMTP id S196654AbUF1BFZ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:05:25 -0300 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at avas-mr02.fibertel.com.ar logged sender identity as: jramirez.bit2net.com From: Javier Ramirez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088383925.1253.8.camel@darkstar.example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:55:09 -0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Fib-Al-Info: Al X-Fib-Al-MRId: 2100bee4949088fa4a29c923c2cb4844 X-Fib-Al-From: jramirez@bit2net.com Subject: mc and kde 3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:17 -0000 Hi I have a question, why freebsd 5.2.1 don't have mc ? and how adapt kde 3.2 to my freebsd 5.2.1 ? regards Javier Ramirez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 01:06:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2AE16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [216.136.174.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 408EB43D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jvr_78@yahoo.com.ar) Received: from unknown (HELO darkstar.example.net) (jvr?78@200.69.53.97 with login) by smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 01:05:33 -0000 From: Javier Ramirez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088384007.1227.10.camel@darkstar.example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:55:22 -0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mc and kde 3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:25 -0000 Hi I have a question, why freebsd 5.2.1 don't have mc ? and how adapt kde 3.2 to my freebsd 5.2.1 ? regards Javier Ramirez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 01:06:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F9316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-f11.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.185.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B720343D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:05:40 -0700 Received: from 211.30.218.106 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:05:40 GMT X-Originating-IP: [211.30.218.106] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:05:40 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2004 01:05:40.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[07914DF0:01C45CAC] Subject: RE: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:06:27 -0000 thanks all for your suggestions. i'll refrain from running the portupgrade on KDE whilst KDE is running. as for the patch procedures you guys suggested, i'm actually looking for a way to do it without using the ports system at all. the problem is that kdebase takes so long to build, and as we have already discussed i can't run it whilst running KDE, and it's a rare occassion that i can afford to be without my PC for that long, and there is no individual port for Kate. the patch i've received is about 10 lines of code and the problem that it solves is _extremely_ minor, so if there is no way to rebuild Kate without rebuilding all of KDEBase, then i probably won't bother :-) but that was some great info for future reference if ever i want to apply a patch locally to verify it before sending it to the port maintainer. thanks very much everyone. cheers iain >From: Robert Huff >To: "Iain Dooley" >Subject: Updating source code manually >Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:20:17 -0400 > > > >Hello: > > > 1) i received a small patch for Kate (K Advanced Text Editor) > > from one of the developers, how can i compile this new code into > > the binary? > > Once you've confirmed the patch works, _please_ get the >developer's permission and submit it to the port maintainer(s). >You may not be the only one suffering. > > > 2) this question may be answered by any information provided in > > answer to my first question, but how can i upgrade specific > > components of KDE (such as Kate) without upgrading the entire KDE > > installation (which takes a couple of days) > > For something as complex as KDE, a proper upgrade will almost >always drag along new versions of infrastructure. > > > 3) Is it safe to do a portupgrade of KDE whilst KDE is still > > running? > > It will probably not be lethal, but it is not safe computing >practice. > During execution, many programs and shared libraries leave most >of the read-only portion of code on disk and reload it when needed. > Let's say KDE uses libfoo.1.5.so, which is actually v1.5.7. >You upgrade something, which upgrades libfoo.1.5.so to v1.5.8. The >kernel (unaware of the change) reloads part of the file and restarts >execution at a particular address. Will that address valid code? > Maybe. But if it isn't the shared library will crash, likely >taking KDE with it. Even if it _is_ valid code, it may not be >compatible with the old version. Best case, the program crashes. >Worst case, ongoing and invisible data corruption with no hint of >cause. > The reality is people (including me) do it. If you choose to >do so, know the risks. > > > Robert Huff > > _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 19:54:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CC516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:54:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C5643D41 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:54:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040627195452.QPLH1464.out001.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:54:52 -0500 Message-ID: <40DF25F8.1050305@mac.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:54:32 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Romain Kang References: <200406261600.i5QG07kG008437@kzsu.stanford.edu> In-Reply-To: <200406261600.i5QG07kG008437@kzsu.stanford.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:54:52 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP alias + NAT through a single NIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:54:53 -0000 Romain Kang wrote: > I have a single physical network with 2 disjoint address spaces in > it. Logical Net 1 is routable, while Logical Net 2 is in private > space intended to keep devices there safe from the outside. Now I > need to allow some Net 2 devices the capability to access the web, > and putting in a second physical net is impractical. > > Can a FreeBSD box with just one NIC on the physical net be used as > the router between the logical nets? Yes, although using one NIC compromises security a great deal compared with having two physical subnets seperated by a packet-filtering firewall. Set up an interface alias via ifconfig to go on the second network, enable ipforwarding and presumably NAT. > If so, could it be used to limit outside access from Net 2 by hardware address? All outside traffic is going to go through the machine used as a router and acquire it's hardware address. If you have another router on net 1, blocking packets from that MAC on all of the hosts on net 2 would be useful, but you'd have to do it for each client machine, not just on this FreeBSD box itself. > Or is there a proxy that would work for this configuration? Running a proxy server on the FreeBSD box is more secure than providing routing and NAT for the machines on net 2. squid works fine for this. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 03:39:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8260016A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:39:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B8E43D45; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:39:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004062812:39:21:412366.23117.2341276592 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:39:21 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:39:30 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:0.42) (by Terrace) Subject: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:39:55 -0000 Hi, By accident I happen to come across this remarkable limit of uptime registration for FreeBSD systems. After 497 days, the timer jumps to zero again. 497 days is less than a 1.5 years ! Has this been fixed in newer versions of FreeBSD (stable and/or current) ? Or is there a hardware limitation (CPU?) that does not allow this? Just wondering. Regards, Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 03:59:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1758816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:59:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smaug.rhavenn.net (rrcs-central-24-123-125-186.biz.rr.com [24.123.125.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9542943D4C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:59:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rhavenn.net) Received: from [172.20.0.132] (unknown [172.20.0.132]) by smaug.rhavenn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11DB2A893 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:12:52 -0500 (CDT) From: Henrik Hudson To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:59:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406272259.14035.lists@rhavenn.net> Subject: Linux Mozilla and Java Error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: lists@rhavenn.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:59:15 -0000 Hey List- I'm trying to get linux Mozilla to work the linux Java SDK. Linux Mozilla itself works fine and have Flash plugins working, but when I symlink to the Java JRE (the ns610-gcc3.2 one) I get an error on starting Mozilla. [libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory] Now indeed, said file is no where to be found on the system. Am I missing a port / package? Do I need a RPM from somewhere? System Info: 4.10 REL linux-base (rh 7) and various other dependent rpm are installed. Both Moz and Linux Moz work just fine, I would just like to have the Java applets for the occasional foray onto Yahoo games :) I could just compile the native Java..but thought if I'm having the problem, so might others and see if we can fix it. Thanks list. Henrik -- Henrik Hudson lists@rhavenn.net RTFM: Not just an acronym, it's the LAW! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 04:10:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1568E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 04:10:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA00C43D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 04:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aharrison@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so376224cwb for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.24.34 with SMTP id 34mr69190rnx; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:10:48 -0400 From: Andy Harrison To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20040626234224.GA88549@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040626234224.GA88549@tao.thought.org> cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: HPA LCD for X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 04:10:49 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:42:24 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > Fellow BSDers, > > A friend here in Seattle offered to sell his IBM laptop > for $100. It needs a new CDROM drive and I don't think it > has a NIC. I've been poking around the web and found that > ebay has several Thinkpad 1400s. > > i'M planning on using the 'festival' text-to-speech > synthesizer. Having X would be a plus, not a necessity. > One of the Thinkpad-1400s says its screen is "HPA LCD". > > Two questions: does X11 4.x work with this type of display? > Also: are there any other (low-cost/used) laptops worth > considering? I do like that stick mouse gadget. > > feedback? > > thanks, > > gary > > PS: This latop will have limited used, not heavy, daily > pounding. > > I had a Thinkpad 600e (366mhz) for quite a while. Loaded up with 296MB of RAM it was actually quite functional. Although it had a crappy sound card, it worked without any headaches. I did an ftp install, too, so you wouldn't even need the cd to at least get up and running, as long as it has the floppy. -- Andy Harrison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 05:03:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255A516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:03:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E3743D54 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:03:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbrier@multideck.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-98-143-250.atl.client2.attbi.com[24.98.143.250]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040628050314015002i3ase>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:03:14 +0000 Message-ID: <40DFA6CA.2000702@multideck.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:04:10 -0400 From: "Frederick N. Brier" Organization: Multideck Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sysinstall in a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:03:20 -0000 I am running into a problem installing packages via sysinstall within a jail using the CD media. I did a minimal install, but added the /usr/src directory. I followed the directions to setup a jail and copied /stand/sysinstall into the jail subdirectory. As per the directions, I then started up the jail and ran sysinstall. But when I attempt to install off of the cdrom media, I get the following error: "Error mounting /dev/acdoc on /dist: Operation not permitted (1)". Now it makes sense that a jail might not be allowed to mount a system device. My confusion is that these were the instructions and I have not seen any posts saying this is a problem. Is there a way to give the jail permission to access the CD device? Should I mount the CD from the host (outside the jail) but to a subdirectory the jail has access to? Such as /usr/jail/myjail/dist? Versus /dist? Thank you for any suggestions. Frederick N. Brier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 06:33:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E3816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:33:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2054E43D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:33:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) i5S6attg005718 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:36:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5S6atD6005717 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:36:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: FreeBSD Mailing List Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:36:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Subject: status of porting pf and spamd from OpenBSD to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:33:31 -0000 I heard some time ago that work was going on to port pf (and spamd, I think) from OpenBSD to FreeBSD. I also recently saw an announcement on the FreeBSD home page that Daniel Hartmeier had joined the FreeBSD team as a committer - a further indication that this work is underway. I'm just curious to know the status of this effort, and any specifics on how or when this will be done. Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 06:47:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D160716A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:47:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whoweb.com (whoweb.com [216.38.168.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB4343D5F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:47:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailist@whoweb.com) Received: from whoweb.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5S6m5sa065893 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mailist@localhost) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5S6m4Tf065892 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:48:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:48:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Incoming Mail List Message-Id: <200406280648.i5S6m4Tf065892@whoweb.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipfw help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:47:44 -0000 I'm having a problem with the logic of ipfw-2 on 5.2.1. I have a 4 port NIC (de0, de1, de2, de3) and separate networks on each port. All routing is working fine and trying to work with dynamic rules but not getting the results I'm expecting. For simplicity, I am only working with two of the ports to keep the ruleset reasonable. de1 - 192.168.1.0 network de3 - 192.168.3.0 network I have the following ruleset: 01600 skipto 4000 ip from any to any via de1 01800 skipto 8000 ip from any to any via de3 04000 deny ip from any to 192.168.1.1 dst-port 80 04100 allow ip from any to any in via de1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 06:55:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F63C16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:55:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 101A943D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:55:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 68246 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 06:55:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 06:55:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 55533 invoked by uid 1008); 28 Jun 2004 06:55:21 -0000 Received: from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.78):. Processed in 0.020075 secs); 28 Jun 2004 06:55:21 -0000 Received: from smtp3.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.78) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 06:55:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 1152 invoked by uid 514); 28 Jun 2004 06:55:20 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp3.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 06:55:20 -0000 (Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:40:20 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: Gautam Gopalakrishnan Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:40:15 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200406271222.37774.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> <200406271502.57057.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406281240.15100.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp3.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:55:41 -0000 I have put following content in my fetchmailrc. poll pop.wlink.com.np localdomains wlink.com.np: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0protocol pop3 user bikrant with pass xxx to = samit xyz test=20 bikrant here Now it is working fine :) regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 19:45, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:57 +0545, Bikrant Neupane > > wrote: > > Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( > > Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. > > > > This is the one added by fetchmail > > > > Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] > > by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) > > for root@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +05= 45 > > (NPT) > > Hello! Would you mind posting your .fetchmailrc here? > I think it should have a "user1 there is user2 here" clause. > > poll server.host with proto POP3 > user 'remoteuser' there is 'localuser' here options flush fetchall > ssl > > So mail for remoteuser gets delivered to localuser. > > Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 07:18:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871E416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:18:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2253C43D49 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:18:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 25408494 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:04:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:18:42 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: a quick mailing list question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:18:59 -0000 I've been going though transfering all the freebsd mailing lists I've subscribe to over to one account... the small problem I ran into is this, I can send emails from this new account fine, but for some reason if I send something to a list, it does not appear to show up... I niether recieve it nor does it show up in the archive... I noticed this when I tried to send out a email regarding drawing tablets and suggestions, but I can't verify it ever working... this was cross posted to hardware and x11 due to it's nature... was cross posting something like that uber stupid to do and resulting in me being blackholed or the like? any ideas on what is happening? -VV From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 07:30:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4D316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:30:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.r.caley.org.uk (82-41-211-19.cable.ubr12.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.211.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEC143D55 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:30:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (pele.r.caley.org.uk [10.0.0.12]) by mail.r.caley.org.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i5S7Ud32064571; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:30:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@caley.org.uk) Received: from pele.r.caley.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5S7UcFm047303; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:30:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) Received: (from rjc@localhost) by pele.r.caley.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i5S7Ubu3047300; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:30:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: pele.r.caley.org.uk: rjc set sender to rjc@bast.r.caley.org.uk using -f Sender: rjc@caley.org.uk To: Kai Grossjohann References: <4B3F673172B98D449EBCC3BE8316F52403BA1722@exch4.elcsb.net> <86d63mm27u.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> From: Richard Caley In-Reply-To: <86d63mm27u.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> Date: 28 Jun 2004 08:30:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87659c9m1u.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Devil Mascot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:30:50 -0000 In article <86d63mm27u.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net>, Kai Grossjohann (kg) writes: kg> Software is written for users, isn't it? >From observation I would say that most software is written against users. As for FBSD, I hope it is being written for the enjoyment of those writing it, since that is the best insurance that it will keep being written. -- Mail me as MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk _O_ |< From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 08:16:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AFD16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com (mailout11.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F11743D31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hhasenbe@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de) Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BerI5-0007NO-03; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:15:01 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (Eq54osZfge2uLoAsrvF0Dq9XxQZ7pJH51gDhlSYMNMo3IracNlCcQJ@[80.130.187.52]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1BerHk-0DUUm80; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:14:40 +0200 Message-ID: <40DFD3BF.1010201@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:15:59 +0200 From: Hendrik Hasenbein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <89ceee7040625133146d9107@mail.gmail.com> <20040625171145.5ec77dd9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200406251417.50927.kstewart@owt.com> <89ceee704062514266e03d1bb@mail.gmail.com> <20040625175427.5394ccbe.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040625175427.5394ccbe.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: Eq54osZfge2uLoAsrvF0Dq9XxQZ7pJH51gDhlSYMNMo3IracNlCcQJ@t-dialin.net cc: Dan Finn cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't mount 300G USB drive that's FAT32 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:11 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > Dan Finn wrote: > > >>FAT32 wasn't my choice. They needed to be writen to by a linux server >>but they want to be able to take these and just plug them into a >>windows server if need be. We knew that linux writing ntfs wasn't a >>good choice so we decided on FAT32. Is there a better solution? > > > Unfortunately, none that I know of. If you want to maintain Windows > support, you're pretty much stuck with either NTFS or FAT, as Windows > is pretty stupid and doesn't understand many filesystems. There was a windows driver for ufs, but I don't know if it has been ported to newer windows versions. Perhaps google can help. > Otherwise, you could use UFS or ext2, which work on both FreeBSD and > Linux. > > >>On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:17:50 -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: >> >>> >>>On Friday 25 June 2004 02:11 pm, Bill Moran wrote: >>> >>>>[I copied Tom on this because I know he was working on FAT filesystem >>>>code at some point ... Don't know if he's still trying to do anything >>>>there or not.] >>>> >>>>Dan Finn wrote: >>>> >>>>>the system sees the disk: >>>>>Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie kernel: umass0: Maxtor OneTouch, rev >>>>>2.00/2.00, addr 2 Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie kernel: umass0: Get Max >>>>>Lun not supported (STALLED) Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: GEOM: >>>>>create disk da0 dp=0xc2d85050 Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: da0 at >>>>>umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: da0: >>>>> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device >>>>>Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: da0: 1.000MB/s transfers >>>>>Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: da0: 286103MB (585938944 512 byte >>>>>sectors: 255H 63S/T 36473C) >>>>> >>>>>this is a Maxtor 300G USB drive. A backup was written to it via a >>>>>linux 2.4 server and now I would like to mount it on my FBSD laptop >>>>>to read it and work with the files. >>>>> >>>>>When trying to mount it using mount_msdos I get the following: >>>>>[ root @ stewie : ~] : mount_msdosfs -o rw /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usb1/ >>>>>mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0s1: Invalid argument >>>>> >>>>>and in /var/log/messages I get the following: >>>>>Jun 24 15:43:52 stewie kernel: mountmsdosfs(): disk too big, sorry >>>> >>>>The source tells the story: >>>>>From msdosfs_vfsops.c >>>> >>>>... >>>>/* >>>> * We cannot deal currently with this size of disk >>>> * due to fileid limitations (see msdosfs_getattr and >>>> * msdosfs_readdir) >>>> */ >>>>... >>>> >>>>This section of code exists even in -CURRENT, so it has not >>>>yet been improved in FreeBSD. >>>> >>>> >>>>>when trying to use ntfs to mount it I get : >>>>>[ root @ stewie : ~] : mount_ntfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usb1/ >>>>>mount_ntfs: /dev/da0s1: Invalid argument >>>>>and nothing in any log file. >>>> >>>>Don't know what's going on there. >>>> >>>> >>>>>One of the taks I need to accomplish here is to copy all of the >>>>>data on this 300G USB drive onto an identical 300G USB drive. I >>>>>was going to mount both and just copy from one to the other. After >>>>>reading about the limited writing capabilities in the man page of >>>>>mount_ntfs I'm wondering if I would be better off doing this on a >>>>>linux box. If you just need to copy the identical drives, you could ignore the filesystem and make a raw copy. >>>>If you ask me, you'd be better off using UFS, which doesn't have any >>>>of the weirdnesses or limitations of FAT _or_ NTFS. >>>> >>>> >>>>>The >>>>>linux box that created the origional backup onto the USB drive had >>>>>no problem creating the Fat32 filesystem and writing to it. >>>> >>>>Horay for Linux. >>>> >>>>If you really need to put FAT filesystems on these drives, you're not >>>>going to be able to use FreeBSD until the limitation is fixed. >>> >>>The other thing is that the cluster size must be huge. Fat32 was >>>supposed to start being inefficient around 8GB and this is well beyond >>>that :). >>> >>>Kent >>> >>> >>>>You should file a PR on this ... it doesn't appear as if one is >>>>currently open that addresses this issue: >>>>http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html >>> >>>-- >>>Kent Stewart >>>Richland, WA >>> >>>http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hendrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 08:43:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649E316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:43:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web11603.mail.yahoo.com (web11603.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4771143D5A for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brycemott@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628084310.99973.qmail@web11603.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.63.36.100] by web11603.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:43:10 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:43:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Bryce To: Freebsd questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: ISP Connection problem - ADSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:43:42 -0000 Hi, Im a freeBSD newbie & have been struggling for some time to get my adsl connection working on Freebsd 5.2.1 Release. I've tried many suggested configurations for /etc/ppp/ppp.conf, and /etc/rc.conf & read relevant chapters from 'Complete FreeBSD' & the handbook, but my connection still dies before reaching the LCP phase. Im using an Alcatel Speedtouch 530 Modem connected to Ethernet. My ADSL connection is fine in Windoze however the configuration for the modem is usually set through a web-browser. Do the modem settings(done via browser) affect the connection in FBSD or does the system simply take the settings from ppp.conf etc? Im somewhat confused on this point. I can ping the modem at 10.0.0.138 and can open the web interface in X. The log reads: Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: bundle: Establish Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: List of netgraph node ``sis0:'' (id 1) hooks: Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Found orphans -> ethernet Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Connecting netgraph socket .:tun1 -> [3]::tun1 Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Sending PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun1 Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Found the following interfaces: Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index 1, name "sis0" Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index 2, name "lp0" Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index 3, name "lo0" Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index 4, name "tun0" Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index 5, name "tun1" Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Connected! Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: opening -> dial Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Waiting for carrier Jun 25 20:00:30 brycepc last message repeated 4 times Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: carrier -> hangup Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: deflink: Close Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out Any help is greatly appreciated I really would like to end my reliance on M$ and get going with BSD :) Bryce __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 08:49:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8039516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:49:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av2-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av2-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F8D43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:49:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omicron@krokk.org) Received: by av2-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CC97D37E98; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:48:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.178]) by av2-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD0937E4C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:48:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.7.62] (ip50.karlssonspools.com [195.198.187.50]) by smtp1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A793F38006 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:48:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40DFDB98.8090303@krokk.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:49:28 +0200 From: Erik Mossberg User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Error in mjpegtools compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:49:18 -0000 Hello, When I try to build mjpegtools 1.6.2 from ports, compile fails with this error: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -I/usr/local/include -D_THREAD_SAFE -mcpu=i686 -march=i386 -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math -march=pentium4 -pthread -Wall -Wunused -MT quantize_x86.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/quantize_x86.Tpo -c quantize_x86.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/quantize_x86.o {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:67: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movd' {standard input}:69: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movd' {standard input}:77: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movd' {standard input}:223: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movd' {standard input}:225: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movd' {standard input}:233: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movd' gmake[2]: *** [quantize_x86.lo] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/mjpegtools/work/mjpegtools-1.6.2/mpeg2enc' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/mjpegtools/work/mjpegtools-1.6.2' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/mjpegtools. My make.conf looks like this: CPUTYPE=p4 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math And i'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8, gcc 3.3.3 I think. Any idea how to go get this working? Sincerely, Erik P.S. I'm not a subscriber of this list, so please CC me in reply. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 09:04:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880CD16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:04:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shockwave.systems.pipex.net (shockwave.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A142E43D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@irrelevant.com) Received: from albert.mosthosts.net (81-86-155-6.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.155.6]) by shockwave.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329681C00361 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:04:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from angua.irrelevant.com (dhcp88.internal.irrelevant.com [192.168.0.88]) by albert.mosthosts.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A9335 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:21:47 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.0.20040628095928.03a88e48@albert> X-Sender: irrelevant1@albert X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:08:23 +0100 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Rob Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: help please? corrupted hard disc - invalid super block. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:04:18 -0000 Hi! I have a hard disc that I think must have been set up wrong initially... It was however working fine, but at some point filled up to capacity, wherapon the next reboot it failed to mount. System is 4.8-RELEASE, Generic Kernel. Currently the disc shows: luggage# mount -r /dev/ad5s1e /mnt mount: /dev/ad5s1e on /mnt: incorrect super block luggage# disklabel -r ad5 # /dev/ad5c: type: ESDI disk: ad5s1 label: flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 14593 sectors/unit: 234441585 rpm: 3600 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 234436482 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 14592*) e: 234436482 0 4.2BSD 16384 16384 300 # (Cyl. 0 - 14592*) Warning, partition c doesn't cover the whole unit! Warning, An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities luggage# fsck /dev/ad5s1e Can't open /dev/ad5s1e: Invalid argument luggage# fsck -b 32 /dev/ad5s1e Alternate super block location: 32 Can't open /dev/ad5s1e: Invalid argument luggage# file -s /dev/ad5s1e /dev/ad5s1e: can't read `/dev/ad5s1e' (Invalid argument). At this point I am stuck ... most of the "Invalid Super Block" messages I can find when searching relate to cd-roms. If I could mount the disc even read-only, I could copy the data off. Can anybody give me any clues on where to go from here? Thanks in advance, Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 09:12:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7F816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:12:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD6C43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andyh@hhbb.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.25] (hedgie1.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.95.107]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297B8256D2E for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:11:47 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <42E7ADCA-C8E3-11D8-B6B4-000D93511A6A@hhbb.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Andy Holyer Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:12:21 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: m0n0BSD: IPSec configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:12:20 -0000 I'm playing with m0n0BSD on Soekris boards, FreeBSD Stable 4.10. I need to get an IPSec tunnel up to allow us to connect to legacy systems which use IPSec connection (and which we can't do much with. The various web resources seem confusing on this - different pages mention different interfaces, and on m0n0BSD I'm limited to the tools which were installed at burn time. m0n0wall provides IPSec, so this must be a routine operation. I just need to work out exactly what incantation I need to use. Thanks in advance for any advice. --- Andy Holyer, Technical stuff Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB 08451 260895 x 241 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 11:09:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6A816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:09:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.ineos.ac.ru (alpha.ineos.ac.ru [193.233.4.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053FA43D49 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pr0vider@ineos.ac.ru) Received: from ws1 (ws1.ineos.ac.ru [193.233.4.3]) by alpha.ineos.ac.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/1) with SMTP id i5SB8tJV090427 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:08:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from pr0vider@ineos.ac.ru) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.31a, engine: 4.31b, virus records: 51236, updated: 22.06.2004] Message-ID: <007401c45d00$40fbbf40$0304e9c1@ws1> From: "pr0vider" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:08:33 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1193 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: FreeBSD 4.10r Installation trouble on Intel ICH-5R system. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:09:15 -0000 Hello! I've tried to install FreeBSD 4.10 on Supermicro P4SCE System with 2 = SATA HDD's on onboard Intel's ICH-5R SATA RAID Controller. There is a = trouble with HDD detection if ICH set to RAID mode. In IDE mode - there = are no problems and Hdd's correctly detected as /dev/ad4 and dev/ad6. = The question is: are there any ways to use FreeBSD on such configuraion = with RAID 1 mode. Thankx for your answers! P.S. I've tried 5.2.1r - but in RAID mode even Bootloader traps to debug = screen and there is no boot at all. SY, Ivan A. Godovikov aka pr0vider System Administrator, INEOS RAS Vavilova str. 28, MSK, RU. Ph: 135-9331 Fax: 135-5174 Cell: 8-501-430-5706 e-mail: pr0vider@ineos.ac.ru ICQ: 261582833 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 11:40:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A7816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smoke.cigartower.hu (smoke.cigartower.hu [195.228.229.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707E843D45 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artifex@freemail.hu) Received: from [192.168.2.8] (wrk-macx-stan.hamuesgyemant.hu [192.168.2.8]) i5SBdlUZ077684 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:39:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from artifex@freemail.hu) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: artifex Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:39:46 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:40:05 -0000 >>>> Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue >>>> files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. >>> .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to >>> convert >>> them to a standard ISO image. >> Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 >> world), >> and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. > What international standard describes their format? > Windows is not a standard. Where are the international standard that describe the ISO file (not the filesystem!) format? How do you convert music disc image to iso format? BTW, the non-standard cdrdao do the job fine. bye, artifex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 12:47:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DB516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:47:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (shadow2.eagle.ca [209.167.16.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D69343D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:47:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 4814 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Jun 2004 12:47:25 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by smtp.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.027428 secs); 28 Jun 2004 12:47:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 12:47:25 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca) by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:47:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3609.209.167.16.15.1088426845.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040627230116.GA18229@tao.thought.org> References: <20040627230116.GA18229@tao.thought.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:47:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Gary Kline" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what types of network cards work with thinkpads? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:47:57 -0000 > Well, I'm seeing some promising thinkpads over on ebay. > Some with "10/100 netword card", most without. Cann nybody > clue me in on what types of laptop NICs work with FBSD? My TP R30 has an Intel NIC, picked up by FreeBSD with the fxp driver. Never had any problems... Steve > > thanks muchly, > > gary > > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service > Unix > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 12:54:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B687416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:54:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net (post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB9343D31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:54:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from [82.161.131.177] (helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1Beveg-000C8Z-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:54:38 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:52:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRdDtG/TgUljzLRRneSXcNPZyJjsQ== Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: calculating/timing dump/restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:54:58 -0000 Hi all, I would like to time a dump/restore operation without actually sitting next to my box with a stopwatch. Specifically restore as dump already indicates the time it took. Can anybody help me out here? Thanks, Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:02:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12DF16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:02:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skutsje.san.webweaving.org (skutsje.san.webweaving.org [209.132.96.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CF043D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:02:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Received: from skutsje.san.webweaving.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5SCrEwT003981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:53:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Received: from localhost (dirkx@localhost)i5SCrEL2003978; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:53:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) X-Authentication-Warning: skutsje.san.webweaving.org: dirkx owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik X-X-Sender: dirkx@skutsje.san.webweaving.org To: Stephan van Beerschoten In-Reply-To: <40DF3FBF.8060400@whacky.net> Message-ID: <20040628055242.E3532@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> References: <40DF3FBF.8060400@whacky.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient with reconfigured SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:02:50 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Stephan van Beerschoten wrote: > Why idea how I can preconfigure an SSID for dhclient ? Just use ifconfig wi0 ssid FOO to lock it. Dw. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:07:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884AB16A4F5 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:07:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F4143D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:07:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i5SD5dM10940; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:05:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200406281305.i5SD5dM10940@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: kline@thought.org (Gary Kline) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:05:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040627230116.GA18229@tao.thought.org> from "Gary Kline" at Jun 27, 2004 04:01:17 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: what types of network cards work with thinkpads? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:07:50 -0000 > > > Well, I'm seeing some promising thinkpads over on ebay. > Some with "10/100 netword card", most without. Cann nybody > clue me in on what types of laptop NICs work with FBSD? Go to: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/hardware-i386.html for V 4.10 on i386 or: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware.html for 5.2.1 on i386 Basically, just go to the FreeBSD web page, pick your version and look it up. ////jerry > > thanks muchly, > > gary > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:19:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7310A16A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:19:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CBF43D4C; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (3ecxeq5m@mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SDJAu517796296; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:10 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:10 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Rob In-Reply-To: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <20040628171820.S36116@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1723781643-1088428750=:36116" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:19:20 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1723781643-1088428750=:36116 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, 12:39+0900, Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > By accident I happen to come across this remarkable limit of > uptime registration for FreeBSD systems. After 497 days, the > timer jumps to zero again. > > 497 days is less than a 1.5 years ! > > Has this been fixed in newer versions of FreeBSD (stable and/or > current) ? Or is there a hardware limitation (CPU?) that does > not allow this? > > Just wondering. $ uptime 5:18ÐÐ up 498 days, 6:13, 5 users, load averages: 0.07, 0.03, 0.06 $ uname -r 4.4-RELEASE -- Maxim Konovalov --0-1723781643-1088428750=:36116-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:22:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEF816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:22:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (hostmansion10.hostmansion.com [216.158.144.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1D943D41 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:22:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@hostmansion.com) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostmansion.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4758F11C021 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 194.39.131.39 (SquirrelMail authenticated user peter@hostmansion.com); by hostmansion10.primenetwork.net with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38256.194.39.131.39.1088401582.squirrel@194.39.131.39> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:46:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "Peter Zyumbilev" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: firewall for web server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:22:39 -0000 Hello, Do you know some good tutorial for bulding firewall for FreeBSD as web server. I found a lot of tutorials but for FreeBSD as router. Some commented premade script with comments will also do the job. I was plannding to use APF, but I am afarid to install it on FreeBSD without good tutorial. Please advise. Best regards, Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:29:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EB116A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:29:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A64543D4C; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SDTIOF003388; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:29:18 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i5SDTI1n003387; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:29:18 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:29:18 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Kenneth Culver Message-ID: <20040628132918.GB1325@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Michal Pasternak cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:29:20 -0000 --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: > So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running > processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop, > my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter... Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power even without the low-power models. We're seeing 1U dual Opteron boxes running at less then 100F under load. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA4B0sXY6L6fI4GtQRAi24AJ4jwoB6Z8F/Y77li5CxNW6KRrUYAQCgod71 L5Lmk9eWILBJ5UzyUz1i9+A= =Ausl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:36:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A323F16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:36:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp05.web.de (smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE8643D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:36:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from platanthera@web.de) Received: from [217.85.228.220] (helo=liza.hacienda.herti) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.101 #38) id 1BewJ2-0008Ci-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:36:22 +0200 From: platanthera To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, arden Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:37:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1088274850.2356.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1088274850.2356.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281537.03292.platanthera@web.de> Sender: platanthera@web.de Subject: Re: voodoo 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:36:27 -0000 On Saturday 26 June 2004 20:34, arden wrote: > hi all > > I've been trying to re-use some old pcs i have kicking around i > really amazed at how much you can do with a k6/2 400 if you tweak it > right > > > one of these pcs has an 16 meg voodoo 2 card is it possible to use > the 3d functions of this card in bsd ? > > been looking around without much luck > > arden hi arden, looks like there's no dri support for voodoo2 see http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/3dfx don't know if it's possible to get glide2 working.. years ago i used a voodoo3 card + linux-2.2.x + XFree-3.x + glide2 to play terminus best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:38:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229A016A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:38:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E23CA43D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:38:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id u22so334487cwc for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.88.78 with SMTP id l78mr76885rnb; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:38:31 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Dancho Penev , FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <20040628115742.GA677@earth.dpsca.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040626171145.GB900@freebsd.vmware.dpsca.bg> <20040628115742.GA677@earth.dpsca.bg> Subject: Re: Unable to boot FreeBSD (dual-boot) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:38:35 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:57:42 +0300, Dancho Penev wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:25:24AM +1000, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > >> For label use /boot/boot file, /boot/boot0 is for mbr. > >> > >> > > >> >/hd is the temporary directory I created to mount /dev/ad0s2a, > >> >so I guess my slice is still ok. > > > >Does not help! I even tried "disklabel -B /dev/ad0s2" because a > >diff between /hd/boot/boot and /boot/boot on the fixit yielded > >nothing. > > > ># disklabel /dev/ad0s2 > >lists the various partitions properly. > > > >I do have an MBR because I get a boot menu. Just can't get the > >MBR to talk to boot1 and boot2... > > If you can remember what were you did to broke configuration it will be > very helpful. At this point I can't say anything else. Sorry. I think I did "boot0cfg -B /dev/ad0s2" or maybe ad0 instead. Wish I could remember what I did exactly. Don't even remember why I did it. Was that helpful? :-) Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:46:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1C616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:46:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (shadow2.eagle.ca [209.167.16.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4471243D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:46:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Jun 2004 13:45:29 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by smtp.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.872585 secs); 28 Jun 2004 13:45:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 13:45:28 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca) by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3678.209.167.16.15.1088430328.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040628084310.99973.qmail@web11603.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040628084310.99973.qmail@web11603.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:45:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Bryce" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: Freebsd questions Subject: Re: ISP Connection problem - ADSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:46:26 -0000 > Im using an Alcatel Speedtouch 530 Modem connected to > Ethernet. My ADSL connection is fine in Windoze > however the configuration for the modem is usually set > through a web-browser. Do the modem settings(done via > browser) affect the connection in FBSD or does the > system simply take the settings from ppp.conf etc? Im > somewhat confused on this point. I can ping the modem > at 10.0.0.138 and can open the web interface in X. Do you have this modem set up to do the PPPoE dialing for you? In Windows, do you have to use any software to connect, or is the connection made automatically. It appears you have your modem set up in routing mode, which means the modem most likely does the authentication to your ISP for you. I have a strong suspicion that you do not even need to use ppp on the FreeBSD box. If your modem contains the login info for the ISP, just set up your /etc/rc.conf file with the following: ifconfig_nic="DHCP" and then run: # /etc/netstart You *should* get your info from the router (modem) and should be up and surfing. If that doesn't work, provide more info on your setup, including the output of 'ipconfig' on the windows machine. Steve > > The log reads: > > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: bundle: > Establish > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: closed -> opening > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: List of > netgraph node ``sis0:'' (id 1) hooks: > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Found > orphans -> ethernet > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: > Connecting netgraph socket .:tun1 -> [3]::tun1 > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Sending > PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun1 > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Found > the following interfaces: > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index > 1, name "sis0" > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index > 2, name "lp0" > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index > 3, name "lo0" > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index > 4, name "tun0" > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Index > 5, name "tun1" > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: Connected! > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: opening -> dial > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Chat: deflink: > Dial attempt 1 of 1 > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: dial -> carrier > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: Waiting > for carrier > Jun 25 20:00:30 brycepc last message repeated 4 times > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: Disconnected! > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: carrier -> hangup > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: > deflink: Close > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets > out > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: > deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out > > Any help is greatly appreciated I really would like to > end my reliance on M$ and get going with BSD :) > > Bryce > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:47:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C82516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C4ED43D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 11332 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 12:44:12 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 12:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 48411 invoked by uid 555); 28 Jun 2004 13:47:06 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.188) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088430425-48343 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 17:47:05 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED741395; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:46:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:46:39 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Iain Dooley Message-ID: <20040628134639.GA5699@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Iain Dooley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: /Ariya/Day_jaru cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:14 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 06:05:40AM +0500, Iain Dooley probably wrote: > thanks all for your suggestions. i'll refrain from running the portupgrad= e=20 > on KDE whilst KDE is running. >=20 > as for the patch procedures you guys suggested, i'm actually looking for = a=20 > way to do it without using the ports system at all. the problem is that= =20 > kdebase takes so long to build, and as we have already discussed i can't= =20 > run it whilst running KDE, and it's a rare occassion that i can afford to= =20 > be without my PC for that long, and there is no individual port for Kate. Just a minute. You shouldn't portupgrade KDE when KDE is running, but you should be able to run `make' to build everything while KDE is running, shut down KDE and `portupgrade -w' afterwards (which will use the binaries built by `make' and install them, taking seriously less time than the original `make') and restart KDE. At least that's how it would with an ordinary port. So if your only problem is that you can't use the thing without KDE, then this approach should solve the problem (use nice(1) to change the make's priority so that the box is really usable). > the patch i've received is about 10 lines of code and the problem that it= =20 > solves is _extremely_ minor, so if there is no way to rebuild Kate withou= t=20 > rebuilding all of KDEBase, then i probably won't bother :-) >=20 HTH anyway, --=20 DoubleF If you want to know what god thinks of money, just look at the people he gave it to. -- Dorothy Parker --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4CE9wo7hT/9lVdwRAnszAJ4jdSCKYv23Q4myy3IJ4iiWYcce7QCeKHFw FHmr1XuLVVHv5VcUCJve6gk= =8cEK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:47:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93FD16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D8443D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr) Received: from localhost.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27A73658D7 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.esiee.fr (VaMailArmor-2.0.1.16) id 55290-0612DBA1; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:47:00 +0200 Received: from [147.215.1.13] (desolation.esiee.fr [147.215.1.13]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656F93658D1 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E02154.2070805@bart.esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:47:00 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr-FR; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.16; VAE: 6.26.0.3; VDF: 6.26.0.7; host: mail.esiee.fr) Subject: Compaq EVO wont boot at 5.2.1 CDROM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: f.bonnet@esiee.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:18 -0000 Hi I am unable to install the 5.2.1 on a Compaq EVO When I bootup with the CDROM it starts then crash with some various hexadec characters then the following message BTX halted thanks for any infos -- Cordialement, Frank Bonnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:47:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA2416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (hostmansion10.hostmansion.com [216.158.144.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD6C43D31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@hostmansion.com) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostmansion.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16F611C021 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 194.39.131.39 (SquirrelMail authenticated user peter@hostmansion.com); by hostmansion10.primenetwork.net with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48864.194.39.131.39.1088403058.squirrel@194.39.131.39> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:10:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Peter Zyumbilev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: firewall for web server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:47:21 -0000 Hello, Do you know some good tutorial for bulding firewall for FreeBSD as web server. I found a lot of tutorials but for FreeBSD as router. Some commented premade script with comments will also do the job. I was plannding to use APF, but I am afarid to install it on FreeBSD without good tutorial. Please advise. Best regards, Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:01:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91B516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:01:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp07.web.de (smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A8143D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from platanthera@web.de) Received: from [217.85.228.220] (helo=liza.hacienda.herti) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.101 #38) id 1BewhA-0006tU-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:17 +0200 From: platanthera To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Javier Ramirez Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1088383925.1253.8.camel@darkstar.example.net> In-Reply-To: <1088383925.1253.8.camel@darkstar.example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406281601.55958.platanthera@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: platanthera@web.de Subject: Re: mc and kde 3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:01:18 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 02:55, Javier Ramirez wrote: > Hi > I have a question, > why freebsd 5.2.1 don't have mc ? > and how adapt kde 3.2 to my freebsd 5.2.1 ? > > regards > Javier Ramirez hi Javier, mc and kde3 are in the ports collection. see chapter 4 of the handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html) for help on how to install applications and section 5.7.2 about kde (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11-wm.html). best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:06:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E87C16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:06:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2D543D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:06:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596B669A39; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:06:39 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Mark Terribile Message-Id: <20040628100639.1540cef2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:06:42 -0000 Mark Terribile wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem with spontaneous restarts. This isn't a new problem, > but I've done the obvious things and the problem hasn't gone away. I > was thinking of asking on -hackers, but I'm trying here first. > > The system is a 4.8 with a mix of patches and port upgrades of various > ages. I'm planning to rebuild the whole thing, bringing it up to date, > but I'm hoping to be able to wait for a 5.x in STABLE; I don't want to do > this twice, since I expect I'll have to dump and restore everything. > > The hardware is a 2.6 GHz P4 with 2 GByte of GEIL dual-channel memory. > (The problem existed on the previous, somewhat slower, memory as well.) > The box contains the processor and motherboard (Gigabyte GA-SINXP1394), > two floppy drives, CD and CD/W drives, an HP DAT, three IBM/Hitachi > 36G/10K SCSI drives, and one 120G IDE. The SCSI card is by Adaptec; the > video card is a low-end NVidia, and I'm running their video driver. The > PS is an Antec True380, which should be enough for the box, with something > to spare. There are several extra, large fans, of which more later. > > The system, monitor, printer, and cable modem are all powered through an > APC BACK-UPS 450, about 18 months old. It's shown in the last week that > it can keep things up for more than an hour. > > The symptom is a restart that leaves no indication of how it happened. > > Recently, the system shut down (completely, and at the power supply) > instead of restarting. In that case, the last deliberate shutdown > was a `shutdown -h now'; it appears that in every other case, the last > deliberate shutdown was a `-r now'. (Question: does the machine > architecture have settings for reset-resume .vs. reset-halt, settings > that might be remembered when a later action occurs?) It has > subsequently shut down with an immediate restart. > > There are no failure indications in the /var/log/messages, nor reported > by dmesg. (The console scrolls by very quickly.) The message sequence > over the restart typically looks like this: > > ======================================================================= > Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from 00:05:00:e7:17:44 > t > o 00:05:00:e7:17:57 on em0 > Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from 00:05:00:e7:17:57 > t > o 00:05:00:e7:17:44 on em0 > Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Network Number: 24.228.64.0 > Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Broadcast Address: 255.255.255.255 > Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. > Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, > 198 > 9, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > ======================================================================== > > The restart most often occurs AFTER X has been shut down (and often > restarted) but sometimes when X has not been run. It most often occurs > when the system is under heavy CPU load, but sometimes when the load > has been light. > > I thought at one time it might be a thermal problem and undertook to > fix that. (I am still working to get more cooling air over the disks.) > Right now, I have 120 mm fans rated at 130-135 CFM (Panaflow and JMC) > pushing air in and out of the box, and pressurizing a duct feeding the > CPU cooler, which is now cool to the touch. The memory modules are cool > to the touch. While the disks need a proper plenum to route more air > over them, I no longer believe that there is a thermal problem. The > vid card's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch; the > northbridge's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch. > > (Some people commute to white-collar jobs in heavy pickups; I drive a > small server as my PC. No chrome pipes.) > > So: what should I do next? Should I set the system up to go to the > kernel debugger on panic, or even start it via the kernel debugger? > (Where is the full documentation?) Should I shell out for an even > bigger power supply? Is there another log that I should examine? > A restart wire that I should check? A power bus I should scope? > (I'll have to borrow a scope somewhere.) Is it time for an exorcist? I would look at the hardware, but not arbitrarily. Try running programs like memtest86 and cpuburn for extended periods of time to see if they trigger the reboot. The randomness of the problem seems to suggest a hardware problem. You may want to hire the exorcist ... hardware problems can be a PITA to track down. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:09:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B229716A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:09:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D34143D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:09:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BewpF-0007WF-A7; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:09:37 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406280910.41702.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4beed95f5b50af68531b241b0b20b70a5d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 Subject: Re: status of porting pf and spamd from OpenBSD to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:09:37 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 01:36 am, Jay Moore wrote: > I heard some time ago that work was going on to port pf (and spamd, I > think) from OpenBSD to FreeBSD. I also recently saw an announcement > on the FreeBSD home page that Daniel Hartmeier had joined the FreeBSD > team as a committer - a further indication that this work is > underway. > > I'm just curious to know the status of this effort, and any specifics > on how or when this will be done. > > Thanks, > Jay You can lookup ports here: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html I searched for 'pf' and found this among the results: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/security/pf/pkg-descr Is this what you're looking for? Best regards, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:12:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628BE16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:12:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0057D43D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:12:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bews4-0006wP-7B; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:12:32 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: Mark Terribile , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088431923.10080.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:12:03 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:12:38 -0000 On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 19:44, Mark Terribile wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem with spontaneous restarts. This isn't a new problem, > but I've done the obvious things and the problem hasn't gone away. I > was thinking of asking on -hackers, but I'm trying here first. > > The system is a 4.8 with a mix of patches and port upgrades of various > ages. I'm planning to rebuild the whole thing, bringing it up to date, > but I'm hoping to be able to wait for a 5.x in STABLE; I don't want to do > this twice, since I expect I'll have to dump and restore everything. > > The hardware is a 2.6 GHz P4 with 2 GByte of GEIL dual-channel memory. > (The problem existed on the previous, somewhat slower, memory as well.) > The box contains the processor and motherboard (Gigabyte GA-SINXP1394), > two floppy drives, CD and CD/W drives, an HP DAT, three IBM/Hitachi > 36G/10K SCSI drives, and one 120G IDE. The SCSI card is by Adaptec; the > video card is a low-end NVidia, and I'm running their video driver. The > PS is an Antec True380, which should be enough for the box, with something > to spare. There are several extra, large fans, of which more later. > > The system, monitor, printer, and cable modem are all powered through an > APC BACK-UPS 450, about 18 months old. It's shown in the last week that > it can keep things up for more than an hour. > > The symptom is a restart that leaves no indication of how it happened. > > Recently, the system shut down (completely, and at the power supply) > instead of restarting. In that case, the last deliberate shutdown > was a `shutdown -h now'; it appears that in every other case, the last > deliberate shutdown was a `-r now'. (Question: does the machine > architecture have settings for reset-resume .vs. reset-halt, settings > that might be remembered when a later action occurs?) It has > subsequently shut down with an immediate restart. > > There are no failure indications in the /var/log/messages, nor reported > by dmesg. (The console scrolls by very quickly.) The message sequence > over the restart typically looks like this: > > ======================================================================= > Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from 00:05:00:e7:17:44 > t > o 00:05:00:e7:17:57 on em0 > Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from 00:05:00:e7:17:57 > t > o 00:05:00:e7:17:44 on em0 > Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Network Number: 24.228.64.0 > Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Broadcast Address: 255.255.255.255 > Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. > Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, > 198 > 9, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > ======================================================================== > > The restart most often occurs AFTER X has been shut down (and often > restarted) but sometimes when X has not been run. It most often occurs > when the system is under heavy CPU load, but sometimes when the load > has been light. > > I thought at one time it might be a thermal problem and undertook to > fix that. (I am still working to get more cooling air over the disks.) > Right now, I have 120 mm fans rated at 130-135 CFM (Panaflow and JMC) > pushing air in and out of the box, and pressurizing a duct feeding the > CPU cooler, which is now cool to the touch. The memory modules are cool > to the touch. While the disks need a proper plenum to route more air > over them, I no longer believe that there is a thermal problem. The > vid card's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch; the > northbridge's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch. > > (Some people commute to white-collar jobs in heavy pickups; I drive a > small server as my PC. No chrome pipes.) > > So: what should I do next? Should I set the system up to go to the > kernel debugger on panic, or even start it via the kernel debugger? > (Where is the full documentation?) Should I shell out for an even > bigger power supply? Is there another log that I should examine? > A restart wire that I should check? A power bus I should scope? > (I'll have to borrow a scope somewhere.) Is it time for an exorcist? > > Thanks for your help. > > Mark Terribile > > Mark In my opinion this is a thermal problem. I have seen this before in some of my systems. Mainly has to do witht he processors not cooling well enough. Try opening the cases up and leaving the the covers off for a temp solution. Are you over clocking? Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:19:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E52F16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:19:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bm.netm.net.ru (bm.netm.net.ru [213.148.26.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956B443D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:19:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bm@netmaster.ru) Received: from bm.netm.net.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bm.netm.net.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i5SEKcwL010545; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:20:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bm@netmaster.ru) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:20:38 +0400 From: Alexey Karguine To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl Message-Id: <20040628182038.5e284a52.bm@netmaster.ru> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: ISP Netmaster.ru X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: calculating/timing dump/restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:19:15 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:52:50 +0200 "Ruben Bloemgarten" wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to time a dump/restore operation without actually > sitting next to my box with a stopwatch. Specifically restore as > dump already indicates the time it took. Can anybody help me out here? You may use `time' command: # time dump -args /dev/something --bm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:31:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0FB16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:31:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bm.netm.net.ru (bm.netm.net.ru [213.148.26.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C1043D45 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:31:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bm@netmaster.ru) Received: from bm.netm.net.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bm.netm.net.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i5SEWjYu018625; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:32:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bm@netmaster.ru) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:32:45 +0400 From: Alexey Karguine To: f.bonnet@esiee.fr Message-Id: <20040628183245.10ae7089.bm@netmaster.ru> In-Reply-To: <40E02154.2070805@bart.esiee.fr> References: <40E02154.2070805@bart.esiee.fr> Organization: ISP Netmaster.ru X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr Subject: Re: Compaq EVO wont boot at 5.2.1 CDROM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:31:15 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:47:00 +0200 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > I am unable to install the 5.2.1 on a Compaq EVO > When I bootup with the CDROM it starts then crash > with some various hexadec characters then the following > message > BTX halted > thanks for any infos Try to turn off ACPI on the start of booting process. --bm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:31:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1490316A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:31:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B46A43D3F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:31:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5SEVF2n003051; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:31:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i5SEVFWo003050; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:31:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:31:15 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Maxim Konovalov Message-ID: <20040628143115.GA2643@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> <20040628171820.S36116@mp2.macomnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040628171820.S36116@mp2.macomnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Rob cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:31:17 -0000 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 05:19:10PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, 12:39+0900, Rob wrote: > > By accident I happen to come across this remarkable limit of > > uptime registration for FreeBSD systems. After 497 days, the > > timer jumps to zero again. > > > > 497 days is less than a 1.5 years ! > > > > Has this been fixed in newer versions of FreeBSD (stable and/or > > current) ? Or is there a hardware limitation (CPU?) that does > > not allow this? > > > > Just wondering. > > $ uptime > 5:18ÐÐ up 498 days, 6:13, 5 users, load averages: 0.07, 0.03, 0.06 > $ uname -r > 4.4-RELEASE % uptime 7:25AM up 932 days, 3:48, 1 user, load averages: 0.47, 0.30, 0.23 % uname -r 4.4-STABLE % That said, I'd love to know what limit it was you (original poster) saw. Maybe something has crept in between 4.4 and now? -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:35:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BE716A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCF243D53 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbrier@multideck.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-98-143-250.atl.client2.attbi.com[24.98.143.250]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004062814354401400l1rcqe>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:44 +0000 Message-ID: <40E02CF8.9030806@multideck.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:36:40 -0400 From: "Frederick N. Brier" Organization: Multideck Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40DFA6CA.2000702@multideck.com> In-Reply-To: <40DFA6CA.2000702@multideck.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sysinstall in a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:49 -0000 I do not know whether this is the proper way of doing it, but I mounted the CD using mount -v -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /usr/jail/myjail/dist Then I went back into the jail'ed environment, started up sysinstall, selected Configure/Media, choosing File System, specifying /dist, then selecting Packages, and it worked. Fred. Frederick N. Brier wrote: > I am running into a problem installing packages via sysinstall within > a jail using the CD media. I did a minimal install, but added the > /usr/src directory. I followed the directions to setup a jail and > copied /stand/sysinstall into the jail subdirectory. As per the > directions, I then started up the jail and ran sysinstall. But when I > attempt to install off of the cdrom media, I get the following error: > "Error mounting /dev/acdoc on /dist: Operation not permitted (1)". > Now it makes sense that a jail might not be allowed to mount a system > device. My confusion is that these were the instructions and I have > not seen any posts saying this is a problem. Is there a way to give > the jail permission to access the CD device? Should I mount the CD > from the host (outside the jail) but to a subdirectory the jail has > access to? Such as /usr/jail/myjail/dist? Versus /dist? Thank you > for any suggestions. > > Frederick N. Brier > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:38:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E5D16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:38:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7906843D4C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:38:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thakur.d@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so2199174cwc for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.61 with SMTP id w61mr569378cwb; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <934564a2040628073879d651e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:38:53 -0700 From: David Thakur To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: calculating/timing dump/restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:38:57 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:52:50 +0200, Ruben Bloemgarten wrote: Try 'man time'. Works like this: 'time command'. David > > Hi all, > > I would like to time a dump/restore operation without actually > > sitting next to my box with a stopwatch. Specifically restore as > > dump already indicates the time it took. Can anybody help me out here? > > Thanks, > > Ruben > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:50:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6087316A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECA243D31; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1])i5SEoSuF092183; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:50:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)i5SEoSco092182; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:50:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:50:27 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Rob Message-ID: <20040628145027.GA92086@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:50:30 -0000 Hi, This tickles something in the back of my memory. You aren't by chance talking about remote uptime detection, Netcraft-style, are you? IIRC, that rolls over to 0 at 497 days. But actual system uptime is unaffected. ==ml On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:39:30PM +0900, Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > By accident I happen to come across this remarkable limit of > uptime registration for FreeBSD systems. After 497 days, the > timer jumps to zero again. > > 497 days is less than a 1.5 years ! > > Has this been fixed in newer versions of FreeBSD (stable and/or > current) ? Or is there a hardware limitation (CPU?) that does > not allow this? > > Just wondering. > > Regards, > Rob. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org "I'm sorry, but 'Social Darwinism' is no excuse for killing all of your co-workers." -- Ivan Brunetti http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 14:55:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0624A16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:55:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net (post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E96643D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:55:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from [82.161.131.177] (helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BexXi-0000KW-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:55:34 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:53:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRdFSpiFoDhOeZQRA6Y+0Pn1nceugAAJY1QAAJ1hyA= Message-Id: cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FW: help please? corrupted hard disc - invalid super block. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:55:54 -0000 It looks like you wrote the disklabel for the slice to the disk or vice-versa. If you check /dev there probably isn't a /dev/ad5s* there. Try mounting /dev/ad5e instead of /dev/ad5s1e. To verify, do a bsdlabel ad5s1 to see if you have a disklabel for the slice. Otherwise you could : 1.backup you disklabel #bsdlabel /dev/ad5e > disklabel.BAK 2. write a correct disklabel for /dev/ad5s1 #bsdlabel -w -B ad5s1 3. Edit your disklabel to be correct : a. note the size values of #bsdlabel ad5s1 b. make another backup of your saved disklabel c. edit one of the backups and change the size value to the value you got from #bsdlabel ad5s1 d. write your edited disklabel to ad5s1 #bsdlabel -R ad5s1 disklabel.BAK This *should* return no errors. 4. try to mount ad5s1 Now this is all based on them hope that you don't have to erase the bad/sliceless disklabel on da5. Good luck, Ruben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rob Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:08 AM To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: help please? corrupted hard disc - invalid super block. Hi! I have a hard disc that I think must have been set up wrong initially... It was however working fine, but at some point filled up to capacity, wherapon the next reboot it failed to mount. System is 4.8-RELEASE, Generic Kernel. Currently the disc shows: luggage# mount -r /dev/ad5s1e /mnt mount: /dev/ad5s1e on /mnt: incorrect super block luggage# disklabel -r ad5 # /dev/ad5c: type: ESDI disk: ad5s1 label: flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 14593 sectors/unit: 234441585 rpm: 3600 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 234436482 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 14592*) e: 234436482 0 4.2BSD 16384 16384 300 # (Cyl. 0 - 14592*) Warning, partition c doesn't cover the whole unit! Warning, An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities luggage# fsck /dev/ad5s1e Can't open /dev/ad5s1e: Invalid argument luggage# fsck -b 32 /dev/ad5s1e Alternate super block location: 32 Can't open /dev/ad5s1e: Invalid argument luggage# file -s /dev/ad5s1e /dev/ad5s1e: can't read `/dev/ad5s1e' (Invalid argument). At this point I am stuck ... most of the "Invalid Super Block" messages I can find when searching relate to cd-roms. If I could mount the disc even read-only, I could copy the data off. Can anybody give me any clues on where to go from here? Thanks in advance, Rob _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:01:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBD716A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:01:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (shadow2.eagle.ca [209.167.16.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11B943D31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 349 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Jun 2004 15:00:54 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by smtp.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.043587 secs); 28 Jun 2004 15:00:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 15:00:54 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca) by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:00:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3759.209.167.16.15.1088434854.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <1088431923.10080.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> References: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> <1088431923.10080.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:00:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:01:24 -0000 >> I'm having a problem with spontaneous restarts. This isn't a new >> problem, >> but I've done the obvious things and the problem hasn't gone away. I >> was thinking of asking on -hackers, but I'm trying here first. I have a mail server that is doing this exact thing. Very spontaneous, more problematic when under heavy load. I tested this theory with buildworld, and it just barfs. I have tracked it down to a problem with the power supply. In my case, the fan is not operating properly (it is moving, but very slowly). I pop the disk in a new machine and voila...problem fixed. Just my $.02 sb >> >> The system is a 4.8 with a mix of patches and port upgrades of various >> ages. I'm planning to rebuild the whole thing, bringing it up to date, >> but I'm hoping to be able to wait for a 5.x in STABLE; I don't want to >> do >> this twice, since I expect I'll have to dump and restore everything. >> >> The hardware is a 2.6 GHz P4 with 2 GByte of GEIL dual-channel memory. >> (The problem existed on the previous, somewhat slower, memory as well.) >> The box contains the processor and motherboard (Gigabyte GA-SINXP1394), >> two floppy drives, CD and CD/W drives, an HP DAT, three IBM/Hitachi >> 36G/10K SCSI drives, and one 120G IDE. The SCSI card is by Adaptec; the >> video card is a low-end NVidia, and I'm running their video driver. The >> PS is an Antec True380, which should be enough for the box, with >> something >> to spare. There are several extra, large fans, of which more later. >> >> The system, monitor, printer, and cable modem are all powered through an >> APC BACK-UPS 450, about 18 months old. It's shown in the last week that >> it can keep things up for more than an hour. >> >> The symptom is a restart that leaves no indication of how it happened. >> >> Recently, the system shut down (completely, and at the power supply) >> instead of restarting. In that case, the last deliberate shutdown >> was a `shutdown -h now'; it appears that in every other case, the last >> deliberate shutdown was a `-r now'. (Question: does the machine >> architecture have settings for reset-resume .vs. reset-halt, settings >> that might be remembered when a later action occurs?) It has >> subsequently shut down with an immediate restart. >> >> There are no failure indications in the /var/log/messages, nor reported >> by dmesg. (The console scrolls by very quickly.) The message sequence >> over the restart typically looks like this: >> >> ======================================================================= >> Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from >> 00:05:00:e7:17:44 >> t >> o 00:05:00:e7:17:57 on em0 >> Jun 7 18:39:09 moleend /kernel: arp: 24.228.64.1 moved from >> 00:05:00:e7:17:57 >> t >> o 00:05:00:e7:17:44 on em0 >> Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Network Number: 24.228.64.0 >> Jun 7 18:59:06 moleend dhclient: New Broadcast Address: 255.255.255.255 >> Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD >> Project. >> Jun 7 22:47:33 moleend /kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, >> 1988, >> 198 >> 9, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> ======================================================================== >> >> The restart most often occurs AFTER X has been shut down (and often >> restarted) but sometimes when X has not been run. It most often occurs >> when the system is under heavy CPU load, but sometimes when the load >> has been light. >> >> I thought at one time it might be a thermal problem and undertook to >> fix that. (I am still working to get more cooling air over the disks.) >> Right now, I have 120 mm fans rated at 130-135 CFM (Panaflow and JMC) >> pushing air in and out of the box, and pressurizing a duct feeding the >> CPU cooler, which is now cool to the touch. The memory modules are cool >> to the touch. While the disks need a proper plenum to route more air >> over them, I no longer believe that there is a thermal problem. The >> vid card's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch; the >> northbridge's fan-blown heatsink is warm (not hot) to the touch. >> >> (Some people commute to white-collar jobs in heavy pickups; I drive a >> small server as my PC. No chrome pipes.) >> >> So: what should I do next? Should I set the system up to go to the >> kernel debugger on panic, or even start it via the kernel debugger? >> (Where is the full documentation?) Should I shell out for an even >> bigger power supply? Is there another log that I should examine? >> A restart wire that I should check? A power bus I should scope? >> (I'll have to borrow a scope somewhere.) Is it time for an exorcist? >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Mark Terribile >> >> > Mark > > In my opinion this is a thermal problem. I have seen this before in > some of my systems. Mainly has to do witht he processors not cooling > well enough. Try opening the cases up and leaving the the covers off for > a temp solution. Are you over clocking? > > Bruce > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:02:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACFC16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 896B343D31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 16138 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 14:00:17 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 14:00:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 82309 invoked by uid 555); 28 Jun 2004 15:03:11 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.144) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088434990-82226 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 19:03:10 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA06434F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:18:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:18:40 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: artifex Message-ID: <20040628141840.GA8282@shark.localdomain> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: /Aquarium/Moyey_zvezde cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:03:00 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:39:46PM +0200, artifex probably wrote: > Where are the international standard that describe the ISO file (not=20 > the filesystem!) format? \From the mount_cd9660 manpage >& MOUNT_CD9660(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual MOUNT_CD9660(8) >& NAME >& mount_cd9660 - mount an ISO-9660 file system So it's ISO 9660. ISO stands for International Standards Organization AFAICT. As for `where', use Google. > BTW, the non-standard cdrdao do the job fine. I think that if the developer of the Windows program which uses/generates the `.cue' files would hear that, he would change the format just so that you couldn't use free tools and were forced to purchase his program. Just kidding, but doesn't it remind you of anything? --=20 DoubleF Those who in quarrels interpose, must often wipe a bloody nose. --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4Ci/wo7hT/9lVdwRAgVBAJ0dt3Km+/tTEDXNl3AhX5jXR1/5uACeIpzP z/ZmIDbvTNotHWfdzUJutyo= =RRDs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:03:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C190E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:03:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07E0D43D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:03:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 13142 invoked by uid 513); 28 Jun 2004 15:08:57 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.52954 secs); 28 Jun 2004 15:08:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 15:08:56 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Bryce In-Reply-To: <20040628084310.99973.qmail@web11603.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040628165121.D24044@pukruppa.net> References: <20040628084310.99973.qmail@web11603.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: Freebsd questions Subject: Re: ISP Connection problem - ADSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:03:40 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Bryce wrote: > Hi, > > Im a freeBSD newbie & have been struggling for some > time to get my adsl connection working on Freebsd > 5.2.1 Release. I've tried many suggested > configurations for /etc/ppp/ppp.conf, and /etc/rc.conf > & read relevant chapters from 'Complete FreeBSD' & the > handbook, but my connection still dies before reaching > the LCP phase. > > Im using an Alcatel Speedtouch 530 Modem connected to > Ethernet. My ADSL connection is fine in Windoze > however the configuration for the modem is usually set > through a web-browser. Do the modem settings(done via > browser) affect the connection in FBSD or does the > system simply take the settings from ppp.conf etc? Im > somewhat confused on this point. I can ping the modem > at 10.0.0.138 and can open the web interface in X. I believe your alcatel speedtouch (although I have never seen one) isn't a modem, but a router. So you don't have to mess around with ppp . You simply set it as default gateway and dns server in /stand/sysinstall --> Configure --> Networking --> Interfaces --> and select you NIC. Or - if you prefer this - have a look at your Complete FreeBSD and edit /etc/rc.conf manually. Greetings, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:06:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8575E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:06:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chaos.evolve.za.net (chaos.evolve.za.net [196.34.172.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A35643D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:06:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@raven.za.net) Received: from root by chaos.evolve.za.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BexiF-000MZh-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:06:27 +0200 Received: from [165.165.46.223] (helo=lucy) by chaos.evolve.za.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BexiE-000MZW-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:06:26 +0200 From: "Dave Raven" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:06:19 +0200 Message-ID: <02c501c45d21$79741090$3200000a@lucy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by Opteq - www.optec.co.za Subject: Datasize change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:06:37 -0000 Hi all, I'm having a problem where I need to allow a proccess to use up to 1.5gig of memory, however its going to be a problem to recompile my = kernel. I know that these options would solve the problem: options MAXDSIZ =3D "(1536 * 1024 * 1024)" options DFLDSIZ =3D "(1536 * 1024 * 1024)" However, I'm wondering if there is a way to do it with login.conf = (limits) - here you can see the limits when datasize is unspecified (using kernel default) - however could I increase it through that mechanism? Or is = there another way I could do this... Resource limits (current): cputime infinity secs filesize infinity kb datasize 524288 kb stacksize 65536 kb coredumpsize infinity kb memoryuse infinity kb memorylocked infinity kb maxprocesses 7390 openfiles 32768 sbsize infinity bytes vmemoryuse infinity kb Thanks in advance Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:15:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B72516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:15:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tut.by (speedy.tutby.com [195.209.41.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8061B43D54 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from domenus@tut.by) X-Spam-Flag: NO Received: from [194.158.212.149] (account domenus HELO domenus) by tut.by (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 99570412 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:15:06 +0300 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:15:04 +0300 From: DoMenus X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1571578203.20040628181504@tut.by> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: DoMenus List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:15:11 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, Monday, June 28, 2004, 1:57:16 PM, you wrote: fqfo> I hope the patch works. yeah! Its works! -- Best regards, DoMenus mailto:domenus@tut.by From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:16:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA616A4DC for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.schluting.com (schluting.com [131.252.214.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CC343D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlie@schluting.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.schluting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AA521C3 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-EbQaApdy for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.0.69] (c-24-20-163-50.client.comcast.net [24.20.163.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.schluting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27D0212F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40E03640.1040107@schluting.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:16:16 -0700 From: Charlie Schluting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by your mom at schluting.com Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:14 -0000 Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > By accident I happen to come across this remarkable limit of > uptime registration for FreeBSD systems. After 497 days, the > timer jumps to zero again. > Not here.. 8:00AM up 1074 days, 11:58, 0 users, load averages: 0.57, 0.26, 0.10 That's on 2.1.0-RELEASE, BTW :) -Charlie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:16:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1B016A4D5 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C26143D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1Bexrr-00032N-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:16:24 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16608.13888.194802.955936@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:16:16 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040628134639.GA5699@shark.localdomain> References: <20040628134639.GA5699@shark.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:25 -0000 Sergey Zaharchenko writes: > Just a minute. You shouldn't portupgrade KDE when KDE is running, > but you should be able to run `make' to build everything while > KDE is running, shut down KDE and `portupgrade -w' afterwards > (which will use the binaries built by `make' and install them, > taking seriously less time than the original `make') and restart > KDE. At least that's how it would with an ordinary port. One of the two of us is confused about this. As I understand it: A) Running "make build" but not "make install" doesn't really solve the "installing while running" issue. Sure, it won't install for that port, but it will build-and-install for every port upstream ... B) ... unless you're suggesting starting at the top of the dependency tree and doing build-but-don't-install by hand for every component in order. I consider this severely impractical; it also ... C) ... won't work with portupgrade unless one uses the "w" option. Or have I missed a memo? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:16:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C35616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A7B43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA11815C93 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:15:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 81.84.175.12 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mailadmin.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:15:04 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <51254.81.84.175.12.1088424904.squirrel@81.84.175.12> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:15:04 -0000 (GMT) From: klr@6s-gaming.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: FreeBSD desktop newcomer (Enemy Territory players read) - need minor help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:16:44 -0000 Hi list, After sucessfully playing Return to Castle Wolfenstein and Enemy Territory on FreeBSD 5.2.1, I decided to switch my workstation to freebsd. I have large experience on the server side but kinda new to the desktop. Here are some minor annoyances i'm not being able to solve: 1. I've added a 'paw' menu to access the main menu, but I'd like the win-key to open this menu. possible? 2. Is there any app like in KDE to update the gnome (2.6.1) menus to reflect changes in installed applications? 3. Annoyances with enemy territory: - The game console isn't bound to \. I have to open it with ~, and the leading \ won't appear. This makes me send lots of commands to general chat instead of issuing them, have to remember this all the time. I did a bind \ toggleconsole, while it will bring console with \ then, it won't make it vanish. My only clue was it could be a keyboard config error, so I configured it (using gnome), layout portuguese keyboard, microsoft natural. it should be working. Also on xchat and such, if I use any letter with an accent people will see it as a '?'. How do I fix this behavior ? - Im getting some delay switching weapons and shooting. I press mouse1 and about 0.5sec later the weapon will shoot. This should be instantaneous. I don't have any idea on this one, solutions ? - CAPS LOCK key won't work ingame. Works fine on gnome. I need the caps lock key on enemy territory. Thanks all in advance! -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:24:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2003E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:24:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.u4eatech.com (blackhole.u4eatech.com [195.188.241.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E6F43D49 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.williamson@u4eatech.com) Received: by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id 69D4A360968; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from apus.u4eatech.com (apus.degree2.com [172.30.40.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5E436097C; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:10 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040628161506.0a8ff458@cygnus> X-Sender: richard@cygnus X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:21:59 +0100 To: Simon Barner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Richard P. Williamson" In-Reply-To: <20040625155220.GB873@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040601110940.GA65805@marvin.penguinpowered.org> <20040601115441.GA87441@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <6.1.0.6.2.20040601140015.0accf008@cygnus> <20040601143002.GB35382@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <6.1.1.1.2.20040625152908.027992a0@cygnus> <20040625155220.GB873@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: Re: Intel Ethernet card not being detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:24:24 -0000 At 16:52 25/06/2004. Simon Barner had this to say: >Richard P. Williamson wrote: > >[...] > >Here another thing you could try: I once had a problem with a 3Com NIC >not being detected properly when the driver was compiled statically into >the kernel. > >Removing it and using the module instead made it work... Nope, still no joy. However my boot is telling me userland is out of sync with the kernel now, so I'm not prepared to say "it didn't work" yet. Per the numbers returned by pciconf, this is a 82559 rev 0x8, which is in the table of supported devices. According to the code, however, if the device claims to be 10Mb only, then it isn't even handed to the miibus code to configure. I'm still working my way through the code to determine if the 10Mb-ness is being reported by the devices directly, or if this is the code's interpretation based on other data requested. The two additional 82559 rev 0x8s (on the plug-in PCI card) are correctly being passed to the miibus, and this is annoying. Thanks for your time in this, anyway. MfG, rip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:40:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D06C16A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:40:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294A943D39; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004062900:40:53:083200.23117.2919119792 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:40:53 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <40E03C05.4070001@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:40:53 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> <20040628145027.GA92086@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <20040628145027.GA92086@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:3.37) (by Terrace) Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:40:59 -0000 Michael W. Lucas wrote: > Hi, > > This tickles something in the back of my memory. > > You aren't by chance talking about remote uptime detection, > Netcraft-style, are you? > > IIRC, that rolls over to 0 at 497 days. But actual system uptime is > unaffected. Yes, I read it first time on a Netcraft's webpage, then googled and found other reports as well. So this 497 limitation is only for Netscaft's way of measuring up-time? Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 15:55:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BB116A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:55:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sjc.ihostsxode.net (sjc.ihostsxode.net [129.41.16.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA6943D41 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mark-and-erika.com) Received: from millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com ([151.205.245.38]) by sjc.ihostsxode.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SFsn2k016757; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:54:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id i5SFsR9Y082508; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:54:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mark@mark-and-erika.com) Received: (from mfrank@localhost)i5SFsRTm082507; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:54:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mark@mark-and-erika.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:54:26 -0400 From: Mark Frank To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040628155426.GA80876@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing List , Jay Moore References: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> X-Certified: Outgoing email is certified Windows Free. X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-System: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Jay Moore Subject: Re: status of porting pf and spamd from OpenBSD to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:55:12 -0000 * On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:36:55AM -0500 Jay Moore wrote: > I heard some time ago that work was going on to port pf (and spamd, I think) > from OpenBSD to FreeBSD. I also recently saw an announcement on the FreeBSD > home page that Daniel Hartmeier had joined the FreeBSD team as a committer - > a further indication that this work is underway. > > I'm just curious to know the status of this effort, and any specifics on how > or when this will be done. There's a mailing list at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list.fcgi?list_id=pf4freebsd that may give you some insight. -- Mark Frank "The fix is only temporary...unless it works." - Red Green From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:01:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8747616A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4188943D3F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1])i5SG1VuF092871; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost)i5SG1UAH092870; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:01:30 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Rob Message-ID: <20040628160130.GA92831@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <40DF92F2.2030407@users.sourceforge.net> <20040628145027.GA92086@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <40E03C05.4070001@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E03C05.4070001@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:01:34 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:40:53AM +0900, Rob wrote: > Michael W. Lucas wrote: > >Hi, > > > >This tickles something in the back of my memory. > > > >You aren't by chance talking about remote uptime detection, > >Netcraft-style, are you? > > > >IIRC, that rolls over to 0 at 497 days. But actual system uptime is > >unaffected. > > Yes, I read it first time on a Netcraft's webpage, then googled and found > other reports as well. So this 497 limitation is only for Netscaft's way > of measuring up-time? > > Rob. Yep. It's a counter that rolls over in the TCP stack. ==ml -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org "I'm sorry, but 'Social Darwinism' is no excuse for killing all of your co-workers." -- Ivan Brunetti http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:03:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50A116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:03:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eagle.fgcu.edu (eagle.fgcu.edu [150.104.224.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA9B43D55 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dbkorink@eagle.fgcu.edu) Received: from eagle.fgcu.edu (eagle.fgcu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.fgcu.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5SG9gxF000990 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:09:42 GMT From: "Douglas Korinke" To: "FreeBSD Help" Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:09:42 -0500 Message-Id: <20040628155928.M80962@eagle.fgcu.edu> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.30 20040103 X-OriginatingIP: 67.8.39.28 (dbkorink) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Trying to install Flash... BUT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:03:39 -0000 Soooo, I am on a Toshiba Satellite 2405-S221 with FBSD 4.9 running KDE 3.1.4 and attempting to get a Flash plugin working.. So I goto the HowTo at KDE's site at: http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php and follow the directions to the line.. but nothing is still going for me. I decide to try it again a few times and still nothing until a brilliant stroke of genius tells me to check my KDE version.. the HowTo calls for KDE- 3.2.3 aduhh, well I finally follow the first step and pkg_delete 3.1.4 and I try to install 3.2.3 from the ports collection. The install finds all the dependencies except for kwalletbackend, then attempts to install it when this warning comes up... Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulnerabilities Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT *** Error Code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. *** Error Code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3. Any ideas or suggestions? Thanks a lot, Doug ICQ : 26096369 AIM : itss0lidstate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:10:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C238316A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:10:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53406.mail.yahoo.com (web53406.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 837C343D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:10:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bg271828@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.107.204.94] by web53406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:12 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Your Name To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:10:12 -0000 I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people have reported general success, but I'm worried that I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding something in the three days it'll take to rebuild every X dependent port on my system. Jen __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:16:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8376816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:16:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4AE43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:16:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SGFwoT094516; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:15:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:15:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281115.58437.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: Your Name Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:16:10 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 11:10 am, Your Name wrote: > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > every X dependent > port on my system. > > Jen Just update your ports tree, and run portupgrade to bring all your installed ports up to date. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:24:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827A416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from invasion.mail.pas.earthlink.net (invasion.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633D943D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by invasion.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Beyvm-0008MI-4d; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:24:30 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, racerx@makeworld.com Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:25:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <200406281115.58437.racerx@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <200406281115.58437.racerx@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281125.35028.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bb7040dabf2e6ddf7ed6f09c5609f05e8350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: Your Name Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:30 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 11:15 am, Chris wrote: > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:10 am, Your Name wrote: > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > every X dependent > > port on my system. > > > > Jen > > Just update your ports tree, and run portupgrade to bring all your > installed ports up to date. > > -- > Best regards, > Chris I was unaware that FreeBSD switched to X.org from XFree86. Did we switch or is there name confusion? Are both offered in the newer ports? Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:30:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D956D16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:30:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A4A43D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SGU8oT094669; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:30:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: "Andrew L. Gould" Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:30:08 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <200406281115.58437.racerx@makeworld.com> <200406281125.35028.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200406281125.35028.algould@datawok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281130.08300.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Your Name Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:30:17 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 11:25 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:15 am, Chris wrote: > > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:10 am, Your Name wrote: > > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > > > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > > every X dependent > > > port on my system. > > > > > > Jen > > > > Just update your ports tree, and run portupgrade to bring all your > > installed ports up to date. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Chris > > I was unaware that FreeBSD switched to X.org from XFree86. Did we > switch or is there name confusion? Are both offered in the newer > ports? > > Andrew Gould Hmm, after looking: /usr/ports/x11/xorg This is a metaport for all the X.Org packages available in the ports tree. WWW: http://www.x.org/ - Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:31:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966EA16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:31:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53406.mail.yahoo.com (web53406.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E94043D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:31:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bg271828@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628163148.87345.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.107.204.94] by web53406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:31:48 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:31:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Your Name To: racerx@makeworld.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200406281115.58437.racerx@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Your Name Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:31:51 -0000 --- Chris wrote: > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:10 am, Your Name wrote: > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from > XFree86. > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? > There's > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some > people > > have reported general success, but I'm worried > that > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > every X dependent > > port on my system. > > > > Jen > > Just update your ports tree, and run portupgrade to > bring all your installed > ports up to date. I don't want to be thick, but what are the exact steps involved in this? My installed ports are already up to date, Id just want to rebuild the ones that depend on some version of X. So I guess I'd first install the xorg meta-port, then delete--what?, to make sure I get all the XFree86 versions?--and then do what to rebuild properly everything with depends? Thanks. I will wait if there is going to be some easy method in the future. Jen __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:37:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344E316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:37:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net (audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EBA43D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bez8G-0004Ua-Np; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:37:24 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: racerx@makeworld.com Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:38:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <200406281125.35028.algould@datawok.com> <200406281130.08300.racerx@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <200406281130.08300.racerx@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281138.29461.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b4b077f7ea5b732e1588c016ba1923cd0350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Your Name Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:37:26 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 11:30 am, Chris wrote: > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:25 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:15 am, Chris wrote: > > > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:10 am, Your Name wrote: > > > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > > > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > > > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > > > > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > > > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > > > every X dependent > > > > port on my system. > > > > > > > > Jen > > > > > > Just update your ports tree, and run portupgrade to bring all > > > your installed ports up to date. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Chris > > > > I was unaware that FreeBSD switched to X.org from XFree86. Did we > > switch or is there name confusion? Are both offered in the newer > > ports? > > > > Andrew Gould > > Hmm, after looking: > > /usr/ports/x11/xorg > This is a metaport for all the X.Org packages available in the ports > tree. > > WWW: http://www.x.org/ > > - Eric Anholt > anholt@FreeBSD.org > > -- > Best regards, > Chris Thanks. I haven't updated my ports in awhile in order to keep ports in sync without a lot of portupgrades. Have a great day! Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:39:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAD016A4F7 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:39:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F3C43D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:39:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SGcsoT094772 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:38:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:38:54 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628163148.87345.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040628163148.87345.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281138.54349.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:39:14 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 11:31 am, Your Name wrote: > --- Chris wrote: > > On Monday 28 June 2004 11:10 am, Your Name wrote: > > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from > > > > XFree86. > > > > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? > > > > There's > > > > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some > > > > people > > > > > have reported general success, but I'm worried > > > > that > > > > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > > every X dependent > > > port on my system. > > > > > > Jen > > > > Just update your ports tree, and run portupgrade to > > bring all your installed > > ports up to date. > > I don't want to be thick, but what are the exact steps > involved in this? My installed ports are already up to > date, Id just want to rebuild the ones that depend on > some version of X. So I guess I'd first install the > xorg meta-port, then delete--what?, to make sure I get > all the XFree86 versions?--and then do what to rebuild > properly everything with depends? > > Thanks. I will wait if there is going to be some easy > method in the future. > Well - if I understand this, you want to use X.org in place of XFree86 - if this is correct, I would assume you install eht X.org meta-port as you mentioned. I don't know if X.org "needs" anything from XFree, so I can't answer that. The next thing is simply update the ports tree (that inturn updates the X.org meta when needed) then run portupgrade after the ports ttree update. See the man page for portupgrade for the parms you want. I myself use -arR Once you have run portupgrade, and if by chance the meta-port did get updated, portupgrade will bring that up to the current build for FreeBSD. I may have left out some steps, but this is the jist of it. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:51:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D076216A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:51:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [217.77.141.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0A343D41 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:51:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5SGpDrU020787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host 152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14] claimed to be [192.168.1.22] Message-ID: <40E04C77.7000500@whacky.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:03 +0200 From: Stephan van Beerschoten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik References: <40DF3FBF.8060400@whacky.net> <20040628055242.E3532@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> In-Reply-To: <20040628055242.E3532@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on erg.verweg.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient with reconfigured SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:51:18 -0000 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Stephan van Beerschoten wrote: > > > >>Why idea how I can preconfigure an SSID for dhclient ? >> >> > >Just use > ifconfig wi0 ssid FOO > >to lock it. > > Will this lock the ssid during reboots as well ? If not, that actually is what I am looking for. /Stephan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 16:57:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810E816A4D0 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:57:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skutsje.san.webweaving.org (skutsje.san.webweaving.org [209.132.96.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4187443D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:57:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Received: from skutsje.san.webweaving.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5SGlnwT005085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:47:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) Received: from localhost (dirkx@localhost)i5SGln8V005082; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:47:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org) X-Authentication-Warning: skutsje.san.webweaving.org: dirkx owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:47:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik X-X-Sender: dirkx@skutsje.san.webweaving.org To: Stephan van Beerschoten In-Reply-To: <40E04C77.7000500@whacky.net> Message-ID: <20040628094208.K92233@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> References: <40DF3FBF.8060400@whacky.net> <20040628055242.E3532@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> <40E04C77.7000500@whacky.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient with reconfigured SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:57:25 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Stephan van Beerschoten wrote: > Will this lock the ssid during reboots as well ? If not, that actually > is what I am looking for. Ah - ok - putting into /etc/r.conf ifconfig_wi0="ssid foo" will lock it during/after reboots; but kills the DHCP. Options are - Do above but add dhclietn wi0& to your /etc/rc.local - Leave ifconfig_wi0=DHCP in rc.conf and do a 'man dhclient-script' and accordingly create a /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks with the text #!/bin/sh ifconfig wi0 ssid f00 add 'if [ "x${interface}" = "xwi0" ]; then' ..'fi' around it if you want it only to happen for wi0. What the second option does is run an extra script early in the dhcp cycle whcih sets your interface to the right ssid. Dw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:05:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F3316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52107.mail.yahoo.com (web52107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B0D743D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idfubar@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628170528.67908.qmail@web52107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.234.212.108] by web52107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:05:28 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:05:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Rishi Chopra To: Dan Nelson , rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu In-Reply-To: <20040622032432.GD86471@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reinstalling And /usr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:29 -0000 --- Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jun 21), Rishi Chopra said: > > What is the effect on the /usr partition when > reinstalling over an > > installation? > > > > I suffered a kernel panic that wiped my MBR; I'd > like to simply > > reinstall with the same partition/slice values - > will my /usr > > partition and the data therein still be accessible > after > > reinstallation? > > Sure, except anything you may have changed in > /usr/{bin,sbin,share,lib,libexec} will get > overwritten. Make sure you > elect not to newfs any of your filesytems :) In > fact, if you know your > exact mbr info, you should be able to boot the > install floppy, go to > the partition editor, set it up, write, reboot, and > you're done. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > > I certainly appreciate the good advice, but I could use a little more information. I'm not really worried about saving the system and the MBR, just my /usr/home directory. Can I install the system again (from floppies) without the inode chain getting messed up and the /usr/home directory becoming invisible? I would like to know if I can just reinstall over the original installation much like a Windows fix; the inode error that I'm getting now prevents /bin/sh from loading and may have made the system unsalvageable. ===== Rishi Chopra http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~rchopra __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:08:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F4616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:08:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out007.verizon.net (out007pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B6643D4C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out007.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040628170832.FVAP28276.out007.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:08:32 -0500 Message-ID: <40E0508F.2060900@mac.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:08:31 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vulpes Velox References: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out007.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:08:32 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:08:35 -0000 Vulpes Velox wrote: > I've been going though transfering all the freebsd mailing lists I've > subscribe to over to one account... the small problem I ran into is > this, I can send emails from this new account fine, but for some > reason if I send something to a list, it does not appear to show up... > I niether recieve it nor does it show up in the archive... This message made it through. I've seen mailing list lag of up to 48 hours from time to time, so there may be some mail getting stuck on a queue for whatever reasons. > any ideas on what is happening? No, although I'd wait a day or so and see whether the messages show up in list traffic, or whether you get a bounce. Also, you might dig up a message-id from your "Sent messages" mbox (if you keep them), and ask to look into the matter. That's what postmasters are there for. :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:13:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6809B16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web60708.mail.yahoo.com (web60708.mail.yahoo.com [216.109.117.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D1EC43D45 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamwynne@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628171303.8148.qmail@web60708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [4.242.9.243] by web60708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:13:03 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Adam Wynne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040626044143.10534.qmail@web60705.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Intel Anypoint PCMCIA ethernet card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:05 -0000 Is there a way for me to increase the verbosity of pccard's output? I couldn't find such an option specific to pccard in LINT. Would "options DIAGNOSTIC" do this for me? Thanks --- Adam Wynne wrote: > I am trying to get my pcmcia ethernet card working on my laptop. It is the > "Intel Anypoint" card and I know that it uses the wi driver, which is > compiled > into my kernel. I am running 4.10-PRERELEASE. > > I saw on the list that people have gotten this card to work by adding an > entry > for it to the /etc/defaults/pccard.conf file. I tried adding the following > entry which did not help: > > card "Intel" "AnyPoint(TM) Wireless II PC Card" > config auto "wi" ? > insert /etc/pccard_ether $device start > remove /etc/pccard_ether $device stop > > I know that the system recognizes that a card has been added. When I insert > it, the following is reported: > > Jun 26 04:33:53 bird /kernel: pccard: card inserted, slot 1 > > It doesn't mention anything about the card in particluar, which seems weird > to > me - I expected it to say that the card was unrecognized or something like > that. > > I don't know if this helps but I got this card to work on the same laptop > under > netbsd according to a doc on the netbsd site. Doing that required adding > entries to 2 or 3 kernel files and recompiling. I tried mimicing that > procedure but ran into problems since the kernel files are layed out > differently on freebsd. > > Please let me know if you have any ideas. It is possible that I have > forgotten > something obvious. > > Thanks! > > -Adam > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:13:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AFF16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (hostmansion10.hostmansion.com [216.158.144.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254AC43D49 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@hostmansion.com) Received: from bgsofx17 (www-1.bivol.net [193.108.24.73]) by mail.hostmansion.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EE3411C036; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:37:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <004601c45d33$3cb69350$0201a8c0@bgsofx17> From: "Peter" To: "Chuck Swiger" , "Vulpes Velox" References: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <40E0508F.2060900@mac.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:13:29 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:34 -0000 I have the same problem ! Best regards, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: Chuck Swiger To: Vulpes Velox Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question Vulpes Velox wrote: > I've been going though transfering all the freebsd mailing lists I've > subscribe to over to one account... the small problem I ran into is > this, I can send emails from this new account fine, but for some > reason if I send something to a list, it does not appear to show up... > I niether recieve it nor does it show up in the archive... This message made it through. I've seen mailing list lag of up to 48 hours from time to time, so there may be some mail getting stuck on a queue for whatever reasons. > any ideas on what is happening? No, although I'd wait a day or so and see whether the messages show up in list traffic, or whether you get a bounce. Also, you might dig up a message-id from your "Sent messages" mbox (if you keep them), and ask to look into the matter. That's what postmasters are there for. :-) -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:14:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839F816A57C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4F843D53 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 25461341 for multiple; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:59:51 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:13:53 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Your Name Message-Id: <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:14:00 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Your Name wrote: > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > every X dependent > port on my system. build xorg-server, deinstall it, reinstall, it use pkgdb -uF to fix :) then repeat for what other xorg stuff you want :) the pkgdb -uF is important... it will go through and update /var/db/pkg so that all ports recognize using the new xlibs and don't try to reinstall xfree86... pkgdb is part of portupgrade From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:15:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25FE16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:15:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out003.verizon.net (out003pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F03143D48 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.84.3]) by out003.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040628171525.EXIF6671.out003.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:15:25 -0500 Message-ID: <40E0522C.1010107@mac.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:15:24 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zyumbilev References: <48864.194.39.131.39.1088403058.squirrel@194.39.131.39> In-Reply-To: <48864.194.39.131.39.1088403058.squirrel@194.39.131.39> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out003.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:15:25 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall for web server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:15:26 -0000 Peter Zyumbilev wrote: > Do you know some good tutorial for bulding firewall for FreeBSD as web > server. I found a lot of tutorials but for FreeBSD as router. First, are you building a firewall or a web server? If you're building a firewall, you don't want to run any services like WWW at all on the machine. If you're building a web server, you're probably not going to be routing traffic, no-- to corresponds to your second remark. > Some commented premade script with comments will also do the job. > I was plannding to use APF, but I am afarid to install it on FreeBSD > without good tutorial. APF? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:17:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3B816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from argent.heraldsnet.org (argent.heraldsnet.org [64.83.41.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CCD43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:17:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jtrigg@spamcop.net) Received: by argent.heraldsnet.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF28F415; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 From: Jim Trigg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:17:58 -0000 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:13:53PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:12 -0700 (PDT) > Your Name wrote: > > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > every X dependent > > port on my system. > > build xorg-server, deinstall it, reinstall, it use pkgdb -uF to fix :) > > then repeat for what other xorg stuff you want :) > > the pkgdb -uF is important... it will go through and update > /var/db/pkg so that all ports recognize using the new xlibs and don't > try to reinstall xfree86... > > pkgdb is part of portupgrade AFAICT, this won't really do anything -- there does not appear to be a real way to tell the ports system that you want X ports to depend on xorg instead of xfree. Every X port appears to have xfree hardcoded. Jim Trigg -- Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website X HELP CURE HTML MAIL Verger, All Saints Church - Sharon Chapel / \ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:27:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C4016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:27:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793B643D41 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:27:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i5SHSGPi055013; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:28:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i5SHSCov055010; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:28:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:28:12 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: <1088431923.10080.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Message-ID: <20040628132509.P54848@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <20040627234410.59010.qmail@web21125.mail.yahoo.com> <1088431923.10080.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: Mark Terribile cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:27:52 -0000 I had a similar problem with a server recently. The issue turned out to be the NIC/NIC driver. I changed it over to a 3com and it worked like a charm ever since. I'm also using that power supply in a server. I've noticed it gets very hot under load. I believe that model only has one fan and is considered a desktop "silent" model. Its possible that your system config is too much for it running 24/7. Its not the wattage per se, just that its not designed for continously use. My system is only an amd athelon 2000+ with 512mb ram, 1 7200rpm 40gig maxtor drive and a dvd reader. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:31:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2608516A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:31:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58E6943D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:31:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 6412 invoked by uid 513); 28 Jun 2004 17:37:10 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.613229 secs); 28 Jun 2004 17:37:10 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 17:37:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:33:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Peter In-Reply-To: <004601c45d33$3cb69350$0201a8c0@bgsofx17> Message-ID: <20040628193202.H24044@pukruppa.net> References: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <40E0508F.2060900@mac.com> <004601c45d33$3cb69350$0201a8c0@bgsofx17> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Vulpes Velox Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:31:53 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Peter wrote: > I have the same problem ! > > Best regards, As was said before: there seems to be some sort of knot in the wires today. One of my messages was several hours on its way. Uli. > > Peter > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Chuck Swiger > To: Vulpes Velox > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:08 PM > Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question > > > Vulpes Velox wrote: >> I've been going though transfering all the freebsd mailing lists I've >> subscribe to over to one account... the small problem I ran into is >> this, I can send emails from this new account fine, but for some >> reason if I send something to a list, it does not appear to show up... >> I niether recieve it nor does it show up in the archive... > > This message made it through. I've seen mailing list lag of up to 48 hours > from time to time, so there may be some mail getting stuck on a queue for > whatever reasons. > >> any ideas on what is happening? > > No, although I'd wait a day or so and see whether the messages show up in > list > traffic, or whether you get a bounce. Also, you might dig up a message-id > from your "Sent messages" mbox (if you keep them), and ask > to look into the matter. That's what postmasters > are > there for. :-) > > -- > -Chuck > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:38:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B3216A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:38:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3130943D5C for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:38:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SHcVoT095311; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:38:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:38:31 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281238.31505.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: Your Name cc: Vulpes Velox Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:38:44 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 12:13 pm, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:12 -0700 (PDT) > > Your Name wrote: > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > every X dependent > > port on my system. > > build xorg-server, deinstall it, reinstall, it use pkgdb -uF to fix :) > > then repeat for what other xorg stuff you want :) > > the pkgdb -uF is important... it will go through and update > /var/db/pkg so that all ports recognize using the new xlibs and don't > try to reinstall xfree86... > > pkgdb is part of portupgrade Indeed - what I have found out - You can't install xorg while XFree resides on the same system. It seems you would need to uninstall XFree before installing xorg. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:44:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B3116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:44:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.hostmansion.com (hostmansion10.hostmansion.com [216.158.144.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7607543D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:44:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@hostmansion.com) Received: from bgsofx17 (www-1.bivol.net [193.108.24.73]) by mail.hostmansion.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1372E11C036; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00b401c45d37$8e346780$0201a8c0@bgsofx17> From: "Peter" To: "Chuck Swiger" References: <48864.194.39.131.39.1088403058.squirrel@194.39.131.39> <40E0522C.1010107@mac.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:44:23 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall for web server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:44:27 -0000 I am budiling a web server. Since it is ina remote data center wher I do not contrl the router I prefer I to build firewall on the www server. APF http://www.rfxnetworks.com/apf.php very popular firewall in the linux world. Thanks, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: Chuck Swiger To: Peter Zyumbilev Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:15 PM Subject: Re: firewall for web server Peter Zyumbilev wrote: > Do you know some good tutorial for bulding firewall for FreeBSD as web > server. I found a lot of tutorials but for FreeBSD as router. First, are you building a firewall or a web server? If you're building a firewall, you don't want to run any services like WWW at all on the machine. If you're building a web server, you're probably not going to be routing traffic, no-- to corresponds to your second remark. > Some commented premade script with comments will also do the job. > I was plannding to use APF, but I am afarid to install it on FreeBSD > without good tutorial. APF? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:49:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2ED16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C5E43D41 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SHmvoT095422 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:48:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:48:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <48864.194.39.131.39.1088403058.squirrel@194.39.131.39> <40E0522C.1010107@mac.com> <00b401c45d37$8e346780$0201a8c0@bgsofx17> In-Reply-To: <00b401c45d37$8e346780$0201a8c0@bgsofx17> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281248.57111.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com Subject: Re: firewall for web server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:12 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 12:44 pm, Peter wrote: > I am budiling a web server. > Since it is ina remote data center wher I do not contrl the router I prefer > I to build firewall on the www server. > > APF http://www.rfxnetworks.com/apf.php > very popular firewall in the linux world. > > Thanks, > > Peter Yes - you can run both the web server and firewall on the same box. What you need to do is think which you wish to do. There are good and bad to both IPFW and IPF. I myself, prefer IPFW. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:49:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FCF16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3D43D48 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id A9B5810D839; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:49:04 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3070; Mon, 28 Jun 04 19:48:52 +0200 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3593C10D834; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:52 +0200 (MSZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 2B11F38131; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE385C002; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: klr@6s-gaming.com In-Reply-To: <51254.81.84.175.12.1088424904.squirrel@81.84.175.12> Message-ID: References: <51254.81.84.175.12.1088424904.squirrel@81.84.175.12> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD desktop newcomer (Enemy Territory players read) - need minor help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:14 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 klr@6s-gaming.com wrote: > Hi list, > 1. I've added a 'paw' menu to access the main menu, but I'd like the > win-key to open this menu. possible? Almost anything is possible, if you work hard enough. Please tell us more about what your environment is before you expect any meaningful answer. You might want to start checking out xmodmap which is good at remapping keys. > 3. Annoyances with enemy territory: Keys: Look above, xmodmap might help. > - Im getting some delay switching weapons and shooting. I press mouse1 > and about 0.5sec later the weapon will shoot. This should be > instantaneous. I don't have any idea on this one, solutions ? Do remember that you are running the Linux version of ET. It is slower than running native. You are very welcome to try to convince the developers of Enemy Territory to do a FreeBSD version. > - CAPS LOCK key won't work ingame. Works fine on gnome. I need the caps > lock key on enemy territory. Look to my answer above. Hope that at least pointed you in the right direction. /andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 17:49:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A367216A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33A4143D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 25483 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 16:46:35 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 16:46:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 48415 invoked by uid 555); 28 Jun 2004 17:49:28 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.213) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088444967-48387 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 21:49:27 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E9940119; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:26:42 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:26:42 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20040628172641.GB2963@shark.localdomain> References: <20040628134639.GA5699@shark.localdomain> <16608.13888.194802.955936@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16608.13888.194802.955936@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: Silence cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:49:19 -0000 --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:16:16AM -0400, Robert Huff probably wrote: >=20 > Sergey Zaharchenko writes: >=20 > > Just a minute. You shouldn't portupgrade KDE when KDE is running, > > but you should be able to run `make' to build everything while > > KDE is running, shut down KDE and `portupgrade -w' afterwards > > (which will use the binaries built by `make' and install them, > > taking seriously less time than the original `make') and restart > > KDE. At least that's how it would with an ordinary port. >=20 > One of the two of us is confused about this. > As I understand it: > A) Running "make build" but not "make install" doesn't really > solve the "installing while running" issue. Sure, it won't install > for that port, but it will build-and-install for every port upstream > ... I see. You are talking abiout ABI mismatch. I dug up a portion of your earlier post: > Let's say KDE uses libfoo.1.5.so, which is actually v1.5.7. > You upgrade something, which upgrades libfoo.1.5.so to v1.5.8. The > kernel (unaware of the change) reloads part of the file and restarts > execution at a particular address. Will that address valid code? When a file is open by a process, even if you unlink it and replace it with another one, the original file will stay on disk until the last file handle referencing it is closed. I assume that holds true for libraries too. So, EXISTING processes aren't screwed. But, when a NEW process is created, it references the NEW shared library, and if their ABI's don't match --- BOOM!:) That was just a correction. I was under the impression that the OP already had KDE (and thus all `father' ports) installed and up-to-date, and only wanted to patch a file. That would mean there would be 0 upstream ports rebuilt, or am I mistaken? Maybe my post looks like stating it's a universal approach. It isn't. Sorry I didn't mention it. But if the OP doesn't have KDE up-to-date, he could `downgrade' his ports tree to match his packages (reducing the problem to the previous one). Of course that's only possible if the patch applies to the `downgraded' KDE too. He will still have to build (not-up-to-date) KDE, but this should escape ABI worries, as in fact no other changes will be made. > B) ... unless you're suggesting starting at the top of the > dependency tree and doing build-but-don't-install by hand for every > component in order. I consider this severely impractical; it also ... The ABI problem isn't solved by your B) approach, which will only build `father' ports but still install `grandfather' ports. > C) ... won't work with portupgrade unless one uses the "w" option. Please read more carefully. I mentioned '-w'. --=20 DoubleF "When I was crossing the border into Canada, they asked if I had any firearms with me. I said, `Well, what do you need?'" -- Steven Wright --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4FTRwo7hT/9lVdwRAm9NAJ4l3rV0IpKDWa5RYQn+fZEHMKET9QCfcmLU j0p0X4slXRuQcgdXjqwRw1E= =yaSa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:06:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E5816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:06:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDA543D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:06:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bf0We-0003Mr-QJ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:06:40 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: Douglas Korinke , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040628155928.M80962@eagle.fgcu.edu> References: <20040628155928.M80962@eagle.fgcu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088445976.98341.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:06:16 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Trying to install Flash... BUT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:06:43 -0000 On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:09, Douglas Korinke wrote: > Soooo, I am on a Toshiba Satellite 2405-S221 with FBSD 4.9 running KDE 3.1.4 > and attempting to get a Flash plugin working.. > > So I goto the HowTo at KDE's site at: > http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php > > and follow the directions to the line.. but nothing is still going for me. > > I decide to try it again a few times and still nothing until a brilliant > stroke of genius tells me to check my KDE version.. the HowTo calls for KDE- > 3.2.3 aduhh, well I finally follow the first step and pkg_delete 3.1.4 and I > try to install 3.2.3 from the ports collection. > > The install finds all the dependencies except for kwalletbackend, then > attempts to install it when this warning comes up... > > Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulnerabilities > Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT > *** Error Code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. > *** Error Code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3. > > Any ideas or suggestions? > > Thanks a lot, > Doug > > ICQ : 26096369 > AIM : itss0lidstate > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Doug Its basically saying you need OpenSSL installed before it can install KDE 3.2.3. Do this: #cd /usr/ports #make search name=openssl | more find openssl port.. then install it.. then try installing kde again. Should fix the problem. Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:20:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4B016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:20:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1F543D53 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:20:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 25470480 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:06:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:20:34 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040628132034.1d17509b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <40E0508F.2060900@mac.com> References: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <40E0508F.2060900@mac.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:20:41 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:08:31 -0400 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > I've been going though transfering all the freebsd mailing lists > > I've subscribe to over to one account... the small problem I ran > > into is this, I can send emails from this new account fine, but > > for some reason if I send something to a list, it does not appear > > to show up... I niether recieve it nor does it show up in the > > archive... > > This message made it through. I've seen mailing list lag of up to > 48 hours from time to time, so there may be some mail getting stuck > on a queue for whatever reasons. Yeah, that is what happened, hehe accidentally tripled posted ^_^ Yeah, never really seen it lag befor like that :/ but it is working nicely now :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:21:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F68F16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bombadil.mebtel.net (bombadil.mebtel.net [64.40.67.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4116743D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:21:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmooney@decaturhotel.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bombadil.mebtel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A892087B3 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:21:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bombadil.mebtel.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bombadil [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08686-04 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:21:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from decaturit (66-79-12-26.clec.nworla.commercial.madisonriver.net [66.79.12.26]) by bombadil.mebtel.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 30D842087BF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:21:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "James Mooney" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:12:38 -0500 Message-ID: <002e01c45d3b$7f711eb0$f201a8c0@decaturit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mebtel.net Subject: Burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmooney@decaturhotel.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:21:37 -0000 I down loaded the newest version release 5.2.1 i386 and I seem to have a problem burning disk 2 it says ziped it is 268 megs but when I unzip it and try to burn it to CD it says it is 799 megs ?? Any ideas? James Mooney IT Dept Decatur Hotels Corp 317 Magazine St New Orleans La.70130 504-962-5582 This e-mail may contain confidential, copyright or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. I cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication, or that it is free from errors, viruses or interference. As the Internet is not a guaranteed secure environment, I cannot ensure that an email is not interfered with during transmission. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 06/04/2004 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:22:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329C816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:22:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E188043D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:22:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 25470695 for multiple; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:08:30 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:22:32 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Jim Trigg Message-Id: <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:22:44 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 Jim Trigg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:13:53PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:12 -0700 (PDT) > > Your Name wrote: > > > > > I'd like to upgrade to the x.org series from XFree86. > > > Is there any simple guide to how to do this? There's > > > nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I see that some people > > > have reported general success, but I'm worried that > > > I'll miss something or forget about rebuilding > > > something in the three days it'll take to rebuild > > > every X dependent > > > port on my system. > > > > build xorg-server, deinstall it, reinstall, it use pkgdb -uF to > > fix :) > > > > then repeat for what other xorg stuff you want :) > > > > the pkgdb -uF is important... it will go through and update > > /var/db/pkg so that all ports recognize using the new xlibs and > > don't try to reinstall xfree86... > > > > pkgdb is part of portupgrade > > AFAICT, this won't really do anything -- there does not appear to be > a real way to tell the ports system that you want X ports to depend > on xorg instead of xfree. Every X port appears to have xfree > hardcoded. Not sure, I think some do, but everything I have hear does not seem to have that problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:26:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151BB16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E735F43D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bf0pS-0008TK-OO; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:26:06 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jmooney@decaturhotel.com Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:27:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <002e01c45d3b$7f711eb0$f201a8c0@decaturit> In-Reply-To: <002e01c45d3b$7f711eb0$f201a8c0@decaturit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281327.12295.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b50c0478ef058c976429e603d05788df3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 Subject: Re: Burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:26:07 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 01:12 pm, James Mooney wrote: > I down loaded the newest version release 5.2.1 i386 and > I seem to have a problem burning disk 2 it says ziped > it is 268 megs but when I unzip it and try to burn it to CD > it says it is 799 megs ?? > Any ideas? > > James Mooney Are you talking about file 5.2.1-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso? If so, don't unzip it, just burn it. Best regards, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:28:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DFE16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:28:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D91743D49 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:28:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 20595 invoked by uid 513); 28 Jun 2004 18:34:02 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.418905 secs); 28 Jun 2004 18:34:02 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 18:34:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:30:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: "Andrew L. Gould" In-Reply-To: <200406281125.35028.algould@datawok.com> Message-ID: <20040628202809.T24044@pukruppa.net> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <200406281125.35028.algould@datawok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Your Name Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:28:44 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > I was unaware that FreeBSD switched to X.org from XFree86. Did we > switch or is there name confusion? Are both offered in the newer > ports? FreeBSD didn't switch. xorg is an alternative to xfree86 and some people try if it works. See www.x.org and google for discussions. Regards, Uli. > > Andrew Gould > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:45:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D5816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:45:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from argent.heraldsnet.org (argent.heraldsnet.org [64.83.41.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4F043D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:45:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jtrigg@spamcop.net) Received: by argent.heraldsnet.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6874E404; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:45:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:45:08 -0400 From: Jim Trigg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628184508.GD83630@spamcop.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:45:12 -0000 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 > Jim Trigg wrote: > > > > AFAICT, this won't really do anything -- there does not appear to be > > a real way to tell the ports system that you want X ports to depend > > on xorg instead of xfree. Every X port appears to have xfree > > hardcoded. > > Not sure, I think some do, but everything I have hear does not seem to > have that problem. OK, so how do you get cvsup to use xorg? As best I can tell, it will depend on either XFree86 (XFree86 v. 3) or XFree86-4-libraries (XFree86 v. 4), with no option to depend on xorg-libraries. Thanks, Jim -- Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website X HELP CURE HTML MAIL Verger, All Saints Church - Sharon Chapel / \ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:46:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CB616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21105.mail.yahoo.com (web21105.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C33D243D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628184645.66571.qmail@web21105.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:46:45 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:46:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Terribile To: User LAFFER1 , Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: <20040628132509.P54848@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:46:46 -0000 Dear "User LAFFER1", > I had a similar problem with a server recently. The issue turned out to > be the NIC/NIC driver. I changed it over to a 3com and it worked like a > charm ever since. Well, I'm using the motherboard NIC, which is an Intel RC82540EM > I'm also using that power supply in a server. I've noticed it gets very > hot under load. I believe that model only has one fan and is considered a > desktop "silent" model. Its possible that your system config is too much > for it running 24/7. Its not the wattage per se, just that its not > designed for continously use. My system is only an amd athelon 2000+ with > 512mb ram, 1 7200rpm 40gig maxtor drive and a dvd reader. This is a two-fan model, with no visible speed adjustment. The output air is warm, but not outrageously so. But if that were the problem, why would the system restart immediately, and why would it be taken down by processor load rather than by a heavy disk load? Is it worth buying a 420 or 480 watt supply to test? Antec supplies are built more heavily than most, and this 380 watter cost as much as a 480 from, say, Powmax. Mark Terribile > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:48:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF5216A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:48:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.ibctech.ca (shadow2.eagle.ca [209.167.16.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D852A43D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:48:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 29837 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Jun 2004 18:48:08 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by smtp.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.028045 secs); 28 Jun 2004 18:48:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 18:48:08 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca) by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4290.209.167.16.15.1088448488.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <002e01c45d3b$7f711eb0$f201a8c0@decaturit> References: <002e01c45d3b$7f711eb0$f201a8c0@decaturit> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:48:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: jmooney@decaturhotel.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:48:52 -0000 > I down loaded the newest version release 5.2.1 i386 and > I seem to have a problem burning disk 2 it says ziped > it is 268 megs but when I unzip it and try to burn it to CD > it says it is 799 megs ?? > Any ideas? If you have downloaded the .iso image, you want to 'Burn CD from CD image', as opposed to unzipping, and/or just plain burning it as data. Depending on what CD burning software you use, you should have a similar option. In Adaptec v5, it is under the 'File' menu. Steve > > James Mooney > IT Dept > Decatur Hotels Corp > 317 Magazine St > New Orleans La.70130 > 504-962-5582 > This e-mail may contain confidential, copyright or privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this e-mail > in > error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this > e-mail is strictly forbidden. > > I cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication, or that it is free > from errors, viruses or interference. As the Internet is not a guaranteed > secure environment, I cannot ensure that an email is not interfered with > during transmission. > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 06/04/2004 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > t: 905.373.9313 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:51:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282E916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD1943D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1Bf1De-0002R1-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:51:08 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16608.26774.233788.432969@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:51:02 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040628172641.GB2963@shark.localdomain> References: <20040628134639.GA5699@shark.localdomain> <16608.13888.194802.955936@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20040628172641.GB2963@shark.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:13 -0000 Sergey Zaharchenko writes: > When a file is open by a process, even if you unlink it and replace it > with another one, the original file will stay on disk until the last > file handle referencing it is closed. Yes. > I assume that holds true for libraries too. I don't ... but I must also allow as I'm talking at the border between understanding, informed speculation, and outright guesswork. > So, EXISTING processes aren't screwed. But, when a NEW > process is created, it references the NEW shared library, and if their > ABI's don't match --- BOOM!:) That was just a correction. > > I was under the impression that the OP already had KDE (and thus all > `father' ports) installed and up-to-date, and only wanted to patch a > file. I don't remember whether he said "up to date"; if so, then my worries are moot. I run a few KDE apps, but very little of the larger environment, Every time I have upgraded even one of those apps it has provoked a long, tortuous (and not always sucessful) session of upgrading other ports. > Please read more carefully. I mentioned '-w'. Mea culpa. Sorry. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:51:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6DF16A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D51543D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5776581FC; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77328-04; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F38881F8; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E06892.5020500@wcborstel.nl> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:50:58 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: <51254.81.84.175.12.1088424904.squirrel@81.84.175.12> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: klr@6s-gaming.com cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD desktop newcomer (Enemy Territory players read) - need minor help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:51:13 -0000 Andreas Davour wrote: >On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 klr@6s-gaming.com wrote: > > > >>Hi list, >> >> > > > >>1. I've added a 'paw' menu to access the main menu, but I'd like the >>win-key to open this menu. possible? >> >> > >Almost anything is possible, if you work hard enough. Please tell us more >about what your environment is before you expect any meaningful answer. >You might want to start checking out xmodmap which is good at remapping >keys. > > > >>3. Annoyances with enemy territory: >> >> > >Keys: Look above, xmodmap might help. > > > >> - Im getting some delay switching weapons and shooting. I press mouse1 >>and about 0.5sec later the weapon will shoot. This should be >>instantaneous. I don't have any idea on this one, solutions ? >> >> > >Do remember that you are running the Linux version of ET. It is slower >than running native. You are very welcome to try to convince the >developers of Enemy Territory to do a FreeBSD version. > > As long as you have a fairly powerful machine you should be able to play it without problems. I ran it on a Celeron 2.8 GHz with 256 DDR-333 without any problems at all. I never used caps lock, so I don't have a clue if I ever had problems with it. Cheers, Jorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:53:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1862316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:53:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCB143D54 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:53:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SIrCoT096079; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:53:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:53:11 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628184508.GD83630@spamcop.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628184508.GD83630@spamcop.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281353.11796.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: Jim Trigg Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:53:18 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 01:45 pm, Jim Trigg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 > > > > Jim Trigg wrote: > > > AFAICT, this won't really do anything -- there does not appear to be > > > a real way to tell the ports system that you want X ports to depend > > > on xorg instead of xfree. Every X port appears to have xfree > > > hardcoded. > > > > Not sure, I think some do, but everything I have hear does not seem to > > have that problem. > > OK, so how do you get cvsup to use xorg? As best I can tell, it will > depend on either XFree86 (XFree86 v. 3) or XFree86-4-libraries (XFree86 > v. 4), with no option to depend on xorg-libraries. > > Thanks, > Jim Well, you could always use cvsup-witout-gui. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:53:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0D316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:53:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DA843D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i5SIr47K068965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:53:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i5SIr463068964; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:53:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:53:04 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Vulpes Velox Message-ID: <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Vulpes Velox , Jim Trigg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:53:04 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Jim Trigg cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:53:18 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:13:53PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > > build xorg-server, deinstall it, reinstall, it use pkgdb -uF to > > > fix :) Doing: # portupgrade -o x11-servers/xorg-server -f XFree86-Server-4.3.0_14 will substitute the X.Org version for the XFree one with minimal hassle and automatically take care of all of the pkgdb(1) stuff as well. > > > then repeat for what other xorg stuff you want :) Actually, you should start with devel/imake-6, then do x11/xorg-libraries, then x11/xorg-clients. Then update the various fonts and stuff -- there's almost a one-to-one mapping of XFree ports onto X.Org ports, except for the x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontScalable port, which I chose to replace by x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype, plus installed x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-type1 after doing that. The x11-servers/XFree86-4-NestServer port doesn't seem to have an X.Org equivalent. Keep x11-servers/xorg-servers till last but one. Finally, pkg_delete the x11/XFree86-4 meta-port, and install x11/xorg. I did have some trouble with compiling the graphics/dri port after the imake and X11 libraries updates. That's something that x11-servers/xorg-servers depends on under i386 arch. You can substitute graphics/dri-devel, which seems to work just fine. > > > the pkgdb -uF is important... it will go through and update > > > /var/db/pkg so that all ports recognize using the new xlibs and > > > don't try to reinstall xfree86... If you use portupgrade to substitute the X.Org port for the XFree86 ones as I describe above, you don't need to continually keep re-running pkgdb -F. However, you will need to run pkgdb every time you unpdate or install any X related port from now on. The good news is most X dependent ports will run just fine without a re-compile. The only one I had any trouble with was multimedia/mplayer, and that was fixed by reinstalling. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4GkPiD657aJF7eIRAialAJ9L5X3o3RtvvNnVVzql781+oxyk8ACaAmRG GuemCrzPYubnONZgURfjyQg= =Q1qJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 18:59:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D395916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:59:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631D843D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:59:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5SIwoco001869; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:58:51 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:59:16 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628021842.72854988@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <40E0508F.2060900@mac.com> <20040628132034.1d17509b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040628132034.1d17509b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281159.16179.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Vulpes Velox Subject: Re: a quick mailing list question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:59:19 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 11:20 am, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:08:31 -0400 > > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > > I've been going though transfering all the freebsd mailing lists > > > I've subscribe to over to one account... the small problem I ran > > > into is this, I can send emails from this new account fine, but > > > for some reason if I send something to a list, it does not appear > > > to show up... I niether recieve it nor does it show up in the > > > archive... > > > > This message made it through. I've seen mailing list lag of up to > > 48 hours from time to time, so there may be some mail getting stuck > > on a queue for whatever reasons. > > Yeah, that is what happened, hehe accidentally tripled posted ^_^ > > Yeah, never really seen it lag befor like that :/ > but it is working nicely now :) Mailman has died a few times. I follow cvs-all and the one of the very last messages was one from krion where he updated ghostscript-gnu. This was about 11:14 am on Sunday and nothing was received until I started kmail on mid-morning Monday. When this happens, what I do is browse the current mail list at http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/current/ If the last email on a list that you subscribe to is the same one that is in your inbox, it is probably safe to assume mailman has died and ignore the situation. Double or triple posting only generates snide remarks :). The plist for the updated ghostscript-gnu included an erroneous file and it was fixed without using mailman. Changes to the system continued it was just the email side that was hung up. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:06:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4250816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6311B43D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ntlbusiness.com) Received: from mta2-svc ([10.137.100.67]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040628190455.ZIOH8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@mta2-svc> for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:04:55 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [62.252.64.15] From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040628190455.ZIOH8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@mta2-svc> Subject: Your help needed please! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:17 -0000 Hello, My first post to this list. I pray that you'll be able to assist me please. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE, and my sister today asked if I could reinstall her OS on her WinXP machine. I used the WinXP CD burning utlity to burn "My documents" folder, and stupidly I didn't check it suceeded, not worked. I then proceeded to reinstall the OS, thus losing all data, and then found that on all PC's I tried, including my WinXP laptop, that the CD appears as blank. When I tried on my FreeBSD machine, a "ls" in the cdrom drive shows nothing, yet: london# burncd -f /dev/acd1c msinfo 0,14266 showing that something has been burned. The actual CD looks as if something has been burned onto it. The data is very important to my sister, so I really need to try and access it. I am not sure if the CD closure procedure didn't work as expected. I tried some CDR recovery applications for Win, but to no avail. london# burncd -f /dev/acd1c fixate fixating CD, please wait.. burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error No idea why this happens. A "du" returns: london# mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1c /cdrom london# cd /cdrom london# du 2 . london# ls london# Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:06:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4293316A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0D343D53 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ntlbusiness.com) Received: from mta2-svc ([10.137.100.67]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040628190453.ZIME8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@mta2-svc> for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:04:53 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [62.252.64.15] From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:36 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040628190453.ZIME8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@mta2-svc> Subject: Your help needed please! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:17 -0000 Hello, My first post to this list. I pray that you'll be able to assist me please. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE, and my sister today asked if I could reinstall her OS on her WinXP machine. I used the WinXP CD burning utlity to burn "My documents" folder, and stupidly I didn't check it suceeded, not worked. I then proceeded to reinstall the OS, thus losing all data, and then found that on all PC's I tried, including my WinXP laptop, that the CD appears as blank. When I tried on my FreeBSD machine, a "ls" in the cdrom drive shows nothing, yet: london# burncd -f /dev/acd1c msinfo 0,14266 showing that something has been burned. The actual CD looks as if something has been burned onto it. The data is very important to my sister, so I really need to try and access it. I am not sure if the CD closure procedure didn't work as expected. I tried some CDR recovery applications for Win, but to no avail. london# burncd -f /dev/acd1c fixate fixating CD, please wait.. burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error No idea why this happens. A "du" returns: london# mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1c /cdrom london# cd /cdrom london# du 2 . london# ls london# Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:06:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B5C16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21122.mail.yahoo.com (web21122.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5D3C43D45 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628190654.96737.qmail@web21122.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21122.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:06:54 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:06:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040628163203.374C216A4E7@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Maximum uptime 497 days? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:06:55 -0000 [Coming in late ...] > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 05:19:10PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, 12:39+0900, Rob wrote: > > > By accident I happen to come across this remarkable limit of > > > uptime registration for FreeBSD systems. After 497 days, the > > > timer jumps to zero again. > > > > > > 497 days is less than a 1.5 years ! > > > > > > Has this been fixed in newer versions of FreeBSD (stable and/or > > > current) ? Or is there a hardware limitation (CPU?) that does > > > not allow this? Most system management/statistical things are built around the MIB (Management Information Base) concept used by SNMP, etc. These call for time to be kept in 10,000ths of a second in a 32-bit unsigned counter. That register rolls over in about 497 days. (Later versions of the base MIB add 64-bit counters, but support isn't universal and software designs tend to prefer the original counters.) Mark Terribile __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:10:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBEA16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:10:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A71743D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:10:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i5SJAZSp000334; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:10:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i5SJAZqq000331; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:10:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:10:35 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: Mark Terribile In-Reply-To: <20040628184645.66571.qmail@web21105.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040628150417.W242@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <20040628184645.66571.qmail@web21105.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bruce Hunter Subject: Re: Problem restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:10:17 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Mark Terribile wrote: > > Dear "User LAFFER1", > >> I had a similar problem with a server recently. The issue turned out to >> be the NIC/NIC driver. I changed it over to a 3com and it worked like a >> charm ever since. > > Well, I'm using the motherboard NIC, which is an Intel RC82540EM > >> I'm also using that power supply in a server. I've noticed it gets very >> hot under load. I believe that model only has one fan and is considered a >> desktop "silent" model. Its possible that your system config is too much >> for it running 24/7. Its not the wattage per se, just that its not >> designed for continously use. My system is only an amd athelon 2000+ with >> 512mb ram, 1 7200rpm 40gig maxtor drive and a dvd reader. > > This is a two-fan model, with no visible speed adjustment. The output air > is warm, but not outrageously so. But if that were the problem, why > would the system restart immediately, and why would it be taken down by > processor load rather than by a heavy disk load? Is it worth buying a > 420 or 480 watt supply to test? Antec supplies are built more heavily than > most, and this 380 watter cost as much as a 480 from, say, Powmax. > > Mark Terribile > >> > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The intel nic drivers tend to be pretty stable. Interesting that yours is a two fan model. Mine was included in an Antec case. If you know it only occurs under heavy CPU load, then that leads to two conclusions. 1. Hardware issue/thermal. Perhaps your cpu fan is not adequate. Perhaps thermal compound might help? Artic silver.. etc. Another possibility is that you have adequate cooling but a sensor on the processor, fan or motherboard watching the cpu is malfunctioning and making the system think its overheating. Can you look at the temperature readings for the cpu in the bios, etc? 2. Software issue. I tend to lean toward hardware as others have posted. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:11:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A053416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:11:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whoweb.com (whoweb.com [216.38.168.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E8D43D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailist@whoweb.com) Received: from whoweb.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5SJC2Ve085160 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mailist@localhost) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5SJC2Po085159 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:12:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Incoming Mail List Message-Id: <200406281912.i5SJC2Po085159@whoweb.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPFW-2 help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:11:41 -0000 Can anyone fluent with IPFW-2 help me by explaining what's happening with the following rules? I'm not getting the results I expect and can't make any logical conclusions regarding them. SERVER CONFIGURATION -------------------- FBSD v5.2.1 with IPFW-2 Four port NIC, but for simplicity sake I am only showing two ports in this example of the rules. FBSD box router/gateway contains: dc1 is 192.168.1.1 dc2 is 192.168.2.1 One machine (192.168.1.10) is attached to the 1.0 network. One machine (192.168.2.254) is attached to the 2.0 network. With an open firewall, anything hanging off the 1.0 network can talk to the 2.0 network and vice-versa. So routing is fine. RULESET ------- 01600 skipto 4000 ip from any to any via dc1 01800 skipto 8000 ip from any to any via dc2 04000 check-state 04200 allow ip from any to any in via dc1 keep-state 04400 deny ip from any to any 08000 deny ip from any to 192.168.2.254 dst-port 23 08100 check-state 08200 allow ip from any to any in via dc2 keep-state 65000 deny ip from any to any MY CONFUSION ------------ 1. I want machines on dc1 to be able to go anywhere, but I want to block telnet into 192.168.2.254. 2. Rule 8000 is not blocking access to 192.168.2.254 dst-port 23 as I thought it would. I can telnet to 2.254 without any problem. The dynamic rule 4200 is setup with bidirectional communication between 1.10 and 2.254, but Rule 8000 has no impact on packets traveling through dc2 with a target of 2.254. 3. If I move Rule 8000 before Rule 1600, packets are blocked from 192.168.2.254 dst-port 23 as I expect them to be. MY QUESTION ----------- Why are packets blocked if the deny rule is placed prior to Rule 1600 but not within the block of rules defined for traffic in and out of dc2? Is this because static rules referencing the interface do not match packets that were initially introduced using a dynamic rule? Thanks, Jon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:12:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC07E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.ewetel.de (mail2-116.ewetel.de [212.6.122.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EC943D31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from ensign.laverenz.de (dialin-80-228-12-043.ewetel.net [80.228.12.43]) by mail2.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5SJClII015023 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:51 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.laverenz.de [127.0.0.1]) by ensign.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD7876F4F5 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ensign.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ensign.laverenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05323-01 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ensign.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id C4D2D76F4F3; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:45 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628191245.GA4968@ensign.laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org References: <40DF3FBF.8060400@whacky.net> <20040628055242.E3532@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> <40E04C77.7000500@whacky.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E04C77.7000500@whacky.net> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at laverenz.de X-CheckCompat: OK Subject: Re: dhclient with reconfigured SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:12:54 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 06:51:03PM +0200, Stephan van Beerschoten wrote: > Will this lock the ssid during reboots as well ? If not, that actually > is what I am looking for. You can put it into /etc/dhclient.conf, e.g.: interface "wi0" { media "ssid wepmode on wepkey "; } cu, Uwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:26:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C10B16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:26:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB7643D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i5SJQSBa069326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:26:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i5SJQSak069325 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:26:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:26:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628192628.GB68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628184508.GD83630@spamcop.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628184508.GD83630@spamcop.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:26:29 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:26:44 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:45:08PM -0400, Jim Trigg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 > > Jim Trigg wrote: > > >=20 > > > AFAICT, this won't really do anything -- there does not appear to be > > > a real way to tell the ports system that you want X ports to depend > > > on xorg instead of xfree. Every X port appears to have xfree > > > hardcoded. > >=20 > > Not sure, I think some do, but everything I have hear does not seem to > > have that problem. >=20 > OK, so how do you get cvsup to use xorg? As best I can tell, it will > depend on either XFree86 (XFree86 v. 3) or XFree86-4-libraries (XFree86 > v. 4), with no option to depend on xorg-libraries. Both the XFree86-4-libraries and xorg-libraries provide the /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 shared library (amongst others). It's the same ABI independent of which port the shlib comes from. The short answer is "just install the x11/xorg-libraries port before you install cvsup". In fact, cvsup works perfectly well even if you replace the XFree86 libs with the xorg ones underneath a previously installed copy of cvsup. Doesn't even need a recompile. The same goes for most X based software. Here's how it works: when the Makefile in the cvsup port says "USE_XLIB" that gets transformed into a LIB_DEPENDS line in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk: LIB_DEPENDS+=3D X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-libraries (assuming you've not got XFREE86_VERSION =3D=3D 3). That LIB_DEPENDS line is in two parts separated by a colon. The first bit: X11.6 means that the port needs to link against libX11.so.6, and it checks to see if a suitable shlib is installed and accessible by grep'ing in the output of ldconfig: % ldconfig -r | fgrep X11.6 116:-lX11.6 =3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 Since last night on my system that's from: % pkg_info -W /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 was installed by package xorg-libraries-6.7.0 If make(1) can find a suitable shlib, everything is happy and the compile continues -- all make looks for is the presence of the library. It doesn't check what (if any) port the library is part of. Only if it can't find the correct shlib does the right hand side of that LIB_DEPENDS line get considered: ${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-libraries That's simply a suggestion of a suitable port that will provide the required shlib, and fulfil the dependency. But there are several such ports in the tree, any of which could be used. Often in such situations there will be some sort of 'WANT_FOO' or 'WITH_FOO_VER' make variable to select which one gets used. Unfortunately, no such mechanism for saying "I want X.Org ports in preference to XFree86 ones" has yet been committed. One annoyance due to the lake of make(1) infrastructure is that the suggested port will be listed in the package dependencies of the installed port, rather than the actual port that provided the shlib you used to build against. That, however, is just an administrative detail which you can fix up with pkgdb(1), and has no real bearing on the effectiveness of the software. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4HDkiD657aJF7eIRAvNpAJ9oOpSelGEMGEIYiuOGyI94no6d1gCfbOpV 0C7G/+5OnU4LddbFtJxx9bY= =9uHN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:33:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB15016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:33:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC7243D55 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:33:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5SJXAoT096571; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:33:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:33:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628184508.GD83630@spamcop.net> <20040628192628.GB68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040628192628.GB68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281433.09907.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:33:25 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 02:26 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:45:08PM -0400, Jim Trigg wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:56 -0400 > > > > > > Jim Trigg wrote: > > > > AFAICT, this won't really do anything -- there does not appear to be > > > > a real way to tell the ports system that you want X ports to depend > > > > on xorg instead of xfree. Every X port appears to have xfree > > > > hardcoded. > > > > > > Not sure, I think some do, but everything I have hear does not seem to > > > have that problem. > > > > OK, so how do you get cvsup to use xorg? As best I can tell, it will > > depend on either XFree86 (XFree86 v. 3) or XFree86-4-libraries (XFree86 > > v. 4), with no option to depend on xorg-libraries. > > Both the XFree86-4-libraries and xorg-libraries provide the > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 shared library (amongst others). It's the > same ABI independent of which port the shlib comes from. > > The short answer is "just install the x11/xorg-libraries port before > you install cvsup". > > In fact, cvsup works perfectly well even if you replace the XFree86 > libs with the xorg ones underneath a previously installed copy of > cvsup. Doesn't even need a recompile. The same goes for most X based > software. > > Here's how it works: when the Makefile in the cvsup port says > "USE_XLIB" that gets transformed into a LIB_DEPENDS line in > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk: > > LIB_DEPENDS+= X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-libraries > > (assuming you've not got XFREE86_VERSION == 3). > > That LIB_DEPENDS line is in two parts separated by a colon. The first > bit: > > X11.6 > > means that the port needs to link against libX11.so.6, and it checks > to see if a suitable shlib is installed and accessible by grep'ing in > the output of ldconfig: > > % ldconfig -r | fgrep X11.6 > 116:-lX11.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > > Since last night on my system that's from: > > % pkg_info -W /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 was installed by package > xorg-libraries-6.7.0 > > If make(1) can find a suitable shlib, everything is happy and the > compile continues -- all make looks for is the presence of the > library. It doesn't check what (if any) port the library is part of. > Only if it can't find the correct shlib does the right hand side of > that LIB_DEPENDS line get considered: > > ${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-libraries > > That's simply a suggestion of a suitable port that will provide the > required shlib, and fulfil the dependency. But there are several such > ports in the tree, any of which could be used. Often in such > situations there will be some sort of 'WANT_FOO' or 'WITH_FOO_VER' > make variable to select which one gets used. Unfortunately, no such > mechanism for saying "I want X.Org ports in preference to XFree86 > ones" has yet been committed. > > One annoyance due to the lake of make(1) infrastructure is that the > suggested port will be listed in the package dependencies of the > installed port, rather than the actual port that provided the shlib > you used to build against. That, however, is just an administrative > detail which you can fix up with pkgdb(1), and has no real bearing on > the effectiveness of the software. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Odd - all I did was remove XFree, install the Xorg meta-port. Rename XF86Config to xorgcfg in /etc/X11R6, restart X and bingo. Now, I am cvsup'in as we speak - then again, I don't use the gui version of cvsup. If anyone is interested, I'll post a follow-up. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:41:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CDA16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:41:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21126.mail.yahoo.com (web21126.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B37343D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:41:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628194104.99686.qmail@web21126.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21126.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:41:04 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:41:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040628191029.B541F16A4E2@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: LAFFER1 Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 67, Issue 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:41:05 -0000 OK, new info on the restart problem. > If you know it only occurs under heavy CPU load, then that leads to two > conclusions. > > 1. Hardware issue/thermal. Perhaps your cpu fan is not adequate. Perhaps > thermal compound might help? Artic silver.. etc. Another possibility is > that you have adequate cooling but a sensor on the processor, fan or > motherboard watching the cpu is malfunctioning and making the system think > its overheating. Can you look at the temperature readings for the cpu in > the bios, etc? > > 2. Software issue. I just ran lmmon (lmmon -i) and got outrageously high readings: 185C, varying. Yet the heat sink isn't even warm. Assuming that lmmon can be trusted, I have to check (read re-do) the thermal compound. I'm not really looking forward to this, so if anyone knows that lmmon can't be trusted, please email me in the next few hours! I have some Arctic Silver laying around. Mark Terribile __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:45:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0A516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:45:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orfeas.asda.gr (orfeas.asda.gr [194.219.142.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CA543D58 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:45:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lefty@ene.asda.gr) Received: by orfeas.asda.gr (Postfix, from userid 202) id 02DDF16D; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:45:54 +0300 (EEST) Received: from ene.asda.gr (ene.asda.gr [193.92.118.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ene.asda.gr", Issuer "ASDA Root CA" (verified OK)) by orfeas.asda.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF026116 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:45:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: by ene.asda.gr (Postfix, from userid 202) id 12314154; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:45:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from ene.asda.gr (lefty.ene.asda.gr [193.92.118.162]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))OK)) by ene.asda.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5346E10 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:45:37 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <40E07571.EBC3290E@ene.asda.gr> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:45:53 +0300 From: Lefteris Tsintjelis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,el MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on orfeas.asda.gr X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: How do I create a freebsd local distribution point? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:45:57 -0000 Hi, I want to create an internal central FreeBSD distribution point for kernel sources and ports. In the long term, I would also like to precompile and distribute packages and sources. Is there any good starting point that explains all this? Please CC TIA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:48:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EA916A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hoemail1.lucent.com (hoemail1.lucent.com [192.11.226.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C4143D1F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rrajarajan@lucent.com) Received: from nj7460exch002h.wins.lucent.com (h135-17-42-35.lucent.com [135.17.42.35])i5SJmcxx006668; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:48:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: by nj7460exch002h.ho.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:48:38 -0400 Message-ID: <1B8C2E08B21B8743A2B3AED07407DA760822B2A3@nj7460exch002u.ho.lucent.com> From: "Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan)" To: "'grog@freebsd.org'" , "'FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:48:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: RE: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:48:55 -0000 Hi, I have a copy of your book and thoroughly enjoyed reading it particularly when I was installing freeBSD the first time one year ago. I see this mail of yours every friday at 1:02 PM and wonder if it is just a cronjob mail. I wish if it could have a synopsis of what are the recent additions to the errata since the last mail was sent out. Thanks RR ps. BTW is your site down today ? -----Original Message----- From: grog@freebsd.org [mailto:grog@freebsd.org] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 1:02 PM To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:00:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319B316A4E9 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:00:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C975843D46 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:59:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AAD4871E for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jester@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i5SJxwA07243 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:59:58 -0400 From: Jesse Sheidlower To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628195958.GA1001@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: libXRes.so.0 and xorg updating X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:00:36 -0000 Inspired by all the talk of upgrading to the xorg libraries, I tried to do this this afternoon. Most things seem to be working OK, but I seem to be hung up in one spot. When I restarted X after the update, I got a bunch of errors about Gnome panel apps, and the panel does not appear. I tried to portupgrade -f gnomepanel, and this eventually dies with a /usr/bin/ld: warning: libXRes.so.0, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libwnck-1.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) error. I tried portinstalling libXres, but this (and its dependencies) conflicts with xorg-libraries, so I pulled it again. I have run pkgdb, so gnomepanel should be looking at xorg-libraries. Any ideas of where to go from here? Thanks. Jesse Sheidlower From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:17:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C926316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:17:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5945743D39 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:17:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (52.80-202-129.nextgentel.com [80.202.129.52]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF38B3081; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:18:10 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <40E0FBB0.4010905@broadpark.no> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:18:40 -0700 From: Henrik W Lund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: nb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lefteris Tsintjelis References: <40E07571.EBC3290E@ene.asda.gr> In-Reply-To: <40E07571.EBC3290E@ene.asda.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I create a freebsd local distribution point? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:17:45 -0000 Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: >Hi, > >I want to create an internal central FreeBSD distribution point for kernel >sources and ports. In the long term, I would also like to precompile and >distribute packages and sources. Is there any good starting point that >explains all this? > >Please CC > >TIA > > Greetings!! You would want to look into cvsup, and use it to pull the entire source repository down to your distribution machine, and let cvsup on the other machines connect to it for updating their individual source trees. Check out the handbook for starters, and dig deeper from there. I'm sure there are other ways of doing this, but this seems to me the easiest. -Henrik W Lund From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:21:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9AD16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A05A43D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:21:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:22:25 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:24:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:24:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2004 20:22:25.0803 (UTC) FILETIME=[A0649DB0:01C45D4D] Subject: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:21:38 -0000 I have 2 fxp Intel 100mb cards in this machine that work fine. I have ran it with 3 fxp cards in the past. I added an em0, Intel gigabit this morning. The card displays a non active status during the boot process. RC.conf is processed and the card does not get an ip address, while the fxp cards do. Later in the boot process in bright white letters it shows the card status has changed to active. I believe my problems getting rc.conf to assign the IP address are related to this. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 5.2-p2 (feb) Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:24:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF75916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:24:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4E943D48 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6184981EB for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jester@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i5SKOYG26314 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:34 -0400 From: Jesse Sheidlower To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628202430.GA17808@panix.com> References: <20040628195958.GA1001@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628195958.GA1001@panix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: libXRes.so.0 and xorg updating X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:24:43 -0000 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:59:58PM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: > > Inspired by all the talk of upgrading to the xorg libraries, I tried > to do this this afternoon. Most things seem to be working OK, but > I seem to be hung up in one spot. > > When I restarted X after the update, I got a bunch of errors about > Gnome panel apps, and the panel does not appear. I tried to > portupgrade -f gnomepanel, and this eventually dies with a > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libXRes.so.0, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libwnck-1.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > > error. I'm sorry for asking this question without first trying to portupgrade libwnck, which did the trick immediately. Luckily I seem to have caught this before anyone responded... Jesse Sheidlower From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:28:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA48316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:28:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDF943D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:28:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8AB48175; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:39:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 141.156.69.109 ([141.156.69.109]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:39:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20040628163921.ps0400cwosw04gg8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:39:21 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Michael Clark References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:28:47 -0000 Quoting Michael Clark : > I have 2 fxp Intel 100mb cards in this machine that work fine. I have ran > it with 3 fxp > cards in the past. I added an em0, Intel gigabit this morning. The card > displays a > non active status during the boot process. RC.conf is processed and the > card > does not get an ip address, while the fxp cards do. Later in the boot > process > in bright white letters it shows the card status has changed to active. I > believe my > problems getting rc.conf to assign the IP address are related to this. Any > suggestions > would be appreciated. > > 5.2-p2 (feb) > I have also noticed that this card takes a while to become active... but I've been able to get an IP using dhcp anyway... it just takes a bit longer than for the 100Mbit/sec cards. Ken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:31:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EC116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:31:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chello080110061116.502.15.vie.surfer.at (chello080110061116.502.15.vie.surfer.at [80.110.61.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37ED043D5D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:31:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 28867 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 20:31:16 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (192.168.123.10) by ns.matrix.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 20:31:16 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:31:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <40E07571.EBC3290E@ene.asda.gr> In-Reply-To: <40E07571.EBC3290E@ene.asda.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_UAI4A5gD4XBN1iB"; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406282231.16530.4711@chello.at> cc: Lefteris Tsintjelis Subject: Re: How do I create a freebsd local distribution point? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:31:22 -0000 --Boundary-02=_UAI4A5gD4XBN1iB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 28 June 2004 21:45, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: > Hi, > > I want to create an internal central FreeBSD distribution point for kernel > sources and ports. In the long term, I would also like to precompile and > distribute packages and sources. Is there any good starting point that > explains all this? See the FreeBSD Handbook, Chapter 22.5 Tracking for Multiple Machines: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html =2D-=20 Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x941B6B0B=20 OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu --Boundary-02=_UAI4A5gD4XBN1iB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA4IAUcyi/EZQbawsRAm31AKCZqb34xZf6e1hUXjg+gZZJ+ZwjIACeNxPk 0fVAmSt49hdQn0aQyqm7aq4= =SbxL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_UAI4A5gD4XBN1iB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:39:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F75416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:39:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51102.mail.yahoo.com (web51102.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B7C643D49 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amour_hack@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040628203953.93932.qmail@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [83.129.187.251] by web51102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:39:53 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:39:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexander Kanchev To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Creating NTFS or FAT32 partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:39:54 -0000 Hello, I have a HDD attached to my computer and I need to format it with windows compatible filesystem, like NTFS or FAT32. Is this possible to make this under FreeBSD ? I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 and the HDD device is /dev/ad1 (also /dev/ad1s1) regards, alexander --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 20:43:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD2016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:43:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-244.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.125.9.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAA743D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:43:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groups@pursued-with.net) Received: from babelfish.pursued-with.net (babelfish.pursued-with.net [10.0.0.42]) by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC981AFC29 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:44:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Stevens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: OT: Beastie makes a cameo appearance on apple.com. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: groups@pursued-with.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:43:34 -0000 Apple just announced their next OS X release "Tiger", today. While browsing through the features, I noticed a Beastie icon nodding approvingly at the paragraph on the new FreeBSD 5.x -based kernel: http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/unix.html KeS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 21:33:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F2B16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:33:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CFE43D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:34:07 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:36:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: 'Kenneth Culver' , Michael Clark Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:35:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2004 21:34:07.0259 (UTC) FILETIME=[A442B6B0:01C45D57] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:33:33 -0000 Any suggestions on how to do this without DHCP? That's really not an option for me. Can I delay the rc.conf processing somehow so that the adaptor has more time to get online? Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Culver [mailto:culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:39 PM To: Michael Clark Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot Quoting Michael Clark : > I have 2 fxp Intel 100mb cards in this machine that work fine. I have ran > it with 3 fxp > cards in the past. I added an em0, Intel gigabit this morning. The card > displays a > non active status during the boot process. RC.conf is processed and the > card > does not get an ip address, while the fxp cards do. Later in the boot > process > in bright white letters it shows the card status has changed to active. I > believe my > problems getting rc.conf to assign the IP address are related to this. Any > suggestions > would be appreciated. > > 5.2-p2 (feb) > I have also noticed that this card takes a while to become active... but I've been able to get an IP using dhcp anyway... it just takes a bit longer than for the 100Mbit/sec cards. Ken CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 21:38:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C1F16A4FD for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:38:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from speedbuggy.telerama.com (speedbuggy.telerama.com [205.201.1.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8556443D1F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:38:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@telerama.com) Received: (qmail 66560 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 21:38:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?205.201.9.222?) (205.201.9.222) by speedbuggy.telerama.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 21:38:30 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:39:37 -0400 From: m To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: IPFW2 strange issues on BSD-5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:38:37 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 with IPFW2 as a firewall/router on a network. I'm seeing some very strange things in the dynamic ruleset. The last 4 entries in the list are the issues. You can see that none of the informatin in the last 4 dynamic rules makes any sense -- not the #/packets or bytes, the rule #, or even the protocol. The IP addresses referred to are not local to any part of the network, and some aren't even listed in the appropriate WHOIS database. I'm totally lost on this. Any help would be appreciated, including suggestions as to how to generate better log information. Nothing shows in my logs, either. Interestingly, these last (wierd) rules appear & disappear at random intervals, with different information each time -- different rule numebrs (but non-existent in my ruleset), different Ips, and different protocols. host-64-179-35-23# ipfw -de show 00050 35654 14976392 divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl0 00100 2988 2071714 allow ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to 127.0.0.0/8 00200 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00300 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00310 0 0 allow ip from 224.0.0.1 to any 00311 110 3960 allow ip from any to 224.0.0.1 00350 0 0 deny log argus from any to any 00351 0 0 deny log scps from any to any 00352 0 0 deny log igmp from any to any 00354 0 0 deny log netblt from any to any 00355 0 0 deny ip from 0.0.0.0 to any 00356 0 0 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0 00357 0 0 deny ipv6-nonxt from any to any 00359 0 0 deny log trunk-2 from any to any 00360 99 6224 deny log icmp from any to any 00400 891 111330 allow ip from 205.201.9.0/24 to me setup keep-state 00410 0 0 allow ip from 151.201.141.231 to me setup keep-state 00420 0 0 deny ip from any to me dst-port 22 00450 1272 539440 allow ip from any to me dst-port 25 setup keep-state 00451 151 12032 allow ip from me to any dst-port 21 setup keep-state 00452 0 0 allow ip from me to any dst-port 20 setup keep-state 00453 11513 1798157 allow ip from me to any dst-port 80 setup keep-state 00454 11 1457 allow ip from me to any dst-port 443 setup keep-state 00455 0 0 allow ip from any 20 to me setup keep-state 00457 0 0 allow ip from me to any dst-port 22 setup keep-state 00458 0 0 allow ip from any 25 to me setup keep-state 00459 0 0 allow ip from any to me dst-port 80 setup keep-state 00498 2373 267409 allow ip from any to me 00499 6267 1635428 allow ip from me to any 00520 0 0 allow ip from 224.0.0.1 to any 00530 0 0 allow ip from any to 224.0.0.1 00800 11 739 allow udp from any to 207.69.188.200 dst-port 53 00810 22 10768 allow udp from 207.69.188.200 53 to any 00820 250 15731 allow udp from any to 64.65.223.6 dst-port 53 00830 498 141930 allow udp from 64.65.223.6 53 to any 00840 94 6784 allow udp from any to any dst-port 53 00841 122 36608 allow udp from any 53 to any 00850 0 0 allow ip from 255.255.255.255 to any 00860 232 70064 allow ip from any to 255.255.255.255 00998 82 18216 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to 192.168.1.0/24 not via xl0 00999 0 0 check-state 01000 0 0 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.5 dst-port 25 setup keep-state 01010 1115 517038 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.5 dst-port 80 setup keep-state 01020 0 0 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.5 dst-port 2500 setup keep-state 01100 332 49019 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 25 setup keep-state 01110 1177 978983 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 80 setup keep-state 01115 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 443 setup keep-state 01120 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 21 setup keep-state 01125 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 20 setup keep-state 01130 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 20 to any setup keep-state 01998 83 3704 deny log ip from 192.168.1.5 to any 01999 36 1440 deny log ip from any to 192.168.1.5 02010 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 20 setup keep-state 02020 40906 23355938 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 80 setup keep-state 02030 39 20505 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 443 setup keep-state 02040 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 21 setup keep-state 02050 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 20 to any setup keep-state 65000 1968 176664 deny log ip from any to any 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any ## Dynamic rules (105): 02020 10 2859 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2943 <-> 65.54.194.59 80 01010 260 145073 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61735 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 01010 62 25228 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61734 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 00450 23 1680 (0s) STATE tcp 66.118.177.230 31470 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 01010 167 84950 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61739 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 01010 16 2474 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61737 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 00453 18 8792 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1369 <-> 63.111.24.21 80 01010 9 1148 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61743 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 02020 116 56383 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1388 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 02020 10 2210 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1382 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 02020 23 12664 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1384 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 02020 66 26546 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1386 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 00453 5 558 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1352 <-> 56.0.134.22 80 02020 30 10124 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1383 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 02020 19 10674 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1378 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 02020 87 83654 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2971 <-> 207.68.173.254 80 02020 33 16730 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2859 <-> 207.91.5.68 80 00453 4 597 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1376 <-> 216.73.86.13 80 02020 47 24913 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2857 <-> 207.91.5.68 80 00453 11 698 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2856 <-> 207.91.5.68 80 02020 10 2000 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2560 <-> 65.205.8.106 80 00453 5 1273 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1395 <-> 216.52.17.116 80 00453 6 1143 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1392 <-> 216.52.17.116 80 02020 8 1136 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2830 <-> 216.27.102.15 80 00453 5 968 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1372 <-> 206.65.183.80 80 02020 12 5126 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1313 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 00450 8 388 (0s) STATE tcp 208.17.205.133 1246 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 00400 890 111270 (300s) STATE tcp 205.201.9.222 56200 <-> 64.179.35.23 22 02020 12 1253 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1376 <-> 216.73.86.13 80 00453 4 592 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2777 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 12 1342 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2777 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00450 28 7929 (0s) STATE tcp 207.69.231.40 4731 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 00451 67 5443 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 53377 <-> 205.201.9.227 21 00453 7 862 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1378 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 7 862 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1377 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00450 28 3078 (0s) STATE tcp 68.95.226.39 2373 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 00453 4 527 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2801 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 12 1105 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2807 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 1 40 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2806 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 10 1182 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2805 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 38 27372 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2805 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 10 1543 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2976 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 02020 12 1105 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2809 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 4 529 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2808 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 86 77940 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2941 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 02020 12 1105 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2813 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 4 529 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2812 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2639 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2638 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2637 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 17 9707 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2866 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 00453 5 604 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2867 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2634 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 6 938 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2957 <-> 209.225.33.67 80 02020 10 1929 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2945 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 4 671 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2944 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 5 598 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2877 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 15 2241 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2876 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 00453 5 549 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2949 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 02020 11 1295 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2949 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 6 722 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2964 <-> 209.225.33.67 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2651 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 5 520 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2650 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 5 772 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2746 <-> 216.109.117.106 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2643 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 519 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2937 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 00450 22 3072 (0s) STATE tcp 207.69.231.40 1415 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2591 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 22 15737 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2725 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 00453 1 40 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2724 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 00453 5 520 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2665 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 5 520 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2664 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 11 1165 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2645 <-> 64.124.109.200 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2661 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 639 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2933 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 02020 10 1663 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2933 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 02020 10 1697 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2961 <-> 216.73.87.102 80 00450 19 1484 (0s) STATE tcp 66.118.177.230 33626 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 02020 10 2812 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2713 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 5 723 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2712 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 02020 17 10529 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2712 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 4 598 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2713 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 02020 17 10167 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2711 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 4 523 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2710 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 20 1316 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2834 <-> 66.218.71.233 80 00453 1 40 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2657 <-> 216.157.112.153 80 02020 8 1324 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2656 <-> 216.157.112.153 80 02020 15 1212 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2664 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 15 1212 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2665 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2661 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 2234 588879 (258s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2208 <-> 207.46.110.4 80 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2651 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2646 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2647 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 15 1677 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2642 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 6 642 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2880 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 15 1672 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2881 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2637 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2638 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 6 646 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2885 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 15 2479 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2884 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2634 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00450 22 5933 (0s) STATE tcp 207.69.231.40 3549 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 17803 51868116715982822 207007877431296 (-1014956032s) nsfnet-igp 182.141.195.93 0 <-> 95.94.91.124 0 54357 103166144177045504 17130536501248 (244479s) proto 212 1.138.233.0 17805 <-> 0.0.1.186 0 25648 7005922216430549619 7234316394206028643 (1919246953s) proto 114 115.35.10.35 25459 <-> 10.35.35.10 25205 28773 746535686742044009 7237131173698865443 (1819176809s) gmtp 112.104.115.101 28521 <-> 114.102.101.114 29285 -- Mark J. Nernberg Downtown Help Desk IT Specialist (412)478-6262 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 22:16:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A73416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:16:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CA343D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:16:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Message-ID: <40E098CB.8090201@intersonic.se> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:16:43 +0200 From: "Per olof Ljungmark" Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040417 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: openoffice configure error on -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:16:47 -0000 FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 28 19:38:50 CEST 2004, cvsup late June 27th. Build of Openoffice-1.1 stops at: checking for XShmCreateImage in -lXext... yes checking for X11/extensions/XShm.h... yes checking for XieFloGeometry in -lXIE... no checking for X11/extensions/XIElib.h... no configure: error: Could not compile basic X program. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. There is no XIElib.h on this system, should there be? /per olof From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 23:07:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C424D16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:07:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A616343D48 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:07:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hasse@swedehost.com) Received: by av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id DAB4A37E94; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.183]) by av3-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC1137E46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from odin.swedehost.com (h171n2fls33o804.telia.com [217.209.211.171]) by smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C119337E45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thor.swedehost.com (thor.swedehost.com [192.168.0.10]) by odin.swedehost.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5SN742J082860 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:07:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hasse@swedehost.com) From: Hasse Organization: The Valhalla Project To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:07:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406290107.04977.hasse@swedehost.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: Any knowledge of " VirTool.DOS.Sfc " ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:07:05 -0000 Hi everybody. Does anybody have any knowledge of VirTool.DOS.Sfc ? Didn't find any useful info on the net or in the archives. Is it a virus or a trojan ? It popped up when I did a virri-scan with ClamAV. " /usr/ports/distfiles/j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip: VirTool.DOS.Sfc FOUND " The j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip was downloaded from Sun a couple of months ago. thor# ll /usr/ports/distfiles | grep "j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip" -rw------- 1 hasse hasse 49269919 Mar 24 19:57 j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip TIA / Hasse. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 23:10:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F260A16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:10:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA5743D3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:10:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Message-ID: <40E0A542.4050209@intersonic.se> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:09:54 +0200 From: "Per olof Ljungmark" Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040417 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Per olof Ljungmark References: <40E098CB.8090201@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <40E098CB.8090201@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice configure error on -current - more info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:10:04 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 28 19:38:50 CEST 2004, cvsup late June > 27th. > > Build of Openoffice-1.1 stops at: > checking for XShmCreateImage in -lXext... yes > checking for X11/extensions/XShm.h... yes > checking for XieFloGeometry in -lXIE... no > checking for X11/extensions/XIElib.h... no > configure: error: Could not compile basic X program. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > There is no XIElib.h on this system, should there be? Last section of /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/mozilla/work/mozilla/config.log reads configure:7423: checking for XieFloGeometry in -lXIE configure:7442: gcc32 -o conftest -O -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib conftest.c -lXIE -lX11 -lXext -lm 1>&5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXIE collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure: failed program was: #line 7431 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2 builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */ char XieFloGeometry(); int main() { XieFloGeometry() ; return 0; } configure:7464: checking for X11/extensions/XIElib.h configure:7474: gcc32 -E -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out configure:7527: gcc32 -c -O -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include conftest.c 1>&5 In file included from /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xlib.h:51, from configure:7514: /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1/3.2.3/include/sys/types.h:251: syntax error before "udev_t" configure: failed program was: #line 7511 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include #include int main() { Display *dpy = 0; if ((dpy = XOpenDisplay(NULL)) == NULL) { fprintf(stderr, ": can't open %s\en", XDisplayName(NULL)); exit(1); } ; return 0; } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 00:06:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F5816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:06:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c001.snv.cp.net (h005.c001.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9D9B43D41 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:05:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kisha@lissaganda.com) Received: (cpmta 23823 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 17:05:59 -0700 Received: from 209.228.32.120 (HELO mail.lissaganda.com.criticalpath.net) by smtp.register-admin.com (209.228.32.119) with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 17:05:59 -0700 X-Sent: 29 Jun 2004 00:05:59 GMT Received: from [203.131.171.171] by mail.lissaganda.com with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: kisha@lissaganda.com X-Sent-From: kisha@lissaganda.com Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:05:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: Web Mail 5.6.4-0 Message-Id: <20040628170559.8244.h006.c001.wm@mail.lissaganda.com.criticalpath.net> Subject: eterm question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:06:00 -0000 i get this error when i try to install 'eterm' from ports, any idea how to fix this, thanks in advance. %uname -a FreeBSD SOULFLY.BACK.TO.THE.PRIMITIVE.PH 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon Jun 21 14:53:05 PHT 2004 dataholic@SOULFLY.BACK.TO.THE.PRIMITIVE.PH:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MMP i386 % SOULFLY# pwd /usr/ports/chinese/eterm SOULFLY# make install clean "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.autotools.mk", line 2: USE_AUTOCONF deprecated: replace with USE_AUTOCONF_VER=... SOULFLY# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 00:31:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CD916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:31:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-f13.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.185.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A591643D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iain_dooley@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:31:44 -0700 Received: from 211.30.218.106 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:31:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [211.30.218.106] X-Originating-Email: [iain_dooley@hotmail.com] X-Sender: iain_dooley@hotmail.com From: "Iain Dooley" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:31:44 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2004 00:31:44.0666 (UTC) FILETIME=[7491F7A0:01C45D70] Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:31:44 -0000 >You shouldn't portupgrade KDE when KDE is running, but >you should be able to run `make' to build everything while KDE is >running, shut down KDE and `portupgrade -w' afterwards (which will use >the binaries built by `make' and install them, taking seriously less >time than the original `make') and restart KDE. At least that's how it >would with an ordinary port. that's great! i never even thought of doing that... that way i can just apply the patch as was described in earlier emails and then make install from the kdebase ports dir and then use "portupgrade -w kdebase" to add the changes. thanks everyone for the great advice! iain _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 01:04:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07C116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:04:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A2643D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:04:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id D716310A; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:15:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pcp04480859pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net (pcp04480859pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net [69.140.243.74]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:15:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20040628211529.6ncosg8s00g8o08w@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:15:29 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Michael Clark References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:04:48 -0000 Quoting Michael Clark : > Any suggestions on how to do this without DHCP? That's really not > an option for me. Can I delay the rc.conf processing somehow > so that the adaptor has more time to get online? > As far as I know there's no way to speed it up. That's just how long it takes for auto-negotiation to finish. Ken > > Michael Clark > Nemschoff Chairs Inc > mclark at nemschoff dot com > CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP > Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 > Fax: (920) 453 6594 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kenneth Culver [mailto:culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz] > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:39 PM > To: Michael Clark > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot > > > Quoting Michael Clark : > >> I have 2 fxp Intel 100mb cards in this machine that work fine. I have ran >> it with 3 fxp >> cards in the past. I added an em0, Intel gigabit this morning. The card >> displays a >> non active status during the boot process. RC.conf is processed and the >> card >> does not get an ip address, while the fxp cards do. Later in the boot >> process >> in bright white letters it shows the card status has changed to active. I >> believe my >> problems getting rc.conf to assign the IP address are related to this. > Any >> suggestions >> would be appreciated. >> >> 5.2-p2 (feb) >> > I have also noticed that this card takes a while to become active... but > I've > been able to get an IP using dhcp anyway... it just takes a bit longer > than for > the 100Mbit/sec cards. > > Ken > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all > attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is > addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, > copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to > intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and > are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please > notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then > immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without > copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 01:43:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF2C16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:43:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9139643D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:43:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004062910:42:57:416081.23117.2402999216 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:42:57 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <40E0C929.4090401@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:43:05 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:0.76) (by Terrace) Subject: FreeBSD cluster: ntpd does not sync time properly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:43:12 -0000 Hello, I have a FreeBSD cluster, all PCs running FreeBSD-Stable (as of one week ago). The cluster has a master, connected to the Internet, and the master is also router, caching nameserver and timeserver for the internal network. The master has two internet cards, and there are 6 slaves on the internal network. Problem is, that as time goes on, the system time on master and slaves deviate more and more. Here is my configuration for the time server configuration: on MASTER (192.168.0.100) rc.conf: ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_flags="-b time.kriss.re.kr time.nuri.net" xntpd_enable="YES" ntp.conf: # prohibit general access to this service restrict default ignore # allow hosts on the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet to query this server restrict 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 nomodify notrap # localhost has full access to the server restrict 127.0.0.1 server time.kriss.re.kr prefer server time.nuri.net driftfile /etc/ntp.drift on SLAVE (192.168.0.) rc.conf: ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_flags="-b 192.168.0.100" xntpd_enable="YES" ntp.conf: # prohibit general access to this service restrict default ignore # localhost has full access to the server restrict 127.0.0.1 server 192.168.0.100 driftfile /etc/ntp.drift The idea is that at boot-up, time is instantly synchronized once by unsing "ntpdate -b"; after that ntpd will control time adjustments. Am I making a mistake in this setup? Thanks, Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 01:56:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7983A16A506 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:56:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC6943D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j.e.drews@att.net) Received: from 204.127.135.30 ([204.127.135.30]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <20040629015619113001ov9me>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:56:19 +0000 Received: from [64.105.56.145] by 204.127.135.30; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:56:27 +0000 From: j.e.drews@att.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:56:27 +0000 Message-Id: <062920040156.20685.40E0CC4B0000CB19000050CD21603760219C990A9D0BD20AD206@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (May 27 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: ai5lLmRyZXdzQGF0dC5uZXQ= Subject: USB controller external modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:56:32 -0000 Hi: Can anyone recommend an USB external modem, that is controller based? I have looked at the FreeBSD laptop compatibility list and found none. I have also done a considerable amount of googling and only found ones that attach through and RS232 cable. My laptop does not have that. I am running FreeBSD 5.2 Current and want to use umodem. TIA Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 02:43:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAC116A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:43:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nexus.oss.uswest.net (nexus.oss.uswest.net [209.180.20.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE13643D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:43:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from novak@nexus.oss.uswest.net) Received: (qmail 46866 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 02:44:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nexus.oss.uswest.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 02:44:10 -0000 Received: (from novak@localhost) by nexus.oss.uswest.net (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i5T2i9xI046864 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:44:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from novak) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:44:09 -0500 From: Jamie Novak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629024409.GB9538@qwest.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040628211529.6ncosg8s00g8o08w@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628211529.6ncosg8s00g8o08w@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:43:31 -0000 On 06/28, Michael Clark rearranged the electrons to read: > Any suggestions on how to do this without DHCP? That's really not > an option for me. Can I delay the rc.conf processing somehow > so that the adaptor has more time to get online? You could always put a sleep statement in the relevant /etc/rc* script. On some of our servers, we added the following two lines to the base /etc/rc script in the NFS Mounts section, because it would process too quickly and try to mount (and fail) before the interface came up: echo 'Waiting 5 seconds for interface to settle...' sleep 5 In our case, it was the ti0 interface, but the concept's the same. Hope that gives you something to start with, at any rate. -Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 02:49:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53ED16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A00E43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5T2nGlo012954 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:49:19 -0000 Hi, I've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box running postfix 2.1, spamassassin 2.63, amavisd-new-20030616.p9, dcc-dccd-1.2.48, and razor-agents-2.40 all installed via ports. I'm having issues with dcc-dccd and razor-agents not working, but i believe that's due to my firewall, anyone know what ports they use, and that's not the purpose of this. I've got amavisd-new as a postfix content filter. It sends messages through spamassassin and an antivirus program, spamassassin interfaces with razor and dcc, which until i get those ports i've disabled. My problem is with amavisd-new, when i have the content_filter line uncommented in main.cf smtpd throttles itself, comment out that line and it works fine. I have no idea what the issue is, i manually run amavisd and it does not report any syntax errors. The below is the strange error i'm getting. I don't get any startup errors from either amavisd-new or postfix, and this only occurs when the content_filter line is uncommented. Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68665]: connect from satellite.domain.net[192.168.0.100] Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68665]: 2F761206C: client=satellite.domain.net[192.168.0.100] Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/cleanup[68666]: 2F761206C: message-id=<000b01c45d77$5c144460$0200a8c0@satellite> Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/qmgr[68637]: 2F761206C: from=dmehler@domain.net, size=706, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68665]: disconnect from satellite.domain.net[192.168.0.100] Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus scanners failed, considering backups Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need "type:name" form instead of: "#" Jun 28 21:35:02 zeus postfix/master[68635]: warning: process /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 68669 exit status 1 Jun 28 21:35:02 zeus postfix/master[68635]: warning: /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 02:51:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F74F16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:51:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD2E43D54 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from metaridley@mchsi.com) Received: from kaworu.dave.cedar-falls.ia.us (12-219-24-19.client.mchsi.com[12.219.24.19]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with SMTP id <20040629025120m9200jfmooe>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:51:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:50:54 -0500 From: Dave Vollenweider To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040628215054.56dbb9ed.metaridley@mchsi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 4.10-RELEASE Installation Locks Up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:51:21 -0000 Hello, I've been having a problem installing FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE on an old Acer Aspire (120 MHz Pentium processor, 80 MB RAM) using a network install via FTP, and I've had it lock up (can't switch from standard view to the debug view or the holographic shell) with the hard drive light staying on multiple times. I turned on the debug mode in sysinstall and it's happened twice when it's been trying to do this: cp -p /kernel.GENERIC /kernel I also know that the cable on the first IDE controller has had some of its shielding scraped off from brushing against the top of the chasis, but it still looks intact. On the first IDE controller is a Quantum 2550 MB hard drive as the master and a generic CD-ROM drive as the slave. The Quantum hard drive is getting the root partition as well as a swap partition and the /tmp directory. The other IDE controller has a Western Digital 6448.6 MB hard drive and nothing else on it. The WD drive is getting the /var and /usr partitions as well as a swap partition. Is there anything I can do to fix this problem? How likely is it that the less-than-perfect IDE cable is causing this problem? If I can't solve this problem (with your help, of course), how can I work around it? I'm subscribed to the list and am getting it in digest form, so I'll get your replies either way, though I'll get them faster if you send them to me directly. Thanks in advance. - Dave V. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 04:01:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B1B16A567 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:01:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E47543D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkeating@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r62so329980cwc for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.34 with SMTP id 34mr74555rnh; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d54d54404062821003ccd08d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:00:20 -0700 From: "Benjamin P. Keating" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 5.2.1: Post Installation order X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:01:30 -0000 My goal in this letter is to show you my post installation order to see what your thoughts and suggestions are, and additionally, I'd like to know your post installation order / style. Perhaps Im breaking down something that shouldn't be looked at with so much detail but I continually have problems with my post installation procedures. Im trying to figure out what Im doing wrong so I'll explain here what it is I do after I complete the CD install and reboot. Here is my post installation order list (everything I compile here is from ports and unless marked below, I install my ports with "make all install clean"): uname -a : FreeBSD tic.longnow.org 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23 20:45:55 GMT 2004 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 1). compile cvsup-without-gui 1a). cp /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile /root 1b). cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile 2). compile portsupgrade 3). portsupgrade -ar Then I get this: %<------------------------------------ ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version ---> Skipping 'sysutils/portupgrade' (portupgrade-20030723) because 'lang/ruby16-shim-ruby18' (ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p2) failed ** Invalid package name: textproc/ruby-rdoc: : Not in due form: - ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! lang/ruby16-shim-ruby18 (ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p2) (unknown build error) ! textproc/expat2 (expat-1.95.6_1) (uninstall error) ! devel/gettext (gettext-0.12.1) (unknown build error) * devel/gmake (gmake-3.80_1) ! databases/ruby-bdb1 (ruby-bdb1-0.2.1) (unknown build error) ! lang/ezm3 (ezm3-1.1) (uninstall error) * sysutils/portupgrade (portupgrade-20030723) ! textproc/ruby-rdoc (ruby-rdoc-0.9.0) (invalid package name) ------------------------------------>% So portsupgrade is now gone so I go back to recompile it and (and I've been getting this with other compiles on other machines): %<------------------------------------ tic# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade tic# make all install clean ===> portupgrade-20040529_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/ruby18 in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18 Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulnerabilities Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade. ------------------------------------>% Wich I work around with "make WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=/usr/bin/openssl all install clean" but is that correct? I've never seen anyone elses post install order. What does your post installation order look like? Any feedback is appreciated as I've only got the handbook and google (which has given me some bad advice (my RAID5 vinum post to this mailing list, boo). - Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 04:12:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66CA16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:12:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web50702.mail.yahoo.com (web50702.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 650B843D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:12:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnslinky@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040629041243.88558.qmail@web50702.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.228.14.246] by web50702.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:43 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:12:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Minnesota Slinky To: FREEBSD-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Mail list problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mnslinky@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:12:48 -0000 Hello all, When I try to send messages to the list via my own mail server, I'm getting the following error (in /var/log/maillog): Jun 28 22:12:29 grog sm-mta[875]: i5SNlvwn000340: to=, ctladdr= (1000/1000), delay=03:24:31, xdelay=00:00:12, mailer=esmtp, pri=661624, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] Jun 28 22:12:39 grog sm-mta[875]: i5S2hWL9000274: to=, ctladdr= (1000/1000), delay=1+00:28:56, xdelay=00:00:05, mailer=esmtp, pri=4891262, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] Jun 28 22:42:23 grog sm-mta[933]: i5SNlvwn000340: to=, ctladdr= (1000/1000), delay=03:54:25, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=esmtp, pri=751624, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] Jun 28 22:42:34 grog sm-mta[933]: i5S2hWL9000274: to=, ctladdr= (1000/1000), delay=1+00:58:51, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=esmtp, pri=4981262, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] Anyone have any ideas what I need to fix? Reverse DNS lookup of IPs is provided by my upstream provider, in this case Qwest. That IP should resolve as front-door.secure-computing.net. Thanks for you help. P.S. This just started happening a day or two ago, after an attempt to install cyrus-sasl, which has to do with the messages that aren't getting through. Eric F Crist __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 04:13:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1E016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:13:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7B243D5A for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:13:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bf9zm-0008Ny-K4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:13:23 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088482378.754.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:12:58 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Converting from wma file to mp3 or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:13:26 -0000 Hello everyone, What is a good program/port to convert wma files to mp3? Any ideas? Thanks all, Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 05:01:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:01:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from garbage.relinfo.ru (garbage.relinfo.ru [195.161.208.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DA543D55 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:01:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from levanty@mari-el.ru) Received: from lion.relinfo.ru ([195.161.208.133]) by garbage.relinfo.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1BfAky-00006D-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:02:08 +0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:02:23 +0400 From: Lev Klimin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Organization: VolgaTelecom X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <122656749812.20040629090223@mari-el.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: constant tun interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Klimin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:01:17 -0000 Hello! I have little trouble. I have 4.10-release with ppp ant ipnat. On startup ipnat reload it's rules with interface tun0 in statments which is ppp's device. But before running ppp, there is no tun device in system [8:48:04][~]:garbage# ifconfig fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 195.161.208.151 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 195.161.208.191 ether 00:a0:c9:4b:09:29 media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP status: active fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 172.16.0.9 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 172.16.0.15 ether 00:a0:c9:b6:59:a1 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 [8:48:09][~]:garbage# Because of lack of tun interface, further ipnat rules don't work. I can reload ipnat then ppp starting, and it's OK. Can I build my kernel to make tun interface on startup sach as ppp interface? I build my kernel with option pseudo-device tun 1 #Tunnel driver (ppp(8), nos-tun(8)) but after reboot I don't see tun interface in ifconfig output. Cat you help me? -- Lev Klimin mailto:levanty@mari-el.ru +7 (8362) 42-15-49 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 05:11:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E4A16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501F943D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) i5T5FFtg009283; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:15:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5T5FEWw009282; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:15:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: "Andrew L. Gould" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:15:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <200406280910.41702.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200406280910.41702.algould@datawok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406290015.14276.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of porting pf and spamd from OpenBSD to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:11:28 -0000 On Monday 28 June 2004 09:10 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > I heard some time ago that work was going on to port pf (and spamd, I > > > > I'm just curious to know the status of this effort, and any specifics > > on how or when this will be done. > > You can lookup ports here: > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html > > I searched for 'pf' and found this among the results: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/security/pf/pkg-descr > > Is this what you're looking for? Yes! Thanks, Andrew. I did try searching, but didn't dig far enough... and didn't think to look in ports as it's not a port in OpenBSD. b/r, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 05:40:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0E716A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:40:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 105FB43D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: (qmail 30995 invoked by uid 510); 29 Jun 2004 05:37:38 -0000 Message-ID: <20040629053738.30992.qmail@gandalf.online.bg> References: <20040628203953.93932.qmail@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040628203953.93932.qmail@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> From: "dvv" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:37:38 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Creating NTFS or FAT32 partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:40:40 -0000 Alexander Kanchev writes: > Hello, > > I have a HDD attached to my computer and I need to format it with windows compatible filesystem, like NTFS or FAT32. Is this possible to make this under FreeBSD ? > > I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 and the HDD device is /dev/ad1 (also /dev/ad1s1) > > regards, > alexander > man newfs_msdos: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=newfs_msdos&apropos=0&sektion=0&man path=FreeBSD+5.2-RELEASE+and+Ports&format=html Didn't it work yesterday?If not get a freedos disk and try with it ad1s1 is your 1st slice of disk.ad1 is the whole thing. Please don't waste community resource. Do you homework - read. Best regards, Dimitar Vassilev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 05:41:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387AE16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:41:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A0B743D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:41:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 24117 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 04:38:19 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 04:38:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7233 invoked by uid 555); 29 Jun 2004 05:41:13 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.148.209) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088487671-7186 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 09:41:11 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB3C5246; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:40:55 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:40:55 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Iain Dooley Message-ID: <20040629054055.GB1160@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Iain Dooley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: /Machina_Vremeni/Vneshtatniy_comandir_Zemli cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating source code manually X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:41:02 -0000 --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:31:44AM +0500, Iain Dooley probably wrote: =20 > that's great! i never even thought of doing that... that way i can just= =20 > apply the patch as was described in earlier emails and then make install= =20 ^ You mean make------------------------------------------------------/ > from the kdebase ports dir and then use "portupgrade -w kdebase" to add t= he=20 > changes. thanks everyone for the great advice! I hope you read the further emails (Robert's and mine). Either you have all dependencies up-to-date, and do what I suggested, or you downgrade the ports tree to the state where your dependencies are up-to-date, and do what I suggested. The two other alternatives are giving it up or, if you enjoy living dangerously, installing KDE's dependencies and dependencies-of-dependencies (actually doing a `portupgrade') while KDE is running. Robert: The `build-depends' target seems to do exactly what your B) point was about. Just FYI. --=20 DoubleF In the beginning was the word. But by the time the second word was added to it, there was trouble. For with it came syntax ... -- John Simon --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4QDmwo7hT/9lVdwRAq35AJwPhAvuqidkut11i2CNVjueS6eEiACfSSMG nQBfzn9vO9YSX24H2/qfyss= =zUUv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 05:44:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C28E16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:44:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD16C43D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 24367 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 04:41:27 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 04:41:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8923 invoked by uid 555); 29 Jun 2004 05:44:21 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.148.209) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1088487860-8901 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 09:44:20 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64A9623C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:33:07 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:33:07 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Lev Klimin Message-ID: <20040629053306.GA1160@shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Lev Klimin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <122656749812.20040629090223@mari-el.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <122656749812.20040629090223@mari-el.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: /Machina_Vremeni/Vneshtatniy_comandir_Zemli cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: constant tun interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:44:10 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:02:23AM +0400, Lev Klimin probably wrote: > Hello! >=20 > I have little trouble. I have 4.10-release with ppp ant ipnat. On > startup ipnat reload it's rules with interface tun0 in statments which > is ppp's device. But before running ppp, there is no tun device in > system > [8:48:04][~]:garbage# ifconfig > fxp0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > inet 195.161.208.151 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 195.161.208.191 > ether 00:a0:c9:4b:09:29 > media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP > status: active > fxp1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > inet 172.16.0.9 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 172.16.0.15 > ether 00:a0:c9:b6:59:a1 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > lo0: flags=3D8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000=20 > ppp0: flags=3D8010 mtu 1500 > faith0: flags=3D8002 mtu 1500 > [8:48:09][~]:garbage#=20 >=20 > Because of lack of tun interface, further ipnat rules don't work. I > can reload ipnat then ppp starting, and it's OK. Can I build my > kernel to make tun interface on startup sach as ppp interface? Maybe you could do some ifconfig(8) magic, but you definitely could use ppp's built-in NAT (by inlcuding `nat enable yes' in the config file). HTH, --=20 DoubleF Everything is worth precisely as much as a belch, the difference being that a belch is more satisfying. -- Ingmar Bergman --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4P8Swo7hT/9lVdwRAlduAJ9LOrps58hlxX0Qv6Tnmd++x2WVEgCfaskW fncVtbKaNSmNURnl9TOdz80= =l4m5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 05:50:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AD716A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:50:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72BA43D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from BCSFD204@twcny.rr.com) Received: from twcny.rr.com (syr-24-59-136-53.twcny.rr.com [24.59.136.53]) i5T5orMv015152; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:50:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40E10300.9090803@twcny.rr.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:49:52 -0400 From: Tom Parquette User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Clark References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:50:57 -0000 Michael Clark wrote: > I have 2 fxp Intel 100mb cards in this machine that work fine. I have ran > it with 3 fxp > cards in the past. I added an em0, Intel gigabit this morning. The card > displays a > non active status during the boot process. RC.conf is processed and the > card > does not get an ip address, while the fxp cards do. Later in the boot > process > in bright white letters it shows the card status has changed to active. I > believe my > problems getting rc.conf to assign the IP address are related to this. Any > suggestions > would be appreciated. > > 5.2-p2 (feb) > > > Michael Clark > Nemschoff Chairs Inc > mclark at nemschoff dot com > CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP > Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 > Fax: (920) 453 6594 > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all > attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is > addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, > copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to > intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and > are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please > notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then > immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without > copying, distributing or disclosing same. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Your question is almost exactly the one I posted on current@. The difference is, I'm using a 3Com 3C996B-T. Question for you: When the card announces that it is active, do you get a kernel message along the lines of em0 Gigabit interface active? That's what mine does (obviously mine is a bge0 not an em0. :-) The one response I got on current@ indicated he had some Netgear cards running without a problem. I'm not sure where I'm going with this information except to think there may be something about gigabit cards that FBSD may not [completely?] account for. Cheers... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 06:38:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFAB16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:38:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD44343D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:38:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.myhost.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.24.106 with login) by smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 06:38:00 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:38:05 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406282338.05068.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Audio/multimedia recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:38:07 -0000 OK, so I've finally moved over to FreeBSD from Linux, and I've fallen in love. To me, this OS makes so much more /sense/ than Linux, though I'm not evangelizing nor knocking anyone's choices. I realize the strength of the FreeBSD is on the server side, but I like it enough that I'm planning on using this current install as a workstation (and later I plan on using a combined FreeBSD/OpenBSD setup for a mail/web server network, OpenBSD being dedicated to firewalling). My stats are FreeBSD 5.2.1 RELEASE, KDE 3.2.3 (I also have Gnome but don't use it often). After toying around a bit with the various installed media players as well as installing XMMS (which has some quirky problems with KDE), I'm wondering if anyone has recommendations on media players, as this ain't cutting it and there are so many audio and multimedia ports that it's a rather daunting task trying to pick any of them. My previous Linux experience didn't involve much media, so I'm not familiar with what's popular or what works well. I'm particularly interested in any players which support streaming media, especially standards like Real and WMP. I tried going to the Real page to dl their player, after discovering it's no longer in ports, and there is no option for FreeBSD, and the Linux player is a binary - haven't tried it yet. Also, my mobo is an Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe with an ATI Radeon 9600 XT video card. The mobo works fine with FreeBSD, but I haven't been able to get my video card to work, even though I've been through a number of steps advised on different sites, including building AGP into the kernel and Radeon support into XFree86. I've also searched through the list archives, but the answers given tend to vary, and the ones I've tried haven't worked. I know many people have asked about this issue, but I have yet to find a solution which works. Anyone have an answer they know works? I'm not all that interested in playing games on this machine or using 3D much at all, but it would be nice to speed up my system by actually using the video memory the card uses. - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 06:48:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61E316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:48:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D2343D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.parks@verizon.net) Received: from verizon.net ([4.61.31.219]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040629064850.UZJV3317.out006.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:48:50 -0500 Message-ID: <40E110D2.9060609@verizon.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:48:50 -0700 From: Ted Parks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [4.61.31.219] at Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:48:47 -0500 Subject: pcmcia driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:48:56 -0000 A moderately experienced Linux user, I am still new to FreeBSD. I am trying to use a Farallon EtherMac PCMCIA ethernet card on an older Toshiba laptop running FreeBSD 4.8. I have enabled pccard. The problem, I think, is that FreeBSD is not loading the driver, "ep." How do I load this driver, then configure the card so that DHCP will connect me to my DSL? Thanks, Ted Parks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 06:56:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB62B16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:56:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from garbage.relinfo.ru (garbage.relinfo.ru [195.161.208.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF7F43D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from levanty@mari-el.ru) Received: from lion.relinfo.ru ([195.161.208.133]) by garbage.relinfo.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1BfCYe-00008Q-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:57:32 +0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:57:48 +0400 From: Lev Klimin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Organization: VolgaTelecom X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <176663674734.20040629105748@mari-el.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040629053306.GA1160@shark.localdomain> References: <122656749812.20040629090223@mari-el.ru> <20040629053306.GA1160@shark.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re[2]: constant tun interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Klimin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:56:33 -0000 Äîáðûé äåíü, Sergey! SZ> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:02:23AM +0400, SZ> Lev Klimin probably wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I have little trouble. I have 4.10-release with ppp ant ipnat. On >> startup ipnat reload it's rules with interface tun0 in statments which >> is ppp's device. But before running ppp, there is no tun device in >> system >> [8:48:04][~]:garbage# ifconfig >> fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> inet 195.161.208.151 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 195.161.208.191 >> ether 00:a0:c9:4b:09:29 >> media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP >> status: active >> fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> inet 172.16.0.9 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 172.16.0.15 >> ether 00:a0:c9:b6:59:a1 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >> ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 >> faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 >> [8:48:09][~]:garbage# >> >> Because of lack of tun interface, further ipnat rules don't work. I >> can reload ipnat then ppp starting, and it's OK. Can I build my >> kernel to make tun interface on startup sach as ppp interface? SZ> Maybe you could do some ifconfig(8) magic, but you definitely could use SZ> ppp's built-in NAT (by inlcuding `nat enable yes' in the config file). SZ> HTH, Initialization of ipnat is done earlier than rc.network script is running. Therefore, I need some other feature. How does ppp and faith interfaces are in ifconfig in startup? Can I do same thing with tun interface. -- Lev Klimin mailto:levanty@mari-el.ru (8362) 42-15-49 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 06:59:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEBC16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:59:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from colossus.systems.pipex.net (colossus.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D37843D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:59:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@irrelevant.com) Received: from albert.mosthosts.net (81-86-155-6.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.155.6]) by colossus.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DC91C00120; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:59:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from angua.irrelevant.com (dhcp88.internal.irrelevant.com [192.168.0.88]) by albert.mosthosts.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550B945; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:17:12 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.0.20040629080008.0798b1c0@albert> X-Sender: irrelevant1@albert X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:03:37 +0100 To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl From: Rob In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FW: help please? corrupted hard disc - invalid super block. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:59:25 -0000 hi, thanks for the help! Mounting /dev/ad5e worked (at least in read-only, it wants a fsck) so rather than try a repair, and risk blowing it up, (and I'm on 4.8, which still has disklabel nor bsdlabel) I'll copy everything off and re-initialise the disc in due course. Thanks! Rob. At 15:53 28/06/2004, Ruben Bloemgarten wrote: >It looks like you wrote the disklabel for the slice to the disk or >vice-versa. >If you check /dev there probably isn't a /dev/ad5s* there. Try mounting >/dev/ad5e instead of /dev/ad5s1e. To verify, do a bsdlabel ad5s1 to see if >you have a disklabel for the slice. Otherwise you could : >1.backup you disklabel > #bsdlabel /dev/ad5e > disklabel.BAK >2. write a correct disklabel for /dev/ad5s1 > #bsdlabel -w -B ad5s1 >3. Edit your disklabel to be correct : > a. note the size values of #bsdlabel ad5s1 > b. make another backup of your saved disklabel > c. edit one of the backups and change the size value > to the value you got from #bsdlabel ad5s1 > d. write your edited disklabel to ad5s1 > #bsdlabel -R ad5s1 disklabel.BAK > This *should* return no errors. >4. try to mount ad5s1 >Now this is all based on them hope that you don't have to erase the >bad/sliceless disklabel on da5. > >Good luck, >Ruben > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rob >Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:08 AM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: help please? corrupted hard disc - invalid super block. > > >Hi! > >I have a hard disc that I think must have been set up wrong initially... > >It was however working fine, but at some point filled up to capacity, >wherapon the next reboot it failed to mount. > >System is 4.8-RELEASE, Generic Kernel. > >Currently the disc shows: > >luggage# mount -r /dev/ad5s1e /mnt >mount: /dev/ad5s1e on /mnt: incorrect super block > >luggage# disklabel -r ad5 ># /dev/ad5c: >type: ESDI >disk: ad5s1 >label: >flags: >bytes/sector: 512 >sectors/track: 63 >tracks/cylinder: 255 >sectors/cylinder: 16065 >cylinders: 14593 >sectors/unit: 234441585 >rpm: 3600 >interleave: 1 >trackskew: 0 >cylinderskew: 0 >headswitch: 0 # milliseconds >track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds >drivedata: 0 > >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 234436482 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - >14592*) > e: 234436482 0 4.2BSD 16384 16384 300 # (Cyl. 0 - >14592*) >Warning, partition c doesn't cover the whole unit! >Warning, An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system >utilities > >luggage# fsck /dev/ad5s1e >Can't open /dev/ad5s1e: Invalid argument > >luggage# fsck -b 32 /dev/ad5s1e >Alternate super block location: 32 >Can't open /dev/ad5s1e: Invalid argument > >luggage# file -s /dev/ad5s1e >/dev/ad5s1e: can't read `/dev/ad5s1e' (Invalid argument). > > > >At this point I am stuck ... most of the "Invalid Super Block" messages I >can find when searching relate to cd-roms. > >If I could mount the disc even read-only, I could copy the data off. > >Can anybody give me any clues on where to go from here? > >Thanks in advance, > >Rob > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 07:28:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8714516A4CE; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:28:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf20.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf20.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2371243D55; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip07.cluster1.charter.net (mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.137])i5T7TWpb003064; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:29:32 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO gamez) (68.189.127.165) by mxip07.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2004 03:28:45 -0400 Message-Id: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> From: "Remi" To: "'Brooks Davis'" , "'Kenneth Culver'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:28:34 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040628132918.GB1325@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRdFC9ymWtuM+HiQt2Aj9UTgcRMVwAleklA cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: 'David O'Brien' Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:28:50 -0000 Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to be changed) So now I come to a cross roads: 1. Buy a 1.7 Centrino 2. Buy a P4 2.8GHz w/ HT 3. Buy the AMD64 laptop What is the state of the AMD64 version of BSD? Other than that im leaning toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? -----Original Message----- From: Brooks Davis [mailto:brooks@one-eyed-alien.net] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:29 AM To: Kenneth Culver Cc: Michal Pasternak; questions@freebsd.org; Remi; current@freebsd.org; David O'Brien Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: > So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running > processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop, > my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter... Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power even without the low-power models. We're seeing 1U dual Opteron boxes running at less then 100F under load. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 07:33:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FADB16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elephant.ru.ac.za (elephant.ru.ac.za [146.231.128.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3339243D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamRemoveFree@iwr.ru.ac.za) Received: from iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.249]:2522) by elephant.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1BfD6x-000Mlb-Az for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:32:59 +0200 Received: from IWR/SpoolDir by iwr.ru.ac.za (Mercury 1.48); 29 Jun 04 09:32:58 +0200 Received: from SpoolDir by IWR (Mercury 1.48); 29 Jun 04 09:32:53 +0200 Received: from iwr50-98 (146.231.64.122) by iwr.ru.ac.za (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP; 29 Jun 04 09:32:51 +0200 From: "DA. Forsyth" Organization: Dave's Workshop To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:32:50 GMT+2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <40E13742.7473.1467E920@localhost> Priority: normal Message-Id: <230701088494370-8322179b0a16f@IWR50.412.spamsucks.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) Subject: setting LPT1 to polled mode via acpi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: spamRemoveFree@iwr.ru.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:33:02 -0000 Hiya all I've got 5.2.1-RELEASE on a P4 1.1Ghz machine I've setup a HP laserjet (iiP) on the first parallel port using a simple filter to get the lines feeding correctly. Sometimes it actually prints, but mostly it will send the job to the printer then WAAAAAIT till I formfeed. After that it will NOT access the printer. LPQ reports jobs in the queue, but also says 'waiting for lp to become ready (offline?)' the printer is not offline. the cable it ok etc etc etc resetting etc in LPC makes no difference I just need some simple text printing from this thing, can it really be so hard? dmesg says about 'ppc' ppc0 port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 which is correct anyhow, I read the printing bit of the handbook, which referred me to the IRQ setting and mentions some HP printers not working in IRQ mode. I commented the relevant line in /boot/device.hints and rebooted no change. I then read some more and went along to the acpi(4) man page and got no further than suspecting hw.acpi.pci.link.%d.%d.%d.irq Override the interrupt to use. is what I need to use to disable the IRQ on the parallel port (I cannot do it in BIOS) however, nowhere can I find out what to put instead of %d.%d.%d to tell it to NOT use IRQ's for the printer port, there is simply no explanation for those numbers. please help I need to print some of the conf files before I rebuild this box with an IDE RAID card for the disks.... -- David /"\ http://terrapin.ru.ac.za/~iwdf/ \ / ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail > - - - - - - -> X If you receive email saying "Send this to everyone you know," / \ PLEASE pretend you don't know me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 07:51:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F14516A4CE; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:51:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580DB43D1F; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:51:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5T7p5kw016490; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:21:05 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:21:04 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> In-Reply-To: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406291721.04984.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.6 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: current@freebsd.org cc: 'Brooks Davis' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Kenneth Culver' cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: Remi Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:51:15 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:58, Remi wrote: > toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD > working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? Works fine here (Dell Inspiron 8600). =2D - Modem doesn't work (no suprise) =2D - Suspend doesn't go below S1 =2D --=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4R9o5ZPcIHs/zowRAgigAKCa+6ZaUYw/X1sE0RxI6vmjNYyXzACdERi6 9MhT60mgl+UoJwqWejJNX+E=3D =3DmV0/ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 08:10:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B2716A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from coral.mweb.co.za (coral.mweb.co.za [196.2.50.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0109243D4C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:10:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vikashb@mweb.co.za) Received: by coral.mweb.co.za (Postfix, from userid 503) id 338AF1F220; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:09:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: from Debug (air.mweb.co.za [196.2.53.154]) by coral.mweb.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id D48091F1FA for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:09:57 +0200 (SAST) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: vikashb@mweb.co.za Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:09:54 SAST X-Posting-IP: 196.29.130.223 X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.2.19 Message-Id: <20040629080957.D48091F1FA@coral.mweb.co.za> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on coral.mweb.co.za X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=7.5 tests=J_CHICKENPOX_38, LOCAL_OBFU_GENERICS,MY_FNAMEB,NO_REAL_NAME,WORKSTATION_NAME6 X-Spam-Report: workstation name. * 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name * 0.7 MY_FNAMEB BODY: Fname rule for body. * 0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_38 BODY: 3alpha-pock-8alpha * 1.8 LOCAL_OBFU_GENERICS BODY: Obfuscated 'GENERICS' in body Subject: sendmail +userdb + Release 4.10p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:10:02 -0000 Greeting, How do i translate any outgoing mail from vix@wormhole.pcs to indicate vikash.badal@bcx.co.za I have tried the genericstable as well as the userdb and no luck attached is my configs, please assist. I've tried the config setups below and the the From address gets translated to vix@bcx.co.za and not vikash.badal@bcx.co.za hostname.mc ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~` dnl define(`confUSERDB_SPEC',/etc/mail/userdb.db) Cwwormhole.pcs MASQUERADE_AS(`bcx.co.za')dnl FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl FEATURE(nocanonify)dnl FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable')dnl GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains')dnl dnlFEATURE(nodns)dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `172.21.63.2') Dmwormhole.pcs define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',`wormhole.pcs')dnl define(`confDELIVERY_MODE',`deferred')dnl MAILER(local) MAILER(smtp) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wormhole# cat genericstable vix vikash.badal@bcx.co.za vikashb vikash.badal@bcx.co.za ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wormhole# cat userdb vix:mailname Vikash.Badal@bcx.co.za Vikash.Badal@bcx.co.za:maildrop vix vikashb:mailname Vikash.Badal@bcx.co.za all these attempts were attempted after googling, please let me know where i am missing the boat Thanks --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using MWEB Airmail. JUST LIKE THAT http://airmail.mweb.co.za/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 08:11:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F30816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:11:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f67.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790FA43D53 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:11:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crollins666@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:11:13 -0700 Received: from 216.19.22.118 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:11:12 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.19.22.118] X-Originating-Email: [crollins666@hotmail.com] X-Sender: crollins666@hotmail.com From: "clayton rollins" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:11:12 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2004 08:11:13.0218 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4B52A20:01C45DB0] cc: freebsd@stateautomation.com Subject: [from newbies] RE: Command path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:11:17 -0000 Hi, On June 29, 2004, freebsd@stateautomation.com wrote: > >Is there any reason why I can't directly run sysinstall when I am already >currently in the /stand directory? The only way I can execute it is to >enter /stand/sysinstall >Is there a path configuration I can edit to get FreeBSD to search the >current directory as well as common places like /bin? > >JS > I can't reply on newbies@; all technical advice should at least be subjected to wide peer review. (It's in the list charter...) I'm replying on questions@, which is more proper for this discussion. I don't know the rhyme or reason to which shells include or don't include the current directory in the default PATH or why... That discussion aside, the PATH is an environment variable. The way you set (and maybe view) it is shell-dependent. I'll give descriptions for sh and (t)csh, which are most common; if you use another, you might write back and be more specific. In both shells, you can view environment variables with the command 'env'. In sh, you could do: 'PATH=.:$PATH' in (t)csh, you could do: 'setenv PATH .:$PATH' Adding such a statement to your ~/.shrc and/or ~/.cshrc startup script would save you from typing it each time... Hope that helps, Clayton _________________________________________________________________ >From ‘will you?’ to ‘I do,’ MSN Life Events is your resource for Getting Married. http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=married From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 08:39:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC46F16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:39:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB74043D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:39:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i5T8d3b4028255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:39:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i5T8d3aG028254; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:39:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:39:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: clayton rollins Message-ID: <20040629083903.GB4372@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , clayton rollins , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd@stateautomation.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:39:03 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd@stateautomation.com Subject: Re: [from newbies] RE: Command path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:39:15 -0000 --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:11:12AM +0000, clayton rollins wrote: =20 > In sh, you could do: > 'PATH=3D.:$PATH' >=20 > in (t)csh, you could do: > 'setenv PATH .:$PATH' Generally you should be exceedingly careful about putting '.' onto your $PATH. You should certainly not put '.' into root's $PATH, and preferably not at the beginning of the $PATH for ordinary users. ie. If you must put '.' in your path, do it like this: PATH=3D${PATH}:. ; export PATH or setenv PATH ${PATH}:. The danger with having '.' on a the $PATH is that you can trick (deliberately or not) people into running trojan programs. Bad for ordinary users, disasterous for root. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4SqniD657aJF7eIRAlYxAKCNLf6+FT6WvJ/eI6C7g7eTJKF4bwCeP/bi TlCTUoOKOf3WHxgkd+g7VQM= =z0Tj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 08:50:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D706816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:50:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.avec.ua (avek.ic.kharkov.ua [212.1.112.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E349C43D54 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:50:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vic@avec.ua) Received: by mail.avec.ua (Postfix, from userid 57) id 8EA6032DFC; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:49:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (unknown [192.168.1.200]) by mail.avec.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD441CAD for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:49:30 +0300 (EEST) From: Vic To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <230701088494370-8322179b0a16f@IWR50.412.spamsucks.net> References: <230701088494370-8322179b0a16f@IWR50.412.spamsucks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Organization: AVEC Message-Id: <1088499022.47716.17.camel@outdoor.concern.avec> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:50:22 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: setting LPT1 to polled mode via acpi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: vic@avec.ua List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:50:38 -0000 I have this problem to. I'm change conncetion to my printer (hp1200) from LPT to USB. ÷ ×Ô, 29.06.2004, × 12:32, DA. Forsyth ÐÉÛÅÔ: > Hiya all > > I've got 5.2.1-RELEASE on a P4 1.1Ghz machine > I've setup a HP laserjet (iiP) on the first parallel port using a simple > filter to get the lines feeding correctly. > > Sometimes it actually prints, but mostly it will > send the job to the printer then WAAAAAIT till I formfeed. > After that it will NOT access the printer. > LPQ reports jobs in the queue, but also says > 'waiting for lp to become ready (offline?)' > > the printer is not offline. the cable it ok etc etc etc > resetting etc in LPC makes no difference > > I just need some simple text printing from this thing, can it really > be so hard? > > dmesg says about 'ppc' > ppc0 port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > which is correct > > anyhow, I read the printing bit of the handbook, which referred me to > the IRQ setting and mentions some HP printers not working in IRQ > mode. > I commented the relevant line in /boot/device.hints > and rebooted > no change. > > I then read some more and went along to the acpi(4) man page and got > no further than suspecting > hw.acpi.pci.link.%d.%d.%d.irq > Override the interrupt to use. > is what I need to use to disable the IRQ on the parallel port (I > cannot do it in BIOS) > > however, nowhere can I find out what to put instead of %d.%d.%d to > tell it to NOT use IRQ's for the printer port, there is simply no > explanation for those numbers. > > please help > I need to print some of the conf files before I rebuild this box with an > IDE RAID card for the disks.... > > > -- > David /"\ > http://terrapin.ru.ac.za/~iwdf/ \ / > ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail > - - - - - - -> X > If you receive email saying "Send this to everyone you know," / \ > PLEASE pretend you don't know me. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Buhancov Vyacheslav mailto:vic@avec.ua TG5-UANIC VICS-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:07:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BEE16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:07:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from exponential-e.com (snails.exponential-e.net [62.244.177.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E9243D41 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:07:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim.mozley@exponential-e.com) Received: from [62.244.191.249] (account jim.mozley HELO [192.168.22.54]) by exponential-e.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2854807 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: <40E13147.1000605@exponential-e.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:07:19 +0100 From: Jim Mozley Organization: Exponential-e User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Support for Promise pdc20378 SATA controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:07:34 -0000 I am inquiring about support for the promise pdc20378 SATA RAID controller on a Tyan Tomcat S5012G3NR motherboard. I am about to take delivery of a server with this hardware and wanted to mirror two disks. The supplier is preloading FreeBSD (I'm a new to this OS) but says there are problems supporting the RAID controller. I have seen this in a recent previous post... "...the RAID support is great using the Promise PDC20378 SATA150 controller for FreeBSD." Can anyone give some pointers as to how this support for RAID is achieved? I've started to look at the vinum and atacontrol documentation but am getting buried under a wealth of new information. Any clues would be helpful. Thanks, Jim Mozley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:15:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E865A16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:15:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk1.snu.ac.kr (auk1.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F5943D53 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (stopspam@users.sourceforge.net) by auk1.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004062918:15:01:316010.24099.3045211056 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:15:01 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <40E13322.4070201@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:15:14 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40E0C929.4090401@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <40E0C929.4090401@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:1.71) (by Terrace) Subject: Re: FreeBSD cluster: ntpd does not sync time properly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:15:36 -0000 Rob wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a FreeBSD cluster, all PCs running FreeBSD-Stable (as of > one week ago). The cluster has a master, connected to the Internet, > and the master is also router, caching nameserver and timeserver > for the internal network. > The master has two internet cards, and there are 6 slaves > on the internal network. > > Problem is, that as time goes on, the system time on master > and slaves deviate more and more. > > Here is my configuration for the time server configuration: > > on MASTER (192.168.0.100) > rc.conf: > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_flags="-b time.kriss.re.kr time.nuri.net" > xntpd_enable="YES" > ntp.conf: > # prohibit general access to this service > restrict default ignore > # allow hosts on the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet to query this server > restrict 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 nomodify notrap > # localhost has full access to the server > restrict 127.0.0.1 > server time.kriss.re.kr prefer > server time.nuri.net > driftfile /etc/ntp.drift > > > on SLAVE (192.168.0.) > rc.conf: > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_flags="-b 192.168.0.100" > xntpd_enable="YES" > ntp.conf: > # prohibit general access to this service > restrict default ignore > # localhost has full access to the server > restrict 127.0.0.1 > server 192.168.0.100 > driftfile /etc/ntp.drift > > > The idea is that at boot-up, time is instantly synchronized once by > unsing "ntpdate -b"; after that ntpd will control time adjustments. > > Am I making a mistake in this setup? Found the solution myself. I should use timed on the internal network, instead of ntpd deamon. That seems to work fine. R. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:17:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6F716A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:17:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zep1.it-austria.net (zep1.it-austria.net [213.150.1.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF8743D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:17:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pinhead@delicious.stderror.at) Received: from delicious.stderror.at (unknown [10.24.28.114]) by zep1.it-austria.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E5E34061 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:17:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by delicious.stderror.at (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6C70FFF45D; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:17:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:17:00 +0200 From: Toni Schmidbauer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629091700.GD17653@stderror.at> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040628203953.93932.qmail@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628203953.93932.qmail@web51102.mail.yahoo.com> Phone: +43 664 3502198 X-WWW-Home-Page: http://stderror.at X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53F2 28AE 8070 83E0 AFEC 0ABC BBF9 A34A 3ED1 3287 X-Operating-System: Darwin User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Creating NTFS or FAT32 partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: toni@stderror.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:17:30 -0000 --HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:39:53PM -0700, Alexander Kanchev wrote: > I have a HDD attached to my computer and I need to format it with windows= compatible filesystem, like NTFS or FAT32. Is this possible to make this u= nder FreeBSD ? /usr/ports/emulators/mtools supports fat32 hth toni --=20 Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert | Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | --HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA4TOMu/mjSj7RMocRAnLoAJ9N38lfz99QPgc8a+sEO7YpfJ9OxACdFZjQ bYjRcxFntXCL1GHnCXApDdc= =/vm4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HeFlAV5LIbMFYYuh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:24:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D28B16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:24:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zep2.it-austria.net (zep2.it-austria.net [213.150.1.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B37A43D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pinhead@delicious.stderror.at) Received: from delicious.stderror.at (unknown [10.24.28.114]) by zep2.it-austria.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809C34137 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:24:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by delicious.stderror.at (Postfix, from userid 501) id 95A6BFF4AF; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:24:16 +0200 From: Toni Schmidbauer To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040629092416.GE17653@stderror.at> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Phone: +43 664 3502198 X-WWW-Home-Page: http://stderror.at X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53F2 28AE 8070 83E0 AFEC 0ABC BBF9 A34A 3ED1 3287 X-Operating-System: Darwin User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: status of porting pf and spamd from OpenBSD to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: toni@stderror.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:24:42 -0000 --rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:36:55AM -0500, Jay Moore wrote: > I heard some time ago that work was going on to port pf (and spamd, I thi= nk)=20 > from OpenBSD to FreeBSD. I also recently saw an announcement on the FreeB= SD=20 > home page that Daniel Hartmeier had joined the FreeBSD team as a committe= r -=20 > a further indication that this work is underway. >=20 > I'm just curious to know the status of this effort, and any specifics on = how=20 > or when this will be done. i am using pf under 5.2.1, works like a charm. just had to add: options RANDOM_IP_ID to my kernel config and install /usr/ports/security/pf. dunno the status of spamd. hth toni --=20 Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert | Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | --rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA4TVAu/mjSj7RMocRAojLAJ9EXD6/dPHKfY21BXotphnOnt4csgCfU+hP Ani3KVEyrJLjjEblU04HBdc= =vrLP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:28:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FF016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:28:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zep2.it-austria.net (zep2.it-austria.net [213.150.1.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9130643D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:28:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pinhead@delicious.stderror.at) Received: from delicious.stderror.at (unknown [10.24.28.114]) by zep2.it-austria.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A734E34102 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by delicious.stderror.at (Postfix, from userid 501) id E45F2FF4F1; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:27:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:27:55 +0200 From: Toni Schmidbauer To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040629092755.GF17653@stderror.at> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20040627230116.GA18229@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L+ofChggJdETEG3Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627230116.GA18229@tao.thought.org> Phone: +43 664 3502198 X-WWW-Home-Page: http://stderror.at X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53F2 28AE 8070 83E0 AFEC 0ABC BBF9 A34A 3ED1 3287 X-Operating-System: Darwin User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: what types of network cards work with thinkpads? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: toni@stderror.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:28:21 -0000 --L+ofChggJdETEG3Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 04:01:17PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > Well, I'm seeing some promising thinkpads over on ebay. > Some with "10/100 netword card", most without. Cann nybody > clue me in on what types of laptop NICs work with FBSD? http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ hth toni --=20 Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert | Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | --L+ofChggJdETEG3Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA4TYbu/mjSj7RMocRAkRbAJ4qBURySMAw0voGApPGRl+t2y2wvACgguPH 631lgvcpIiwTMIJ6PpKZulE= =H5M1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L+ofChggJdETEG3Y-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:47:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B6016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blue.rahul.net (blue.rahul.net [192.160.13.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E55943D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:47:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conover@rahul.net) Received: by blue.rahul.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id A21F418E29; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:45:11 -0700 (PDT) X-UUCP-From: conover@rahul.net Tue Jun 29 09:45:30 2004 Received: (qmail 9865 invoked by uid 4199); 29 Jun 2004 09:45:30 -0000 Date: 29 Jun 2004 09:45:30 -0000 Message-ID: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: conover@rahul.net (John Conover) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: BSD on a floppy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Conover List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:47:10 -0000 I'm new to the list and was wondering if there was a BSD version that would run on a write protected floppy without a HD to use for a router/firewall? Thanks, John -- John Conover, conover@rahul.net, http://www.rahul.net/conover/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 09:55:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C1616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:55:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566A343D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:55:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6494AC7C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:57:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Cordula's Web To: conover@rahul.net In-reply-to: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> (conover@rahul.net) X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE References: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> Message-Id: <20040629095751.6A6494AC7C@fw.farid-hajji.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:57:51 +0200 (CEST) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD on a floppy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:55:57 -0000 > I'm new to the list and was wondering if there was a BSD version that > would run on a write protected floppy without a HD to use for a > router/firewall? I don't know about floppy, but if you're using CURRENT, nanobsd works fine for CF cards: /usr/src/tools/tools/nanobsd. You may also check out picobsd. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 10:40:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF3C16A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:40:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21113.mail.yahoo.com (web21113.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDE1D43D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:40:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040629103942.66293.qmail@web21113.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21113.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:39:42 PDT Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:39:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040629054047.E116E16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: lmmon -- re: Spontaneous Restarts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:40:33 -0000 Thanks to those who've helped so far. I thought we were onto something, but ... > I just ran lmmon (lmmon -i) and got outrageously high readings: 185C, > varying. Yet the heat sink isn't even warm. Assuming that lmmon can > be trusted, have to check (read re-do) the thermal compound. ... Before fooling around with the processor chip, I did the fastest shutdown I could (short of the reset button) and looked at the temperature known to the configuration BIOS. It was the same placid 39C +/- 1C. This leaves me fairly sure that lmmon is wrong; if it had been over 100C less than fifteen seconds before, the temperature would still have been decaying. OTOH, lmmon's value did float/bobble like a real reading. Is there another way to examine the CPU temperature on a P4 while FreeBSD is running? And, of course, there's still the original problem. In the UNIX v5 documentation for a system panic, one entry read ``Definitely hardware or software error.'' The next read ``Like the previous, but produced elsewhere.'' My restart must be the one Produced Elsewhere. Mark Terribile __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 10:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52E016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A82DB43D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.bissex@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so724132cwc for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.61 with SMTP id w61mr720355cwb; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10015231040629035244981fa1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:52:33 -0400 From: Paul Bissex To: FreeBSD Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20040629092416.GE17653@stderror.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <200406280136.55101.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> <20040629092416.GE17653@stderror.at> Subject: Re: status of porting pf and spamd from OpenBSD to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:53:05 -0000 > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:36:55AM -0500, Jay Moore wrote: > > I heard some time ago that work was going on to port pf (and spamd, I t= hink) > > from OpenBSD to FreeBSD. I also recently saw an announcement on the Fre= eBSD > > home page that Daniel Hartmeier had joined the FreeBSD team as a commit= ter - > > a further indication that this work is underway. > > > > I'm just curious to know the status of this effort, and any specifics o= n how > > or when this will be done. On my server running FreeBSD 4.8 (and cvsup), "whereis spamd" yields: /usr/ports/mail/spamd and as mentioned earlier, pf in in ports as well: /usr/ports/security/pf --=20 paul bissex, e-scribe.com -- database-driven web development 413.585.8095 69.55.225.29 01061-0847 72=B039'71"W 42=B019'42"N From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 11:46:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E071616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-out1.xs4all.nl (smtp-out1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E80243D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eyesonly@xs4all.nl) Received: from alden-0b614aab4 (revelation.xs4all.nl [194.109.220.1]) by smtp-out1.xs4all.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5TBk36H013631; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <200406291346210845.1927A117@smtp.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> References: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:21 +0200 From: eyesonly@xs4all.nl To: "John Conover" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: BSD on a floppy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:07 -0000 On 29-06-2004 at 09:45 conover@rahul.net wrote: >I'm new to the list and was wondering if there was a BSD version that >would run on a write protected floppy without a HD to use for a >router/firewall? ClosedBSD may be exactly what you're looking for:= http://www.closedbsd.org/faq.html regards Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 11:51:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B910E16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:51:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E97243D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:51:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so471082cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.24.34 with SMTP id 34mr108499rnx; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:51:06 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: <1088482378.754.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1088482378.754.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Converting from wma file to mp3 or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:51:08 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:12:58 -0400, Bruce Hunter wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > What is a good program/port to convert wma files to mp3? mplayer can convert I think: $ mencoder -oac mp3lame -o a.mp3 a.wma /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer /usr/ports/audio/lame Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 11:59:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B1A16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:59:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outfbmx010.isp.belgacom.be (outfbmx010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D48043D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:59:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx002.isp.belgacom.be (outmx002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.52]) (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-FALLBACK-2.22) with ESMTP id i5TB1QV8001611 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:26 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from outmx002.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i5TB1BxQ025539 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:11 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (238-131.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.131.238]) with ESMTP id i5TB1B0h025536; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:11 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E7EC35C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:02 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: John Conover Message-ID: <20040629110102.GA7543@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD on a floppy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:59:24 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:45:30AM -0000, John Conover wrote: > I'm new to the list and was wondering if there was a BSD version that > would run on a write protected floppy without a HD to use for a > router/firewall? > > Thanks, > > John Checkout people.freebsd.org/~picobsd/picobsd.html GH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 12:14:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387E716A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:14:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA2E43D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5D369A3F; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:14:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:14:17 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: mnslinky@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20040629081417.5009cf76.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629041243.88558.qmail@web50702.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040629041243.88558.qmail@web50702.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FREEBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail list problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:14:23 -0000 Minnesota Slinky wrote: > Hello all, > > When I try to send messages to the list via my own > mail server, I'm getting the following error (in > /var/log/maillog): > > Jun 28 22:12:29 grog sm-mta[875]: i5SNlvwn000340: > to=, > ctladdr= (1000/1000), > delay=03:24:31, xdelay=00:00:12, mailer=esmtp, > pri=661624, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], > dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: > cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] > Jun 28 22:12:39 grog sm-mta[875]: i5S2hWL9000274: > to=, > ctladdr= (1000/1000), > delay=1+00:28:56, xdelay=00:00:05, mailer=esmtp, > pri=4891262, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], > dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: > cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] > Jun 28 22:42:23 grog sm-mta[933]: i5SNlvwn000340: > to=, > ctladdr= (1000/1000), > delay=03:54:25, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=esmtp, > pri=751624, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], > dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: > cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] > Jun 28 22:42:34 grog sm-mta[933]: i5S2hWL9000274: > to=, > ctladdr= (1000/1000), > delay=1+00:58:51, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=esmtp, > pri=4981262, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], > dsn=4.2.0, stat=Deferred: 450 Client host rejected: > cannot find your hostname, [63.228.14.246] > > Anyone have any ideas what I need to fix? Reverse DNS > lookup of IPs is provided by my upstream provider, in > this case Qwest. That IP should resolve as > front-door.secure-computing.net. Yes, but front-door.secure-computing.net doesn't resolve to anything. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 12:29:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9AC16A4E0 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:29:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx007.isp.belgacom.be (outmx007.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7531043D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx007.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i5TCTHBk015272 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:18 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (238-131.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.131.238]) with ESMTP id i5TCTCwu015226; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:12 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A867C4B8; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:11 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: Matthew Seaman , Vulpes Velox , Jim Trigg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en Subject: Re: Guide to x.org update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:29:21 -0000 I followed Matthew's instructions to upgrade from XFree86-4.3 to X.org and it worked well. It took about 14 hours on my laptop (a P3 with 64Mb or RAM). I have not recompiled any other packages and I haven't had any troubles so far. Here's how I did it exactly: cd /var/db/pkg # so I can use tab-completion for the exact XFree86 version-numbers. pkg_deinstall XFree86-4.0.1,1 # This is the metaport. I deinstall it first because later it would # complain about the stale dependency to wrapper: pkg_deinstall wrapper-1.0_3 # This is used by XFree86, but not by xorg. I remove it because I # suspect it could cause trouble with x11/xorg-server. portupgrade -o devel/imake-6 imake-4.3.0_1 portupgrade -o x11/xorg-libraries XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 portupgrade -o x11/xorg-clients XFree86-clients-4.3.0_3 portupgrade -o x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-encodings XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 portupgrade -o x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-100dpi XFree86-font100dpi-4.3.0 portupgrade -o x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-75dpi XFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0 portupgrade -o x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-cyrillic XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0 portupgrade -o x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 portupgrade -o x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 portupgrade -o x11-servers/xorg-server XFree86-Server-4.3.0_14 portupgrade -o x11-servers/xorg-fontserver XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0_2 portupgrade -o x11/xorg-manpages XFree86-documents-4.3.0 # You could as well just pkg_deinstall XFree86-documents-4.3.0, # since xorg-manpages is not required by the x11/xorg metaport cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg && make install clean # This will additionally install x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-type1, # x11-servers/xorg-vfbserver and x11-servers/xorg-printserver, which # had no equivalents in XFree86. pkgdb -u rehash Now, `find /usr/X11R6 -name "*[Ffe]86*"` says I've still got quite some XFree86-related files left, but according to pkg_which, most of them are claimed by some xorg-package. I have merged my custom XF86Config with a generic xorg.conf and all seems to work well. GH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 12:32:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A5816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:32:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thunder.trej.net (as3-3-6.orby.s.bonet.se [217.215.33.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2D443D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:32:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dagerot.nu) Received: from mailgw.trej.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])i5TCWlv18782 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:32:47 +0200 Message-Id: <200406291232.i5TCWlv18782@thunder.trej.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:32:46 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Joachim Dagerot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FREEBSD-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: IMHO/0.98.3t (Webmail for Roxen) 3j-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information 3j-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Ripping Real Audiostreams? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:32:54 -0000 There are a few tools on the MS platform for saving down a realaudio stream to disk. Are any of you aware of such a tool for our beloved OS? //J From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 12:36:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE1E16A4CE; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:36:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from coruscant.rfc1149.org (coruscant.rfc1149.org [217.160.130.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E343D1F; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne@rfc2549.org) Received: by coruscant.rfc1149.org (Postfix, from userid 110) id 99D5C3FC4; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:36:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kamino.rfc1149.org (kamino.rfc1149.org [2001:8d8:81:11::2]) by coruscant.rfc1149.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7B73CE9; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:36:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by kamino.rfc1149.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ED37726; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:36:27 +0200 (CEST) To: "Remi" In-Reply-To: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> (MrL0L@charter.net's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:28:34 -0700") References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> From: Arne Schwabe Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:36:27 +0200 Message-ID: <86r7ry35is.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on coruscant.rfc1149.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: cc: 'Brooks Davis' cc: 'Kenneth Culver' cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:36:32 -0000 "Remi" writes: > Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I > wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they > say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to > be changed) So now I come to a cross roads: > 1. Buy a 1.7 Centrino > 2. Buy a P4 2.8GHz w/ HT > 3. Buy the AMD64 laptop > > What is the state of the AMD64 version of BSD? Other than that im leaning > toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD > working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? You can't change the cpu speed while running at the Moment, I don't see any other iusses at the Moment with my Notebook (IBM T40). Arne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 12:38:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B931516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC3943D41 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id u33so295201cwc for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.59 with SMTP id f59mr109391rng; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:38:07 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Joachim Dagerot In-Reply-To: <200406291232.i5TCWlv18782@thunder.trej.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200406291232.i5TCWlv18782@thunder.trej.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ripping Real Audiostreams? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:12 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:32:46 +0200, Joachim Dagerot wrote: > > There are a few tools on the MS platform for saving down a realaudio > stream to disk. > mplayer -dumpstream -dumpfile a.dump Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 19:27:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BA416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:27:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52103.mail.yahoo.com (web52103.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC56C43D54 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:27:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idfubar@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040627192704.9134.qmail@web52103.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.234.212.108] by web52103.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:27:04 PDT Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Rishi Chopra To: Sergey Zaharchenko , rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu In-Reply-To: <20040624033142.GA2667@shark.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:45:01 +0000 cc: Dan Nelson Subject: Re: Reinstalling And /usr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:27:59 -0000 --- Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 09:43:54AM -0700, > Rishi Chopra probably wrote: > > > What I've done is gotten another set of four > drives > > and reinstalled everything from scratch (using the > > same partition and slice values) and then simply > > exported the MBR. Only trouble is now I get a "/: > bad > > dir ino 19009 at offset 0" error during startup; > looks > > like recovering the MBR is a wash... > > You could try booting from a rescue diskette, > backing up /, newfs'ing it > and restoring... > > -- > DoubleF > 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0. > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature This is exactly the problem; I'm a novice user who isn't sure how exactly to boot from a rescue disk, how to back up /, etc. What I'm hoping is that someone can volunteer to help my out; I'll ship my box to you and pay you whatever you wish for your time. I'm willing to attempt recovery on my own, but my skills are limited and recovering the MBR to its current state was the best I could do; the inode error has me stumped. Any volunteers to help me out? ===== Rishi Chopra http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~rchopra __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 13:18:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CE616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:18:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thunder.trej.net (as3-3-6.orby.s.bonet.se [217.215.33.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7AA43D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:18:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dagerot.nu) Received: from mailgw.trej.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])i5TDIOv19604 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:18:24 +0200 Message-Id: <200406291318.i5TDIOv19604@thunder.trej.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:18:23 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Joachim Dagerot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: IMHO/0.98.3t (Webmail for Roxen) 3j-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information 3j-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Can't install XVID from ports tree, can someone understand the error message? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:18:27 -0000 I ran make install in /usr/ports/multimedia/xvid and it compiled for quite some time and then suddenly the rows below came up. What is wrong and how can I solve the problems? gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `reload1.c', needed by `reload1.o'. Stop. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc' gmake[1]: *** [stage3_build] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc' gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc33. *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 13:46:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF7E16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta3p.point.ne.jp (mta3.point.ne.jp [210.188.175.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1EB43D41 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pwd8jmr22w@me.point.ne.jp) Received: from vc11.point.ne.jp ([211.1.103.139]) by mta3p.point.ne.jp with ESMTP id <20040629134609.PULH17180.mta3p@vc11.point.ne.jp> for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:46:09 +0900 Received: from fvc1-p.point.ne.jp (fvc1.point.ne.jp [210.188.175.76]) by vc11.point.ne.jp (Scanmail) with ESMTP id EA0B02AA0D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:46:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from me.point.ne.jp ([210.141.251.185]) by fvc1-p.point.ne.jp with ESMTP id <20040629134608.NYOT13867.fvc1-p@me.point.ne.jp> for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:46:08 +0900 Message-ID: <40E172A4.8030802@me.point.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:46:12 +0900 From: Bull TORS User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040626 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD QUESTIONS - ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: VESA Driver or NVIDIA Driver on Consoles, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pwd8jmr22w@me.point.ne.jp List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:11 -0000 I was reading on the manual page for vidcontrol and began wondering if I can configure my system: 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #1: Sun Jun 27 16:46:47 JST 2004 i386 Video Card: GeForce NVIDIA FX-5500 Can I utilize its vesa driver or maybe my NVIDIA driver on my consoles. I have invoked "vidcontrol -i adapter" in a console and below is the result: fb0: vga0, type:VESA VGA (5), flags:0x700ff initial mode:24, current mode:24, BIOS mode:3 frame buffer window:0xb8000, buffer size:0x8000 window size:0x8000, origin:0x0 display start address (0, 0), scan line width:80 reserved:0x0 I have invoked "vidcontrol -i mode" in a console and below is the result: mode# flags type size font window linear buffer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . . . 276 (0x114) 0x0000000f G 800x600x16 1 8x16 0xa0000 64k 64k 0xd0000000 131072k 277 (0x115) 0x0000000f G 800x600x32 1 8x16 0xa0000 64k 64k 0xd0000000 131072k 279 (0x117) 0x0000000f G 1024x768x16 1 8x16 0xa0000 64k 64k 0xd0000000 131072k 280 (0x118) 0x0000000f G 1024x768x32 1 8x16 0xa0000 64k 64k 0xd0000000 131072k 282 (0x11a) 0x0000000f G 1280x1024x16 1 8x16 0xa0000 64k 64k 0xd0000000 131072k 283 (0x11b) 0x0000000f G 1280x1024x32 1 8x16 0xa0000 64k 64k 0xd0000000 131072k . . . Does this mean I can set my consoles to which ever settings above? If it is possible, how can I go about it? Any advice, hints, or whatever response will be really appreciated. Thanks in advance... Bull TORS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 13:46:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D1A16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78EFB43D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zam4ever@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so476296cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.98.7 with SMTP id v7mr1271962cwb; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:46:13 +0800 From: zam4ever To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: BSD on a floppy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:46:15 -0000 > Date: 29 Jun 2004 09:45:30 -0000 > From: conover@rahul.net (John Conover) > Subject: BSD on a floppy? > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20040629094530.9864.qmail@rahul.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > I'm new to the list and was wondering if there was a BSD version that > would run on a write protected floppy without a HD to use for a > router/firewall? > Thanks, > > John Single Floppy OpenBSD based firewall (FOAF) http://www.theapt.org/openbsd/firewall.html BSD Router http://www.bsdrouter.org/ closedBSD http://www.closedbsd.org/ ekkoBSD http://www.ekkobsd.org/ floppy-1 project http://www.floppy-1.com/ Shaped IP http://www.3bit.co.jp/shapeip/ picoBSD http://people.freebsd.org/~picobsd/picobsd.html And the other list can be found at this website: http://staff.mybsd.org.my/zam4ever/www/link/bsdlink.htm Best regards, zam4ever From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 13:51:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB9416A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:51:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B41143D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieckiel@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:pieckiel@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5TDp52f004775 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:51:05 GMT Received: (from pieckiel@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i5TDp59W016815 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:51:05 -0400 From: "Kevin A. Pieckiel" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629135105.GB27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Snapshot question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:51:12 -0000 Greetings! I use filesystem snapshots when I backup my filesystems. I backup to tape and I ALWAYS read back the backup and compare it to the snapshot to verify the data was written correctly. I use FreeBSD 5.2.1-p6, and my tape drive is an Exabyte M2 drive. When I do my compare of my tape against my snapshot, it's not uncommon for one or two files (always the same files) to be different. The most usual culprit being my winbindd_cache.tdb file for Samba. I thought the snapshot would not change over time as the files on the filesystem change. Does this definitively indicate this particular file isn't being written to tape correctly most nights? (Yes, I *AM* backing up my snapshot and comparing the backup to my snapshot, not the live filesystem.) I doubt it, since I've gotten differences in this file on four different tapes, all brand new. What does this mean? Is there a problem, or am I missing something? Thanks, Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 14:08:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B14016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:08:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server117-han.de-nserver.de (server117-han.de-nserver.de [81.3.17.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6397943D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@paldau207.com) Received: (qmail 17443 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 14:07:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO paldau207.com) (freebsd@paldau207.com@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 14:07:59 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:07:59 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: From: "freebsd@paldau207.com" Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Jebbar-Office Mail Message-Id: <20040629140809.6397943D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: PPP Problems ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@paldau207.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:08:12 -0000 Hi! I want to use a FreeBSD-Server for my network at home. Now i'm using a Windows-Server but it crashes too often. I think the connection is slower if i use it in fbsd. Maybe because of the thousands of errors. Here are some informations: --------------------------- OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE Connection: ISDN Flatrate 64kbit/s, Telekom Austria Modem: Elsa Tango 2000 (external, port com1) # dmesg | grep "sio" sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A # errors sio0: 15 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 15) .. sio0: xx more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total xxxxxx) # answer from a various mailinglist It means that the kernel couldn't service the serial port fast enough and it dropped characters. If it happens any time you try to send something, your interrupts may be misconfigured. # /etc/ppp/ppp.conf default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set device /dev/cuaa0 set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set timeout 180 enable dns provider: set phone "1234" set authname "5678" set authkey "foo" # set login "TIMEOUT 10 \"\" \"\" gin:--gin: \\U word: \\P col: ppp" set timeout 300 set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.255 add default HISADDR ----------------------------- plz, help ... i can't find a solution by my own. mfg seppo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 14:11:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE3816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C3A43D5D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i5TEBYaR076280; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:11:34 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "DA. Forsyth" Message-ID: <20040629141133.GB81324@dan.emsphone.com> References: <230701088494370-8322179b0a16f@IWR50.412.spamsucks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <230701088494370-8322179b0a16f@IWR50.412.spamsucks.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting LPT1 to polled mode via acpi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:11:37 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 29), DA. Forsyth said: > I've got 5.2.1-RELEASE on a P4 1.1Ghz machine I've setup a HP > laserjet (iiP) on the first parallel port using a simple filter to > get the lines feeding correctly. > > Sometimes it actually prints, but mostly it will send the job to the > printer then WAAAAAIT till I formfeed. After that it will NOT access > the printer. LPQ reports jobs in the queue, but also says 'waiting > for lp to become ready (offline?)' > > the printer is not offline. the cable it ok etc etc etc resetting > etc in LPC makes no difference > > I just need some simple text printing from this thing, can it really > be so hard? > > dmesg says about 'ppc' > ppc0 port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > which is correct > > anyhow, I read the printing bit of the handbook, which referred me to > the IRQ setting and mentions some HP printers not working in IRQ > mode. I commented the relevant line in /boot/device.hints and > rebooted no change. Use the lptcontrol command to switch between polling and interrupt mode. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 14:12:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A38016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:12:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C916943D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:12:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:13:45 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:15:45 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:15:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2004 14:13:45.0793 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A40B310:01C45DE3] Subject: RE: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:12:59 -0000 Thank you everyone for the suggestions. I am going to try out the sleep statements this morning and see how that works out. Will post results. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -----Original Message----- From: Jamie Novak [mailto:novak@qwest.net] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 9:44 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot On 06/28, Michael Clark rearranged the electrons to read: > Any suggestions on how to do this without DHCP? That's really not > an option for me. Can I delay the rc.conf processing somehow > so that the adaptor has more time to get online? You could always put a sleep statement in the relevant /etc/rc* script. On some of our servers, we added the following two lines to the base /etc/rc script in the NFS Mounts section, because it would process too quickly and try to mount (and fail) before the interface came up: echo 'Waiting 5 seconds for interface to settle...' sleep 5 In our case, it was the ti0 interface, but the concept's the same. Hope that gives you something to start with, at any rate. -Jamie _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 14:20:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6ADA16A4CE; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:20:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EE343D46; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id D039E10A; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:31:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 141.156.69.109 ([141.156.69.109]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:31:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:31:06 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Remi References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> In-Reply-To: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: 'Brooks Davis' cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: 'David O'Brien' Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:20:16 -0000 Quoting Remi : > Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I > wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they > say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to > be changed) So now I come to a cross roads: > 1. Buy a 1.7 Centrino > 2. Buy a P4 2.8GHz w/ HT > 3. Buy the AMD64 laptop > > What is the state of the AMD64 version of BSD? Other than that im leaning > toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD > working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? > It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure what the laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD, it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after already booting an OS. Ken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 14:54:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608FA16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:54:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FC143D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD55F4AC85; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:56:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Cordula's Web To: pieckiel+freebsd-questions@sdf.lonestar.org In-reply-to: <20040629135105.GB27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> (pieckiel+freebsd-questions@sdf.lonestar.org) X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE References: <20040629135105.GB27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Message-Id: <20040629145654.BD55F4AC85@fw.farid-hajji.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:56:54 +0200 (CEST) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snapshot question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:54:56 -0000 pieckiel+freebsd-questions@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: > When I do my compare of my tape against my snapshot, it's not uncommon for > one or two files (always the same files) to be different. The most usual > culprit being my winbindd_cache.tdb file for Samba. I thought the snapshot > would not change over time as the files on the filesystem change. Does this > definitively indicate this particular file isn't being written to tape > correctly most nights? (Yes, I *AM* backing up my snapshot and comparing > the backup to my snapshot, not the live filesystem.) Are you sure you are comparing against the correct snapshot? If you use dump -L, the snapshot is created, opened, and immediately unlinked, then the open file is saved. After dump exits, the snapshot file is pysically released. Are you creating a snapshot manually? What commands do you use exactly? -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:07:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A8816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:07:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4B243D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:07:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BA98325; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:07:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82376-10; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A9B81FD; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E18588.6090101@wcborstel.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:06:48 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:07:02 -0000 dave wrote: >Hi, > I've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box running postfix 2.1, spamassassin 2.63, >amavisd-new-20030616.p9, dcc-dccd-1.2.48, and razor-agents-2.40 all >installed via ports. I'm having issues with dcc-dccd and razor-agents not >working, but i believe that's due to my firewall, anyone know what ports >they use, and that's not the purpose of this. I've got amavisd-new as a >postfix content filter. It sends messages through spamassassin and an >antivirus program, spamassassin interfaces with razor and dcc, which until i >get those ports i've disabled. My problem is with amavisd-new, when i have >the content_filter line uncommented in main.cf smtpd throttles itself, >comment out that line and it works fine. I have no idea what the issue is, i >manually run amavisd and it does not report any syntax errors. The below is >the strange error i'm getting. I don't get any startup errors from either >amavisd-new or postfix, and this only occurs when the content_filter line is >uncommented. > > Here, take a look at my log. Do note that I'm using Postfix 2.1 and ClamAV. I'm not really sure if spamassassin is doing his job right, but that's not really the point now. Jun 29 16:50:44 www postfix/smtpd[83091]: connect from bay13-f103.bay13.hotmail.com[64.4.31.103] Jun 29 16:50:45 www postfix/smtpd[83091]: 2F518809E: client=bay13-f103.bay13.hotmail.com[64.4.31.103] Jun 29 16:50:45 www postfix/cleanup[83094]: 2F518809E: message-id= Jun 29 16:50:45 www postfix/qmgr[40431]: 2F518809E: from=, size=4706, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jun 29 16:50:45 www postfix/smtpd[83091]: disconnect from bay13-f103.bay13.hotmail.com[64.4.31.103] Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/smtpd[83096]: connect from localhost.demon.nl[127.0.0.1] Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/smtpd[83096]: 2C23D8325: client=localhost.demon.nl[127.0.0.1] Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/cleanup[83094]: 2C23D8325: message-id= Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/qmgr[40431]: 2C23D8325: from=, size=5150, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/smtpd[83096]: disconnect from localhost.demon.nl[127.0.0.1] Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/smtp[83095]: 2F518809E: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=1, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=82376-09, from MTA: 250 Ok: queued as 2C23D8325) Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/qmgr[40431]: 2F518809E: removed Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/local[83097]: 2C23D8325: to=, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox) Jun 29 16:50:46 www postfix/qmgr[40431]: 2C23D8325: removed As you can see, the scanning done by ClamAV and Spamassassin (at least, I think that Spamassassin is working) is being done by the loopback interface. It doesn't require an outside connection again. I'm not really sure if your firewall is a troublesome factor or not. The only ports I have forwarded from my router are 21,22,25,80,110(so FTP, SSH, SMTP, HTTP and POP3, in case you didn't know ;) Give us an output of /var/amavis/amavis.log, and perhaps you can find an error there. I think that amavis is the problematic factor in here. Also, this is what I have in my main.cf concerning the content_filter you're talking about. Perhaps it is of use for you. content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024 Cheers, Jorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:10:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CDF16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:10:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E08643D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 6196 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jun 2004 20:24:20 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.947922 secs); 28 Jun 2004 20:24:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 20:24:18 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4753.209.167.16.15.1088454258.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <003201c45d45$9425d350$f201a8c0@decaturit> References: <4290.209.167.16.15.1088448488.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> <003201c45d45$9425d350$f201a8c0@decaturit> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:24:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: jmooney@decaturhotel.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Burn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:10:55 -0000 > TY for your help it worked great . > I am using NERO 5.0 to burn with btw. > That's great! Have fun with the new install ;o) Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:iaccounts@ibctech.ca] > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:48 PM > To: jmooney@decaturhotel.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Burn > > >> I down loaded the newest version release 5.2.1 i386 and >> I seem to have a problem burning disk 2 it says ziped >> it is 268 megs but when I unzip it and try to burn it to CD >> it says it is 799 megs ?? >> Any ideas? > > If you have downloaded the .iso image, you want to 'Burn CD from CD > image', as opposed to unzipping, and/or just plain burning it as data. > > Depending on what CD burning software you use, you should have a similar > option. In Adaptec v5, it is under the 'File' menu. > > Steve > >> >> James Mooney >> IT Dept >> Decatur Hotels Corp >> 317 Magazine St >> New Orleans La.70130 >> 504-962-5582 >> This e-mail may contain confidential, copyright or privileged >> information. >> If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this >> e-mail >> in >> error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any >> unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this >> e-mail is strictly forbidden. >> >> I cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication, or that it is >> free >> from errors, viruses or interference. As the Internet is not a >> guaranteed >> secure environment, I cannot ensure that an email is not interfered with >> during transmission. >> >> >> >> >> --- >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >> Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 06/04/2004 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > t: 905.373.9313 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 06/04/2004 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 06/04/2004 > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:16:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E433D16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:16:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gldis.ca (constans.gldis.ca [66.11.169.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1B743D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gldis.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with SMTP id i5TFSsqi002785; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:28:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gldisater@gldis.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: gldis.ca: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol Message-ID: <40E188C2.5040602@gldis.ca> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:20:34 -0400 From: Jeremy Faulkner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: artifex References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <40DEDA22.30106@gldis.ca> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:17:00 -0000 artifex wrote: >>>>> Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue >>>>> files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. >>>> >>>> .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert >>>> them to a standard ISO image. >>> >>> Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), >>> and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. >> >> What international standard describes their format? >> Windows is not a standard. > > Where are the international standard that describe the ISO file (not the > filesystem!) format? http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=17505 > How do you convert music disc image to iso format? You do not convert music disc image to iso format. ISO-9660 is a filesystem. The audio disc format is IEC 908. > BTW, the non-standard cdrdao do the job fine. > > bye, > artifex > -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:22:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57E716A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:22:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-gw4.njit.edu (mail-gw4.njit.edu [128.235.251.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5009A43D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:22:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kellers@njit.edu) Received: from [128.235.114.39] (dhcp114-39.NJIT.EDU [128.235.114.39]) by mail-gw4.njit.edu (8.12.10/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i5TFLj0f017344; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:21:46 -0400 (EDT) From: T Kellers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:21:46 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <230701088494370-8322179b0a16f@IWR50.412.spamsucks.net> <20040629141133.GB81324@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629141133.GB81324@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291121.46259.kellers@njit.edu> cc: "DA. Forsyth" cc: Dan Nelson Subject: Re: setting LPT1 to polled mode via acpi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:22:14 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 10:11 am, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jun 29), DA. Forsyth said: > > I've got 5.2.1-RELEASE on a P4 1.1Ghz machine I've setup a HP > > laserjet (iiP) on the first parallel port using a simple filter to > > get the lines feeding correctly. > > > > Sometimes it actually prints, but mostly it will send the job to the > > printer then WAAAAAIT till I formfeed. After that it will NOT access > > the printer. LPQ reports jobs in the queue, but also says 'waiting > > for lp to become ready (offline?)' > > > > the printer is not offline. the cable it ok etc etc etc resetting > > etc in LPC makes no difference > > > > I just need some simple text printing from this thing, can it really > > be so hard? > > > > dmesg says about 'ppc' > > ppc0 port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > > ppbus0: on ppc0 > > which is correct > > > > anyhow, I read the printing bit of the handbook, which referred me to > > the IRQ setting and mentions some HP printers not working in IRQ > > mode. I commented the relevant line in /boot/device.hints and > > rebooted no change. > > Use the lptcontrol command to switch between polling and interrupt mode. I used a simple shell script to execute lptcontrol -p I haven't had to do this since my June 23rd build world/build kernel, though. I'm running 5.2-CURRENT. Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:47:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A2C16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:47:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.nmi.rulez.org (drama.obuda.kando.hu [193.224.41.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB4843D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:47:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from feczo@nmi.rulez.org) Received: by ns.nmi.rulez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AA8A40FB; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:47:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:47:46 +0200 From: Feczak Szabolcs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629154746.GA45755@nmi.rulez.org> References: <20040615100155.GA85637@nmi.rulez.org> <20040615110023.GA95164@izb.knu.ac.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040615110023.GA95164@izb.knu.ac.kr> X-Mailer: Sony playstation email client (0.97b) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: ipv6 basic problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:47:53 -0000 On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:00:23PM +0900, Byung-hee H. wrote: > Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:04:29PM +0200 > Feczak Szabolcs wrote: > > # ping6 ::1 > > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) ::1 --> ::1 > > ping6: sendmsg: No route to host > > > > Any hint why it is not working ? > > thanks > > > If you can not obtain native IPv6 address, try to connect via 6to4. > But, 6to4 IPv6 address depends on IPv4 address. This means that you have to reconfigure your tunnel every time after your IPv4 address changes. no, the problem was that I couldn't even ping the loopback interface, and the problem was solved by commenting the following line out from the kernelconfig #options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default -- _(_)_ (_. o_) F3CZ0 (_,) http://feczo.nmi.rulez.org ( ) __________________________ // // From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:48:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A23416A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:48:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB29543D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieckiel@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:pieckiel@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5TFloXu002555; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:47:50 GMT Received: (from pieckiel@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i5TFlksk010217; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:47:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:47:46 -0400 From: "Kevin A. Pieckiel" To: "Cordula's Web" Message-ID: <20040629154746.GC27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mail-Followup-To: Cordula's Web , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040629135105.GB27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20040629145654.BD55F4AC85@fw.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629145654.BD55F4AC85@fw.farid-hajji.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snapshot question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:48:01 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:56:54PM +0200, Cordula's Web wrote: > Are you sure you are comparing against the correct snapshot? If you use > dump -L, the snapshot is created, opened, and immediately unlinked, > then the open file is saved. After dump exits, the snapshot file is > pysically released. > > Are you creating a snapshot manually? What commands do you use exactly? I'm actually using tar because my data store is larger than my tapes, and I can't find a way to get dump to change tapes for me automatically (something akin to tar's --new-volume-script parameter). The relevant commands I use are as follows (this just shows the /var parittion, but I make snapshots and mount all important partitions in /mnt/backup before I run tar): cd / mksnap_ffs /var /var/.snap/backup.snap mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /var/.snap/backup.snap -u 6 mount -r /dev/md6 /mnt/backup/root.var tar -cvf ${BACKUP_DEVICE} --totals --preserve \ --blocking-factor ${BACKUP_BLOCKSIZE} --block-number --multi-volume \ --new-volume-script ${PROGROOT}/next.sh \ --newer-mtime "${TIMESTAMP}" ${BACKUP_FLAGS} \ ${BACKUP_PATHS} >> ${LOGFILE} 2>&1 tar --compare -f ${BACKUP_DEVICE} --blocking-factor ${BACKUP_BLOCKSIZE} \ --multi-volume --new-volume-script ${PROGROOT}/next.sh >> ${COMPAREFILE} 2>&1 umount /mnt/backup/root.var mdconfig -d -u 6 rm -f /var/.snap/backup.snap Here, BACKUP_PATHS is set as follows: BACKUP_PATHS="/mnt/backup" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 15:50:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2293D16A4D2 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:50:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.nmi.rulez.org (drama.obuda.kando.hu [193.224.41.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE71C43D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from feczo@nmi.rulez.org) Received: by ns.nmi.rulez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 28E2D40FD; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:50:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:50:56 +0200 From: Feczak Szabolcs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629155056.GA45900@nmi.rulez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: Sony playstation email client (0.97b) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: firewall on cdrom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:50:57 -0000 Any similar projects like closedbsd out there ? -- _(_)_ (_. o_) F3CZ0 (_,) http://feczo.nmi.rulez.org ( ) __________________________ // // From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:02:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7AF16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:02:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6EF43D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i5TG2ZaI037793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:02:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5TG1nUi018019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5TG1nrW003306; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5TG1l9C003305; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:47 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Darren Pilgrim Message-ID: <20040629160146.GF609@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <000601c449d2$793e91c0$0a2a15ac@spud> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c449d2$793e91c0$0a2a15ac@spud> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can I access a USB device that has no driver attached? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:02:48 -0000 On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 06:22:54PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > I have a UPS with a USB interface. There isn't a specific UPS driver in > FreeBSD beyond uhid. If I were to connect the UPS's interface port > without having a driver attached, is it still possible to talk to the > device in some way? I ask because I'm helping get nut (sysutils/nut) > working for USB UPSes under FreeBSD. Maybe your question is outdated, but since noone answered yet. - You can enhance our uhid driver - You can write your own driver - You can do raw control transfers via /dev/usb* - You can also do raw control and pipe trandfers if ugen takes the device - You can use libusb for portable (Linux, ...) device access via ugen -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:11:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8BA16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:11:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omega.noc.uk.easynet.net (omega.noc.uk.easynet.net [212.135.8.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D152343D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net) Received: from aedwards by omega.noc.uk.easynet.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BfLCt-0002HL-WD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:11:40 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:11:39 +0100 From: Anthony Edwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629161139.GA5153@omega.noc.uk.easynet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: easynet Ltd User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Subject: portsdb -Uu error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:11:56 -0000 This looks to be a fairly straightforward error: ---- begin error message ---- fishcat# portsdb -Uu Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..drweb_postfix-4.29.12f: "/usr/ports/security/drwebd" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete ===> security/drweb-postfix failed *** Error code 1 1 error ******************************************************************** Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you have a complete and up-to-date ports collection (INDEX builds are not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections). If so, then report the failure to ports@FreeBSD.org together with relevant details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version, environment and /etc/make.conf settings). ******************************************************************** Stop in /usr/ports. failed to generate INDEX! portsdb: index generation error ---- end error message ---- bash-2.05b$ pwd /usr/ports/security bash-2.05b$ ls | more [...] dropbear drweb drweb-postfix drweb-qmail drweb-sendmail dsniff [...] As the portsdb -Uu error message states, /usr/ports/security/drwebd is non-existent (at least following a cvsup of the ports tree today, I am not sure if it was there before) and so the portsdb -Uu run fails with the error message shown above. My FreeBSD version is RELENG_4 (FreeBSD-STABLE). What is the fix for this please? Waiting until a new cvsup corrects the error above, or...? -- Anthony Edwards anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:30:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9284C16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:30:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D81743D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:30:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5TGU0co015618; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:30:02 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:30:25 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040629161139.GA5153@omega.noc.uk.easynet.net> In-Reply-To: <20040629161139.GA5153@omega.noc.uk.easynet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406290930.25879.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Anthony Edwards Subject: Re: portsdb -Uu error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:30:49 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 09:11 am, Anthony Edwards wrote: > This looks to be a fairly straightforward error: > > ---- begin error message ---- > fishcat# portsdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please > wait..drweb_postfix-4.29.12f: "/usr/ports/security/drwebd" > non-existent -- dependency list incomplete > ===> security/drweb-postfix failed > *** Error code 1 > 1 error > > ******************************************************************** > Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported > version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you > have a complete and up-to-date ports collection (INDEX builds are > not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections). If > so, then report the failure to ports@FreeBSD.org together with > relevant details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD > version, environment and /etc/make.conf settings). > ******************************************************************** > > Stop in /usr/ports. > failed to generate INDEX! > portsdb: index generation error > ---- end error message ---- > > bash-2.05b$ pwd > /usr/ports/security > bash-2.05b$ ls | more > [...] > dropbear > drweb > drweb-postfix > drweb-qmail > drweb-sendmail > dsniff > [...] > > As the portsdb -Uu error message states, /usr/ports/security/drwebd > is non-existent (at least following a cvsup of the ports tree today, > I am not sure if it was there before) and so the portsdb -Uu run > fails with the error message shown above. > > My FreeBSD version is RELENG_4 (FreeBSD-STABLE). > > What is the fix for this please? Waiting until a new cvsup corrects > the error above, or...? If you follow ports, I was told you also should also follow cvs-all. It was fixed about an hour ago. So, it should have made it to your favorite cvsup-mirror. A faster fix is to edit the drweb_postfix make file and change the drwebd entry on the PORTSDIR entry to just drweb. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:39:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7379E16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:39:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D0543D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:39:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5TGdCVd020049; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001801c45df6$43f0a980$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: "Jorn Argelo" References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <40E18588.6090101@wcborstel.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:29:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:39:25 -0000 Hello, Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter line, it didn't matter because i got the same behavior from smtpd on postfix. Keep the ideas coming. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:40:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFF216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:40:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from discordia.pl (discordia.pl [212.160.154.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F62443D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:40:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toread@discordia.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost.discordia.pl [127.0.0.1]) by discordia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FF720B404 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:40:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from discordia.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (discordia.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 62755-02-5 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by discordia.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D83720B407; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by discordia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4513120B403 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:40:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Piotr Gnyp To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629183657.O63478@discordia.pl> Organization: The Golden Apple Corp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (DrWeb at discordia.pl) Subject: user is not logger in, but who claims something else X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:40:23 -0000 Hi the situation: discordia# ps -auwx | grep diabeu discordia# discordia# w 18:37 up 8 days, 5:54, 9 users, load averages: 0,03 0,05 0,02 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT toread p0 chello0621790851 18:26 - pine -i diabeu po 213.134.140.150: 17:42 46 - diabeu pp 213.134.140.150: 15:15 3:13 - diabeu pt 213.134.140.150: 15:01 3:12 - diabeu pu 213.134.140.150: 15:25 3:11 - discordia# watch -coW ttypp Snoop device change due to write failure. Enter device name [ttypp]: How to fix this bug? Well it`s not messing, but it`s very irritating. Please advice. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:46:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D21616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:46:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F4B43D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B0B106873; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:45:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E19CC7.1050305@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:45:59 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <40E18588.6090101@wcborstel.nl> <001801c45df6$43f0a980$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <001801c45df6$43f0a980$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: Jorn Argelo cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:46:02 -0000 dave wrote: > Hello, > Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've > got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something > strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix > forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter line, it didn't > matter because i got the same behavior from smtpd on postfix. > Keep the ideas coming. > Thanks. > Dave. > My amavis logs to syslog: # true (e.g. 1) => syslog; false (e.g. 0) => logging to file $DO_SYSLOG = 1; # (defaults to false) #$SYSLOG_LEVEL = 'user.info'; # (defaults to 'mail.info') there is something in your logfile there? (/var/log/maillog or /var/log/messages or something :-)) Perhaps you sould look at that. Also changing in your master.cf file # ========================================================================== # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100) # ========================================================================== smtp inet n - n - - smtpd to smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v should give you verbose logging, that might help solving the problem... Let us know what happends ... -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:48:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D18916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdhacker.org (h71.52.102.166.ip.alltel.net [166.102.52.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECF443D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:48:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uidzero@one-arm.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bsdhacker.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319B7484 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from bsdhacker.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cvsup.bsdhacker.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81329-05 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (bsd.bsdhacker.org [192.168.0.2]) by bsdhacker.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C81351 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:46:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <40E19D5A.6050007@one-arm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:48:26 -0500 From: uidzero User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040629) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <40E18588.6090101@wcborstel.nl> <001801c45df6$43f0a980$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <001801c45df6$43f0a980$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bsdhacker.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:48:27 -0000 dave wrote: >Hello, > Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've >got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something >strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix >forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter line, it didn't >matter because i got the same behavior from smtpd on postfix. > Keep the ideas coming. >Thanks. >Dave. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Dave, I've been working on postfix with clamav, amavis, and SA. In your "/usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf" at he bottom make sure you have these lines and make sure that they are indented. It took me a day or so to figure that out. (Again, make sure all of the "-o etc..." is idented under the main heading.) # amavis configuration smtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 smtp -o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200 -o disable_dns_lookups=yes 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter= -o local_recipient_maps= -o relay_recipient_maps= -o smtpd_restriction_classes= -o smtpd_client_restrictions= -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8 -o strict_rfc821_envelopes=yes Hope this helps, if it doesn't, please let me know and I apologize. :) Michael -- Michael D. Whities uidzero@one-arm.com http://www.one-arm.com -- There are four colors of hats to watch for: Black, White, Grey, and Red. The meanings are: Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:49:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7A616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:49:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av5-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (av5-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D7343D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:49:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hasse@swedehost.com) Received: by av5-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 564FD37E74; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.164]) by av5-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4611E37E46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from odin.swedehost.com (h171n2fls33o804.telia.com [217.209.211.171]) by smtp3-2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E14C37E52 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thor.swedehost.com (thor.swedehost.com [192.168.0.10]) by odin.swedehost.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5TGn23a085001 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hasse@swedehost.com) From: Hasse Organization: The Valhalla Project To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406290107.04977.hasse@swedehost.com> In-Reply-To: <200406290107.04977.hasse@swedehost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291849.00322.hasse@swedehost.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: Repost : Anybody having any knowledge of VirTool.DOS.Sfc ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:49:01 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 01.07, Hasse wrote: > Hi everybody. > Does anybody have any knowledge of VirTool.DOS.Sfc ? > Didn't find any useful info on the net or in the archives. > Is it a virus or a trojan ? > It popped up when I did a virri-scan with ClamAV. > " /usr/ports/distfiles/j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip: VirTool.DOS.Sfc FOUND " > The j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip was downloaded from Sun a couple of months > ago. thor# ll /usr/ports/distfiles | grep "j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip" > -rw------- 1 hasse hasse 49269919 Mar 24 19:57 j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip > > TIA > / Hasse. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:51:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3330C16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:51:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA03D43D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:51:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i5TGpGA3095250; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:51:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:51:16 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Piotr Gnyp Message-ID: <20040629165116.GE81324@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040629183657.O63478@discordia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629183657.O63478@discordia.pl> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: user is not logger in, but who claims something else X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:51:54 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 29), Piotr Gnyp said: > discordia# ps -auwx | grep diabeu > discordia# > > discordia# w > 18:37 up 8 days, 5:54, 9 users, load averages: 0,03 0,05 0,02 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > toread p0 chello0621790851 18:26 - pine -i > diabeu po 213.134.140.150: 17:42 46 - > diabeu pp 213.134.140.150: 15:15 3:13 - > diabeu pt 213.134.140.150: 15:01 3:12 - > diabeu pu 213.134.140.150: 15:25 3:11 - w looks at the contents of /var/run/utmp, and if the user's login process dies unexpectedly then it doesn't clear the entry out of utmp. The next login to use that particular pty will overwrite the stale entry. Rebooting will fix it (of course), as will logging in a bunch of times or running enough screen sessions that ttyp[optu] are reused. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:53:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DA116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:53:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D8543D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i5TGrJ1X002851; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:53:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:53:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Hasse Message-ID: <20040629165318.GF81324@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200406290107.04977.hasse@swedehost.com> <200406291849.00322.hasse@swedehost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406291849.00322.hasse@swedehost.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Repost : Anybody having any knowledge of VirTool.DOS.Sfc ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:53:21 -0000 In the last episode (Jun 29), Hasse said: > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 01.07, Hasse wrote: > > Hi everybody. > > Does anybody have any knowledge of VirTool.DOS.Sfc ? > > Didn't find any useful info on the net or in the archives. > > Is it a virus or a trojan ? > > It popped up when I did a virri-scan with ClamAV. > > " /usr/ports/distfiles/j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip: VirTool.DOS.Sfc FOUND " > > The j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip was downloaded from Sun a couple of months > > ago. thor# ll /usr/ports/distfiles | grep "j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip" > > -rw------- 1 hasse hasse 49269919 Mar 24 19:57 j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip Almost certainly a false detection. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:54:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D662316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:54:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from discordia.pl (discordia.pl [212.160.154.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925B043D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:54:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from toread@discordia.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost.discordia.pl [127.0.0.1]) by discordia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5556420B404; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from discordia.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (discordia.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 63556-02-11; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by discordia.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1A12420B407; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by discordia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1257120B403; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:54:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Piotr Gnyp To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20040629165116.GE81324@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: <20040629185342.V63478@discordia.pl> References: <20040629183657.O63478@discordia.pl> <20040629165116.GE81324@dan.emsphone.com> Organization: The Golden Apple Corp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (DrWeb at discordia.pl) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: user is not logger in, but who claims something else X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:54:14 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Dan Nelson wrote: > Rebooting will fix it (of course), as will logging in a bunch of times > or running enough screen sessions that ttyp[optu] are reused. it helped! thanks a lot! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:02:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BD316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:02:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F8C43D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:02:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@trini0.org) Received: from hivemind.trini0.org (trini0.org[65.34.205.195]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004062917013701400hqa8de>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:01:37 +0000 Received: from gladiator.trini0.org (gladiator.trini0.org [192.168.0.3]) by hivemind.trini0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E04216C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerard Samuel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291301.36285.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> Subject: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:02:19 -0000 When editing php files, via the command line, there is a newline character after the closing ?> Im looking for a command that would trim files, so that I can append it to the find command. find ./ -name '*.php' -exec SOME_COMMAND {} \; Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:04:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002CA16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:04:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cenedra.walrond.org (host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com [213.160.108.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BA243D58 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:04:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@walrond.org) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=bob.mobile) by cenedra.walrond.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BfM2N-0000kH-JF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:04:51 +0100 From: Andrew Walrond To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:39:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Help required installing 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:04:53 -0000 I have tried unsuccessfully to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 from downloaded isos. I have the i386 isos, but the first machine I tried was an Asus SK8N motherboard with Amd Opteron and 2Gb ram. The various hardware is shown as supported on the Hardware list; notably the Promise SATA150 TX2 disk controller. Although this is an Amd64, I assume the 386 version should still install OK? Anyhow, I booted from cd disk 1, went through the various questions, auto partitioned and it began "Extracting ... into / directory". This went well for a few minutes, lots of disk activity, then Panic - page fault CPUID 0 and was informed that the machine would reboot after 15seconds. I tried again, this time booting without ACPI, with the same results. Any suggestions? Andrew Walrond From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:07:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4136F16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F9843D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:07:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7BA69A39; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:07:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:07:02 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Gerard Samuel Message-Id: <20040629130702.4116ec60.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200406291301.36285.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> References: <200406291301.36285.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:07:25 -0000 Gerard Samuel wrote: > When editing php files, via the command line, there is a newline character > after the closing ?> > Im looking for a command that would trim files, so that I can append it to the > find command. > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec SOME_COMMAND {} \; If you're absolutely sure of the number of characters you're removing from the end of the file, you could use truncate(1). Otherwise, you'll probably want sed or perl to check that it's not removing important characters. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:18:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2091116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:18:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A727843D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:18:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org) Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 9D158BAE2; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:18:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:18:25 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel To: Andrew Walrond Message-ID: <20040629171824.GB2103@ns1.tcbug.org> References: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help required installing 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:18:42 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Andrew Walrond wrote: > I have tried unsuccessfully to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 from downloaded isos. > > I have the i386 isos, but the first machine I tried was an Asus SK8N > motherboard with Amd Opteron and 2Gb ram. The various hardware is shown as > supported on the Hardware list; notably the Promise SATA150 TX2 disk > controller. > > Although this is an Amd64, I assume the 386 version should still install OK? > > Anyhow, I booted from cd disk 1, went through the various questions, auto > partitioned and it began "Extracting ... into / directory". This went well > for a few minutes, lots of disk activity, then > Panic - page fault > CPUID 0 > > and was informed that the machine would reboot after 15seconds. > > I tried again, this time booting without ACPI, with the same results. > > Any suggestions? > > Andrew Walrond Perhaps ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/5.2.1/ will work better for you. Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:20:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79F016A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:20:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBC643D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:20:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276E2106873; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:20:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1A4E3.7000602@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:20:35 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Paetzel References: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> <20040629171824.GB2103@ns1.tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <20040629171824.GB2103@ns1.tcbug.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: Andrew Walrond cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help required installing 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:20:40 -0000 Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Andrew Walrond wrote: > >> >>I tried again, this time booting without ACPI, with the same results. >> >>Any suggestions? >> >>Andrew Walrond > > > Perhaps ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/5.2.1/ will work > better for you. I had the same with -amd64 my i386 workstation didn't bootup anymore so i needed to use the AMD64 version, that works :-) > > Josh Paetzel -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:28:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9EF16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:28:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fe2.cluster1.echolabs.net (mail.atlanticbb.net [216.52.118.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F3143D41 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:28:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tommoyer@atlanticbb.net) X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/ClamAV http://raeinternet.com/mpp X-Scanned-By: Scanned by MPP/ClamAV/SpamAssassin Received: from [68.114.85.228] (account tommoyer@atlanticbb.net HELO [192.168.1.102]) by fe2.cluster1.echolabs.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 4199663 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:08 -0400 Message-ID: <40E1A6A2.6060001@atlanticbb.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:02 -0400 From: Thomas Moyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: home directory questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:28:24 -0000 Is it possible to setup a file server with FreeBSD and use that as a home partition and also share other files on a small network? What kinds of utilities would I need to run? I imagine NFS for *nix clients and Samba for MS clients. Also possibly share printers with this computer as well. CUPS for that. Also what kind a minimum system reccomendations does anyone have? Thanks, Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:34:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C901616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:34:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caduceus.jf.intel.com (fmr06.intel.com [134.134.136.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A073E43D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomasx.foster@intel.com) Received: from talaria.jf.intel.com (talaria.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.7]) major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i5THY0o5007022; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:34:00 GMT Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206]) major-inner.mc,v 1.10 2004/03/01 19:21:36 root Exp $) with SMTP id i5THSTtP003298; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:28:44 GMT Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.60]) M2004062910335209174 ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:33:52 -0700 Received: from orsmsx405.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.46]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:33:52 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:33:50 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: firewall on cdrom thread-index: AcRd9KOx3smXP0pNRm+TYcm4aGT+ZAACo8+g From: "Foster, ThomasX" To: "Feczak Szabolcs" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2004 17:33:52.0839 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F028570:01C45DFF] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: RE: firewall on cdrom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:34:09 -0000 http://www.m0n0.ch/ T -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Feczak Szabolcs Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 8:51 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: firewall on cdrom Any similar projects like closedbsd out there ? --=20 _(_)_ (_. o_) F3CZ0 (_,) http://feczo.nmi.rulez.org ( ) __________________________ // // _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:38:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EBD16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:38:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omega.noc.uk.easynet.net (omega.noc.uk.easynet.net [212.135.8.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316D643D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net) Received: from aedwards by omega.noc.uk.easynet.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BfMYq-00048u-7a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:24 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:24 +0100 From: Anthony Edwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629173824.GA15740@omega.noc.uk.easynet.net> References: <20040629161139.GA5153@omega.noc.uk.easynet.net> <200406290930.25879.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406290930.25879.kstewart@owt.com> Organization: easynet Ltd User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Subject: Re: portsdb -Uu error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:38:35 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:30:25AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > If you follow ports, I was told you also should also follow cvs-all. It > was fixed about an hour ago. So, it should have made it to your > favorite cvsup-mirror. Indeed yes, now resolved. I have also subscribed to cvs-all in order to track such things in the future. -- Anthony Edwards anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:45:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A17516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:45:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D6B43D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq57-119.dial.allstream.net [216.123.134.247]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id A0A3A1EC310; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:45:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:44:50 -0400 From: epilogue@allstream.net To: Joachim Dagerot Message-Id: <20040629134450.79a78a09@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <200406291232.i5TCWlv18782@thunder.trej.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ripping Real Audiostreams? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:45:20 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:38:07 +1000 Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:32:46 +0200, Joachim Dagerot > wrote: > > > > There are a few tools on the MS platform for saving down a realaudio > > stream to disk. > > > > mplayer -dumpstream -dumpfile a.dump hey there joachim, though i haven't checked, there may also be other apps which do what you want. i'm writing only to share a couple of tools with you. in case you weren't already aware, you have a some built-in tools for searching your local ports collection. check out this article http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/07/FreeBSD_Basics.html. page two is particularly relevant to what you're trying to discover. (also, spend some time in the bsd section of that site. many, many useful tutorials ;) if you prefer a web interface, check out freshports.org. they have a good search engine which allows you to restrict your search to port name or port description, among others. in this case, you would probably want to search by port description. hope that this adds to your bag of tricks. epi out. > Gautam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:47:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C5216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:47:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4092F43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:47:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D4569A39; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:47:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:47:10 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Thomas Moyer Message-Id: <20040629134710.68550ab2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <40E1A6A2.6060001@atlanticbb.net> References: <40E1A6A2.6060001@atlanticbb.net> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: home directory questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:47:48 -0000 Thomas Moyer wrote: > Is it possible to setup a file server with FreeBSD and use that as a > home partition and also share other files on a small network? > What kinds of utilities would I need to run? I imagine NFS for *nix > clients and Samba for MS clients. Also possibly share printers with > this computer as well. CUPS for that. Um ... yes. I assume you're just looking for verification that you're selecting the correct technology, and you are. > Also what kind a minimum system reccomendations does anyone have? That's impossible to even guesstimate without some idea of what kind of load the system is going to be under. I have a fileserver here that serves Windows and FreeBSD clients and it's a 200mhz with 96M of RAM. But I would never suggest that for a big installation. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:48:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F7F16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:48:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C1E43D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukas@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:lukas@mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.21]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5THlKEP005900 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:47:20 GMT Received: (from lukas@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i5THlKpu005783; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:47:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke X-X-Sender: lukas@mx.freeshell.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: xorg-clients-6.7.0 syntax error in xhost.c building xvinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: LukeD@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:48:07 -0000 I'm trying to install xorg since I think I need the latest nvidia drivers to solve a problem I'm having and there seems to be some kind of holdup on upgrading the XFree86 port. I'm getting the following error: Script started on Tue Jun 29 10:23:19 2004 You have mail. greentower# cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg greentower# make install ===> Installing for xorg-6.7.0 ===> xorg-6.7.0 depends on executable: xvinfo - not found ===> Verifying install for xvinfo in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients ===> Building for xorg-clients-6.7.0 making all in programs/appres... making all in programs/bdftopcf... making all in programs/bitmap... making all in programs/beforelight... making all in programs/editres... making all in programs/fslsfonts... making all in programs/fstobdf... making all in programs/iceauth... making all in programs/ico... making all in programs/listres... making all in programs/luit... making all in programs/makepsres... making all in programs/dpsinfo... making all in programs/dpsexec... making all in programs/texteroids... making all in programs/mkcfm... making all in programs/mkfontdir... making all in programs/mkfontscale... making all in programs/oclock... making all in programs/proxymngr... making all in programs/rgb... making all in programs/rstart... making all in programs/showfont... making all in programs/smproxy... making all in programs/twm... making all in programs/viewres... making all in programs/x11perf... making all in programs/xauth... making all in programs/xbiff... making all in programs/xcalc... making all in programs/xclipboard... making all in programs/xclock... making all in programs/xcmsdb... making all in programs/xconsole... making all in programs/xditview... making all in programs/xdm... making all in programs/xdm/config... making all in programs/xdpyinfo... making all in programs/xf86dga... making all in programs/xedit... making all in programs/xedit/lisp... making all in programs/xedit/lisp/mp... making all in programs/xedit/lisp/re... making all in programs/xev... making all in programs/xeyes... making all in programs/xfd... making all in programs/xfontsel... making all in programs/xfsinfo... making all in programs/xfindproxy... making all in programs/xfwp... making all in programs/xgamma... making all in programs/xgc... making all in programs/xhost... cc -O -pipe -ansi -pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DTCPCONN -DUNIXCONN -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -DHAS_FCHOWN -DIPv6 -DSECURE_RPC -DBSD44SOCKETS -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c xhost.c xhost.c: In function `change_host': xhost.c:423: error: syntax error before "siaddr" xhost.c:434: error: `siaddr' undeclared (first use in this function) xhost.c:434: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once xhost.c:434: error: for each function it appears in.) xhost.c: In function `get_hostname': xhost.c:883: error: `XServerInterpretedAddress' undeclared (first use in this function) xhost.c:883: error: `sip' undeclared (first use in this function) xhost.c:884: warning: ISO C89 forbids mixed declarations and code xhost.c:888: error: syntax error before ')' token *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs/xhost. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg. greentower# exit exit Script done on Tue Jun 29 10:23:45 2004 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 17:56:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FF916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:56:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAAB43D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:56:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hasse@swedehost.com) Received: by av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id DC1DA37EAE; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.182]) by av5-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBF237E48; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from odin.swedehost.com (h171n2fls33o804.telia.com [217.209.211.171]) by smtp2-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0F537E5E; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thor.swedehost.com (thor.swedehost.com [192.168.0.10]) by odin.swedehost.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5THt5Gu085157; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:55:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hasse@swedehost.com) From: Hasse Organization: The Valhalla Project To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:55:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406290107.04977.hasse@swedehost.com> <200406291849.00322.hasse@swedehost.com> <20040629165318.GF81324@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629165318.GF81324@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291955.03621.hasse@swedehost.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: Dan Nelson Subject: Re: Repost : Anybody having any knowledge of VirTool.DOS.Sfc ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:56:01 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 18.53, Dan Nelson wrote: > VirTool.DOS.Sfc FOUND --------------------------------------------- This is what it says when I'm doing a search in ClamAV Virus Database : main.cvd VirTool.DOS.Sfc (Clam) But I can't find any other useful info any other places. I've tried Symantec, Trend Micro, F-Secure and several others. So, I guess you're right. Thanks for you answer. /Hasse. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:02:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46C616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:02:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABDC43D54 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78A169A39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:02:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:02:36 -0000 I'm having some really weird problems with ftp performance on FreeBSD 4.10 that I just can't seem to figure out. My uplink here maxes out at about 35k/sec. If I scp to the machine in question I get about 30k/sec (which is expected) but when I ftp, I never get anything better than 15k/sec, and occasionally as low as 8k/sec. Using a server colocated at another facility, I can ftp at about 45k/sec, and scp at about 60k/sec. Downloads are all as expected ... scp and ftp downloads seem to be in about the same range, and it's a number I would expect. I tried running the ftp daemon that ships with FreeBSD, as well as Proftpd and they both exhibit the same performance issues. Most settings on this machine are at their defaults. I've tried tweaking send/recv sizes, as well as toggling delayed_ack. None of these have made any difference so far. Suggestions? Is anyone else seeing this? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:11:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F216A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:11:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82143D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:11:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from 250-217.customer.cloud9.net (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11])i5TIBswH040282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:11:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5TIBkOZ035713 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:11:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:11:46 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291411.46266@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: select(2)'s timeout argument X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:11:58 -0000 Why is the pointer to the `struct timeval' not declared as `const'? Can select(2) ever modify the structure pointed to? Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:15:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B1516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:15:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3FDB43D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhrider@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so497880cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.98.59 with SMTP id v59mr994392cwb; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ceee704062911153d97c8fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:15:36 -0700 From: Dan Finn In-Reply-To: <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:15:51 -0000 Could someone provide me with the correct syntax for burning bin/cue files using cdrdao. I read through the man page but it doesnt' seem to recognize my .cue file as a toc file. I am trying: cdrdao write -v /home/dfinn/videos/CD1/CD1.cue but getting: ERROR: Missing toc-file Will this burn them in VCD format so that they will play in my home dvd player? Thanks Dan On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:52 +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue > > > files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > > > .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert > > them to a standard ISO image. > > Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), > and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. > > Cheers, > -- > Miguel Mendez > http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org > PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 > > > > > noname - 1K > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:26:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AA116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:26:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vvi.com (vvionly.penn.com [208.22.30.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF85043D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lbland@vvi.com) Received: from [206.229.112.1] ([206.229.112.1] verified) by vvi.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 3990423; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:27:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200406291411.46266@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> References: <200406291411.46266@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: lbland Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:27:36 -0400 To: Mikhail Teterin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: select(2)'s timeout argument X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:26:32 -0000 On Jun 29, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Why is the pointer to the `struct timeval' not declared as `const'? > > Can select(2) ever modify the structure pointed to? Thanks! hi- Some versions of Linux modified timeval. Posix.1g specifies const qualifier. I think most unixes don't modify it. I think ?? in the old days some unixes did modify it. legacy and compatibility issues. thanks!- -lance Lance Bland mailto:lbland@vvi.com VVI Mac OS X Charting http://www.vvi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:29:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1664F16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:29:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wxinmail01.webexc.com (wxinmail01.webexc.com [209.43.0.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D5F43D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asp@webexc.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wxinmail01.webexc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3185C7C5A2; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:29:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from wxinmail01.webexc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wxinmail01.webexc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27065-05; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:29:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.3.96] (exacttarget-21.iquest.net [209.43.38.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by wxinmail01.webexc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFF07C5C6; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:29:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40E1B4CD.3070604@webexc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:29 -0500 From: Ben Timby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zyumbilev References: <38256.194.39.131.39.1088401582.squirrel@194.39.131.39> In-Reply-To: <38256.194.39.131.39.1088401582.squirrel@194.39.131.39> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV (via amavisd-new) on wxinmail01.webexc.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.8 tests= X-Spam-Level: cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall for web server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:29:48 -0000 Peter, choose your firewall software, with a host firewall (what you are looking for, not a network firewall) the features you need will be limited. Find a howto on using that firewall package. The only difference between what you want and what most howtos provide instructions for is the ruleset. You will probably want rules like the following: -- block in log all (default deny stance). block out log all (default deny stance). allow in tcp port 80 SYN/SYN+ACK keep state (only allow new connections and established ones to httpd). allow in tcp port 22 SYN/SYN+ACK from host keep state (only allow new connections and established ones to sshd). allow out tcp src port > 1024 dest port < 1024 keep state (only allow new connections and established ones to "server" ports from "client" ports). -- Modify for your firewall package and to suit your needs. Something simple like the above is probably all you need. I personally have used ipfilter in the past with good success, but I currently use pf, which is ported from OpenBSD, and is the most excellent firewall package I have ever used. The rule preprocessor makes writing rules a breeze. I will not use any other firewall package again as long as pf is a choice. Hope that helps. Peter Zyumbilev wrote: > Hello, > > Do you know some good tutorial for bulding firewall for FreeBSD as web > server. I found a lot of tutorials but for FreeBSD as router. > Some commented premade script with comments will also do the job. > I was plannding to use APF, but I am afarid to install it on FreeBSD > without good tutorial. > Please advise. > > Best regards, > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:31:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B79216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A23443D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rpratt1950@earthlink.net) Received: from user227.net977.fl.sprint-hsd.net ([69.34.142.227] helo=kt.weeble.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BfNNy-0005b5-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:31:15 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:34:02 -0400 From: Randy Pratt To: Dan Finn Message-Id: <20040629143402.10f60d94.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <89ceee704062911153d97c8fe@mail.gmail.com> References: <20040627135532.85572.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> <20040627181552.7b2d445e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <89ceee704062911153d97c8fe@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:31:22 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:15:36 -0700 Dan Finn wrote: > Could someone provide me with the correct syntax for burning bin/cue > files using cdrdao. I read through the man page but it doesnt' seem > to recognize my .cue file as a toc file. > > I am trying: > cdrdao write -v /home/dfinn/videos/CD1/CD1.cue > but getting: > ERROR: Missing toc-file > > Will this burn them in VCD format so that they will play in my home dvd player? > > Thanks > Dan Hi Dan, What I sucessfully use is: cdrdao write --device 2,1,0 --driver generic-mmc --speed 8 --eject foo.cue but some of that may need adjusted depending on your hardware. The Handbook has some information on finding which scsi device it is. Also, you may need to be in the same directory as the .cue file since the cue file does specify the .bin file to use. In all probability, it will not have the path you show in your example. Open the .cue file with your favorite editor and you'll see what I mean. Best regards, Randy > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:15:52 +0200, Miguel Mendez > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 > > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue > > > > files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. > > > > > .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert > > > them to a standard ISO image. > > > > Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), > > and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Miguel Mendez > > http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org > > PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 > > > > > > > > > > noname - 1K > > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:32:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB8116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:32:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E07143D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:32:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.parks@verizon.net) Received: from verizon.net ([4.61.31.219]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040629183256.KXLE1464.out001.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:32:56 -0500 Message-ID: <40E1B5D8.1040007@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:32:56 -0700 From: Ted Parks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [4.61.31.219] at Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:32:56 -0500 Subject: ep driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:32:58 -0000 I am using a Farallon pcmcia ethernet card in a Toshiba laptop. Pccard sees the card but does not load the required ep driver. How do I load the driver? Thanks, Ted Parks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:35:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9E916A4D0 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E48943D4C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F84106873; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:35:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1B67D.7000204@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:35:41 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Parks References: <40E1B5D8.1040007@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <40E1B5D8.1040007@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ep driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:35:43 -0000 Ted Parks wrote: > I am using a Farallon pcmcia ethernet card in a Toshiba laptop. Pccard > sees the card but does not load the required ep driver. > > How do I load the driver? > > Thanks, > Ted Parks Hey ted, To manually load a driver you should issue kldload if_ep.ko Hope this works. cheesr -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:42:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC1216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:42:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD4143D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:42:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i5TIgSCY010939; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i5TIgRT9008211; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:42:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:42:27 -0400 To: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:42:52 -0000 On Jun 29, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > I'm having some really weird problems with ftp performance on FreeBSD > 4.10 > that I just can't seem to figure out. > > My uplink here maxes out at about 35k/sec. If I scp to the machine in > question > I get about 30k/sec (which is expected) but when I ftp, I never get > anything > better than 15k/sec, and occasionally as low as 8k/sec. [ ... ] > I tried running the ftp daemon that ships with FreeBSD, as well as > Proftpd and > they both exhibit the same performance issues. I haven't seen any signs of such problems with 4.10. Given that you've reproduced this using different FTP servers, it seems more likely to be a network issue or some hardware glitch (cables? flaky NIC?) than a software issue. Have you asked your ISP about the issue? Can you reproduce by moving ftp to a different port #? (Perhaps some quality-of-service thingy is providing different bandwidth by port...) Does passive versus active FTP make a difference? Anything interesting in 'netstat -s'? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:46:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319EE16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:46:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cenedra.walrond.org (host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com [213.160.108.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9F43D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@walrond.org) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=bob.mobile) by cenedra.walrond.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BfNcq-0000t8-Rv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:46:37 +0100 From: Andrew Walrond To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:21:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> <20040629171824.GB2103@ns1.tcbug.org> <40E1A4E3.7000602@elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <40E1A4E3.7000602@elvandar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291921.27838.andrew@walrond.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Re: Help required installing 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:46:47 -0000 On Tuesday 29 Jun 2004 18:20, Remko Lodder wrote: > Josh Paetzel wrote: > > Perhaps ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/5.2.1/ will > > work better for you. > > I had the same with -amd64 my i386 workstation didn't bootup anymore so > i needed to use the AMD64 version, that works :-) > Thanks; downloading isos as I type :) Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 18:49:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C60616A4F3 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F211443D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from 250-217.customer.cloud9.net (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11])i5TInbn0040772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:49:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5TInVPp035925; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:49:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: lbland Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:49:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406291411.46266@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291449.31105@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: select(2)'s timeout argument X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:49:58 -0000 =On Jun 29, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Mikhail Teterin wrote: = => Why is the pointer to the `struct timeval' not declared as `const'? => Can select(2) ever modify the structure pointed to? Thanks! Thank you very much, Lance, for the quick response! =Some versions of Linux modified timeval. Posix.1g specifies const =qualifier. I think most unixes don't modify it. I think ?? in the old =days some unixes did modify it. legacy and compatibility issues. If Posix.1g specifies const-ness and we don't, in fact, modify it, is it a bug, we don't declare it const? -mi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:03:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125B716A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:03:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B773643D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:03:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047F969A40; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:03:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:03:24 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Thomas Moyer Message-Id: <20040629150324.3ca94637.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <40E1AC67.4010307@atlanticbb.net> References: <40E1A6A2.6060001@atlanticbb.net> <20040629134710.68550ab2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <40E1AC67.4010307@atlanticbb.net> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: home directory questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:03:47 -0000 [Keep the mailing list CCed] Thomas Moyer wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > >Thomas Moyer wrote: > > > >>Is it possible to setup a file server with FreeBSD and use that as a > >>home partition and also share other files on a small network? > >>What kinds of utilities would I need to run? I imagine NFS for *nix > >>clients and Samba for MS clients. Also possibly share printers with > >>this computer as well. CUPS for that. > > > >Um ... yes. I assume you're just looking for verification that you're > >selecting the correct technology, and you are. > > > >>Also what kind a minimum system reccomendations does anyone have? > > > >That's impossible to even guesstimate without some idea of what kind > >of load the system is going to be under. I have a fileserver here that > >serves Windows and FreeBSD clients and it's a 200mhz with 96M of RAM. > >But I would never suggest that for a big installation. > > > At most the server will serve 4 to 5 clients at any given time. This > might increase later but for now it is limited to those few. Seriously. This is one of the biggest misconceptions around - that I can tell you what kind of hardware to purchase based solely on how many clients you have. Without a better usage profile, I can only guess. And here's my guess: With that many clients, it's likely that your reliability requirements will be greater than your performance requirements. Meaning: you could probably get a used computer at Goodwill for $100 that would perform acceptably for that load, but do you really want your server running on used hardware? You could probably buy cheap NICs that are advertised at 100mb/sec but can only really do 70mb/sec, and you'd still think they were fast enough, but that depends on your tolerance for delay, which is a pretty difficult thing to judge until people start complaining. All said and done, you can probably buy commodity hardware at a competitive price and get something that will suit. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:09:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D0B16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:09:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thunder.trej.net (as3-3-6.orby.s.bonet.se [217.215.33.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF60543D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:09:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joachim@dagerot.nu) Received: from mailgw.trej.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])i5TJ9Qv25924; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:09:26 +0200 Message-Id: <200406291909.i5TJ9Qv25924@thunder.trej.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:09:25 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Joachim Dagerot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gautam Gopalakrishnan In-Reply-To: User-Agent: IMHO/0.98.3t (Webmail for Roxen) 3j-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information 3j-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ripping RealAudiostreams? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:09:39 -0000 Great tip, works like a charm *well, after some hours of cvsuping, deinstalling and installing atleast). I'm dumping right now, just out of curiosity, what format will a.dump be in? ------------------- | On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:32:46 +0200, Joachim Dagerot wrote: | > | > There are a few tools on the MS platform for saving down a realaudio | > stream to disk. | > | | mplayer -dumpstream -dumpfile a.dump From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:15:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABC116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:15:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3738143D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:15:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@trini0.org) Received: from hivemind.trini0.org (trini0.org[65.34.205.195]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040629191530016002ah0te>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:15:30 +0000 Received: from gladiator.trini0.org (gladiator.trini0.org [192.168.0.3]) by hivemind.trini0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3AF16C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:15:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerard Samuel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:15:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406291301.36285.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> <20040629130702.4116ec60.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629130702.4116ec60.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291515.29580.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:15:43 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 01:07 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > Gerard Samuel wrote: > > When editing php files, via the command line, there is a newline > > character after the closing ?> > > Im looking for a command that would trim files, so that I can append it > > to the find command. > > > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec SOME_COMMAND {} \; > > If you're absolutely sure of the number of characters you're removing from > the end of the file, you could use truncate(1). > > Otherwise, you'll probably want sed or perl to check that it's not removing > important characters. Thanks. I'll see what I can come up with... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:21:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B86516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:21:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from speedbuggy.telerama.com (speedbuggy.telerama.com [205.201.1.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98B2243D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:21:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@telerama.com) Received: (qmail 62299 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 19:21:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.22.1.20?) (m@151.201.141.231) by speedbuggy.telerama.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 19:21:27 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:20:23 -0400 From: m To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: IPFW2 strange issues on BSD-5.2.1 (RESENT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:21:39 -0000 This is a resent message, as noone has bothered to reply (yet). RESENT MESSAGE TEXT FOLLOWS ___________________________ I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 with IPFW2 as a firewall/router on a network. The firewall itself does not need to be terribly sophisticated -- on the other hand, it is having some problems. I'm seeing some very strange things in the dynamic ruleset. The last 4 entries in the list are the issues. You can see that none of the informatin in the last 4 dynamic rules makes any sense -- not the #/packets or bytes, the rule #, or even the protocol. The IP addresses referred to are not local to any part of the network, and some aren't even listed in the appropriate WHOIS database. I'm totally lost on this. Any help would be appreciated, including suggestions as to how to generate better log information. Nothing shows in my logs, either. Interestingly, these last (wierd) rules appear & disappear at random intervals, with different information each time -- different rule numebrs (but non-existent in my ruleset), different Ips, and different protocols. host-64-179-35-23# ipfw -de show 00050 35654 14976392 divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl0 00100 2988 2071714 allow ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to 127.0.0.0/8 00200 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00300 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00310 0 0 allow ip from 224.0.0.1 to any 00311 110 3960 allow ip from any to 224.0.0.1 00350 0 0 deny log argus from any to any 00351 0 0 deny log scps from any to any 00352 0 0 deny log igmp from any to any 00354 0 0 deny log netblt from any to any 00355 0 0 deny ip from 0.0.0.0 to any 00356 0 0 deny ip from any to 0.0.0.0 00357 0 0 deny ipv6-nonxt from any to any 00359 0 0 deny log trunk-2 from any to any 00360 99 6224 deny log icmp from any to any 00400 891 111330 allow ip from 205.201.9.0/24 to me setup keep-state 00410 0 0 allow ip from 151.201.141.231 to me setup keep-state 00420 0 0 deny ip from any to me dst-port 22 00450 1272 539440 allow ip from any to me dst-port 25 setup keep-state 00451 151 12032 allow ip from me to any dst-port 21 setup keep-state 00452 0 0 allow ip from me to any dst-port 20 setup keep-state 00453 11513 1798157 allow ip from me to any dst-port 80 setup keep-state 00454 11 1457 allow ip from me to any dst-port 443 setup keep-state 00455 0 0 allow ip from any 20 to me setup keep-state 00457 0 0 allow ip from me to any dst-port 22 setup keep-state 00458 0 0 allow ip from any 25 to me setup keep-state 00459 0 0 allow ip from any to me dst-port 80 setup keep-state 00498 2373 267409 allow ip from any to me 00499 6267 1635428 allow ip from me to any 00520 0 0 allow ip from 224.0.0.1 to any 00530 0 0 allow ip from any to 224.0.0.1 00800 11 739 allow udp from any to 207.69.188.200 dst-port 53 00810 22 10768 allow udp from 207.69.188.200 53 to any 00820 250 15731 allow udp from any to 64.65.223.6 dst-port 53 00830 498 141930 allow udp from 64.65.223.6 53 to any 00840 94 6784 allow udp from any to any dst-port 53 00841 122 36608 allow udp from any 53 to any 00850 0 0 allow ip from 255.255.255.255 to any 00860 232 70064 allow ip from any to 255.255.255.255 00998 82 18216 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to 192.168.1.0/24 not via xl0 00999 0 0 check-state 01000 0 0 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.5 dst-port 25 setup keep-state 01010 1115 517038 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.5 dst-port 80 setup keep-state 01020 0 0 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.5 dst-port 2500 setup keep-state 01100 332 49019 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 25 setup keep-state 01110 1177 978983 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 80 setup keep-state 01115 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 443 setup keep-state 01120 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 21 setup keep-state 01125 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 to any dst-port 20 setup keep-state 01130 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.5 20 to any setup keep-state 01998 83 3704 deny log ip from 192.168.1.5 to any 01999 36 1440 deny log ip from any to 192.168.1.5 02010 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 20 setup keep-state 02020 40906 23355938 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 80 setup keep-state 02030 39 20505 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 443 setup keep-state 02040 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 21 setup keep-state 02050 0 0 allow ip from 192.168.1.0/24 20 to any setup keep-state 65000 1968 176664 deny log ip from any to any 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any ## Dynamic rules (105): 02020 10 2859 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2943 <-> 65.54.194.59 80 01010 260 145073 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61735 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 01010 62 25228 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61734 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 00450 23 1680 (0s) STATE tcp 66.118.177.230 31470 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 01010 167 84950 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61739 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 01010 16 2474 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61737 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 00453 18 8792 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1369 <-> 63.111.24.21 80 01010 9 1148 (0s) STATE tcp 67.165.52.118 61743 <-> 192.168.1.5 80 02020 116 56383 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1388 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 02020 10 2210 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1382 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 02020 23 12664 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1384 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 02020 66 26546 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1386 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 00453 5 558 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1352 <-> 56.0.134.22 80 02020 30 10124 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1383 <-> 64.65.208.72 80 02020 19 10674 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1378 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 02020 87 83654 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2971 <-> 207.68.173.254 80 02020 33 16730 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2859 <-> 207.91.5.68 80 00453 4 597 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1376 <-> 216.73.86.13 80 02020 47 24913 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2857 <-> 207.91.5.68 80 00453 11 698 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2856 <-> 207.91.5.68 80 02020 10 2000 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2560 <-> 65.205.8.106 80 00453 5 1273 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1395 <-> 216.52.17.116 80 00453 6 1143 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1392 <-> 216.52.17.116 80 02020 8 1136 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2830 <-> 216.27.102.15 80 00453 5 968 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1372 <-> 206.65.183.80 80 02020 12 5126 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1313 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 00450 8 388 (0s) STATE tcp 208.17.205.133 1246 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 00400 890 111270 (300s) STATE tcp 205.201.9.222 56200 <-> 64.179.35.23 22 02020 12 1253 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.101 1376 <-> 216.73.86.13 80 00453 4 592 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2777 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 12 1342 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2777 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00450 28 7929 (0s) STATE tcp 207.69.231.40 4731 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 00451 67 5443 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 53377 <-> 205.201.9.227 21 00453 7 862 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1378 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 7 862 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 1377 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00450 28 3078 (0s) STATE tcp 68.95.226.39 2373 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 00453 4 527 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2801 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 12 1105 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2807 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 1 40 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2806 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 10 1182 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2805 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 38 27372 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2805 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 10 1543 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2976 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 02020 12 1105 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2809 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 4 529 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2808 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 02020 86 77940 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2941 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 02020 12 1105 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2813 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 4 529 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2812 <-> 143.231.86.196 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2639 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2638 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2637 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 17 9707 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2866 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 00453 5 604 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2867 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2634 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 6 938 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2957 <-> 209.225.33.67 80 02020 10 1929 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2945 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 4 671 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2944 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 5 598 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2877 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 15 2241 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2876 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 00453 5 549 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2949 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 02020 11 1295 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2949 <-> 216.39.69.76 80 00453 6 722 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2964 <-> 209.225.33.67 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2651 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 5 520 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2650 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 5 772 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2746 <-> 216.109.117.106 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2643 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 519 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2937 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 00450 22 3072 (0s) STATE tcp 207.69.231.40 1415 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2591 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 22 15737 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2725 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 00453 1 40 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2724 <-> 64.65.208.71 80 00453 5 520 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2665 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 5 520 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2664 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 11 1165 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2645 <-> 64.124.109.200 80 00453 4 480 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2661 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 4 639 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2933 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 02020 10 1663 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2933 <-> 65.54.140.158 80 02020 10 1697 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2961 <-> 216.73.87.102 80 00450 19 1484 (0s) STATE tcp 66.118.177.230 33626 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 02020 10 2812 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2713 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 5 723 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2712 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 02020 17 10529 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2712 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 4 598 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2713 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 02020 17 10167 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2711 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 4 523 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2710 <-> 216.73.86.105 80 00453 20 1316 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2834 <-> 66.218.71.233 80 00453 1 40 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2657 <-> 216.157.112.153 80 02020 8 1324 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2656 <-> 216.157.112.153 80 02020 15 1212 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2664 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 15 1212 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2665 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2661 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 2234 588879 (258s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2208 <-> 207.46.110.4 80 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2651 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2646 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2647 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 15 1677 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2642 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 6 642 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2880 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 15 1672 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2881 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2637 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 02020 14 1172 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2638 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00453 6 646 (0s) STATE tcp 64.179.35.23 2885 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 15 2479 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.22 2884 <-> 209.195.176.247 80 02020 14 1218 (0s) STATE tcp 192.168.1.100 2634 <-> 128.121.26.136 80 00450 22 5933 (0s) STATE tcp 207.69.231.40 3549 <-> 64.179.35.23 25 17803 51868116715982822 207007877431296 (-1014956032s) nsfnet-igp 182.141.195.93 0 <-> 95.94.91.124 0 54357 103166144177045504 17130536501248 (244479s) proto 212 1.138.233.0 17805 <-> 0.0.1.186 0 25648 7005922216430549619 7234316394206028643 (1919246953s) proto 114 115.35.10.35 25459 <-> 10.35.35.10 25205 28773 746535686742044009 7237131173698865443 (1819176809s) gmtp 112.104.115.101 28521 <-> 114.102.101.114 29285 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:28:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045FC16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:28:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CD643D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:28:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.214]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I0300I6A4R9Z4@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:21 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml2so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.146]) by pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I0300KLP4R9KV50@pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sirius (S0106004001438e5b.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.47.89]) 2003))freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:21 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:28:21 -0600 From: Dan MacMillan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Subject: Moving HDD with FreeBSD installed between machines with different hardware. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:28:25 -0000 Hello, I have a machine with FreeBSD installed on it that is serving DNS, CVS, NTP and a few other things for our organization. I plan to add a mail gateway using Postfix, ClamAV, amavisd-new and SpamAssassin as well to protect the tender underbelly of our MS Exchange server. However the machine is running 5.1-RELEASE. It shouldn't be. :) I would like to rebuild the machine completely to exercise the knowledge I have gained re: FreeBSD but I can't afford for it to be down for the length of time it would take and I don't have a standby machine available. So what I'm thinking is that I could take a spare hard drive home and pop it in one of my own machines, install FreeBSD on that, and then bring it back to work and swap the hard drive out with the one in the production machine. What kind of problems am I letting myself in for if I go ahead with this? The hardware in the two machines in question is quite dissimilar. For example, one's an Athlon 266 with 64MB of RAM, one's a Pentium[-something] 300 with 400 MB. Here are the things that occurred to me: One of them has an 'rl0' NIC, the other 'dc0'. So I'd have to change the ifconfig_ line in /etc/rc.conf. But would this also imply changes elsewhere that would have to be made? Actually, that's all I've thought of so far. Are there any gotchas I should be considering? -- Danny MacMillan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:34:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7406016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:34:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail2.cableone.net [24.116.0.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9AA43D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 7409975 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:20:44 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:33:58 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040629143358.044bad67@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: References: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:34:17 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:25:53 +0200 "Daniel Eriksson" wrote: > Jeremy Faulkner wrote: > > > What international standard describes their format? > > > > Windows is not a standard. > > Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a > "real" standard. Commonly used, but not a standard. Still odd, though, I've found ISO to rather more common myself, even in areas dealing with windows. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:39:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7BB16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:39:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C92943D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:39:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3DC69A39; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:38:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:38:55 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Charles Swiger Message-Id: <20040629153855.300b3888.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:39:40 -0000 Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jun 29, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > > I'm having some really weird problems with ftp performance on FreeBSD > > 4.10 > > that I just can't seem to figure out. > > > > My uplink here maxes out at about 35k/sec. If I scp to the machine in > > question > > I get about 30k/sec (which is expected) but when I ftp, I never get > > anything > > better than 15k/sec, and occasionally as low as 8k/sec. > [ ... ] > > I tried running the ftp daemon that ships with FreeBSD, as well as > > Proftpd and > > they both exhibit the same performance issues. > > I haven't seen any signs of such problems with 4.10. Given that you've > reproduced this using different FTP servers, it seems more likely to be > a network issue or some hardware glitch (cables? flaky NIC?) than a > software issue. I hadn't even considered hardware, becuase scp is always as fast as I would expect. I wouldn't suspect a NIC or HDD, unless the problem was consistent with _all_ file transfers, and it's not. The performance issue only occurs with FTP. If I'm wrong on this, I'd be happy to hear about it, though. > Have you asked your ISP about the issue? The ISP is my client in this case. He's asking _me_ about the issue ;) > Can you reproduce by moving ftp to a different port #? (Perhaps some > quality-of-service thingy is providing different bandwidth by port...) I haven't tried that, but I forgot to mention that a Debian box located right next to the problem box (on the same network) gets speeds equal to what would be expected. To me, that ruled out QOS, routing and other beyond-my-control Internet problems. Again, I'm happy to be corrected if there's something here I'm not aware of. > Does passive versus active FTP make a difference? Doesn't seem to. The speed seems to be about 14k/sec, regardless of active/passive. > Anything interesting in 'netstat -s'? This is just a snippet ... but it looks like an awful lot of retransmits and duplicates to me. I hadn't looked at this before, is this indicative of any particular problem? tcp: 309984 packets sent 202559 data packets (238348935 bytes) 1620 data packets (1751573 bytes) retransmitted 1 resend initiated by MTU discovery 71396 ack-only packets (1521 delayed) 0 URG only packets 49 window probe packets 21125 window update packets 13235 control packets 286171 packets received 135943 acks (for 236641220 bytes) 8830 duplicate acks 0 acks for unsent data 142183 packets (164768204 bytes) received in-sequence 215 completely duplicate packets (25524 bytes) 1 old duplicate packet 0 packets with some dup. data (0 bytes duped) 1719 out-of-order packets (2151248 bytes) 37 packets (37 bytes) of data after window 37 window probes 667 window update packets 32 packets received after close 5 discarded for bad checksums 0 discarded for bad header offset fields 0 discarded because packet too short 4613 connection requests 5160 connection accepts 19 bad connection attempts 0 listen queue overflows 9748 connections established (including accepts) 10039 connections closed (including 1656 drops) 463 connections updated cached RTT on close 463 connections updated cached RTT variance on close 132 connections updated cached ssthresh on close 22 embryonic connections dropped 90592 segments updated rtt (of 76760 attempts) 805 retransmit timeouts 9 connections dropped by rexmit timeout 54 persist timeouts 0 connections dropped by persist timeout 0 keepalive timeouts 0 keepalive probes sent 0 connections dropped by keepalive 55073 correct ACK header predictions 120750 correct data packet header predictions 5210 syncache entries added 61 retransmitted 36 dupsyn 0 dropped 5160 completed 0 bucket overflow 0 cache overflow 43 reset 7 stale 0 aborted 0 badack 0 unreach 0 zone failures 0 cookies sent 0 cookies received -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:45:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD78016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:45:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63F543D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@trini0.org) Received: from hivemind.trini0.org (trini0.org[65.34.205.195]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <200406291945410130053q7se>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:45:41 +0000 Received: from gladiator.trini0.org (gladiator.trini0.org [192.168.0.3]) by hivemind.trini0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ED816C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:45:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerard Samuel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:45:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406291301.36285.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> <20040629130702.4116ec60.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629130702.4116ec60.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291545.40422.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:45:53 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 01:07 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > Gerard Samuel wrote: > > When editing php files, via the command line, there is a newline > > character after the closing ?> > > Im looking for a command that would trim files, so that I can append it > > to the find command. > > > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec SOME_COMMAND {} \; > > If you're absolutely sure of the number of characters you're removing from > the end of the file, you could use truncate(1). > > Otherwise, you'll probably want sed or perl to check that it's not removing > important characters. Trying to use truncate is not working on my end. Does anyone see a syntax error with it??? Ran on 5.2.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD. $ pwd /usr/home/gsam $ ls ~/z.php /home/gsam/z.php $ truncate -r ~/z.php usage: truncate [-c] -s [+|-]size[K|M|G] file ... truncate [-c] -r rfile file ... I tried $ truncate -r rfile ~/z.php but that didn't work either. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:53:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B1116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mfe2.prod.danger.com (mta.prod1.dngr.net [63.241.65.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB0943D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lantal@tmail.com) Received: from [10.12.5.252] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by mfe2.prod.danger.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 134854863 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:59 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:56 -0700 X-Mailer: Danger Service Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Laszlo Antal Message-Id: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> Subject: Which book should I start? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Laszlo Antal List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:01 -0000 Hi, I am new to Bsd. I did a lot of research on the net which book should I start with. I got two of them. I can not deside which one should I start. Here are my books:: - The Complet FreeBSD. 4th Edition From O'Reilly, Greg Lehey. - Absolute BSD The ultimate guide to FreeBSD. From Michael Lucas. Thank you for all the advise. Laszlo One more questione the complete freebsd covers Bsd 5. I have the FreeBsd 4.8. Do I need to buy the version 5 ?? Thank you again --lantal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFDC16A507 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.valuedj.com (adsl-216-100-130-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.130.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9129E43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whizkid@ValueDJ.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.valuedj.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.valuedj.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41023612E for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.valuedj.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.valuedj.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11714-08 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ns1.valuedj.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 325256128; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 207.13.174.37 (SquirrelMail authenticated user whizkid) by www.ValueDJ.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT) From: whizkid@ValueDJ.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ValueDJ.com Subject: IPFW acting weird OR invalid ruleset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:06 -0000 Hey everyone. Below is my natd.conf file and my rc.firewall.rule file. I cannot figure it out, but if one of my machines that is behind my Masqurading Firewall tries to d/l a file that is on a FTP site, it fails to connect. FreeBSD 5.2.1 machine with 2 nics. xl0 outside Nic fxp0 inside Nic rc.conf: # enable firewall firewall_enable="YES" # set path to custom firewall config firewall_type="/etc/fw/rc.firewall.rules" # be non-verbose? set to YES after testing firewall_quiet="NO" # enable natd, the NAT daemon natd_enable="YES" # which is the interface to the internet that we hide behind? natd_interface="xl0" # flags for natd natd_flags="-f /etc/fw/natd.conf" natd.conf: unregistered_only interface xl0 use_sockets dynamic # dyamically open fw for ftp, irc punch_fw 2000:50 rc.firewall.rules: # be quiet and flush all rules on start -q flush # allow local traffic, deny RFC 1918 addresses on the outside add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 add 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 add 00120 deny ip from any to any not verrevpath in add 00301 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via xl0 add 00302 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via xl0 add 00303 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via xl0 # check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, allow through if yes add 01000 divert natd ip from any to me in via xl0 add 01001 check-state # allow some traffic from the local net to the router #SMTP add 02000 allow tcp from any to any 25 setup keep-state # SSH add 04000 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04001 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via xl0 setup keep-state #IMAP-SSL add 04010 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04011 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via xl0 setup keep-state # NTP add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 keep-state add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 setup keep-state add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 keep-state #webmin add 04030 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04031 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via xl0 setup keep-state #http add 04040 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04041 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via xl0 setup keep-state # DNS add 04050 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 add 04051 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 add 04052 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 add 04053 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 #POP add 04060 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04061 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via xl0 setup keep-state #HTTPS add 04070 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04071 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via xl0 setup keep-state #IMAPS add 04080 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via fxp0 setup keep-state add 04081 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via xl0 setup keep-state # drop everything else add 04090 deny ip from any to me # pass outgoing packets (to be natted) on to a special NAT rule add 04109 skipto 61000 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any in via fxp0 keep-state # allow all outgoing traffic from the router add 05010 allow ip from me to any out keep-state # drop everything that has come so far. This means it doesn't belong to an # established connection, don't log the most noisy scans. add 59998 deny icmp from any to me add 59999 deny ip from any to me dst-port 135,137-139,445,4665 add 60000 deny log tcp from any to any established add 60001 deny log ip from any to any # this is the NAT rule. Only outgoing packets from the local net will come here. # First, nat them, then pass them on (again, you may choose to be more restrictive) add 61000 divert natd ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via xl0 add 61001 allow ip from any to any From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:56:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEDE16A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:56:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F5143D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:56:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D9B10687D; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1C97C.7090706@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:56:44 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laszlo Antal References: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> In-Reply-To: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which book should I start? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:56:46 -0000 Laszlo Antal wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Bsd. I did a lot of research on the net which book should I > start with. > I got two of them. I can not deside which one should I start. > Here are my books:: > - The Complet FreeBSD. 4th Edition > From O'Reilly, Greg Lehey. > > - Absolute BSD The ultimate guide to FreeBSD. > From Michael Lucas. Since i did not read both of those book (sorry greg and michael) i read the handbook, which gives also good information (but not a hardcover, though you can order that at bsdmall.com) the handbook is located here: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook > > Thank you for all the advise. > > Laszlo > > One more questione the complete freebsd covers > Bsd 5. I have the FreeBsd 4.8. > Do I need to buy the version 5 ?? You can , but you can also download it for free :-) If you are intersted checkout the website on how to obtain it :-) Cheers > > Thank you again > --lantal -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 19:58:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD7916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:58:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2D343D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:58:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C933106882; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:58:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1C9F5.2050100@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:58:45 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: whizkid@ValueDJ.com References: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> In-Reply-To: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW acting weird OR invalid ruleset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:58:46 -0000 whizkid@ValueDJ.com wrote: > Hey everyone. Below is my natd.conf file and my rc.firewall.rule file. I > cannot figure it out, but if one of my machines that is behind my > Masqurading Firewall tries to d/l a file that is on a FTP site, it fails > to connect. Does the ipfw offer logging (i dont know ipfw) perhaps you can see why it gets blocked there (ehm i presume it gets blocked) But perhaps a ipfw guru should help ;-) Cheers > > FreeBSD 5.2.1 machine with 2 nics. > > xl0 outside Nic > fxp0 inside Nic > > rc.conf: > > # enable firewall > firewall_enable="YES" > # set path to custom firewall config > firewall_type="/etc/fw/rc.firewall.rules" > # be non-verbose? set to YES after testing > firewall_quiet="NO" > # enable natd, the NAT daemon > natd_enable="YES" > # which is the interface to the internet that we hide behind? > natd_interface="xl0" > # flags for natd > natd_flags="-f /etc/fw/natd.conf" > > > natd.conf: > > unregistered_only > interface xl0 > use_sockets > dynamic > # dyamically open fw for ftp, irc > punch_fw 2000:50 > > > rc.firewall.rules: > > # be quiet and flush all rules on start > -q flush > > # allow local traffic, deny RFC 1918 addresses on the outside > add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > add 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > add 00120 deny ip from any to any not verrevpath in > add 00301 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via xl0 > add 00302 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via xl0 > add 00303 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via xl0 > > # check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, allow through if yes > add 01000 divert natd ip from any to me in via xl0 > add 01001 check-state > > # allow some traffic from the local net to the router > #SMTP > add 02000 allow tcp from any to any 25 setup keep-state > > # SSH > add 04000 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04001 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > #IMAP-SSL > add 04010 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04011 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > # NTP > add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 keep-state > add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 setup keep-state > add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 keep-state > > #webmin > add 04030 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04031 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > #http > add 04040 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04041 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > # DNS > add 04050 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 > add 04051 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 > add 04052 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 > add 04053 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 > > #POP > add 04060 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04061 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > #HTTPS > add 04070 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04071 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > #IMAPS > add 04080 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via fxp0 setup keep-state > add 04081 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > # drop everything else > add 04090 deny ip from any to me > > # pass outgoing packets (to be natted) on to a special NAT rule > add 04109 skipto 61000 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any in via fxp0 keep-state > > # allow all outgoing traffic from the router > add 05010 allow ip from me to any out keep-state > > # drop everything that has come so far. This means it doesn't belong to an > # established connection, don't log the most noisy scans. > add 59998 deny icmp from any to me > add 59999 deny ip from any to me dst-port 135,137-139,445,4665 > add 60000 deny log tcp from any to any established > add 60001 deny log ip from any to any > > # this is the NAT rule. Only outgoing packets from the local net will come > here. > # First, nat them, then pass them on (again, you may choose to be more > restrictive) > add 61000 divert natd ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via xl0 > add 61001 allow ip from any to any -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:00:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A25516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:00:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFADE43D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 64371 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Jun 2004 20:00:54 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.993678 secs); 29 Jun 2004 20:00:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 20:00:53 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:00:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4141.209.167.16.15.1088539253.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> References: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:00:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: whizkid@ValueDJ.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW acting weird OR invalid ruleset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:00:56 -0000 > Hey everyone. Below is my natd.conf file and my rc.firewall.rule file. I > cannot figure it out, but if one of my machines that is behind my > Masqurading Firewall tries to d/l a file that is on a FTP site, it fails > to connect. Are you using a passive FTP connection? Steve > > FreeBSD 5.2.1 machine with 2 nics. > > xl0 outside Nic > fxp0 inside Nic > > rc.conf: > > # enable firewall > firewall_enable="YES" > # set path to custom firewall config > firewall_type="/etc/fw/rc.firewall.rules" > # be non-verbose? set to YES after testing > firewall_quiet="NO" > # enable natd, the NAT daemon > natd_enable="YES" > # which is the interface to the internet that we hide behind? > natd_interface="xl0" > # flags for natd > natd_flags="-f /etc/fw/natd.conf" > > > natd.conf: > > unregistered_only > interface xl0 > use_sockets > dynamic > # dyamically open fw for ftp, irc > punch_fw 2000:50 > > > rc.firewall.rules: > > # be quiet and flush all rules on start > -q flush > > # allow local traffic, deny RFC 1918 addresses on the outside > add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > add 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > add 00120 deny ip from any to any not verrevpath in > add 00301 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via xl0 > add 00302 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via xl0 > add 00303 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via xl0 > > # check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, allow through if > yes > add 01000 divert natd ip from any to me in via xl0 > add 01001 check-state > > # allow some traffic from the local net to the router > #SMTP > add 02000 allow tcp from any to any 25 setup keep-state > > # SSH > add 04000 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04001 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > #IMAP-SSL > add 04010 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04011 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > # NTP > add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 keep-state > add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 keep-state > > #webmin > add 04030 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04031 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > #http > add 04040 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04041 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > # DNS > add 04050 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 > add 04051 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 > add 04052 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 > add 04053 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 > > #POP > add 04060 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04061 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > #HTTPS > add 04070 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04071 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > #IMAPS > add 04080 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04081 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > # drop everything else > add 04090 deny ip from any to me > > # pass outgoing packets (to be natted) on to a special NAT rule > add 04109 skipto 61000 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any in via fxp0 > keep-state > > # allow all outgoing traffic from the router > add 05010 allow ip from me to any out keep-state > > # drop everything that has come so far. This means it doesn't belong to an > # established connection, don't log the most noisy scans. > add 59998 deny icmp from any to me > add 59999 deny ip from any to me dst-port 135,137-139,445,4665 > add 60000 deny log tcp from any to any established > add 60001 deny log ip from any to any > > # this is the NAT rule. Only outgoing packets from the local net will come > here. > # First, nat them, then pass them on (again, you may choose to be more > restrictive) > add 61000 divert natd ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via xl0 > add 61001 allow ip from any to any > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:01:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B97D16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:01:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE51143D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:01:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i5TK1DJd026125; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i5TK1BMw017858; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040629153855.300b3888.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040629153855.300b3888.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1133CD52-CA07-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:01:10 -0400 To: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:01:29 -0000 On Jun 29, 2004, at 3:38 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > Charles Swiger wrote: >> I haven't seen any signs of such problems with 4.10. Given that >> you've >> reproduced this using different FTP servers, it seems more likely to >> be >> a network issue or some hardware glitch (cables? flaky NIC?) than a >> software issue. > > I hadn't even considered hardware, becuase scp is always as fast as I > would expect. I wouldn't suspect a NIC or HDD, unless the problem was > consistent with _all_ file transfers, and it's not. The performance > issue only occurs with FTP. If I'm wrong on this, I'd be happy to hear > about it, though. You're not wrong, and I don't see anything obviously wrong, so I'm reaching for possibilities to check. :-) >> Can you reproduce by moving ftp to a different port #? (Perhaps some >> quality-of-service thingy is providing different bandwidth by port...) > > I haven't tried that, but I forgot to mention that a Debian box located > right next to the problem box (on the same network) gets speeds equal > to what would be expected. To me, that ruled out QOS, routing and > other > beyond-my-control Internet problems. Again, I'm happy to be corrected > if there's something here I'm not aware of. Well, that does tend to rule out a bunch of issues. Have you tried changing the MTU of the FreeBSD box down to 1400 or so (or even 512), just to see whether that does anything? > This is just a snippet ... but it looks like an awful lot of > retransmits > and duplicates to me. I hadn't looked at this before, is this > indicative > of any particular problem? You're seeing ~1% or less retransmits, that's pretty normal. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:06:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A821D16A4D8 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:06:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8907243D4C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:06:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i5TK5nZ18158; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:05:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200406292005.i5TK5nZ18158@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: fbsd-questions@trini0.org (Gerard Samuel) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:04:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200406291545.40422.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> from "Gerard Samuel" at Jun 29, 2004 03:45:40 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:06:05 -0000 > > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 01:07 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > > Gerard Samuel wrote: > > > When editing php files, via the command line, there is a newline > > > character after the closing ?> > > > Im looking for a command that would trim files, so that I can append it > > > to the find command. > > > > > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec SOME_COMMAND {} \; > > > > If you're absolutely sure of the number of characters you're removing from > > the end of the file, you could use truncate(1). > > > > Otherwise, you'll probably want sed or perl to check that it's not removing > > important characters. > > Trying to use truncate is not working on my end. > Does anyone see a syntax error with it??? > Ran on 5.2.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD. > > $ pwd > /usr/home/gsam > $ ls ~/z.php > /home/gsam/z.php > $ truncate -r ~/z.php > usage: truncate [-c] -s [+|-]size[K|M|G] file ... > truncate [-c] -r rfile file ... > > I tried $ truncate -r rfile ~/z.php but that didn't work either. Well is 'rfile' the exact length you want and is it always going to be exactly a newline character shorter than z.php? Maybe you want something more like 'truncate -s -1 z.php' presuming it is always just one newline character at the end. Do you need to take the character only from the last line of the file or from any line in the file that has it? If it is from any line, check out tr(1). tr -d "\n" < z.php > z.php-clean rm z.php mv z.php-clean z.php Otherwise, I would be inclined to break out perl. ////jerry > Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:07:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E102416A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:07:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from northwindcom.dyndns.org (135-203-237-24.gci.net [24.237.203.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AD443D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:07:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org) Received: from localhost.dyndns.org (localhost.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by northwindcom.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389B726CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:06:59 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beecher Rintoul Organization: NorthWind Communications To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:06:58 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> In-Reply-To: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291206.58534.akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org> Subject: Re: Which book should I start? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:07:05 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:52 am, Laszlo Antal wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Bsd. I did a lot of research on the net which book should I > start with. > I got two of them. I can not deside which one should I start. > Here are my books:: > - The Complet FreeBSD. 4th Edition > From O'Reilly, Greg Lehey. > > - Absolute BSD The ultimate guide to FreeBSD. > From Michael Lucas. > > Thank you for all the advise. > > Laszlo > > One more questione the complete freebsd covers > Bsd 5. I have the FreeBsd 4.8. > Do I need to buy the version 5 ?? > > Thank you again > --lantal I would start with Greg's book. I found it invaluable when I was first learning FreeBSD (still use it occasionally). As for buying FreeBSD-5, you can upgrade for free. That's also covered in Greg's book. Above all, the handbook and man are your friends. just my $.02, Beech --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:08:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DB316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973D843D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steveb@eagle.ca) Received: (qmail 65199 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Jun 2004 20:08:40 -0000 Received: from steveb@eagle.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.997535 secs); 29 Jun 2004 20:08:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 20:08:39 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:08:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4149.209.167.16.15.1088539719.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> References: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:08:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: whizkid@ValueDJ.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW acting weird OR invalid ruleset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:08:33 -0000 > Hey everyone. Below is my natd.conf file and my rc.firewall.rule file. I > cannot figure it out, but if one of my machines that is behind my > Masqurading Firewall tries to d/l a file that is on a FTP site, it fails > to connect. Ok, I jumped earlier, but actually re-RTF ruleset, I've got a couple questions: - Is it only one pc that can't get through? - Do other services work from behind NAT? (http etc) It looks like rule 4109 should be BEFORE 4090, as 4090 denies all traffic and stops, and internal traffic can't go anywhere (or so it appears). Steve > > FreeBSD 5.2.1 machine with 2 nics. > > xl0 outside Nic > fxp0 inside Nic > > rc.conf: > > # enable firewall > firewall_enable="YES" > # set path to custom firewall config > firewall_type="/etc/fw/rc.firewall.rules" > # be non-verbose? set to YES after testing > firewall_quiet="NO" > # enable natd, the NAT daemon > natd_enable="YES" > # which is the interface to the internet that we hide behind? > natd_interface="xl0" > # flags for natd > natd_flags="-f /etc/fw/natd.conf" > > > natd.conf: > > unregistered_only > interface xl0 > use_sockets > dynamic > # dyamically open fw for ftp, irc > punch_fw 2000:50 > > > rc.firewall.rules: > > # be quiet and flush all rules on start > -q flush > > # allow local traffic, deny RFC 1918 addresses on the outside > add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > add 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > add 00120 deny ip from any to any not verrevpath in > add 00301 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via xl0 > add 00302 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via xl0 > add 00303 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via xl0 > > # check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, allow through if > yes > add 01000 divert natd ip from any to me in via xl0 > add 01001 check-state > > # allow some traffic from the local net to the router > #SMTP > add 02000 allow tcp from any to any 25 setup keep-state > > # SSH > add 04000 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04001 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 22 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > #IMAP-SSL > add 04010 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04011 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 143 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > # NTP > add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via fxp0 keep-state > add 04020 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > add 04021 allow udp from any to me dst-port 123 in via xl0 keep-state > > #webmin > add 04030 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04031 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 10000 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > #http > add 04040 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04041 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 80 in via xl0 setup keep-state > > # DNS > add 04050 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 > add 04051 allow udp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 > add 04052 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via fxp0 > add 04053 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 53 in via xl0 > > #POP > add 04060 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04061 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 110 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > #HTTPS > add 04070 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04071 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 443 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > #IMAPS > add 04080 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via fxp0 setup > keep-state > add 04081 allow tcp from any to me dst-port 993 in via xl0 setup > keep-state > > # drop everything else > add 04090 deny ip from any to me > > # pass outgoing packets (to be natted) on to a special NAT rule > add 04109 skipto 61000 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any in via fxp0 > keep-state > > # allow all outgoing traffic from the router > add 05010 allow ip from me to any out keep-state > > # drop everything that has come so far. This means it doesn't belong to an > # established connection, don't log the most noisy scans. > add 59998 deny icmp from any to me > add 59999 deny ip from any to me dst-port 135,137-139,445,4665 > add 60000 deny log tcp from any to any established > add 60001 deny log ip from any to any > > # this is the NAT rule. Only outgoing packets from the local net will come > here. > # First, nat them, then pass them on (again, you may choose to be more > restrictive) > add 61000 divert natd ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via xl0 > add 61001 allow ip from any to any > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:14:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA8216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:14:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC05343D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:14:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from rekon (hki4-81.kiinteisto.inet.fi [80.221.67.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320154AC for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:14:09 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <05f501c45e15$af66a380$0a06a8c0@rekon> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <40DF00FB.4060207@gldis.ca> <20040629143358.044bad67@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:14:29 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2149 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149 Subject: Re: cue images X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:14:23 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vulpes Velox" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:33 PM Subject: Re: cue images > Commonly used, but not a standard. Still odd, though, I've found ISO > to rather more common myself, even in areas dealing with windows. Cue files are usual in cases where ISO-images can't be used - backing up copy protected CD's and such. Every Windows burner I've used supports ISO-images in addition of their own formats. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:14:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FE016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:14:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1570543D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:14:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org) Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 736D8BAE2; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:14:44 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:14:43 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel To: Dan MacMillan Message-ID: <20040629201443.GC2103@ns1.tcbug.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving HDD with FreeBSD installed between machines with different hardware. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:14:59 -0000 > I would like to rebuild the machine completely to exercise the knowledge I > have gained re: FreeBSD but I can't afford for it to be down for the length > of time it would take and I don't have a standby machine available. So what > I'm thinking is that I could take a spare hard drive home and pop it in one > of my own machines, install FreeBSD on that, and then bring it back to work > and swap the hard drive out with the one in the production machine. > > What kind of problems am I letting myself in for if I go ahead with this? > The hardware in the two machines in question is quite dissimilar. For > example, one's an Athlon 266 with 64MB of RAM, one's a Pentium[-something] > 300 with 400 MB. > > Here are the things that occurred to me: > > One of them has an 'rl0' NIC, the other 'dc0'. So I'd have to change the > ifconfig_ line in /etc/rc.conf. But would this also imply changes elsewhere > that would have to be made? > > Actually, that's all I've thought of so far. Are there any gotchas I should > be considering? > > -- > Danny MacMillan > There shouldn't be a problem if you install and run GENERIC on one machine and then transplant that machine's hard-drive to another machine. /etc/rc.conf is one area to beware of, another would be ipfw/ipf having rules based on interfaces. Something tells me you'll want to have a copy of /etc/fstab available, but I can't for the life of me think why. Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:21:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6145516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4899943D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:21:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@trini0.org) Received: from hivemind.trini0.org (trini0.org[65.34.205.195]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040629202123015002nvr8e>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:21:24 +0000 Received: from gladiator.trini0.org (gladiator.trini0.org [192.168.0.3]) by hivemind.trini0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D732139; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:21:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerard Samuel To: Jerry McAllister Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:21:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406292005.i5TK5nZ18158@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200406292005.i5TK5nZ18158@clunix.cl.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291621.22848.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:21:37 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:04 pm, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 01:07 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > > > Gerard Samuel wrote: > > > > When editing php files, via the command line, there is a newline > > > > character after the closing ?> > > > > Im looking for a command that would trim files, so that I can append > > > > it to the find command. > > > > > > > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec SOME_COMMAND {} \; > > > > > > If you're absolutely sure of the number of characters you're removing > > > from the end of the file, you could use truncate(1). > > > > > > Otherwise, you'll probably want sed or perl to check that it's not > > > removing important characters. > > > > Trying to use truncate is not working on my end. > > Does anyone see a syntax error with it??? > > Ran on 5.2.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD. > > > > $ pwd > > /usr/home/gsam > > $ ls ~/z.php > > /home/gsam/z.php > > $ truncate -r ~/z.php > > usage: truncate [-c] -s [+|-]size[K|M|G] file ... > > truncate [-c] -r rfile file ... > > > > I tried $ truncate -r rfile ~/z.php but that didn't work either. > > Well is 'rfile' the exact length you want and is it always going to > be exactly a newline character shorter than z.php? > > Maybe you want something more like 'truncate -s -1 z.php' > presuming it is always just one newline character at the end. > > > Do you need to take the character only from the last line of the file or > from any line in the file that has it? > > If it is from any line, check out tr(1). > tr -d "\n" < z.php > z.php-clean > rm z.php > mv z.php-clean z.php > > Otherwise, I would be inclined to break out perl. > > ////jerry > Well although I can use a bit of perl within php, trying it via the command line is a bit of a learning curve, that I try to attempt to master it another day (after reading all those man pages :) ). Maybe if someone can suggest a how to page on the net, would be appreciated. But your suggestion on using 'truncate -s -1 z.php' worked as I would like it. The scenario Im trying to clean up is, if I were to create a file like this on the command line -> -- -- is actually -- \n -- on the file system. Which is normal. But Im trying to clean up the files to eliminate the trailing \n from the file, so that its consistent on the command line, and GUI editors, and to keep the hard core nuts off my back about having trailing space after the closing ?> So Ill start using truncate() for now, and start investigating perl. Thanks.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:35:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB60D16A4CE; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:35:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A81C43D45; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0728A653D2; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:35:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 56061-01-2; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:35:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE36D65381; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:35:33 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C15F0614B; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:35:32 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:35:32 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Arne Schwabe Message-ID: <20040629203532.GC34501@empiric.dek.spc.org> References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> <86r7ry35is.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86r7ry35is.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> cc: 'Kenneth Culver' cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:35:42 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote: > You can't change the cpu speed while running at the Moment, I don't > see any other iusses at the Moment with my Notebook (IBM T40). I too have an IBM T40. It gives me much love, daily. BMS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:38:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C30516A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:38:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net (starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6045A43D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BfPNQ-0003C3-D4; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:38:48 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Laszlo Antal Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:39:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> In-Reply-To: <1088538779.1C1EDA5C@s29.dngr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291539.55426.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b1048135fe03ce09188f61701c764369b350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 Subject: Re: Which book should I start? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:38:50 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 02:52 pm, Laszlo Antal wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Bsd. I did a lot of research on the net which book should > I start with. > I got two of them. I can not deside which one should I start. > Here are my books:: > - The Complet FreeBSD. 4th Edition > From O'Reilly, Greg Lehey. > > - Absolute BSD The ultimate guide to FreeBSD. > From Michael Lucas. The 2nd edition of Greg Lehey's book introduced me to FreeBSD. I have purchased the most recent edition; and I also have Michael Lucas' book, which I find very helpful. Both books are excellent; but the authors have different writing styles. My suggestion is to read a chapter from each book that covers the same topic, and see which style you're more receptive to. Use the second book as an additional reference **while** you read the first book. > > Thank you for all the advise. > > Laszlo > > One more questione the complete freebsd covers > Bsd 5. I have the FreeBsd 4.8. > Do I need to buy the version 5 ?? > > Thank you again > --lantal Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:45:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C532F16A4D1 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:45:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-dav10.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.48.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CFF43D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aafalusi@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:44:48 -0700 Received: from 80.45.185.255 by bay14-dav10.bay14.hotmail.com with DAV; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:44:48 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [80.45.185.255] X-Originating-Email: [aafalusi@hotmail.com] X-Sender: aafalusi@hotmail.com From: "Ade Falusi" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:45:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2004 20:44:48.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB422330:01C45E19] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: HP visulaize B132 workstation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:45:08 -0000 Can FreeBSD be installed on an HP visulaize B132 workstation, if so how = and what type i.e=20 alpha, amd64, i38,ia64, pc98 or sparc64. Pls help. Toni From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:46:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897C916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:46:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5A543D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@trini0.org) Received: from hivemind.trini0.org (trini0.org[65.34.205.195]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004062920462901200m23jde>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:46:29 +0000 Received: from gladiator.trini0.org (gladiator.trini0.org [192.168.0.3]) by hivemind.trini0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8B916C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:46:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Gerard Samuel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:46:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406292005.i5TK5nZ18158@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <200406291621.22848.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> In-Reply-To: <200406291621.22848.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291646.28811.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> cc: Jerry McAllister cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:46:30 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:21 pm, Gerard Samuel wrote: > So Ill start using truncate() for now, and start investigating perl. > Thanks.... > As I was writing the previous email, I thought about combining find with php's cli interface and came up with this "dirty" command (all in one line) -> find ./ -name '*.php' -exec php -r '$f = file_get_contents("{}"); $h = fopen("{}", "wb"); fwrite($h, trim($f)); fclose($h);' \; It did the job perfectly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:48:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D3D16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E5443D41 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5TKleco028456; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:47:41 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:48:07 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291348.07456.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:48:10 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:02 am, Bill Moran wrote: > I'm having some really weird problems with ftp performance on FreeBSD > 4.10 that I just can't seem to figure out. > > My uplink here maxes out at about 35k/sec. If I scp to the machine > in question I get about 30k/sec (which is expected) but when I ftp, I > never get anything better than 15k/sec, and occasionally as low as > 8k/sec. > > Using a server colocated at another facility, I can ftp at about > 45k/sec, and scp at about 60k/sec. > > Downloads are all as expected ... scp and ftp downloads seem to be in > about the same range, and it's a number I would expect. > > I tried running the ftp daemon that ships with FreeBSD, as well as > Proftpd and they both exhibit the same performance issues. > > Most settings on this machine are at their defaults. I've tried > tweaking send/recv sizes, as well as toggling delayed_ack. None of > these have made any difference so far. > > Suggestions? Is anyone else seeing this? I want to add that I have a machine that did that once in awhile. As soon as I see it, I look at my switch and the NIC has switched into half-duplex. An ifconfig still shows full-duplex. I would power down and reboot and it went away for awhile. After having done this 3 or 4 times, I powered it down, reseated the NIC and it has been a little over three weeks since it flipped modes on me. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 20:57:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8760516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:57:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-dav3.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.48.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A2943D4C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aafalusi@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:57:30 -0700 Received: from 80.45.185.255 by bay14-dav3.bay14.hotmail.com with DAV; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:57:30 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [80.45.185.255] X-Originating-Email: [aafalusi@hotmail.com] X-Sender: aafalusi@hotmail.com From: "Ade Falusi" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:57:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2004 20:57:30.0144 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1175200:01C45E1B] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: HP Visualize workstation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:57:34 -0000 Can FreeBSD be installed on an HP visualize B132L workstation, if so = how and what type i.e=20 alpha, amd64, i38, ia64, pc98 or sparc64. Pls help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:05:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF9916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:05:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E6F43D31 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:05:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832B5826A; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:05:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84647-06; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:05:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14A081FC; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:05:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1D985.1080801@wcborstel.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:05:09 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200406291348.07456.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200406291348.07456.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:05:14 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: >On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:02 am, Bill Moran wrote: > > >>I'm having some really weird problems with ftp performance on FreeBSD >>4.10 that I just can't seem to figure out. >> >>My uplink here maxes out at about 35k/sec. If I scp to the machine >>in question I get about 30k/sec (which is expected) but when I ftp, I >>never get anything better than 15k/sec, and occasionally as low as >>8k/sec. >> >>Using a server colocated at another facility, I can ftp at about >>45k/sec, and scp at about 60k/sec. >> >>Downloads are all as expected ... scp and ftp downloads seem to be in >>about the same range, and it's a number I would expect. >> >>I tried running the ftp daemon that ships with FreeBSD, as well as >>Proftpd and they both exhibit the same performance issues. >> >>Most settings on this machine are at their defaults. I've tried >>tweaking send/recv sizes, as well as toggling delayed_ack. None of >>these have made any difference so far. >> >>Suggestions? Is anyone else seeing this? >> >> > >I want to add that I have a machine that did that once in awhile. As >soon as I see it, I look at my switch and the NIC has switched into >half-duplex. An ifconfig still shows full-duplex. I would power down >and reboot and it went away for awhile. > >After having done this 3 or 4 times, I powered it down, reseated the NIC >and it has been a little over three weeks since it flipped modes on me. > >Kent > > > But even if it is an 10 MBit NIC running half duplex, it should still be capable of handling internet traffic at normal speeds (200 - 300 KB/s or something, depends on your line of course) My first insight of those problems is probably bad DNS settings. What about FTPing to your ip address? Is that giving you the bad speed as well? Jorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:08:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3421216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:08:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF94743D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:08:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8818337; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84647-07; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DF781FC; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1DA67.6010202@wcborstel.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:08:55 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Walrond References: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> In-Reply-To: <200406291739.43843.andrew@walrond.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help required installing 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:08:58 -0000 Andrew Walrond wrote: >I have tried unsuccessfully to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 from downloaded isos. > >I have the i386 isos, but the first machine I tried was an Asus SK8N >motherboard with Amd Opteron and 2Gb ram. The various hardware is shown as >supported on the Hardware list; notably the Promise SATA150 TX2 disk >controller. > >Although this is an Amd64, I assume the 386 version should still install OK? > >Anyhow, I booted from cd disk 1, went through the various questions, auto >partitioned and it began "Extracting ... into / directory". This went well >for a few minutes, lots of disk activity, then > Panic - page fault > CPUID 0 > >and was informed that the machine would reboot after 15seconds. > >I tried again, this time booting without ACPI, with the same results. > >Any suggestions? > >Andrew Walrond >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > My AMD64 machine couldn't even boot from the i386 install CD. A kernel panic when it's booting. Not that that matters, since the AMD64 version is working just fine :) It's quite strange though, since the AMD folks promised complete backwards compatiblity with the i386 architecture. Or they only guarantee it for Bill's software, which is also a possibility. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:14:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FFF16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:14:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mwinf0803.wanadoo.fr (smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2315243D2D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:14:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fc.h@wanadoo.fr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (Mix-Reims-107-3-223.w193-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.249.54.223]) by mwinf0803.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1A4CA1800339 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:14:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:14:34 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 5.1Release on Compaq Presario Laptop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:14:45 -0000 Hi, I have just installed FreeBSD 4.10 - Release on my laptop Compaq Presario 2132. Everything's working fine, but I have a couple of doubts. 1. My console does'nt cover the entire screen of my laptop. It only appears in a middle rectangular area of the screen. How do I fix this to cover the entire screen??? Some people directed my to run the 'diagnostics check' in my BIOS. But my BIOS does not have diagnostic checks. Is there another way? 2. Whenever I boot into ACPI enabled mode, I can't configure my mouse to work? Whats the reason for this? How can I work this, i.e. the ACPI and the mouse together? Thanks, Nikhil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:24:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3905E16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:24:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.valuedj.com (adsl-216-100-130-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.130.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC59443D2F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whizkid@ValueDJ.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.valuedj.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.valuedj.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FE0612E; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.valuedj.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.valuedj.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12696-06; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ns1.valuedj.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id C57176128; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 207.13.174.37 (SquirrelMail authenticated user whizkid) by www.ValueDJ.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4315.207.13.174.37.1088544251.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> In-Reply-To: <4149.209.167.16.15.1088539719.squirrel@209.167.16.15> References: <3443.207.13.174.37.1088538748.squirrel@www.ValueDJ.com> <4149.209.167.16.15.1088539719.squirrel@209.167.16.15> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) From: whizkid@ValueDJ.com To: "Steve Bertrand" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ValueDJ.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW acting weird OR invalid ruleset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:24:56 -0000 [snip] > Ok, I jumped earlier, but actually re-RTF ruleset, I've got a couple > questions: > > - Is it only one pc that can't get through? > - Do other services work from behind NAT? (http etc) > > It looks like rule 4109 should be BEFORE 4090, as 4090 denies all traffic > and stops, and internal traffic can't go anywhere (or so it appears). > > Steve > [snip] steve, Yes everything else seems to work fine. There are currently 2 PCs with this issue. 1 is XP the other is Win2k. This ruleset worked fine on FreeBSD 5.1, but I reformatted the box, and install 5.2.1 uploaded the rc.firewall.rules and natd.conf files, since the network interfaces where the same I didn't really have to change anything. I found these rules on this website: http://www.lugbe.ch/lostfound/contrib/freebsd_router/ here is the sample I used from the website: # be quiet and flush all rules on start -q flush # allow local traffic, deny RFC 1918 addresses on the outside add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 add 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 add 00120 deny ip from any to any not verrevpath in add 00301 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via ep0 add 00302 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via ep0 add 00303 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via ep0 # check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, allow through if yes add 01000 divert natd ip from any to me in via ep0 add 01001 check-state # allow some traffic from the local net to the router # SSH add 04000 allow tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port 22 in via ep1 setup keep-state # ICMP add 04001 allow icmp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me in via ep1 # NTP add 04002 allow tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port 123 in via ep1 setup keep-state add 04003 allow udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port 123 in via ep1 keep-state # DNS add 04006 allow udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port 53 in via ep1 # drop everything else add 04009 deny ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to me # pass outgoing packets (to be natted) on to a special NAT rule add 04109 skipto 61000 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any in via ep1 keep-state # allow all outgoing traffic from the router (maybe you should be more restrictive) add 05010 allow ip from me to any out keep-state # drop everything that has come so far. This means it doesn't belong to an established connection, don't log the most noisy scans. add 59998 deny icmp from any to me add 59999 deny ip from any to me dst-port 135,137-139,445,4665 add 60000 deny log tcp from any to any established add 60000 deny log ip from any to any # this is the NAT rule. Only outgoing packets from the local net will come here. # First, nat them, then pass them on (again, you may choose to be more restrictive) add 61000 divert natd ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via ep0 add 61001 allow ip from any to any From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:26:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D773C16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:26:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net (audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C622C43D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BfQ7p-0002eB-3P; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:26:45 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:27:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406291627.52112.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bd367a74eb603123aadbab35eb60c98a6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1Release on Compaq Presario Laptop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:26:50 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:14 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Hardy wrote: > Hi, > I have just installed FreeBSD 4.10 - Release on my laptop Compaq > Presario 2132. Everything's working fine, but I have a couple of > doubts. > 1. My console does'nt cover the entire screen of my laptop. It only > appears in a middle rectangular area of the screen. How do I fix this > to cover the entire screen??? Some people directed my to run the > 'diagnostics check' in my BIOS. But my BIOS does not have diagnostic > checks. Is there another way? Another poster gave me this advice: try Fn-F7 (Function-F7). It worked=20 nicely for my Dell Inspiron 8100. > > 2. Whenever I boot into ACPI enabled mode, I can't configure my mouse > to work? Whats the reason for this? How can I work this, i.e. the > ACPI and the mouse together? I used to have FreeBSD 4.9 on a Compaq Presario 910US. I had to disable=20 ACPI for anything to work. > > Thanks, > Nikhil. Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:30:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CD916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93AE43D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukas@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:lukas@mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.21]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5TLTm5R005114; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:29:48 GMT Received: (from lukas@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i5TLTmac010413; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke X-X-Sender: lukas@mx.freeshell.org To: Luke In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg-clients-6.7.0 syntax error in xhost.c building xvinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: LukeD@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:35 -0000 I worked around that problem and ran into another. I had an old copy of Xlib.h in /usr/X11R6/include/X11, so XServerInterpretedAddress was undefined. Explicitly installing /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries before installing /usr/ports/x11/xorg did the trick. I still can't see why making xorg didn't do that automatically. The makefile looks like it would. Now that I'm past that problem, I'm getting "make: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h. Stop" I'll keep working on this. I probably have an old copy of something else lying around messing this up too. On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Luke wrote: > Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:47:19 -0700 (PDT) > From: Luke > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: xorg-clients-6.7.0 syntax error in xhost.c building xvinfo > > > I'm trying to install xorg since I think I need the latest nvidia drivers to > solve a problem I'm having and there seems to be some kind of holdup on > upgrading the XFree86 port. > > I'm getting the following error: > > Script started on Tue Jun 29 10:23:19 2004 > You have mail. > greentower# cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg greentower# make install ===> Installing > for xorg-6.7.0 > ===> xorg-6.7.0 depends on executable: xvinfo - not found > ===> Verifying install for xvinfo in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients > ===> Building for xorg-clients-6.7.0 > making all in programs/appres... > making all in programs/bdftopcf... > making all in programs/bitmap... > making all in programs/beforelight... > making all in programs/editres... > making all in programs/fslsfonts... > making all in programs/fstobdf... > making all in programs/iceauth... > making all in programs/ico... > making all in programs/listres... > making all in programs/luit... > making all in programs/makepsres... > making all in programs/dpsinfo... > making all in programs/dpsexec... > making all in programs/texteroids... > making all in programs/mkcfm... > making all in programs/mkfontdir... > making all in programs/mkfontscale... > making all in programs/oclock... > making all in programs/proxymngr... > making all in programs/rgb... > making all in programs/rstart... > making all in programs/showfont... > making all in programs/smproxy... > making all in programs/twm... > making all in programs/viewres... > making all in programs/x11perf... > making all in programs/xauth... > making all in programs/xbiff... > making all in programs/xcalc... > making all in programs/xclipboard... > making all in programs/xclock... > making all in programs/xcmsdb... > making all in programs/xconsole... > making all in programs/xditview... > making all in programs/xdm... > making all in programs/xdm/config... > making all in programs/xdpyinfo... > making all in programs/xf86dga... > making all in programs/xedit... > making all in programs/xedit/lisp... > making all in programs/xedit/lisp/mp... > making all in programs/xedit/lisp/re... > making all in programs/xev... > making all in programs/xeyes... > making all in programs/xfd... > making all in programs/xfontsel... > making all in programs/xfsinfo... > making all in programs/xfindproxy... > making all in programs/xfwp... > making all in programs/xgamma... > making all in programs/xgc... > making all in programs/xhost... > cc -O -pipe -ansi -pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=__asm -Wall > -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc > -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DTCPCONN -DUNIXCONN > -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -DHAS_FCHOWN -DIPv6 -DSECURE_RPC > -DBSD44SOCKETS -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' > -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c xhost.c > xhost.c: In function `change_host': > xhost.c:423: error: syntax error before "siaddr" > xhost.c:434: error: `siaddr' undeclared (first use in this function) > xhost.c:434: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > xhost.c:434: error: for each function it appears in.) > xhost.c: In function `get_hostname': > xhost.c:883: error: `XServerInterpretedAddress' undeclared (first use in this > function) > xhost.c:883: error: `sip' undeclared (first use in this function) > xhost.c:884: warning: ISO C89 forbids mixed declarations and code > xhost.c:888: error: syntax error before ')' token > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs/xhost. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg. > greentower# exit exit > > Script done on Tue Jun 29 10:23:45 2004 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:30:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5927316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mwinf0803.wanadoo.fr (smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBCE43D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fc.h@wanadoo.fr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (Mix-Reims-107-3-223.w193-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.249.54.223]) by mwinf0803.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2454118002E3; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:29:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1DF4F.7080902@wanadoo.fr> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:29:51 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew L. Gould" References: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> <200406291627.52112.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200406291627.52112.algould@datawok.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1Release on Compaq Presario Laptop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:35 -0000 Andrew L. Gould wrote: >On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:14 pm, Frédéric Hardy wrote: > > >>Hi, >> I have just installed FreeBSD 4.10 - Release on my laptop Compaq >>Presario 2132. Everything's working fine, but I have a couple of >>doubts. >>1. My console does'nt cover the entire screen of my laptop. It only >>appears in a middle rectangular area of the screen. How do I fix this >>to cover the entire screen??? Some people directed my to run the >>'diagnostics check' in my BIOS. But my BIOS does not have diagnostic >>checks. Is there another way? >> >> > >Another poster gave me this advice: try Fn-F7 (Function-F7). It worked >nicely for my Dell Inspiron 8100. > > Thanks for your response. Using Fn-F7 at boot ? >>2. Whenever I boot into ACPI enabled mode, I can't configure my mouse >>to work? Whats the reason for this? How can I work this, i.e. the >>ACPI and the mouse together? >> >> > >I used to have FreeBSD 4.9 on a Compaq Presario 910US. I had to disable >ACPI for anything to work. > > > >>Thanks, >>Nikhil. >> >> > >Best of luck, > >Andrew Gould > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:32:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859AD16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:32:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD0C43D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5TLVcVd011898 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:31:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000201c45e1f$1be58400$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <40E18588.6090101@wcborstel.nl> <001801c45df6$43f0a980$0200a8c0@satellite> <40E19D5A.6050007@one-arm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:21:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:32:26 -0000 Hello, My thanks to everyone who has so far offered help. Unfortunately i'm not any closer to fixing this. I had to enable amavisd to log through syslog and set it to mail so it would put output in maillog, then i added -v to the end of the postfix smtpd line in master.cf. I then enabled content_filter in main.cf, and tried to send a test message. Well, it didn't work and after going through the resulting log file which vividly detailed the smtp transaction i got the same error from smtpd as in my original post, no additional information. Any other suggestions welcome. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:34:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504F616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:34:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F4D43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:34:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BfQEl-0000WP-Rp; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:33:56 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:35:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> <200406291627.52112.algould@datawok.com> <40E1DF4F.7080902@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <40E1DF4F.7080902@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406291635.03217.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b393cb7ac0d2c2f5d4cfeeb0b1e54ec2c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1Release on Compaq Presario Laptop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:34:50 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:29 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Hardy wrote: > Andrew L. Gould wrote: > >On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:14 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Hardy wrote: > >>Hi, > >> I have just installed FreeBSD 4.10 - Release on my laptop Compaq > >>Presario 2132. Everything's working fine, but I have a couple of > >>doubts. > >>1. My console does'nt cover the entire screen of my laptop. It only > >>appears in a middle rectangular area of the screen. How do I fix > >> this to cover the entire screen??? Some people directed my to run > >> the 'diagnostics check' in my BIOS. But my BIOS does not have > >> diagnostic checks. Is there another way? > > > >Another poster gave me this advice: try Fn-F7 (Function-F7). It > > worked nicely for my Dell Inspiron 8100. > > Thanks for your response. > Using Fn-F7 at boot ? No, when your console is a small rectangle. Best regards, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:39:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FF616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6882143D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:39:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5TLcnco030994; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:38:52 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: Jorn Argelo Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:39:16 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200406291348.07456.kstewart@owt.com> <40E1D985.1080801@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: <40E1D985.1080801@wcborstel.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291439.16831.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:39:31 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 02:05 pm, Jorn Argelo wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > >On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:02 am, Bill Moran wrote: > >>I'm having some really weird problems with ftp performance on > >> FreeBSD 4.10 that I just can't seem to figure out. > >> > >>My uplink here maxes out at about 35k/sec. If I scp to the machine > >>in question I get about 30k/sec (which is expected) but when I ftp, > >> I never get anything better than 15k/sec, and occasionally as low > >> as 8k/sec. > >> > >>Using a server colocated at another facility, I can ftp at about > >>45k/sec, and scp at about 60k/sec. > >> > >>Downloads are all as expected ... scp and ftp downloads seem to be > >> in about the same range, and it's a number I would expect. > >> > >>I tried running the ftp daemon that ships with FreeBSD, as well as > >>Proftpd and they both exhibit the same performance issues. > >> > >>Most settings on this machine are at their defaults. I've tried > >>tweaking send/recv sizes, as well as toggling delayed_ack. None of > >>these have made any difference so far. > >> > >>Suggestions? Is anyone else seeing this? > > > >I want to add that I have a machine that did that once in awhile. As > >soon as I see it, I look at my switch and the NIC has switched into > >half-duplex. An ifconfig still shows full-duplex. I would power down > >and reboot and it went away for awhile. > > > >After having done this 3 or 4 times, I powered it down, reseated the > > NIC and it has been a little over three weeks since it flipped > > modes on me. > > > >Kent > > But even if it is an 10 MBit NIC running half duplex, it should still > be capable of handling internet traffic at normal speeds (200 - 300 > KB/s or something, depends on your line of course) > > My first insight of those problems is probably bad DNS settings. What > about FTPing to your ip address? Is that giving you the bad speed as > well? > That only occurs when both ifconfig and the NIC are set at half-duplex. The system is on a local network and all systems are in the hosts table. The network is 100Mb/s but the ftp xfer rate would drop to 8KB/s. It is my test system and the drop from 11MB/s to 8KB/s was noticeable. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:39:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B1216A4CF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:39:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mwinf0604.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15EE43D5A for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fc.h@wanadoo.fr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (Mix-Reims-107-4-161.w193-250.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.250.84.161]) by mwinf0604.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E564428003BB; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:39:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1E1A1.60504@wanadoo.fr> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:39:45 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew L. Gould" References: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> <200406291627.52112.algould@datawok.com> <40E1DF4F.7080902@wanadoo.fr> <200406291635.03217.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200406291635.03217.algould@datawok.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1Release on Compaq Presario Laptop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fc.h@wanadoo.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:39:53 -0000 Andrew L. Gould wrote: >On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:29 pm, Frédéric Hardy wrote: > > >>Andrew L. Gould wrote: >> >> >>>On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:14 pm, Frédéric Hardy wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> I have just installed FreeBSD 4.10 - Release on my laptop Compaq >>>>Presario 2132. Everything's working fine, but I have a couple of >>>>doubts. >>>>1. My console does'nt cover the entire screen of my laptop. It only >>>>appears in a middle rectangular area of the screen. How do I fix >>>>this to cover the entire screen??? Some people directed my to run >>>>the 'diagnostics check' in my BIOS. But my BIOS does not have >>>>diagnostic checks. Is there another way? >>>> >>>> >>>Another poster gave me this advice: try Fn-F7 (Function-F7). It >>>worked nicely for my Dell Inspiron 8100. >>> >>> >>Thanks for your response. >>Using Fn-F7 at boot ? >> >> > >No, when your console is a small rectangle. > >Best regards, > >Andrew Gould > > > I'm very disapointed, fn-F7 seems not worked :-( Have you got any solutions ? Best regards, fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:42:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A187216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2241E43D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:42:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BfQND-0001FK-1C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:42:40 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BfQIk-0006Ic-8b; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:38:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:38:02 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Ade Falusi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Level: / cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HP Visualize workstation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:42:42 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Ade Falusi wrote: > Can FreeBSD be installed on an HP visualize B132L workstation, if so how and what type i.e > alpha, amd64, i38, ia64, pc98 or sparc64. > Pls help. I believe that machine is based around the PA-RISC. You might want to see if NetBSD will run on it. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ On modesty: whoever said "it's hard being perfect" obviously wasn't me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:51:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F35216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:51:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net (starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5375943D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BfQVH-0007D0-Bl; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:50:59 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: fc.h@wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:52:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <40E1DBBA.4030807@wanadoo.fr> <200406291635.03217.algould@datawok.com> <40E1E1A1.60504@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <40E1E1A1.60504@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406291652.06729.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b07175f4cc7f5679a5f9a8bbb2bfe052b350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1Release on Compaq Presario Laptop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:51:23 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:39 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Hardy wrote: > Andrew L. Gould wrote: > >On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:29 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Hardy wrote: > >>Andrew L. Gould wrote: > >>>On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:14 pm, Fr=E9d=E9ric Hardy wrote: > >>>>Hi, > >>>> I have just installed FreeBSD 4.10 - Release on my laptop Compaq > >>>>Presario 2132. Everything's working fine, but I have a couple of > >>>>doubts. > >>>>1. My console does'nt cover the entire screen of my laptop. It > >>>> only appears in a middle rectangular area of the screen. How do > >>>> I fix this to cover the entire screen??? Some people directed my > >>>> to run the 'diagnostics check' in my BIOS. But my BIOS does not > >>>> have diagnostic checks. Is there another way? > >>> > >>>Another poster gave me this advice: try Fn-F7 (Function-F7). It > >>>worked nicely for my Dell Inspiron 8100. > >> > >>Thanks for your response. > >>Using Fn-F7 at boot ? > > > >No, when your console is a small rectangle. > > > >Best regards, > > > >Andrew Gould > > I'm very disapointed, fn-F7 seems not worked :-( > Have you got any solutions ? > > Best regards, fred Other than playing around with different key combinations, no. Good luck, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:52:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7D516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:52:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14A1543D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cjalmond@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x17so417579cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr19093rnb; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92b67e1b04062914527a5ccdc0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:52:31 -0500 From: Curtis Almond To: krinklyfig@spymac.com In-Reply-To: <200406282338.05068.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200406282338.05068.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Audio/multimedia recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:52:51 -0000 I have tried the following on earlier version of BSD. I had a specific need for MP3 jukebox features. Juk with KDE Net-Rhythm Jukebox (currently broken) Juk was functional and did a good job at organizing my small mp3 collection. Curtis On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:38:05 -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > OK, so I've finally moved over to FreeBSD from Linux, and I've fallen in love. > To me, this OS makes so much more /sense/ than Linux, though I'm not > evangelizing nor knocking anyone's choices. I realize the strength of the > FreeBSD is on the server side, but I like it enough that I'm planning on > using this current install as a workstation (and later I plan on using a > combined FreeBSD/OpenBSD setup for a mail/web server network, OpenBSD being > dedicated to firewalling). My stats are FreeBSD 5.2.1 RELEASE, KDE 3.2.3 (I > also have Gnome but don't use it often). After toying around a bit with the > various installed media players as well as installing XMMS (which has some > quirky problems with KDE), I'm wondering if anyone has recommendations on > media players, as this ain't cutting it and there are so many audio and > multimedia ports that it's a rather daunting task trying to pick any of them. > My previous Linux experience didn't involve much media, so I'm not familiar > with what's popular or what works well. I'm particularly interested in any > players which support streaming media, especially standards like Real and > WMP. I tried going to the Real page to dl their player, after discovering > it's no longer in ports, and there is no option for FreeBSD, and the Linux > player is a binary - haven't tried it yet. > > Also, my mobo is an Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe with an ATI Radeon 9600 XT video card. > The mobo works fine with FreeBSD, but I haven't been able to get my video > card to work, even though I've been through a number of steps advised on > different sites, including building AGP into the kernel and Radeon support > into XFree86. I've also searched through the list archives, but the answers > given tend to vary, and the ones I've tried haven't worked. I know many > people have asked about this issue, but I have yet to find a solution which > works. Anyone have an answer they know works? I'm not all that interested in > playing games on this machine or using 3D much at all, but it would be nice > to speed up my system by actually using the video memory the card uses. > > - jt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 22:15:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAD116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:15:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AA343D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:15:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBED15C93 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:13:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 81.84.175.12 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mailadmin.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:13:53 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <53864.81.84.175.12.1088536433.squirrel@81.84.175.12> In-Reply-To: <40E06892.5020500@wcborstel.nl> References: <51254.81.84.175.12.1088424904.squirrel@81.84.175.12> <40E06892.5020500@wcborstel.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:13:53 -0000 (GMT) From: klr@6s-gaming.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: FreeBSD desktop newcomer (Enemy Territory players read) - need minor help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:15:42 -0000 > Andreas Davour wrote: > >>On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 klr@6s-gaming.com wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi list, >>> >>> >> >> >> >>>1. I've added a 'paw' menu to access the main menu, but I'd like the >>>win-key to open this menu. possible? >>> >>> >> >>Almost anything is possible, if you work hard enough. Please tell us more >>about what your environment is before you expect any meaningful answer. >>You might want to start checking out xmodmap which is good at remapping >>keys. >> >> >> >>>3. Annoyances with enemy territory: >>> >>> >> >>Keys: Look above, xmodmap might help. >> >> >> >>> - Im getting some delay switching weapons and shooting. I press mouse1 >>>and about 0.5sec later the weapon will shoot. This should be >>>instantaneous. I don't have any idea on this one, solutions ? >>> >>> >> >>Do remember that you are running the Linux version of ET. It is slower >>than running native. You are very welcome to try to convince the >>developers of Enemy Territory to do a FreeBSD version. >> >> > As long as you have a fairly powerful machine you should be able to play > it without problems. I ran it on a Celeron 2.8 GHz with 256 DDR-333 > without any problems at all. I never used caps lock, so I don't have a > clue if I ever had problems with it. > > Cheers, > > Jorn > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I will see about this xmodmap, about the shooting delay, I find it odd because all other actions are timed perfectly except shooting and changing weapons. My CPU is a 1.4ghz P4.. the game ran fine on windows (no delay). The FPS are OK, this delay shooting is killing me tho. I'm pretty sure it's not et-specific, because I also play RtCW, which is a fair lighter game and I have the same issue. My only guesses are some problem with the nvidia driver or with moused working on OpenGL.. -- www.6s-gaming.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 22:24:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA9D16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:24:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EAB43D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from 250-217.customer.cloud9.net (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11])i5TMMjMN043014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:22:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5TMMQ25037075 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:22:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:22:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291822.25914@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: Using syslog(3) after chroot-ing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:24:08 -0000 Hello! I'm writing a daemon, which chroots after initialization. It uses syslog(3) extensively. I have already figured out, that I need to openlog() with LOG_NDELAY, otherwise syslog() will not find the syslogd's socket. Is there a similar trick to make it use the local timezone instead of UTC? I'm surprised, the time is interpreted by the sender (rather than by the syslogd-recipient), but it is -- and I want it to be local, without copying /etc/localtime into the chroot tree. Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 22:34:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C916A16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:34:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hoemail1.lucent.com (hoemail1.lucent.com [192.11.226.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D9843D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:34:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rrajarajan@lucent.com) Received: from nj7460exch002h.wins.lucent.com (h135-17-42-35.lucent.com [135.17.42.35]) by hoemail1.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5TMXpH1012650 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:33:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: by nj7460exch002h.ho.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:33:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1B8C2E08B21B8743A2B3AED07407DA760822B2C6@nj7460exch002u.ho.lucent.com> From: "Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan)" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:33:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Which book should I start? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:34:23 -0000 >> Hi, >> >> I am new to Bsd. I did a lot of research on the net which book should I >> start with. >> I got two of them. I can not deside which one should I start. >> Here are my books:: >> - The Complet FreeBSD. 4th Edition >> From O'Reilly, Greg Lehey. >> >> - Absolute BSD The ultimate guide to FreeBSD. >> From Michael Lucas. >> >> Thank you for all the advise. >> >> Laszlo >> > >I would start with Greg's book. I found it invaluable when I was first >learning FreeBSD (still use it occasionally). As for buying FreeBSD-5, you >can upgrade for free. That's also covered in Greg's book. Above all, the >handbook and man are your friends. > >just my $.02, > >Beech > I have Greg's book and I second Beech's mail as I too found it very invaluable when I installed freeBSD the first time. RR From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 22:40:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17D116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:40:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8510E43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 27018 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jun 2004 22:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.8?) (192.168.10.8) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 22:40:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:37:38 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: "Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan)" In-Reply-To: <1B8C2E08B21B8743A2B3AED07407DA760822B2C6@nj7460exch002u.ho.lucent.com> References: <1B8C2E08B21B8743A2B3AED07407DA760822B2C6@nj7460exch002u.ho.lucent.com> Message-Id: <20040630073409.7B83.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.01 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which book should I start? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:40:06 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:33:50 -0400 "Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan)" spake thus: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am new to Bsd. I did a lot of research on the net which book should I > >> start with. > >> I got two of them. I can not deside which one should I start. > >> Here are my books:: > >> - The Complet FreeBSD. 4th Edition > >> From O'Reilly, Greg Lehey. > >> > >> - Absolute BSD The ultimate guide to FreeBSD. > >> From Michael Lucas. > >> > >> Thank you for all the advise. > >> > >> Laszlo > >> > > > >I would start with Greg's book. I found it invaluable when I was first > >learning FreeBSD (still use it occasionally). As for buying FreeBSD-5, you > >can upgrade for free. That's also covered in Greg's book. Above all, the > >handbook and man are your friends. > > > >just my $.02, > > > >Beech > > > I have Greg's book and I second Beech's mail as I too found it very > invaluable when I installed freeBSD the first time. > > RR Seems to me that it depends a great deal on which writer you find easiest to follow. If you want a sample of Michael Lucas' style go to Big Scary Daemons on the O'Reilly website. ( www.onlamp.com/bsd). I have Greg's book and it has safely guided me through all the basics. I still refer to it from time to time. Michael's material on the web is also easy to read. If you can afford it I'd get both. HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 22:44:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D15416A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:44:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c001.snv.cp.net (h001.c001.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7FE843D39 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jromero@romero3000.com) Received: (cpmta 19351 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 15:43:58 -0700 Received: from 69.33.104.67 (HELO unixws.romero3000.com) by smtp.register-admin.com (209.228.32.115) with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 15:43:58 -0700 X-Sent: 29 Jun 2004 22:43:58 GMT From: Jeronimo Romero Organization: romero3000.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:44:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291844.13637.jromero@romero3000.com> Subject: file system activity question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jromero@romero3000.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:44:00 -0000 quick question: is there a way to monitor filesystem writes the way tcp/dump monitors tcp/ip activity on the network??? I know this is sort of a strange question. but i was just curious. I'm not in this list so please cc: me. thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:38:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7378B16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:38:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.alternativ-data.no (mail.alternativ-data.no [195.18.251.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DC7D43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:38:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from axel@sjostedt.no) Received: (qmail 55279 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 23:38:23 -0000 Received: from sjostedt.no (HELO axel) (217.8.136.240) by mail.alternativ-data.no with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 23:38:23 -0000 Message-ID: <001301c45e32$2b818220$0000fea9@axel> From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Axel_Sj=F8stedt?= To: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:38:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.alternativ-data.no X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: Problems installing perl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:38:40 -0000 Hello all, I've run into a problem trying to install the perl5.8 port that I cannot solve. I've been Googling around, and found a few having a simular problem, but no solution. I have not updated perl before, so the present version are the one that came bundled with FreeBSD. Here's the last bit of output: -------------------------------------------------------- install -c -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/use.perl /usr/local/bin/use.perl /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/. install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.4/BSDPAN.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/BSDPAN.pm /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/BSDPAN install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.4/BSDPAN/Override.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/BSDPAN/Override.pm /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/. install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.4/Config.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/Config.pm /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/ExtUtils install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.4/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/ExtUtils install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.4/ExtUtils/Packlist.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.4/BSDPAN/ExtUtils/Packlist.pm /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/perl: Undefined symbol "PL_exit_flags" *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8. *** Error code 1 -------------------------------------------------------- This happens both on cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 + make install clean, and portinstall lang/perl5.8. Both /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 and /usr/local/bin/perl have a minute-fresh changed date. I've tried a rm /usr/local/bin/perl and then making perl a symlink to perl5.8.4, with the same problem. use.perl ports gives the same error. FreeBSD version is now 4.10-RELEASE. I installed the most recent release in may 2001, and have kept it updated since then using cvsup and the instructions on http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html (kernelupgrade and mergemaster). Hope anyone can gice me a clue on this issue. Thanks! -- Axel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:43:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB8916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:43:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outfbmx003.isp.belgacom.be (outfbmx003.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D120C43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:43:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (outmx021.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.202]) (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-FALLBACK-2.22) with ESMTP id i5TN5gJ6010937 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:42 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i5TN5SdU015347 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:28 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (64-22.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.22.64]) with ESMTP id i5TN5Pv3015315; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:25 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26617533; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:22 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en Subject: WinKey doesn't work in X.org? (was Re: Guide to x.org update?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:43:16 -0000 One difference I noticed, after switching to X.org, is that my WinKey doesn't work anymore. I used it a lot for custom keybindings in IceWM. Any clue, anyone? GH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A66016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1982543D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5TNkn46004607 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:46:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'FreeBSD-questions'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:41:34 -0500 Message-ID: <000201c45e32$a000cfc0$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:08 -0000 I've installed SASL(Cyrus) according to the instructions found in the handbook. I've removed all the proper entries in the relay-domains file, but I get the following error message now when I try to send mail: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Final test? Sent: 6/27/2004 9:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'that_guy@fakedomain.com' on 6/27/2004 9:33 PM 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. Yes, I did enable authentication within Outlook. Does anyone have any ideas what I missed? I followed the examples in the handbook EXACTLY. You can find it here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Thanks for your help. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1391916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73D043D48 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5TNjFL3004565 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:45:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'FreeBSD-questions'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:40:29 -0500 Message-ID: <000101c45e32$7a45d870$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:09 -0000 I've installed SASL(Cyrus) according to the instructions found in the handbook. I've removed all the proper entries in the relay-domains file, but I get the following error message now when I try to send mail: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Final test? Sent: 6/27/2004 9:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'that_guy@fakedomain.com' on 6/27/2004 9:33 PM 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. Yes, I did enable authentication within Outlook. Does anyone have any ideas what I missed? I followed the examples in the handbook EXACTLY. You can find it here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Thanks for your help. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9052316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406CF43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) with ESMTP id i5TNhkwR004538 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:43:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'FreeBSD-questions'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c45e32$55cbc590$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:09 -0000 I've installed SASL(Cyrus) according to the instructions found in the handbook. I've removed all the proper entries in the relay-domains file, but I get the following error message now when I try to send mail: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Final test? Sent: 6/27/2004 9:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'that_guy@fakedomain.com' on 6/27/2004 9:33 PM 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. Yes, I did enable authentication within Outlook. Does anyone have any ideas what I missed? I followed the examples in the handbook EXACTLY. You can find it here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Thanks for your help. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D9816A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD82543D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245])i5TN31bq004358 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:03:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: Eric Crist Organization: Secure Computing Networks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20040629041243.88558.qmail@web50702.mail.yahoo.com> <20040629081417.5009cf76.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629081417.5009cf76.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291801.03456.ecrist@secure-computing.net> Subject: Re: Mail list problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@secure-computing.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:10 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 07:14, Bill Moran wrote: > Yes, but front-door.secure-computing.net doesn't resolve > to anything. Well, I fixed it. We'll see if this gets to the list OK. -- Eric F Crist Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry, and the world WILL turn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF84516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E35243D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245])i5SNlvwn000340 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:47:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: Eric Crist Organization: Secure Computing Networks Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:45:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406281845.58207.ecrist@secure-computing.net> Subject: Cyrus SASL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@secure-computing.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:10 -0000 Hey all, My other message doesn't seem to have gone through, so I'll ask again. I followed the instruction to the letter from the documentation on the freebsd site for smtp auth via sendmail and cyrus-sasl. In order to get sendmail running, I had to delete a bunch of nearly blank lines from around line 80 to line 90 or so, then it booted just fine. I also had to edit rc.conf to include the following lines: sasl_pwcheck_enable="YES" sasl_pwcheck_program="/usr/local/sbin/pwcheck" saslauthd1_enable="YES" cyrus_pwcheck_enable="YES" Everything seems to have started just fine. So, I removed the corresponding lines in /etc/mail/relay-domains for my current host, to test the auth fuctionality. Without auth setup in my mail client (tried in both Outlook and Kmail), mail gets blocked, asking for auth. Trying it with both clients configured with the authentication settings, I get the same error. Is there something I'm missing. Adding the lines to rc.conf wasn't really in the handbook, but I found they needed to be added in order for a server restart to come back up correctly. TIA -- Eric F Crist Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry, and the world WILL turn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390BD16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC4643D1D for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5S2hWL9000274 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:43:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'FreeBSD-questions'" Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:41:22 -0500 Message-ID: <019e01c45cb9$704a7710$6401a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:11 -0000 I've installed SASL(Cyrus) according to the instructions found in the handbook. I've removed all the proper entries in the relay-domains file, but I get the following error message now when I try to send mail: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Final test? Sent: 6/27/2004 9:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'that_guy@fakedomain.com' on 6/27/2004 9:33 PM 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. Yes, I did enable authentication within Outlook. Does anyone have any ideas what I missed? I followed the examples in the handbook EXACTLY. You can find it here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Thanks for your help. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B4116A4D6 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A3243D46 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5TNmT0R004651 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:48:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'FreeBSD-questions'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:42:41 -0500 Message-ID: <000301c45e32$c71cddb0$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:37 -0000 I've installed SASL(Cyrus) according to the instructions found in the handbook. I've removed all the proper entries in the relay-domains file, but I get the following error message now when I try to send mail: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Final test? Sent: 6/27/2004 9:33 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'that_guy@fakedomain.com' on 6/27/2004 9:33 PM 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. Yes, I did enable authentication within Outlook. Does anyone have any ideas what I missed? I followed the examples in the handbook EXACTLY. You can find it here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Thanks for your help. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:48:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1664916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C643D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howardjp@well.com) Received: from well.com (well.com [206.14.209.5]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5TNmo90016667 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost) by well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i5TNmnBJ028209 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:48:49 -0700 (PDT) From: James Howard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040628, clamav-milter version 0.73d on smtp X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Routing problem in IPv4/IPSec VPN environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:48:51 -0000 (This message may reappear in the future, it was rejected by the lists from my webhost.) As a personal favor, I am building a VPN for a small business. I have chosen FreeBSD for this due to my greater familiarity. The project will consist of linking four sites, each with a FreeBSD system providing DHCP, NAT, and VPN services. I have built DHCP and NAT servers before, but the IPSec and VPN is new to me. Right now, the first two systems are nearly complete. The two machines are named goldengate and waltwhitman. Here's the IP config, currently: goldengate: external 192.168.1.101 internal 10.1.1.1 waltwhitman: external 192.168.1.102 internal 10.1.2.1 The external interfaces are in the reserved space because testing is taking place behind a cable/DSL router providing NAT services. The output of "gifconfig -a; ifconfig -a; netstat -rn" for each will be provided at the end of this message. IPSec, with Racoon, is properly exchanging keys. From goldengate, I can ping 10.1.2.1 and from waltwhitman I can ping 10.1.1.1. If a Windows computer is connected behind either system, they receive an IP (10.1.x.254, where x is the network number). The problem is, if behind the 10.1.2.1 firewall, I cannot ping 10.1.1.1 and vice-versa. I assume, at this point, this is some type of routing issue and not a problem with IPSec. This seems to be confirmed by the fact tracerouting to the local internal interface goes through the *other* internal interface first: waltwhitman$ ifconfig bge1; traceroute 10.1.2.1 bge1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=3 inet 10.1.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.2.255 inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe60:e508%bge1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:09:5b:60:e5:08 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) status: active traceroute to 10.1.2.1 (10.1.2.1), 64 hops max, 44 byte packets 1 10.1.1.1 (10.1.1.1) 0.848 ms 0.736 ms 0.783 ms 2 10.1.2.1 (10.1.2.1) 1.173 ms 1.262 ms 1.247 ms The other machine behaves identically, except the numbers are reversed. At this point, I have reached the limits of my knowledge. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, James Notes on the output: IPv6 info removed from netstat output. There is a third interface in WALTWHITMAN which may break off to a DMZ in the future. No descision has been made and won't be for some time. The interface was given the IP 172.16.1.1. GOLDENGATE: goldengate$ gifconfig -a; ifconfig -a; netstat -rn gif0: flags=8051 mtu 1280 inet 10.1.1.1 --> 10.1.2.1 netmask 0xffffffff inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe62:714e%gif0 prefixlen 64 physical address inet 192.168.1.101 --> 192.168.1.102 bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=3 inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe62:714e%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:09:5b:62:71:4e media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1 inet6 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe23:5b8d%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 192.168.1.101 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:b0:d0:23:5b:8d media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 gif0: flags=8051 mtu 1280 tunnel inet 192.168.1.101 --> 192.168.1.102 inet 10.1.1.1 --> 10.1.2.1 netmask 0xffffffff inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe62:714e%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.1.1 UGSc 3 6082 xl0 10.1.1/24 link#1 UC 2 0 bge0 10.1.1.1 00:09:5b:62:71:4e UHLW 0 306 lo0 10.1.1.254 link#1 UHLW 2 14933 bge0 10.1.2/24 10.1.2.0 UGSc 0 15578 xl0 10.1.2.1 10.1.1.1 UH 0 2060 gif0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 48 lo0 192.168.1 link#2 UC 3 0 xl0 192.168.1.1 00:0c:41:7f:8a:6e UHLW 4 2 xl0 1042 192.168.1.100 00:30:65:2e:ae:f7 UHLW 0 0 xl0 1100 192.168.1.101 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 192.168.1.102 00:b0:d0:a1:81:09 UHLW 3 13842 xl0 1054 WALTWHITMAN: waltwhitman$ gifconfig -a; ifconfig -a; netstat -rn gif0: flags=8051 mtu 1280 inet 10.1.2.1 --> 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe62:1ab2%gif0 prefixlen 64 physical address inet 192.168.1.102 --> 192.168.1.101 bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=3 inet 172.16.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.1.255 inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe62:1ab2%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:09:5b:62:1a:b2 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier bge1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=3 inet 10.1.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.2.255 inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe60:e508%bge1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:09:5b:60:e5:08 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) status: active xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1 inet6 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fea1:8109%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 192.168.1.102 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:b0:d0:a1:81:09 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 gif0: flags=8051 mtu 1280 tunnel inet 192.168.1.102 --> 192.168.1.101 inet 10.1.2.1 --> 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe62:1ab2%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.1.1 UGSc 1 1416 xl0 10.1.1/24 10.1.1.1 UGSc 0 9633 gif0 10.1.1.1 10.1.2.1 UH 1 1986 gif0 10.1.2/24 link#2 UC 2 0 bge1 10.1.2.1 00:09:5b:60:e5:08 UHLW 0 14 lo0 10.1.2.254 link#2 UHLW 2 883 bge1 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 48 lo0 172.16.1/24 link#1 UC 0 0 bge0 192.168.1 link#3 UC 2 0 xl0 192.168.1.1 00:0c:41:7f:8a:6e UHLW 3 2 xl0 192 192.168.1.101 00:b0:d0:23:5b:8d UHLW 5 12307 xl0 204 192.168.1.102 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 -- James P. Howard, II -- howardjp@vocito.com http://www.jameshoward.us/ -- 202-390-4933 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:50:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6746116A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:50:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB2843D49 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:50:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B09E69A39; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:50:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:50:25 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Gerard Samuel Message-Id: <20040629195025.549fe8f3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200406291646.28811.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> References: <200406292005.i5TK5nZ18158@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <200406291621.22848.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> <200406291646.28811.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:50:27 -0000 Gerard Samuel wrote: > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:21 pm, Gerard Samuel wrote: > > So Ill start using truncate() for now, and start investigating perl. > > Thanks.... > > > > As I was writing the previous email, I thought about combining find with php's > cli interface and came up with this "dirty" command (all in one line) -> > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec php -r '$f = file_get_contents("{}"); $h = > fopen("{}", "wb"); fwrite($h, trim($f)); fclose($h);' \; > > It did the job perfectly. Now _that's_ using the tools ... and the tools you know to boot! -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:51:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258C216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:51:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A2A43D1F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:51:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5TNpceI004733 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:51:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:44:59 -0500 Message-ID: <000401c45e33$19de0420$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: Sorry! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:51:45 -0000 Hey all! Sorry for the multiple posts. I was trying to get my mail server working again, and apparently I did. I just didn't happen to get the mail queue cleared before I did so. Sorry again. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 23:56:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB9516A509 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:56:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from et.endace.com (et.endace.com [219.88.101.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABACB43D4C for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:56:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@endace.com) Received: from muon.et.endace.com (muon.et.endace.com [192.168.64.11]) by et.endace.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5TNuDfY049897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:56:13 +1200 (NZST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0)i5TNuO33008266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:56:25 +1200 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:56:24 +1200 From: Richard Stevenson To: Eric Crist In-Reply-To: <000001c45e32$55cbc590$6501a8c0@Nomad> Message-ID: References: <000001c45e32$55cbc590$6501a8c0@Nomad> Comments: PGP Public Key on keyservers: Key ID FA6D9719 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: milter-gris/0.3.18 (et.endace.com [192.168.64.254]); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:56:13 +1200 X-Scanned-By: milter-gris/0.3.18 (muon.et.endace.com [192.168.64.11]); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:56:25 +1200 X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040611, clamav-milter version 0.72a on et.endace.com X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040618, clamav-milter version 0.72a on muon.et.endace.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: 'FreeBSD-questions' Subject: Re: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:56:27 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Eric Crist wrote: > I've installed SASL(Cyrus) according to the instructions found in the > handbook. I've removed all the proper entries in the relay-domains > file, but I get the following error message now when I try to send mail: > > 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. > Proper authentication required. What does it say in /var/log/maillog about these attempts? You might need to raise the Sendmail logging level (set LogLevel=14 in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf, restart Sendmail, and try again). Without better information, there's very little anyone can do to help. Cheers Richard -- Richard Stevenson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 00:04:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563B816A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:04:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beastie.flncs.com (ns1.flncs.com [204.0.142.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3966A43D45 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:04:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from moti@flncs.com) Received: (qmail 50143 invoked by uid 1003); 29 Jun 2004 23:38:45 -0000 Received: from moti@flncs.com by beastie.flncs.com by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 Clear:RC:0(68.157.93.122):SA:0(0.0/4.0):. Processed in 2.719299 secs); 29 Jun 2004 23:38:45 -0000 Received: from adsl-068-157-093-122.sip.bct.bellsouth.net (HELO xpm) (moti@flncs.com@68.157.93.122) by beastie.flncs.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 23:38:42 -0000 Message-ID: <00bb01c45e35$b96295e0$1401a8c0@xpm> From: "Moti Levy" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:03:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on beastie.flncs.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Freebsd 5.2.1 , poweredge 1750 amr and messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:04:38 -0000 Anyone using poweredge 1750 's with raid ? FreeBSD installed smoothly but if i remove a drive and the array is degraded , i dont see any messages in the logs . any idea' s ? Thanks Moti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 00:05:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7E416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:05:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFD943D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:05:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: from speck.techno.pagans (c-24-21-232-241.client.comcast.net [24.21.232.241]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938802A41A; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spud (one0.techno.pagans [172.21.42.10]) by speck.techno.pagans (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C3A926; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:03:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:04:50 -0700 Message-ID: <000201c45e35$e00f6740$0a2a15ac@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <20040629160146.GF609@cicely12.cicely.de> Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Can I access a USB device that has no driver attached? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:05:28 -0000 > From: Bernd Walter [mailto:ticso@cicely12.cicely.de]=20 > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 06:22:54PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > I have a UPS with a USB interface. There isn't a specific UPS = driver in > > FreeBSD beyond uhid. If I were to connect the UPS's interface port > > without having a driver attached, is it still possible to talk to = the > > device in some way? I ask because I'm helping get nut = (sysutils/nut) > > working for USB UPSes under FreeBSD. >=20 > Maybe your question is outdated, but since noone answered yet. >=20 > - You can enhance our uhid driver > - You can write your own driver > - You can do raw control transfers via /dev/usb* > - You can also do raw control and pipe trandfers if ugen takes the > device > - You can use libusb for portable (Linux, ...) device access via ugen Wow, I'd given up on getting an answer for this one. Here's the = situation right now: With some custom patches provided some helpful folks, I've been able to = get nut's newhidups driver to compile, run, and talk to the device without crashing. As newhidups uses libusb, it is necessary to attach the USB = with ugen. In debugging mode, the newhidups driver dumps the entire usage = table data for the device. Unfortunately, APC irrationally believes the = format of this data to be their intellectual property and thus refuses to make it available, even under NDA. APC will, however, send, at no cost to the customer, serial cables to be used with any UPS that comes with a USB = cable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 00:28:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9053616A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:28:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF3243D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:28:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq56-155.dial.allstream.net [216.123.140.219]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 350135D7C; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:27:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:27:40 -0400 From: epilogue@allstream.net To: Geert Hendrickx Message-Id: <20040629202740.30611215@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WinKey doesn't work in X.org? (was Re: Guide to x.org update?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:28:03 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:22 +0200 Geert Hendrickx wrote: > One difference I noticed, after switching to X.org, is that my WinKey > doesn't work anymore. I used it a lot for custom keybindings in IceWM. > > Any clue, anyone? by your question, it sounds as though you didn't set your custom key bindings in XFree directly, rather you did it via IceWM. this is just a guess, but you might want to reinstall Ice so that it compiles with the X.org libraries. (anyone ?) > GH > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 00:47:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1181D16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:47:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blair.epifora.com (blair.epifora.com [207.139.168.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2ED443D54 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drvince@anonymnet.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.epifora.com [127.0.0.1]) by blair.epifora.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97D8165935 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.anonymnet.net ([205.205.52.19]) by localhost (blair.epifora.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25798-02 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:47:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.anonymnet.net (mail.anonymnet.net [205.205.52.19]) by mail.anonymnet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3034F165939 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:47:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "DrVince" To: "freebsd-questions" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:47:36 -0500 Message-Id: <20040630003738.M60971@anonymnet.net> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.30 20040131 X-OriginatingIP: 205.205.52.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Smarter ACL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:47:21 -0000 Hi, is there a way to make ACL smarter about mkdir? When I set the default on a directory, it works fine and the files in it gets the right perms. But the subdirectories doesn't get their execution perms. So those dirs are unusable. My standard commands for user's web roots (Apache running under www:www): setfacl -d -m u::rw-,g::r--,o::---,g:www:r--,g:staff:r--,g:wheel:rw- www/ setfacl -m u::rwx,g::r-x,o::---,g:www:r-x,g:staff:r-x,g:wheel:rwx www/ setfacl -m u::rw-,g::r--,o::---,g:www:r--,g:staff:r--,g:wheel:rw- www/* setfacl -m u::rw-,g::r--,o::---,g:www:r--,g:staff:r--,g:wheel:rw- www/.ht* DrVince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 00:56:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E762616A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:56:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698D443D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5U0uADK005033; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:56:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'Richard Stevenson'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:53:54 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c45e3c$ba63fc20$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SASL and Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:56:29 -0000 How, more specifically, do I enable TLS/SSL in sendmail, and where does the 'p' go? Thanks for your help. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Stevenson [mailto:richard@endace.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:48 PM > To: Eric Crist > Subject: RE: SASL and Sendmail > > > Hi > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Eric Crist wrote: > > > Here is output at loglevel 20 on a denied mail: > > This is your problem: > > > Jun 29 19:09:50 grog sm-mta[4868]: AUTH: available mech=LOGIN PLAIN > > ANONYMOUS, allowed mech=EXTERNAL GSSAPI KERBEROS_V4 > DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 > > The intersection of (available mech) and (allowed mech) is null. You > should probably add PLAIN and LOGIN to the TRUST_AUTH_MECH in > your .mc > file, regenerate the .cf and restart Sendmail. Those two > mechanisms are > susceptible to sniffing, so it's probably a good idea to > enable STARTTLS > in Sendmail as well, and add 'p' to the AuthOptions in your > .cf as well. > > I hope this helps. > > Cheers > > Richard > > -- > Richard Stevenson > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 01:07:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627B916A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:07:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C01643D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:07:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@chvlva.adelphia.net) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.73.175]) by mta11.adelphia.netESMTP <20040630010740.REFG13168.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:07:40 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18A405876; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:08:50 -0400 From: Parv To: Joachim Dagerot Message-ID: <20040630010850.GB28292@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Joachim Dagerot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200406291318.i5TDIOv19604@thunder.trej.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406291318.i5TDIOv19604@thunder.trej.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't install XVID from ports tree, can someone understand the error message? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:07:53 -0000 in message <200406291318.i5TDIOv19604@thunder.trej.net>, wrote Joachim Dagerot thusly... > > I ran make install in /usr/ports/multimedia/xvid and it compiled for > quite some time and then suddenly the rows below came up. > > What is wrong and how can I solve the problems? > > > gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `reload1.c', needed by > `reload1.o'. Stop. > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc' > gmake[1]: *** [stage3_build] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc' ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc33. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > *** Error code 1 The problem is not w/ xvid port but w/ gcc33 during bootstraping. Error message seems incomplete in addition. Could you please include some more lines above the error & report it as being error in lang/gcc33 so that others could help you better? - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 01:14:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAC716A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:14:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6E343D48; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:14:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 60EA672DF2; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDB472DB5; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:13:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Kenneth Culver In-Reply-To: <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Message-ID: <20040629181248.S54069@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:14:19 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote: > It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure > what the > laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD, > it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after > already > booting an OS. Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode. Thats one of the processor's features. :-) You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of course. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 01:28:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764C916A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:28:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf11.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf11.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E061B43D1D; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:28:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip18.cluster1.charter.net (mxip18a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.148])i5U1SMnn026227; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:28:24 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO gamez) (68.189.127.165) by mxip18.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2004 21:27:34 -0400 Message-Id: <391q2v$239uih@mxip18a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.81R,139,1083556800"; d="scan'208"; a="70580817:sNHT14113202" From: "Remi" To: "'Kenneth Culver'" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:27:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRd5DcB4/c3WmCyQ+ev0bXm4rIsSQAXOzNw cc: 'Brooks Davis' cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: 'David O'Brien' Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:28:44 -0000 Just to clarify exactly what you mean. I can the x86 version of BSD with no changes to the BIOS, jumpers or anything on an AMD64? Sorry in advanced if this is a stupid question, Ive never dealt with anything but x86 -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Culver [mailto:culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 AM To: Remi Cc: 'Brooks Davis'; 'Michal Pasternak'; questions@freebsd.org; current@freebsd.org; 'David O'Brien' Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD Quoting Remi : > Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I > wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they > say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to > be changed) So now I come to a cross roads: > 1. Buy a 1.7 Centrino > 2. Buy a P4 2.8GHz w/ HT > 3. Buy the AMD64 laptop > > What is the state of the AMD64 version of BSD? Other than that im leaning > toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD > working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? > It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure what the laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD, it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after already booting an OS. Ken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 02:36:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C56016A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 02:36:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021F543D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 02:36:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) i5U2aDS7005568 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:36:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:30:39 -0500 Message-ID: <000301c45e4a$3edd0700$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: OPIEKEY and ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 02:36:35 -0000 Hey all, I can't, for the life of me, remember what I did to get opie to work when you su to root. I have it working on one of three servers, but can't get it to work on the other two. Any advice would be great! Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:09:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B162016A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:09:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EA343D46 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:09:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9E369A39; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:08:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:08:17 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Charles Swiger Message-Id: <20040629230817.0f6d230e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1133CD52-CA07-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040629153855.300b3888.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1133CD52-CA07-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:09:15 -0000 Charles Swiger wrote: > >> Can you reproduce by moving ftp to a different port #? (Perhaps some > >> quality-of-service thingy is providing different bandwidth by port...) > > > > I haven't tried that, but I forgot to mention that a Debian box located > > right next to the problem box (on the same network) gets speeds equal > > to what would be expected. To me, that ruled out QOS, routing and > > other > > beyond-my-control Internet problems. Again, I'm happy to be corrected > > if there's something here I'm not aware of. > > Well, that does tend to rule out a bunch of issues. Have you tried > changing the MTU of the FreeBSD box down to 1400 or so (or even 512), > just to see whether that does anything? OK. I've had a bit of success here ... By setting the MTU down to ~650, I get the best performance I've seen with this setup (about 27k/sec ... which isn't too bad) I set "SocketOptions maxseg 650" in the proftpd.conf file for now, which seems to help a good bit. But I'm really confused. Why does reducing the MTU improve performance? I would have thought it would hurt performance by increasing the # of packets, thus increasing overhead. I did some captures using Ethereal, and I'm seeing a weird pause (with the MTU at the default) where the client will send three packets, there'll be a pause, then the ack comes back, then three packets, pause, ack ... You'd think that reducing the MTU would make this worse because there's less data in the three packets, thus more pauses, but when I drop the MTU, the pause reduces significantly. There's something with TCP going on here that I don't understand. (Thanks a LOT for your assistance so far!) -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:09:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A9616A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40B3F43D46 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x71so386095cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.24.8 with SMTP id 8mr16576rnx; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:09:26 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20040629195025.549fe8f3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200406292005.i5TK5nZ18158@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <200406291621.22848.fbsd-questions@trini0.org> <20040629195025.549fe8f3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> cc: Gerard Samuel cc: jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Means of trimming files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:09:54 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:50:25 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > Gerard Samuel wrote: > > > find ./ -name '*.php' -exec php -r '$f = file_get_contents("{}"); $h = > > fopen("{}", "wb"); fwrite($h, trim($f)); fclose($h);' \; > > > > It did the job perfectly. $ perl -0 -pi -e 's/\n+$//s' *.php will edit each .php file and replace it too. If you want a backup, then $ perl -0 -p -i.bak -e 's/\n+$//s' *.php Cheers Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:37:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FDF16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:37:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66C7843D2F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:37:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lashby@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so1515640cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.38 with SMTP id m38mr27823rne; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:36:19 -0500 From: Logan Ashby To: dave In-Reply-To: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:37:02 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400, dave wrote: > Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus > scanners failed, considering backups > Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need > "type:name" form instead of: "#" > Jun 28 21:35:02 zeus postfix/master[68635]: warning: process > /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 68669 exit status 1 > Jun 28 21:35:02 zeus postfix/master[68635]: warning: > /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling My guess would be a misplaced comment in main.cf or master.cf. Can you post the relevant lines with a couple of lines of surrounding context? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:41:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042AC16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:41:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D997F43D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 1087 invoked by uid 513); 30 Jun 2004 03:46:49 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.434107 secs); 30 Jun 2004 03:46:49 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 03:46:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:42:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Thomas Moyer In-Reply-To: <40E1A6A2.6060001@atlanticbb.net> Message-ID: <20040630051626.Y7597@pukruppa.net> References: <40E1A6A2.6060001@atlanticbb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: home directory questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:41:53 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Thomas Moyer wrote: > Is it possible to setup a file server with FreeBSD and use that as a home > partition and also share other files on a small network? > What kinds of utilities would I need to run? I imagine NFS for *nix clients > and Samba for MS clients. Also possibly share printers with this computer as > well. CUPS for that. > Also what kind a minimum system reccomendations does anyone have? This cannot be predicted as long as you don't know what kind of setup you want to run (simple file server, domain controller ...), what kind of people are going to use it (people at work will kill you if their files aren't available, especially that kind who always forget their passwords) and how big the traffic on your server is. So I would recommend to test your setup privately on some old machine that can install FreeBSD and then ask again for hardware requirements. Regards, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:52:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F7816A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:52:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DC3B43D3F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:52:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mazakolo@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 7015 invoked by uid 65534); 30 Jun 2004 03:52:49 -0000 Received: from 68-232-238-218.losaca.adelphia.net (EHLO [192.168.0.3]) (68.232.238.218) by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 05:52:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14563771 From: Jonas Mazakolo To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:52:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> Subject: Thunderbird and Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:52:59 -0000 Hello, I find thunderbird to be my favorite email program, but unfortunately I have already set up good spam filters through postfix/procmail/fetchmail and I wish to keep that. I read that some have set up IMAP servers so thunderbird can access it. Is that possible? How can I set up a very simple IMAP (which ones? dovecot? cyrus? courier?) server? Could someone help or point me to documents that tells me how to set it up (a standalone IMAP server with no connection to outside internet, just on my box? Thank you, Jonas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:58:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF7E16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:58:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E3E743D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:58:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zam4ever@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x43so532306cwb for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.98.74 with SMTP id v74mr1067072cwb; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:58:15 +0800 From: zam4ever To: Feczak Szabolcs In-Reply-To: <20040629155056.GA45900@nmi.rulez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040629155056.GA45900@nmi.rulez.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall on cdrom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:58:32 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:50:56 +0200, Feczak Szabolcs wrote: > > Any similar projects like closedbsd out there ? NetBoz Firewall http://www.netboz.net/ Best regards, zam4ever From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:58:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C5316A4CF for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:58:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdhacker.org (h71.52.102.166.ip.alltel.net [166.102.52.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB6A43D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:58:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uidzero@one-arm.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bsdhacker.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4774491 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:57:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from bsdhacker.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cvsup.bsdhacker.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83623-03 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:57:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (bsd.bsdhacker.org [192.168.0.2]) by bsdhacker.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BDE351 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:57:08 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <40E23A77.8040405@one-arm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:58:47 -0500 From: uidzero User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040629) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions References: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bsdhacker.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird and Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:58:49 -0000 Jonas Mazakolo wrote: >Hello, > >I find thunderbird to be my favorite email program, but unfortunately I >have already set up good spam filters through >postfix/procmail/fetchmail and I wish to keep that. I read that some >have set up IMAP servers so thunderbird can access it. Is that >possible? How can I set up a very simple IMAP (which ones? dovecot? >cyrus? courier?) server? Could someone help or point me to documents >that tells me how to set it up (a standalone IMAP server with no >connection to outside internet, just on my box? > >Thank you, > >Jonas >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I installed Postfix with courier-imap /usr/ports/mail/courier-imap/ Works great. Michael -- Michael D. Whities uidzero@one-arm.com http://www.one-arm.com -- There are four colors of hats to watch for: Black, White, Grey, and Red. The meanings are: Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 04:12:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C03C16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web50304.mail.yahoo.com (web50304.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57A243D45 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murcielako@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040630041231.3507.qmail@web50304.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.116.93.197] by web50304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:12:31 CDT Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:12:31 -0500 (CDT) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Jorge=20Mario=20G.?=" To: Jim Durham , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200406262228.34997.durham@jcdurham.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: Robert Storey Subject: Re: Centrino - Made for Microsoft Windows XP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:12:53 -0000 Hi there I have a dell D600 and FreeBSD works with no problem I think I had some problems with ACPI but then I fixed that prob. I dont have the intel wireless card I have the broadcom one and it works very nice with the patches from the Evil project (aka DNISulator) Jorge ===== _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 04:15:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECC416A4DA for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:15:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (user204.net795.mo.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE9043D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:15:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-freebsdquestions@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 50827 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 04:15:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 04:15:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:15:44 -0500 From: Gary To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> References: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Thunderbird and Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:15:53 -0000 Hi Jonas, --On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 08:52:47 PM -0700 Jonas Mazakolo wrote: > I find thunderbird to be my favorite email program, but > unfortunately I have already set up good spam filters through > postfix/procmail/fetchmail and I wish to keep that. I read that some > have set up IMAP servers so thunderbird can access it. Is that > possible? Of course. > How can I set up a very simple IMAP (which ones? dovecot? > cyrus? courier?) server? Could someone help or point me to documents > that tells me how to set it up (a standalone IMAP server with no > connection to outside internet, just on my box? Consider the type of mail format you wish. Courier uses Maildir format, Dovecot uses both mbox or Maildir format, etc... I am partial to a newer Maildir format type IMAPs server, binc at http://www.bincimap.org It is 1000s of lines of code lighter than the others, very fast, and works very well. I have it on 5 production boxes currently ... without problems. It is very easy to set up, and runs well on FreeBSD. -- Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 04:34:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B8616A4CF for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:34:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5189643D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BfWnU-0002sf-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:34:12 +0200 Received: from [217.1.218.151] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BfWnS-0005Vf-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:34:11 +0200 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5U4Y2Yf006652verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:34:05 +0200 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i5U3EcRP004762 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:14:38 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:14:38 +0200 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040630031437.GA3781@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20040629080957.D48091F1FA@coral.mweb.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629080957.D48091F1FA@coral.mweb.co.za> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: Re: sendmail +userdb + Release 4.10p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:34:46 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, vikashb@mweb.co.za wrote: > Greeting, > > How do i translate any outgoing mail from vix@wormhole.pcs to > indicate vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > > I have tried the genericstable as well as the userdb and > no luck attached is my configs, please assist. > > I've tried the config setups below and the the From address > gets translated to vix@bcx.co.za and not vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > > hostname.mc > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~` > dnl define(`confUSERDB_SPEC',/etc/mail/userdb.db) > Cwwormhole.pcs > MASQUERADE_AS(`bcx.co.za')dnl > FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl > FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl > FEATURE(nocanonify)dnl > FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable')dnl > GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains')dnl > dnlFEATURE(nodns)dnl > define(`SMART_HOST', `172.21.63.2') > Dmwormhole.pcs > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',`wormhole.pcs')dnl > define(`confDELIVERY_MODE',`deferred')dnl > MAILER(local) > MAILER(smtp) > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > wormhole# cat genericstable > vix vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > vikashb vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From cf.README: [...] genericstable This feature will cause unqualified addresses (i.e., without a domain) and addresses with a domain listed in class {G} to be looked up in a map and turned into another ("generic") form, which can change both the domain name and the user name. Notice: if you use an MSP (as it is default starting with 8.12), the MTA will only receive qualified addresses from the MSP (as required by the RFCs). Hence you need to add your domain to class {G}. This feature is similar to the userdb functionality. [...] So in your genericstable try to add qualified addresses: vix@wormhole.pcs vikash.badal@bcx.co.za Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 04:57:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D0E16A4CF for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:57:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2862C43D53 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5U4v8lo027522; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000601c45e5d$5793a5c0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: "Logan Ashby" References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:47:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:57:30 -0000 Hi, Thanks for your reply. I thought of a misplaced comment in postfix, but two things lead me away from that. Firstly, this only occurs when i bring amavisd in to the picture. And secondly, postfix check does not report any syntax errors. I'm getting tempted to post these files somewhere, this problem is extremely elusive. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 05:06:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4FD16A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:06:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E7D43D54; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id 77F8B10A; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:17:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hachigo (hachigo [66.92.171.91]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:17:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20040630011735.8mv40og88c4goko8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:17:35 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Doug White References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20040629181248.S54069@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040629181248.S54069@carver.gumbysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Remi cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:06:57 -0000 Quoting Doug White : > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote: > >> It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure >> what the >> laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD, >> it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after >> already >> booting an OS. > > Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode. > Thats one of the processor's features. :-) > > You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of course. > Yeah you can run x86 but you cant' go into regular 32 bit mode that's all. Ken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 05:09:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CF616A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:09:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6F743D41; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id 19EE210A; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:19:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hachigo (hachigo [66.92.171.91]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:19:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20040630011948.szgkcoo0c4wwcow0@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:19:48 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Remi References: <391q2v$239uih@mxip18a.cluster1.charter.net> In-Reply-To: <391q2v$239uih@mxip18a.cluster1.charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: 'Brooks Davis' cc: 'Michal Pasternak' cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: 'David O'Brien' Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:09:27 -0000 Quoting Remi : > Just to clarify exactly what you mean. I can the x86 version of BSD with no > changes to the BIOS, jumpers or anything on an AMD64? > > Sorry in advanced if this is a stupid question, Ive never dealt with > anything but x86 > Yeah, no changes anywhere. I have my machine set to triple-boot. First Hard drive is windows, second is x86 freebsd, 3rd is amd64 freebsd. I can boot each of the x86 OS's just like my computer was a normal x86, and I can boot the amd64 with no bios or jumper changes. Ken From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 05:29:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D3916A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:29:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web3.acecape.com (web3.acecape.com [66.114.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD55143D3F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:29:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wrivera@acedsl.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by web3.acecape.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i5U5StEs029494 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:28:55 -0400 Received: from p86-35.acedsl.com (p86-35.acedsl.com [66.114.86.35]) by www.acedsl.com (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:28:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1088573335.40e24f972bcd2@www.acedsl.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:28:55 -0400 From: wrivera@acedsl.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 66.114.86.35 Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:29:19 -0000 I recently install freebsd 5.2.1, which seemed to go well. But lately my system has been locking up and rebooting out or the blue. I have included the error that is displayed each time my system locks. Jun 29 20:37:09 candice syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: fault virtual address = 0xc5f12321 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: fault code = supervisor read, page not present Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0694770 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: stack pointer = 0x10:0xddd77a1c Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: frame pointer = 0x10:0xddd77a28 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: current process = 21866 (devinfo) Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: trap number = 12 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: panic: page fault Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: cpuid = 0; Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: syncing disks, buffers remaining... 3428 3428 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 If anyone has any idea why this is happening I would really appreciate your help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 05:53:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9904A16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:53:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D35D43D45 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:53:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd2@c2i.net) Received: from tove (la3sg.net [217.13.29.172]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9553EFE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:54:03 +0200 (MEST) From: "Kjell Midtseter" To: Matthew Seaman Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:53:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <40E2717F.11339.5FEAA4@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20040626094422.GA73314@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting a disk read only X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:53:47 -0000 On 26 Jun 2004 at 10:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:38:28AM +0200, MICSKO Viktor wrote: > > > Is it possible to setting a *whole* disk read only? I mean the way linux > > does it with "hdparm -r 1 device". So adding an -o ro parameter to mount > > isn't enough, I want to be sure that the disk is unmodified. > > > > (I have to access an existing raid of 8 disks using vinum without any > > modified bit, because of the highly sensitive data. Any idea doing this > > absolutely securely is welcome too) > > Hmmm... SCSI disks can be physically jumpered to be read-only. I > should think that ATA drives can be treated the same way. Consult the > manufacturers' data sheets for details. > Some time ago there was an article in the Elektor Magazine. They broke a line in the ATA cable and brought it to a switch on the front, with a pullup resistor on the disk side. The switch was labeled 'normal operation' and 'read only' Could be the hard way to do it. Literally. Kjell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 07:36:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A28116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server1.web-mania.com (server1.web-mania.com [193.22.244.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A21843D3F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:36:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@arameus.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by server1.web-mania.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i5U7ZtG16150; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:35:55 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:35:55 +0100 Message-Id: <200406300735.i5U7ZtG16150@server1.web-mania.com> X-Authentication-Warning: server1.web-mania.com: www set sender to list@arameus.net using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from 212.159.95.35 (auth. user list@arameus.net@pop3.arameus.net) by www.arameus.net with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:35:55 +0000 X-IlohaMail-Blah: list@arameus.net X-IlohaMail-Method: mail() [mem] X-IlohaMail-Dummy: moo X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.12 (On: www.arameus.net) From: Edd Bounce-To: Edd Errors-To: Edd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hanging on shutdown X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:36:50 -0000 Has anyone had any problems with thier (x86) machines taking ages to shutdown after the syncing buffers stage? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 07:39:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E52316A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:39:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53302.mail.yahoo.com (web53302.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14BB743D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:39:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from non_secure@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040630073904.89140.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.196.243.239] by web53302.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:39:04 PDT Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:39:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Joe Schmoe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: max concurrent scp sessions - and testing methodology for them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:39:23 -0000 I have read several documents on the number of concurrent https sessions a FreeBSD system is capable of. However, I wonder how well this relates to how many ssh sessions (scp file transfers, specifically) that a FreeBSD server can handle. Can anyone throw out some basic numbers for this ? Assuming a 1ghz p3 and 2gigs of RAM, and assuming that everyone is transferring a totally different file. (so there is no amount of cache hits - everything comes straight off the drives) I would think the major bottleneck would be disk - you would start chugging the disks far before you used up all the CPU on a 1ghz p3 ... but what is the second bottleneck ? Is it cpu, or is it ram (or mbufs, etc.) Would it be a reasonable test to just start up scp sessions from the machine to itself and then divide the number of sessions you can acceptably create by the number 2 ? Or is this somehow a flawed test ? Any additional comments (kernel tunes, settings, war stories) are greatly appreciated. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 08:12:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC24316A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:12:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2B243D55 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i5U8AFYn076671 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:10:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <40E27567.8060506@circlesquared.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:10:15 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Question List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make clean all installed ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:12:09 -0000 I'm sure I saw recently on this list that it's possible to: #cd /usr/ports #make clean somethingorother and clean just installed ports. A straight make clean in the root of the ports tree takes rather a long time. But I can't seem to find the post anywhere. If this isn't the product of my feverish imagination, I'd be grateful for a reminder. TIA Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 08:14:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA2216A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:14:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A854443D2F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:14:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA50106873; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:14:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E27656.4040607@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:14:14 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Logan Ashby References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: dave cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:14:37 -0000 Logan Ashby wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400, dave wrote: > > >>Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus >>scanners failed, considering backups >>Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need >>"type:name" form instead of: "#" >>Jun 28 21:35:02 zeus postfix/master[68635]: warning: process >>/usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 68669 exit status 1 >>Jun 28 21:35:02 zeus postfix/master[68635]: warning: >>/usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling > > > My guess would be a misplaced comment in main.cf or master.cf. Can > you post the relevant lines with a couple of lines of surrounding > context? I would agree with Logan here, There is an typo perhaps below the amavis statement in your smtp_recipients option (or however it was called ;-)) Could you show us those lines? (They dont contain any privileged information imho so it can be safely done) Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 08:17:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A8116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:17:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jellyfish.mweb.co.za (jellyfish.mweb.co.za [196.2.50.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92F343D4C for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:17:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vikashb@mweb.co.za) Received: by jellyfish.mweb.co.za (Postfix, from userid 501) id A70B221503; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:17:22 +0200 (SAST) Received: from Debug (air.mweb.co.za [196.2.53.154]) by jellyfish.mweb.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id 931C3212C8 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:17:22 +0200 (SAST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: vikashb@mweb.co.za Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:17:19 SAST X-Posting-IP: 196.29.130.223 X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.2.19 Message-Id: <20040630081722.931C3212C8@jellyfish.mweb.co.za> Subject: Re: sendmail +userdb + Release 4.10p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:17:39 -0000 Greetings, > > hostname.mc > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~` > > dnl define(`confUSERDB_SPEC',/etc/mail/userdb.db) > > Cwwormhole.pcs > > MASQUERADE_AS(`bcx.co.za')dnl > > FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl > > FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl > > FEATURE(nocanonify)dnl > > FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable')dnl > > GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains')dnl > > dnlFEATURE(nodns)dnl > > define(`SMART_HOST', `172.21.63.2') > > Dmwormhole.pcs > > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',`wormhole.pcs')dnl > > define(`confDELIVERY_MODE',`deferred')dnl > > MAILER(local) > > MAILER(smtp) > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > wormhole# cat genericstable > > vix vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > > vikashb vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > From cf.README: > [...] > genericstable This feature will cause unqualified addresses > (i.e., without > a domain) and addresses with a domain listed in > class {G} > to be looked up in a map and turned into > another ("generic") > form, which can change both the domain name and > the user name. > Notice: if you use an MSP (as it is default > starting with > 8.12), the MTA will only receive qualified > addresses from the > MSP (as required by the RFCs). Hence you need > to add your > domain to class {G}. This feature is similar > to the userdb > functionality. > [...] > > So in your genericstable try to add qualified addresses: > > vix@wormhole.pcs vikash.badal@bcx.co.za > Tried that, still the same, domain name translates but username does not. Thanks --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using MWEB Airmail. JUST LIKE THAT http://airmail.mweb.co.za/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 08:35:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D146C16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:35:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A480243D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq56-155.dial.allstream.net [216.123.140.219]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 92C505D0B; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:34:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:33:46 -0400 From: epilogue@allstream.net To: Peter Risdon Message-Id: <20040630043346.67a54eb3@localhost> In-Reply-To: <40E27567.8060506@circlesquared.com> References: <40E27567.8060506@circlesquared.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Question List Subject: Re: make clean all installed ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:35:00 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:10:15 +0100 Peter Risdon wrote: > I'm sure I saw recently on this list that it's possible to: > > #cd /usr/ports > #make clean somethingorother > > and clean just installed ports. A straight make clean in the root of the > ports tree takes rather a long time. > > But I can't seem to find the post anywhere. If this isn't the product of > my feverish imagination, I'd be grateful for a reminder. i seem to recall having seen it in an onlamp article. you may also have seen it there. just in case you're actually considering cleaning-up that way, you can save yourself a _LOT_ of time by installing the portupgrade suite of tools then simply... portsclean -C > > TIA > > Peter. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 08:36:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D5B16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:36:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.tpgi.com.au (mail.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9D643D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agh@tpg.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (220-244-72-6.tpgi.com.au [220.244.72.6]) by mail.tpgi.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5U8ZEGE022879; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:35:15 +1000 From: "Alastair G. Hogge" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:35:16 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406300735.i5U7ZtG16150@server1.web-mania.com> In-Reply-To: <200406300735.i5U7ZtG16150@server1.web-mania.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406301835.16228.agh@tpg.com.au> X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed cc: Edd Subject: Re: Hanging on shutdown X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:36:02 -0000 On Wednesday 30 June 2004 17:35, Edd wrote: > Has anyone had any problems with thier (x86) machines taking ages to > shutdown after the syncing buffers stage? Yes I have. There was also a thread already discussing this somewhere on the current or questions mailing lists. A proposed solution, which worked for me and others was to run sync, wait X amount of time, and run sync again then shutdown. -Alastair From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 08:56:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED6B16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:56:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.sch.bme.hu (kaa.sch.bme.hu [152.66.208.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311AB43D2F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tamas@bazmag.hu) Received: by lists.sch.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 102) id 64074858239; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ural14.sch.bme.hu [152.66.211.76]) by lists.sch.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7AA858220; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E28056.4020209@bazmag.hu> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:56:54 +0200 From: MEZEI Tamas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonas Mazakolo References: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird and Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:56:43 -0000 > cyrus? courier?) server? Could someone help or point me to documents > that tells me how to set it up (a standalone IMAP server with no www.postfix.org has some nice docs. Or, you could just use google and search for the server of your needs. I used courier-imap, and it's working nicely. UW-imap just sucks (performance and the mbox-way of IMAP, not too cool ;) Btw. if you're planning to *move* from mbox-stlye mailboxes to Maildir boxes, don't forget to convert the users' mailboxes with mb2md.pl (search google and follow the instructions). I've heard about dovecot but just after I set courier up (that was a 5-minute procedure). I think the normal-base-whatever-you-call-it procmail cannot do anything with Maildirs. If I'm wrong, tell me. Tamas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 09:37:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CD416A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from profi.kharkov.ua (as-0-22.ar36-1s.kharkov.ukrtel.net [195.5.17.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CA243D49; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@profi.kharkov.ua) Received: by profi.kharkov.ua (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B18A521E5; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:38:11 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:38:11 +0300 From: Gregory Edigarov To: squid-users@squid-cache.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040630093811.GA828@profi.kharkov.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:37:37 -0000 squid-users@squid-cache.org,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,freebsd-net@freebsd.org,freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Bcc: Subject: PPP Multilink, FreeBSD, Squid Reply-To: Hello, I have Squid-2.5 running on FreeBSD 5-Current. We have 2 ppp links, and use them in multilink mode, through userlevel ppp. If one or both links fail and then come up, say, if I just turn the modem power off and on all the web browsing becomes very slow squid. It takes forever for squid to show a page which, in a normal conditions, would take only a few seconds. Pings to those sites I am trying to open are just fine. Taking squid down and then up have no effect. The only thing help is rebooting the whole system. Is there anything I can do? -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ profi.kharkov.ua Systems Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 09:42:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041F516A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:42:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from profi.kharkov.ua (as-0-22.ar36-1s.kharkov.ukrtel.net [195.5.17.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901AC43D46; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@profi.kharkov.ua) Received: by profi.kharkov.ua (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E2059222D; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:43:14 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:43:14 +0300 From: Gregory Edigarov To: squid-users@squid-cache.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040630094314.GA1016@profi.kharkov.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Squid, FreeBSD, Multilink PPP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:42:30 -0000 Hello, I have Squid-2.5 running on FreeBSD 5-Current. We have 2 ppp links, and use them in multilink mode, through userlevel ppp. If one or both links fail and then come up, say, if I just turn the modem power off and on all the web browsing becomes very slow squid. It takes forever for squid to show a page which, in a normal conditions, would take only a few seconds. Pings to those sites I am trying to open are just fine. Taking squid down and then up have no effect. The only thing help is rebooting the whole system. Is there anything I can do? -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ profi.kharkov.ua Systems Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 10:15:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D216416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:15:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web3.acecape.com (web3.acecape.com [66.114.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC8043D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:15:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wrivera@acedsl.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by web3.acecape.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i5UAEmSY013619 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:14:48 -0400 Received: from p86-35.acedsl.com (p86-35.acedsl.com [66.114.86.35]) by www.acedsl.com (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:14:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1088590488.40e2929886a60@www.acedsl.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:14:48 -0400 From: wrivera@acedsl.com To: FreeBSD Question List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 66.114.86.35 Subject: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:15:03 -0000 I recently installed freebsd 5.2.1, which seemed to go well. But lately my system has been locking up and rebooting. I have included the error that is displayed each time my system locks. Jun 29 20:37:09 candice syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: fault virtual address        = 0xc5f12321 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: fault code                = supervisor read, page not present Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: instruction pointer        = 0x8:0xc0694770 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: stack pointer                = 0x10:0xddd77a1c Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: frame pointer                = 0x10:0xddd77a28 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: code segment                = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: current process                = 21866 (devinfo) Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: trap number                = 12 Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: panic: page fault Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: cpuid = 0; Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: Jun 29 20:37:09 candice kernel: syncing disks, buffers remaining... 3428 3428 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 3427 342 7 3427 3427 3427 3427 Does anyone have an idea why this is happening? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 10:45:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9E116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:45:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sffwd0.suedfactoring.de (port-212-202-224-251.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.224.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB06743D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:45:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de) Received: from pcs28.suedfactoring.de (pcs28.SUEDFAC.COM [10.2.1.228]) ESMTP id i5UAioi4030646 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:44:50 +0200 From: "Axel S. Gruner" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:46:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406301246.37912.axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Using xorg instead of XFree86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:45:08 -0000 Hi, i have written a howto for people willing to switch from XFree86 to xorg. Ok, at this time it is only available in german: http://www.bsdforen.de/showthread.php?p=39983#post39983 But i also have some questions about switching to xorg. (1) Will xorg be the default X in future FreeBSD Releases? (2) I have xorg running, without a problem, but if i install a new application with a XFree86 dependency i have to run "pkgdb -F" to fix the dependency to xorg stuff (and imake-6). If i change /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and the entries about XFree86 and imake-4 to xorg and imake-6, the change will not be permanent (cvsup will overwrite the change): [...] LIB_DEPENDS+= X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xorg-libraries [...] .if defined(USE_IMAKE) BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${X11BASE}/lib/X11/config/date.def: ${PORTSDIR}/devel/imake-6 RUN_DEPENDS+= mkhtmlindex:${PORTSDIR}/devel/imake-6 [...] So, is there another way to fix that permanently or a work-around? asg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:06:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875B716A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:06:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1A443D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:06:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i5UB6Tg6012763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:06:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i5UB6TIf012751; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:06:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:06:29 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Axel S. Gruner" Message-ID: <20040630110629.GA54498@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Axel S. Gruner" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200406301246.37912.axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406301246.37912.axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:06:29 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using xorg instead of XFree86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:06:59 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:46:37PM +0200, Axel S. Gruner wrote: > i have written a howto for people willing to switch from XFree86 to=20 > xorg. Ok, at this time it is only available in german: >=20 > http://www.bsdforen.de/showthread.php?p=3D39983#post39983 >=20 > But i also have some questions about switching to xorg.=20 >=20 > (1) Will xorg be the default X in future FreeBSD Releases? Probably. It seems that most of the Linux distros have switched or are switching to it, and the Unix vendors like Sun always were behind X.Org anyway. =20 There is has been a discussion on the x11 and docs mailing lists covering all of the whys and wherefores. A good place to start is here: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406051411.04259.linimon > (2) I have xorg running, without a problem, but if i install a new=20 > application with a XFree86 dependency i have to run "pkgdb -F" to fix=20 > the dependency to xorg stuff (and imake-6). > If i change /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and the entries about XFree86 and= =20 > imake-4 to xorg and imake-6, the change will not be permanent (cvsup=20 > will overwrite the change): >=20 > [...] > LIB_DEPENDS+=3D X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xorg-libraries > [...] > .if defined(USE_IMAKE) > BUILD_DEPENDS+=3D ${X11BASE}/lib/X11/config/date.def: > ${PORTSDIR}/devel/imake-6 > RUN_DEPENDS+=3D mkhtmlindex:${PORTSDIR}/devel/imake-6 > [...] >=20 > So, is there another way to fix that permanently or a work-around? Eventually something like what you propose will be added to bsd.port.mk or whichever makefile is appropriate. Until then, you're going to have to maintain your patches in parallel to the ordinary development of the ports tree. On the whole though, you can get by without fiddling in the makefiles if you're prepared to run pkgdb(1) to fix up the dependencies after the fact. The X.Org stuff is still considered experimental at the moment. As more and more people start to use it and it gets well debugged, the ports infrastructure around it will be improved. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4p60iD657aJF7eIRAmW/AJ9pl3b5yNXTxN302MYgObQSNWCCAgCgpVpO JEO3i33t+W7sdKTjQFvLti4= =a5aj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:07:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C516A4EB for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:07:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.mplik.ru (relay.mplik.ru [212.23.64.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B30943D41 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:07:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexxisr@mail.ru) Received: from relay.mplik.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d162.mplik.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 4889CCDA25 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:06:34 +0600 (YEKST) Received: from compy.mydom (67-ats73-as2.dialup.mplik.ru [213.140.126.67]) by relay.mplik.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1FFCD8A6 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:02:27 +0600 (YEKST) Received: from alexx (helo=localhost) by compy.mydom with local-esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BfiQF-0001Q0-6v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:58:59 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:58:59 +0000 (GMT) From: =?koi8-r?B?8s/T08nIyc4g4czFy9PFyg==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040629230731.C2110@compy.mydom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.497376, version=0.12.3 X-Sagator-Scanner: 0.4.9-0rc1; drop(clamd()) deliver(BogoFilter()) Subject: Permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:07:03 -0000 Is it possible to set different permissions on one file for 2 groups and set 'no access' for other people? And how? Alexxis Rossikhin alexxisr@mail.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:20:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B8E16A4CF for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:20:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maze.meitech.com (maze.meitech.com [69.33.133.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9FF43D39 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:20:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tjg@meitech.com) Received: from ripley.meitech.com (ripley.meitech.com [192.168.100.12]) by maze.meitech.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5UBKG0Z050110 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:20:16 GMT (envelope-from tjg@meitech.com) Received: by RIPLEY with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:24:58 -0400 Message-ID: <86ECB35C998DCC49AD435A099AFACCD1E8DA54@RIPLEY> From: "Gustafson, Tim" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:24:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: vi / EAGAIN Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:20:41 -0000 Hello everyone. I finally have the output of a ktrace of the problem where vi returns "Error: input: Resource temporarily unavailable" to me. It can be downloaded from the following link. Any information that can tell me what's going on here and maybe what I can do to fix it would be greatly appreciated. http://www.meitech.com/fbsd/ktrace.out Thanks a billion! Tim Tim Gustafson MEI Technology Consulting, Inc tjg@meitech.com (516) 379-0001 Office (516) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergencies http://www.meitech.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:30:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE0B16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF50243D55 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7688120; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:30:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88427-01; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:30:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD6180AF; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:30:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E2A44C.30108@wcborstel.nl> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:30:20 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?w7LDj8OTw5PDicOIw4nDjiDDocOMw4XDi8OTw4XDig==?= References: <20040629230731.C2110@compy.mydom> In-Reply-To: <20040629230731.C2110@compy.mydom> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:30:45 -0000 РоÑÑихин ÐлекÑей wrote: >Is it possible to set different permissions >on one file for 2 groups and set 'no access' >for other people? And how? > > Alexxis Rossikhin > alexxisr@mail.ru >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > That almost sounds like NTFS permissions to me. But the answer is no, you can't. You can change the file owner, the group owner the file belongs to (so not two), and what the persmission for everybody else is. You can always add the users of one group to the other one, so that you have one group. Then you can chmod it to 660 or 770 or something. Correct me if I'm wrong though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:33:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CA416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:33:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from monroe.tera-byte.com (monroe.tera-byte.com [216.194.64.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E29C43D5A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@mattford.net) Received: from mattspc (limend.plus.com [80.229.15.68]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by monroe.tera-byte.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5UBXal23641 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:33:36 -0600 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:34:51 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Win32, build 3798) Subject: Alcatel PCi ADSL Modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:33:51 -0000 I have an "Alcatel PC" which is a PCi ADSL modem, I am trying to locate a driver for it and generally work out how to use it. My dmesg output which I think relates to it is: pci0: on pcib0 pci0: (vendor=0x1471, dev=0x0188) at 7.0 irq 10 I rang the Alcatel help desk and they confirmed there is no linux driver or FreeBSD driver. Would it be possible to adapt a windows driver or to use the Speedtouch USB driver? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:49:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D28F16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:49:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F65643D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:49:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x17so468105cwb for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr35568rnb; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:42:10 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: " >AA8E8= ;5:A59" In-Reply-To: <20040629230731.C2110@compy.mydom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <20040629230731.C2110@compy.mydom> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:49:29 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:58:59 +0000 (GMT), =D0=A0=D0=BE=D1=81=D1=81=D0=B8=D1= =85=D0=B8=D0=BD =D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=B9 wrote: >=20 > Is it possible to set different permissions > on one file for 2 groups and set 'no access' > for other people? And how? http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200310/acl.html Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 11:49:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B10C16A4D9 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:49:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sffwd0.suedfactoring.de (port-212-202-224-251.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.224.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A5F43D4C for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de) Received: from pcs28.suedfactoring.de (pcs28.SUEDFAC.COM [10.2.1.228]) ESMTP id i5UBmwi4031316; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:48:58 +0200 From: "Axel S. Gruner" To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:50:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406301246.37912.axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de> <20040630110629.GA54498@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040630110629.GA54498@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406301350.46960.axel.gruner@suedfactoring.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Using xorg instead of XFree86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:49:35 -0000 Hi Matthew, On Wednesday 30 June 2004 13:06, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Probably. It seems that most of the Linux distros have switched or > are switching to it, and the Unix vendors like Sun always were behind > X.Org anyway. > There is has been a discussion on the x11 and docs mailing lists > covering all of the whys and wherefores. A good place to start is > here: > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406051411.04259.linimon thanks for your quick answer and that link. > Eventually something like what you propose will be added to > bsd.port.mk or whichever makefile is appropriate. Until then, you're > going to have to maintain your patches in parallel to the ordinary > development of the ports tree. > On the whole though, you can get by without fiddling in the makefiles > if you're prepared to run pkgdb(1) to fix up the dependencies after > the fact. > The X.Org stuff is still considered experimental at the moment. As > more and more people start to use it and it gets well debugged, the > ports infrastructure around it will be improved. Ok, fine. XFree86 is still fine for most of the users out there (and just a few of them looking at stuff like "licenses"...). So, i can live with a "pkgdb -F", or a temporary change of bsd.port.mk. Well, a second one, like a "bsd.port.mk.xorg" in the tree (which is also up-to date) would be also nice, renaming that one after a cvsup would made it a lot easier for the moment. Cheers, asg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 16:41:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A148616A4D1 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:41:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beastie.flncs.com (ns1.flncs.com [204.0.142.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B878D43D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:39:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from moti@flncs.com) Message-Id: <20040629163945.B878D43D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:39:45 +0000 (GMT) From: moti@flncs.com To: undisclosed-recipients: ; X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:55:33 +0000 Subject: Dell Poweredge 1750 - amr driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:41:57 -0000 Hi , I was wondering if anyone runs freebsd on the above hardware ? I managed to get freebsd installed with no problem , how ever tried pulling a drive out of the raid i got npo alerts / messages in the log fles . i was wondering anyone uses an amr based raid and can help me out . this will be a prodcution system and i'd hate to not know if there are any problems with the raid . thanks you . Moti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 03:15:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8995716A577 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:15:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f7.mail.ru (f7.mail.ru [194.67.57.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D485F43D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:15:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tsmm@list.ru) Received: from mail by f7.mail.ru with local id 1BfVZ2-0009yp-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:15:12 +0400 Received: from [212.19.145.209] by msg.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:15:12 +0400 From: Mikhail TSaplin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: 192.168.0.113 via proxy [212.19.145.209] Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:15:12 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:55:33 +0000 Subject: "ppp -auto" linkup without outgoing trafic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikhail TSaplin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:15:17 -0000 HI ALL, I have freebsd 5.1 release and a litle problem: When i invoke "ppp -auto", it starts calling without outgoing packets (i used tcpdump to see it) and after some minutes it drops the line by timeout. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 12:25:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058EA16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:25:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (user204.net795.mo.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5885243D31 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:25:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-freebsdquestions@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 53531 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 12:24:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 12:24:44 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:24:44 -0500 From: Gary To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6C5CEC79F064CC972D14675A@[192.168.0.5]> In-Reply-To: <40E28056.4020209@bazmag.hu> References: <200406292052.47117.mazakolo@gmx.net> <40E28056.4020209@bazmag.hu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Thunderbird and Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:25:11 -0000 Hi MEZEI, --On Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:56:54 AM +0200 MEZEI Tamas wrote: > I think the normal-base-whatever-you-call-it procmail cannot do > anything with Maildirs. If I'm wrong, tell me. Ok The latest versions of procmail wlll deliver to Maildirs without problems. .. Or.. you can use a very little program called safecat in your deliver line of your recipe in procmail, to safely deliver mail to a Maildir.. -- Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 12:26:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B85116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:26:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6439C43D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B679D69A39; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:25:57 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Joe Schmoe Message-Id: <20040630082557.50a8e09a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040630073904.89140.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040630073904.89140.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: max concurrent scp sessions - and testing methodology for them... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:26:22 -0000 Joe Schmoe wrote: > I have read several documents on the number of > concurrent https sessions a FreeBSD system is capable > of. > > However, I wonder how well this relates to how many > ssh sessions (scp file transfers, specifically) that a > FreeBSD server can handle. Can anyone throw out some > basic numbers for this ? Assuming a 1ghz p3 and 2gigs > of RAM, and assuming that everyone is transferring a > totally different file. (so there is no amount of > cache hits - everything comes straight off the drives) I doubt that will pan out in reality. Depending on the number of files and how much RAM is available, there's always some % chance that a file will be in cache. However, overall, it's not a bad testing scheme, as you're trying to get worst case scenerio. > I would think the major bottleneck would be disk - you > would start chugging the disks far before you used up > all the CPU on a 1ghz p3 ... but what is the second > bottleneck ? Is it cpu, or is it ram (or mbufs, etc.) I would suspect that as well, but with fast disks, it may not be the case (there are a lot of different classes of disks out there. Keep in mind, also, that scp is heavy processor overhead because it's encrypting everything, so you may find the CPU bottlenecks the throughput first. > Would it be a reasonable test to just start up scp > sessions from the machine to itself and then divide > the number of sessions you can acceptably create by > the number 2 ? Or is this somehow a flawed test ? This dodges the (remote) possibility that the NIC might be the bottleneck (since it's using the loopback) ... I would start the parallel scps from a different machine (just have them store the downloaded file in /dev/null to avoid the download machine's HDD becomming the bottleneck) You can then monitor the "server" using top/netstat/whatever and figure out what causes the first bottleneck. The difficult thing will be that different hardware will bottleneck at different places. You might even find that different brands of the same speed CPU bottleneck differently. I'm not aware of any published tests of this kind of thing, so your results would probably be pretty interesting to the community. If I were to guess ... I would expect that your prediction that the disks would be the first bottleneck is probably right. If you upgraded to fast enough disks, I would expect the CPU to become the next bottleneck. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 12:39:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7346516A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [80.177.173.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD69643D2D; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from mail.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.5]) by Awfulhak.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i5UCdOKi051193; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:39:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:39:23 +0100 From: Brian Somers To: Gregory Edigarov Message-Id: <20040630133923.5aedaade@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <20040630094314.GA1016@profi.kharkov.ua> References: <20040630094314.GA1016@profi.kharkov.ua> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on gw.lan.Awfulhak.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Squid, FreeBSD, Multilink PPP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:09 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:43:14 +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Hello, > > I have Squid-2.5 running on FreeBSD 5-Current. We have 2 ppp links, > and use them in multilink mode, through userlevel ppp. > If one or both links fail and then come up, say, if I just turn the > modem power off and on all the web browsing becomes very slow > squid. > It takes forever for squid to show a page which, in a normal > conditions, would take only a few seconds. Pings to those sites I am > trying to open are just fine. > Taking squid down and then up have no effect. The only thing help is > rebooting > the whole system. > > Is there anything I can do? How does ppp deal with the link loss - does it notice immediately ? I would expect very little latency if it does as it should be able to just trash the existing queued data and continue using the other link. I guess other connections suffer the same problems -- it's not just squid ? It might be interesting doing a ``show mp'' or ``show bundle'' to determine what sort of packet queuing and reassembly is happening after the link is lost. If the queues are large, you might get slightly better performance by reducing the links mtu (set mtu max), but really, things should recover ok even with a ~1500 MTU. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 12:50:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7E116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:50:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from otech.servercentral.net (office2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91ABB43D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@servercentral.net) Received: from servercentral.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5UCnWrD099426 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:49:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djh@servercentral.net) Message-ID: <40E2B6DC.5080908@servercentral.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:49:32 -0500 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040405) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Pulling measurements of system memory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:50:49 -0000 What's the easiest command to read to get good information on memory usage? I played with "/sbin/sysctl -n hw.physmem hw.usermem vm.kvm_size vm.kvm_free" yesterday but I have the feeling that these are not the numbers I think they are, because they add up wrong. There's some pretty good stuff at the top of top, but I'd be happier with output in raw numbers of bytes, to feed to my graphing program. This would also save the trouble of reinterpreting M into * 1024^2. Thanks in advance for any tips. Sincerely, -danny -- Danny Howard djh@servercentral.net Technical Support Manager (312)829-1111 x235 Server Central Network http://www.servercentral.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 13:07:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CF816A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:07:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C9443D2F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 67246 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Jun 2004 13:07:37 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.995818 secs); 30 Jun 2004 13:07:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 13:07:36 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:07:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4820.209.167.16.15.1088600856.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <20040629230656.45784.qmail@web11601.mail.yahoo.com> References: <3678.209.167.16.15.1088430328.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> <20040629230656.45784.qmail@web11601.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:07:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Bryce" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISP Connection problem - ADSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:07:55 -0000 > Many thanks for your help with this problem, you were > right on the money. I followed your directions and it > worked like a charm. Great. Glad I could help ;o) > If only I'd asked sooner I could > have saved hours fiddling unsuccessfully with PPP > settings, but it was a learning experience. Agreed. I'll bet if you put your DSL modem in simple modem mode, you'd have no problem at all getting that PPPoE link up and running. I believe that it is worth trying ones self after RTFM for the experience, then ask the questions when one is really stuck. Cheers, Steve > > Thanks very much! :) > > Bryce > > --- Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> > Im using an Alcatel Speedtouch 530 Modem connected >> to >> > Ethernet. My ADSL connection is fine in Windoze >> > however the configuration for the modem is usually >> set >> > through a web-browser. Do the modem settings(done >> via >> > browser) affect the connection in FBSD or does the >> > system simply take the settings from ppp.conf etc? >> Im >> > somewhat confused on this point. I can ping the >> modem >> > at 10.0.0.138 and can open the web interface in X. >> >> Do you have this modem set up to do the PPPoE >> dialing for you? In Windows, >> do you have to use any software to connect, or is >> the connection made >> automatically. It appears you have your modem set up >> in routing mode, >> which means the modem most likely does the >> authentication to your ISP for >> you. >> >> I have a strong suspicion that you do not even need >> to use ppp on the >> FreeBSD box. >> >> If your modem contains the login info for the ISP, >> just set up your >> /etc/rc.conf file with the following: >> >> ifconfig_nic="DHCP" >> >> and then run: >> >> # /etc/netstart >> >> You *should* get your info from the router (modem) >> and should be up and >> surfing. >> >> If that doesn't work, provide more info on your >> setup, including the >> output of 'ipconfig' on the windows machine. >> >> Steve >> >> >> > >> > The log reads: >> > >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> bundle: >> > Establish >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: closed -> opening >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> List of >> > netgraph node ``sis0:'' (id 1) hooks: >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Found >> > orphans -> ethernet >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> > Connecting netgraph socket .:tun1 -> [3]::tun1 >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Sending >> > PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun1 >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Found >> > the following interfaces: >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Index >> > 1, name "sis0" >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Index >> > 2, name "lp0" >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Index >> > 3, name "lo0" >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Index >> > 4, name "tun0" >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Index >> > 5, name "tun1" >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: Connected! >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: opening -> dial >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Chat: >> deflink: >> > Dial attempt 1 of 1 >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: dial -> carrier >> > Jun 25 20:00:26 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> Waiting >> > for carrier >> > Jun 25 20:00:30 brycepc last message repeated 4 >> times >> > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: Disconnected! >> > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: carrier -> hangup >> > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Debug: >> > deflink: Close >> > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 >> octets >> > out >> > Jun 25 20:00:31 brycepc ppp[801]: tun1: Phase: >> > deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out >> > >> > Any help is greatly appreciated I really would >> like to >> > end my reliance on M$ and get going with BSD :) >> > >> > Bryce >> > >> > >> > >> > __________________________________ >> > Do you Yahoo!? >> > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! >> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >> >> > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 13:10:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEA116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:10:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.u4eatech.com (blackhole.u4eatech.com [195.188.241.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA3343D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.williamson@u4eatech.com) Received: by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id 1C3E53603C8; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:10:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from apus.u4eatech.com (apus.degree2.com [172.30.40.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050C03603BC for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:10:07 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040630135552.0a8deff8@cygnus> X-Sender: richard@cygnus X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:11:07 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Richard P. Williamson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: failing to boot from mfsroot.gz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:10:33 -0000 Hello all, I have a 4.8 system that booted from flash using a kernel.gz and mfsroot.gz. The ethernet parts were not fully supported by the fxp driver in 4.8, so I was testing 4.10 to see if they were with that version of the OS. I've replace the kernel.gz with a 4.10 version, and the mfsroot.gz is built using 4.10 objects. If I try to boot it, this is what I get: ... md0: Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot> 50331648 bytes at 0xc02b2794 md1: malloc disk ... sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 in isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3b0-0x3bb iomem 0xb0000-0xb7ffff on isa0 ad0: 30MB [490/4/32] at ata0-master PI01 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c And then nothing. Nada. Zip. No kernel panic message, no prompt, nothing. Which leaves me in a bit of a pickle as to what to try. If I use a 4.10 kernel with a 4.8 mfsroot.gz, it boots, but tells me that proc is out of sync with the kernel. Help?! TIA rip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 13:26:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A5A16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:26:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CA943D55 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 69673 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Jun 2004 13:25:52 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.982119 secs); 30 Jun 2004 13:25:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 13:25:51 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:25:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4860.209.167.16.15.1088601951.squirrel@209.167.16.15> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:25:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: kern.ipc.nmbclusters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:26:34 -0000 I have a machine that is rebooting with the following error: "All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7)." Which through google and man tuning I was able to figure out that indeed, mbufs were exhausted. So I tried to set kern.ipc.nmbclusters=4096 (which should cover the load of the server), but found out after it is not a run-time tunable parameter. I searched google, and gathered that I should put this setting in /boot/loader.conf. This is contradictory of me usually putting kernel tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf. >From your experience, where is the best place to load this variable from, why is it a better location, and what will happen if I don't load it from the proper place? Tks. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 13:39:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D877716A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:39:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redtick.homeunix.com (adsl-209-30-229-36.dsl.ksc2mo.swbell.net [209.30.229.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D6443D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boxend@redtick.homeunix.com) Received: from redtick.homeunix.com (localhost.homeunix.com [127.0.0.1]) i5UDbkVb007158; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:37:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boxend@redtick.homeunix.com) Received: (from boxend@localhost) by redtick.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5UDbk02007157; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:37:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boxend) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:37:46 -0500 From: Mark To: Brian Somers Message-ID: <20040630133746.GA7125@redtick.homeunix.com> References: <20040630094314.GA1016@profi.kharkov.ua> <20040630133923.5aedaade@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040630133923.5aedaade@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Squid, FreeBSD, Multilink PPP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:39:19 -0000 Do you have a cache dns server running on your system, if not start one add it to the resolve.conf pluse the upstream dns servers then ## out the enable dns in the ppp.conf (you'll lose the ref to yours in the resolv.conf each time you reconnect if you don't). SOunds to me squid is looking for a dns server that is not there, and waits for a time out. On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:39:23PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:43:14 +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have Squid-2.5 running on FreeBSD 5-Current. We have 2 ppp links, > > and use them in multilink mode, through userlevel ppp. > > If one or both links fail and then come up, say, if I just turn the > > modem power off and on all the web browsing becomes very slow > > squid. > > It takes forever for squid to show a page which, in a normal > > conditions, would take only a few seconds. Pings to those sites I am > > trying to open are just fine. > > Taking squid down and then up have no effect. The only thing help is > > rebooting > > the whole system. > > > > Is there anything I can do? > > How does ppp deal with the link loss - does it notice immediately ? I > would expect very little latency if it does as it should be able to just > trash the existing queued data and continue using the other link. > > I guess other connections suffer the same problems -- it's not just squid ? > > It might be interesting doing a ``show mp'' or ``show bundle'' to determine > what sort of packet queuing and reassembly is happening after the link is > lost. > > If the queues are large, you might get slightly better performance by > reducing the links mtu (set mtu max), but really, things should recover > ok even with a ~1500 MTU. > > -- > Brian > > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********** The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. ********** ============================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 13:46:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E844616A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:46:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DD143D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE52E69A39; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:45:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:45:31 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Steve Bertrand" Message-Id: <20040630094531.59de248a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4860.209.167.16.15.1088601951.squirrel@209.167.16.15> References: <4860.209.167.16.15.1088601951.squirrel@209.167.16.15> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:46:02 -0000 "Steve Bertrand" wrote: > I have a machine that is rebooting with the following error: > > "All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7)." > > Which through google and man tuning I was able to figure out that indeed, > mbufs were exhausted. So I tried to set kern.ipc.nmbclusters=4096 (which > should cover the load of the server), but found out after it is not a > run-time tunable parameter. > > I searched google, and gathered that I should put this setting in > /boot/loader.conf. > > This is contradictory of me usually putting kernel tweaks in > /etc/sysctl.conf. > > >From your experience, where is the best place to load this variable from, > why is it a better location, and what will happen if I don't load it from > the proper place? You have to put it in loader.conf because that value is set _very_ early in the boot process (before sysctl.conf is used) and can not be changed later. You can also put this value in your kernel config and recompile your kernel. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 13:55:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E7016A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:55:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80C43D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:55:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 74266 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Jun 2004 13:54:52 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.978319 secs); 30 Jun 2004 13:54:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 13:54:51 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:54:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4902.209.167.16.15.1088603691.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <20040630094531.59de248a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4860.209.167.16.15.1088601951.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <20040630094531.59de248a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:54:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Bill Moran" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:55:33 -0000 >> >From your experience, where is the best place to load this variable >> from, >> why is it a better location, and what will happen if I don't load it >> from >> the proper place? > > You have to put it in loader.conf because that value is set _very_ early > in the boot process (before sysctl.conf is used) and can not be changed > later. > > You can also put this value in your kernel config and recompile your > kernel. Thanks Bill. It is not completely clear which syntax would be right for the file...this: kern.ipc.nmbclusters=4096 or this: kern.ipc.nmbclusters="4096" I certainly don't need an unbootable box with 1500 mail accounts on it :o) Tks, Steve > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 14:26:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3803016A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:26:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outfbmx008.isp.belgacom.be (outfbmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7976743D45 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx003.isp.belgacom.be (outmx003.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.100]) (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-FALLBACK-2.22) with ESMTP id i5UAxrhN018041 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:53 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from outmx003.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i5UAxdKS002364 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:40 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (254-144.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.144.254]) with ESMTP id i5UAxWtj002321; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:32 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 59B184C4; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:29 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: epilogue@allstream.net Message-ID: <20040630105929.GA57799@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> <20040629202740.30611215@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040629202740.30611215@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WinKey doesn't work in X.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:26:04 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:27:40PM -0400, epilogue@allstream.net wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:22 +0200 > Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > > One difference I noticed, after switching to X.org, is that my WinKey > > doesn't work anymore. I used it a lot for custom keybindings in IceWM. > > > > Any clue, anyone? > > by your question, it sounds as though you didn't set your custom key > bindings in XFree directly, rather you did it via IceWM. > > this is just a guess, but you might want to reinstall Ice so that it > compiles with the X.org libraries. (anyone ?) I just recompiled IceWM (with X.org installed), but it still doesn't work. Maybe I should recompile other dependencies "between" IceWM and X too, because XFree86-libraries still shows up when I do a make clean in x11-wm/icewm: lori:/root # cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/icewm/ lori:icewm # make clean ===> Cleaning for esound-0.2.34 ===> Cleaning for libaudiofile-0.2.6 ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.1_3 ===> Cleaning for autoconf-2.57_1 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.13.1_1 ===> Cleaning for glib-1.2.10_11 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 ===> Cleaning for imake-4.3.0_2 ===> Cleaning for libgnugetopt-1.2 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.6 ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4_1 ===> Cleaning for p5-gettext-1.01_4 ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0_1 ===> Cleaning for imlib-1.9.14_2 ===> Cleaning for jpeg-6b_3 ===> Cleaning for libungif-4.1.3 ===> Cleaning for png-1.2.5_5 ===> Cleaning for tiff-3.6.1_1 ===> Cleaning for help2man-1.33.1 ===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.7_3 ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.7 ===> Cleaning for fontconfig-2.2.2,1 ===> Cleaning for libXft-2.1.6 ===> Cleaning for gtk-1.2.10_12 ===> Cleaning for XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7 ===> Cleaning for icewm-1.2.14 lori:icewm # Any clue which one(s)? Thanks for the suggestion anyway. GH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 14:36:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB81F16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:36:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.aeria.net (www.esrs.net [209.183.219.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2665B43D31 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:36:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xpi@aeria.net) Received: from squee.aeria.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aeria.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83C833CFA2 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:36:18 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:36:18 -0400 From: xpi Message-Id: <20040630143618.B83C833CFA2@mail.aeria.net> Subject: 5.2.1-rel install CD hangs Tecra 9100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:36:51 -0000 -or- Idiot user can't find the any key. I have a Toshiba Tecra 9100 laptop 1700mhz/256m, I'd like 5.2.1-rel on it. Think I'm falling off the directions about disabling laptop pcibios ..but I'm out of FAQ's Boot(8) sucessfully loads a kernel and displays the boot menu, and no matter how I tell the kernel to boot ( no APCI ) we hang after this... Sorry no serial cable dmesg =) Tell me if we need to type _the whole thing_. agp0: mem 0xe00000000-0xefffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 and then nothing, no disk access, no kbd interaction only zuul. The faq has a note about disabling pcibios by getting '-c' to the kernel via the boot> prompt. I can't seem to get at that prompt in any way. The suggested technique is to hit the any key at the boottrap spinner cursor; but those keystrokes are buffered until the loader's menu comes up. (Idiot user can't find the any key, tee hee) Issuing boot -c to the loader prompt gets me to the same nowhere. Help. I'm ignorant of the magick of boot(8) and it's gang. I don't belive that this machine has a text bios meny to tweak hw compatibility settings. Hmm.. I should give darwin a shot that this HW . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 14:44:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC8D16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF52A43D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 697463FB3; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:44:12 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: "ORACLE ." Message-ID: <20040630144412.GD1878@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040623125548.GC31046@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20040630141842.26254.qmail@web50608.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040630141842.26254.qmail@web50608.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Soundcard woes (help!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:44:59 -0000 --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ORACLE . wrote: > hey=20 > i am usinf freebsd 5.0 and i added the line pcm to my > kernel and sound card is working but same problem only > one speaker(i have two speakers) is working and the > there is too much noise when i play any mp3 can you > tell me how can i fix that and i dont know about BIOS > that much .............. Is your cabeling ok? Does it work on Linux or Windows. You should also consider upgrading to 5.2.1, since a lot of stuff was fixed (also sound stuff, IIRC). Please keep the questions mailing list Cc'ed so other people can help you, too. I'm quite short on time right now. Simon --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4tG8Ckn+/eutqCoRAsy/AKC/dUhhCb/UmVEg6JD3AuaM1dS7MQCfRko5 MJt6YK0iS/dSG1FqDWjw2OY= =/Mxf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:10:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C7916A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:10:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailoff.mtu.edu (mailoff.mtu.edu [141.219.70.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E7F43D4C for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from todd@mtu.edu) Received: from node5.services.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5]) by mailoff.mtu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i5UG9Ub26574 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node9.services.dcsint.mtu.edu (node9.mtu.edu [141.219.69.9]) i5UG9UL9021721 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:09:30 -0400 Received: from campus4.mtu.edu ([141.219.70.7]) by node9.services.dcsint.mtu.edu (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:09:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node6.services.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6]) by mail.mtu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5UG9UG15066 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:09:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [141.219.6.44] (deepfriedsugar.dcs.it.mtu.edu [141.219.6.44]) (authenticated bits=0)with ESMTP id i5UG9TPt010968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:09:29 -0400 Message-ID: <40E2E5BC.8010601@mtu.edu> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:09:32 -0400 From: Todd Piket User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Apache2 mod_auth_ldap (FreeBSD-specific problem?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:10:07 -0000 I am seeing this same problem. Have you heard about a solution yet? Any information would be appreciated. -- Regards, ------------------------------------------------------------ | Todd Piket | Email: todd@mtu.edu | | Programmer/Analyst | Phone: (906) 487-1720 | | Distributed Computing Services | | | Michigan Technological University | | ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:21:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5145816A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:21:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane.co.uk [82.152.23.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737B043D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:21:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unsane.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5UGL6dl071959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:21:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from localhost (jhary@localhost) by unsane.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i5UGL6Z0071956; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:21:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:21:06 +0100 (BST) From: Vince Hoffman To: xpi In-Reply-To: <20040630143618.B83C833CFA2@mail.aeria.net> Message-ID: <20040630171727.X68069@unsane.co.uk> References: <20040630143618.B83C833CFA2@mail.aeria.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1-rel install CD hangs Tecra 9100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:21:52 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, xpi wrote: > -or- > Idiot user can't find the any key. > > > I have a Toshiba Tecra 9100 laptop 1700mhz/256m, I'd like 5.2.1-rel on it. Think I'm falling off the directions about disabling laptop pcibios ..but I'm out of FAQ's > > Boot(8) sucessfully loads a kernel and displays the boot menu, and no matter how I tell the kernel to boot ( no APCI ) we hang after this... Sorry no serial cable dmesg =) Tell me if we need to type _the whole thing_. > > > agp0: mem 0xe00000000-0xefffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 > > and then nothing, no disk access, no kbd interaction only zuul. > > The faq has a note about disabling pcibios by getting '-c' to the kernel via the boot> prompt. I can't seem to get at that prompt in any way. The suggested technique is to hit the any key at the boottrap spinner cursor; but those keystrokes are buffered until the loader's menu comes up. (Idiot user can't find the any key, tee hee) Issuing boot -c to the loader prompt gets me to the same nowhere. > > Help. I'm ignorant of the magick of boot(8) and it's gang. I don't belive that this machine has a text bios meny to tweak hw compatibility settings. erk your mailer doesnt wrap at a sensible length (hint hint) to get to the bios on all the tosiba tecra laptops i've come across, (8000,8100,8200) you hold the esc key as soon as you turn it on, wait for it to say there is an error, then press F1 to check the bios settings. havent played with the 9000 series much though, so not sure what, if any, useful options the bios will have. Vince > Hmm.. I should give darwin a shot that this HW . > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:24:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61E416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E66243D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq68-138.dial.allstream.net [216.123.142.74]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 9AAEC5D49; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:24:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:24:33 -0400 From: epilogue To: "Richard P. Williamson" Message-Id: <20040630122433.27d99453@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6.1.1.1.2.20040630135552.0a8deff8@cygnus> References: <6.1.1.1.2.20040630135552.0a8deff8@cygnus> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: failing to boot from mfsroot.gz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:48 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:11:07 +0100 "Richard P. Williamson" wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a 4.8 system that booted from flash using a kernel.gz and > mfsroot.gz. The ethernet parts were not fully supported by the fxp driver > in 4.8, so I was testing 4.10 to see if they were with that version of > the OS. > > I've replace the kernel.gz with a 4.10 version, and the mfsroot.gz > is built using 4.10 objects. If I try to boot it, this is what I > get: > > ... > md0: Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot> 50331648 bytes at 0xc02b2794 > md1: malloc disk > ... > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 in isa0 > sio0: type 16550A, console > sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 > sio1: type 16550A > vga0: at port 0x3b0-0x3bb iomem 0xb0000-0xb7ffff on > isa0 ad0: 30MB [490/4/32] at ata0-master PI01 > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c > > And then nothing. Nada. Zip. > > No kernel panic message, no prompt, nothing. > > Which leaves me in a bit of a pickle as to what to try. > > If I use a 4.10 kernel with a 4.8 mfsroot.gz, it boots, > but tells me that proc is out of sync with the kernel. If i get you correctly, you're trying to run a 4.10 kernel on a 4.8 system. (?) if so, you're really on your own here and destined to bang your head against the wall trying to get this to work. rather unlike linux, the FBSD system is an integrated whole, not mix and match. if you want to take advantage of features available under 4.10, you will need to upgrade your system. the process is rather straightforward and there is significant documentation covering the necessary steps (handbook and google are good sources here -- though do _avoid_ the advice given at bsdnews.org) if i've misunderstand your intention, apologies. cheers, epi > Help?! > > TIA > > rip > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:43:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:43:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E6A43D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq68-138.dial.allstream.net [216.123.142.74]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 100E0B47C9; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:43:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:43:02 -0400 From: epilogue To: Geert Hendrickx Message-Id: <20040630124302.4df6b7b1@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040630105929.GA57799@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> <20040629202740.30611215@localhost> <20040630105929.GA57799@lori.mine.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WinKey doesn't work in X.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:43:37 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:59:29 +0200 Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:27:40PM -0400, epilogue@allstream.net wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:22 +0200 > > Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > > > > One difference I noticed, after switching to X.org, is that my WinKey > > > doesn't work anymore. I used it a lot for custom keybindings in > > > IceWM. > > > > > > Any clue, anyone? > > > > by your question, it sounds as though you didn't set your custom key > > bindings in XFree directly, rather you did it via IceWM. > > > > this is just a guess, but you might want to reinstall Ice so that it > > compiles with the X.org libraries. (anyone ?) > > I just recompiled IceWM (with X.org installed), but it still doesn't > work. Maybe I should recompile other dependencies "between" IceWM and X > too, because XFree86-libraries still shows up when I do a make clean in > x11-wm/icewm: > > lori:/root # cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/icewm/ > lori:icewm # make clean > ===> Cleaning for esound-0.2.34 > ===> Cleaning for libaudiofile-0.2.6 > ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.1_3 > ===> Cleaning for autoconf-2.57_1 > ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.13.1_1 > ===> Cleaning for glib-1.2.10_11 > ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 > ===> Cleaning for imake-4.3.0_2 > ===> Cleaning for libgnugetopt-1.2 > ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 > ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.6 > ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4_1 > ===> Cleaning for p5-gettext-1.01_4 > ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0_1 > ===> Cleaning for imlib-1.9.14_2 > ===> Cleaning for jpeg-6b_3 > ===> Cleaning for libungif-4.1.3 > ===> Cleaning for png-1.2.5_5 > ===> Cleaning for tiff-3.6.1_1 > ===> Cleaning for help2man-1.33.1 > ===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.7_3 > ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.7 > ===> Cleaning for fontconfig-2.2.2,1 > ===> Cleaning for libXft-2.1.6 > ===> Cleaning for gtk-1.2.10_12 > ===> Cleaning for XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7 > ===> Cleaning for icewm-1.2.14 > lori:icewm # > > Any clue which one(s)? having not yet tinkered with x.org, i'm am not going to be able to provide any concrete assistance. hopefully, someone on the list will help (this means 'you', list. :). > Thanks for the suggestion anyway. > > GH > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:45:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A205416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:45:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from otech.servercentral.net (office2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6DE43D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@servercentral.net) Received: from servercentral.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5UGjArD000140 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:45:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djh@servercentral.net) Message-ID: <40E2EE16.1070808@servercentral.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:45:10 -0500 From: Danny Howard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040405) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40E2B6DC.5080908@servercentral.net> <40E2E34B.5090308@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <40E2E34B.5090308@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How do I calculate the size and utilization of my VM from sysctl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:45:34 -0000 Phil Schulz wrote: > Danny Howard wrote: > >> What's the easiest command to read to get good information on memory >> usage? I played with "/sbin/sysctl -n hw.physmem hw.usermem >> vm.kvm_size vm.kvm_free" yesterday but I have the feeling that these >> are not the numbers I think they are, because they add up wrong. >> >> There's some pretty good stuff at the top of top, but I'd be happier >> with output in raw numbers of bytes, to feed to my graphing program. >> This would also save the trouble of reinterpreting M into * 1024^2. > [...] > Are you looking for vmstat(8)? Actually, I'm looking for: "How do I calculate the size and utilization of my VM from sysctl?" vm.kvm_size is not consistent with the size of swap output by top. But then, I'm not sure what "kvm" is supposed to be anyway. I've looked at vm.stats.vm.v_page_size * vm.stats.vm.v_page_count but that aint right either ... ? Thanks, -danny -- Danny Howard djh@servercentral.net Technical Support Manager (312)829-1111 x235 Server Central Network http://www.servercentral.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 16:51:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC4F16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:51:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4C443D4C for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 10547 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 16:51:09 -0000 Received: from 67-51-112-35.dsl1.elk.ca.frontiernet.net (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) ([67.51.112.35]) (envelope-sender )SMTP for ; 30 Jun 2004 16:51:09 -0000 Received: from [165.107.42.177] (unknown [165.107.42.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D393BF422 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:51:10 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Perl Syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:51:22 -0000 I'm using perl 5.8.4 on a 4.9 machine. I want to add code a perl script to check for value passed from command line. If it is null, I want to exit with an error message. First I tried this and got "Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./test.pl line 20." if ($ARGV[0] eq "") { print "You must include the file name."; exit 1; } Next I tried this but get "Use of uninitialized value in length at ./test.pl line 20." if (length ($ARGV[0]) = "0") { print "You must include the file name."; exit 1; } I've searched the web and all examples that I've found indicate that I'm doing things correctly but obviously I'm not. What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:04:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA0A16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:04:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F45B43D45 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:04:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steveb@eagle.ca) Received: (qmail 96330 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Jun 2004 17:04:47 -0000 Received: from steveb@eagle.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.010374 secs); 30 Jun 2004 17:04:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pearl.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 17:04:45 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by pearl.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:04:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4769.209.167.16.15.1088615085.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> References: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:04:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Drew Tomlinson" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Perl Syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:04:37 -0000 > I'm using perl 5.8.4 on a 4.9 machine. I want to add code a perl script > to check for value passed from command line. If it is null, I want to > exit with an error message. > > First I tried this and got "Use of uninitialized value in string eq at > ./test.pl line 20." > > if ($ARGV[0] eq "") { > print "You must include the file name."; > exit 1; > } > > Next I tried this but get "Use of uninitialized value in length at > ./test.pl line 20." > > if (length ($ARGV[0]) = "0") { > print "You must include the file name."; > exit 1; > } > > I've searched the web and all examples that I've found indicate that I'm > doing things correctly but obviously I'm not. What am I doing wrong? > I know this works: if ($ARGV[0] eq '') { print "Debug Mode\n"; } Cheers, Steve > Thanks, > > Drew > > -- > Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse > Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! > > http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:07:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999EC16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:07:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A28343D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:07:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059D84AC32; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:42:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Cordula's Web To: pieckiel+freebsd-questions@sdf.lonestar.org In-reply-to: <20040629154746.GC27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> (pieckiel+freebsd-questions@sdf.lonestar.org) X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE References: <20040629135105.GB27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20040629154746.GC27491@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Message-Id: <20040630164201.059D84AC32@fw.farid-hajji.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:42:01 +0200 (CEST) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snapshot question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:07:03 -0000 [Does a snapshot change between backup and verify?] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040629135105.GB27491 Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote: > cd / > mksnap_ffs /var /var/.snap/backup.snap > mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /var/.snap/backup.snap -u 6 > mount -r /dev/md6 /mnt/backup/root.var > tar -cvf ${BACKUP_DEVICE} --totals --preserve \ > --blocking-factor ${BACKUP_BLOCKSIZE} --block-number --multi-volume \ > --new-volume-script ${PROGROOT}/next.sh \ > --newer-mtime "${TIMESTAMP}" ${BACKUP_FLAGS} \ > ${BACKUP_PATHS} >> ${LOGFILE} 2>&1 > tar --compare -f ${BACKUP_DEVICE} --blocking-factor ${BACKUP_BLOCKSIZE} \ > --multi-volume --new-volume-script ${PROGROOT}/next.sh >> ${COMPAREFILE} 2>&1 > umount /mnt/backup/root.var > mdconfig -d -u 6 > rm -f /var/.snap/backup.snap > > Here, BACKUP_PATHS is set as follows: > > BACKUP_PATHS="/mnt/backup" Strange. I can't reproduce this bug. All snapshots I'm taking on a very active FS are still 100% stable. Since you're mounting the snapshot read-only, nothing _should_ change. Anyone else experiencing this behaviour? -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:18:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D00416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:18:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E1643D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 26762 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 17:17:44 -0000 Received: from 67-51-112-35.dsl1.elk.ca.frontiernet.net (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) ([67.51.112.35]) (envelope-sender )SMTP for ; 30 Jun 2004 17:17:44 -0000 Received: from [165.107.42.177] (unknown [165.107.42.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86FA3BF422; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40E2F5B9.305@mykitchentable.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:17:45 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> <4769.209.167.16.15.1088615085.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <4769.209.167.16.15.1088615085.squirrel@209.167.16.15> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Perl Syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:18:11 -0000 On 6/30/2004 10:04 AM Steve Bertrand wrote: >>I'm using perl 5.8.4 on a 4.9 machine. I want to add code a perl script >>to check for value passed from command line. If it is null, I want to >>exit with an error message. >> >>First I tried this and got "Use of uninitialized value in string eq at >>./test.pl line 20." >> >>if ($ARGV[0] eq "") { >> print "You must include the file name."; >> exit 1; >>} >> >>Next I tried this but get "Use of uninitialized value in length at >>./test.pl line 20." >> >>if (length ($ARGV[0]) = "0") { >> print "You must include the file name."; >> exit 1; >>} >> >>I've searched the web and all examples that I've found indicate that I'm >>doing things correctly but obviously I'm not. What am I doing wrong? >> >> >> > >I know this works: > >if ($ARGV[0] eq '') { > print "Debug Mode\n"; >} > >Cheers, > >Steve > Thanks for your reply. I tried your suggestion and it seems to work but I get this output: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./test.pl line 16. You must include the file name. I have "use warnings;" and "use strict;" in the script. I assume the error comes from the "use warnings;" but why does perl see "eq" as a string and not an operator? Or am I misinterpreting the message? Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:30:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6045916A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:30:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3271E43D55 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i5UHSQAv015536; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i5UHSPT9023683; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:28:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200406291822.25914@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> References: <200406291822.25914@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:28:22 -0400 To: Mikhail Teterin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Using syslog(3) after chroot-ing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:30:04 -0000 On Jun 29, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Is there a similar trick to make it use the local timezone instead of > UTC? I'm surprised, the time is interpreted by the sender (rather than > by the syslogd-recipient), but it is -- and I want it to be local, > without copying /etc/localtime into the chroot tree. What happens if you set TZ in the environment which syslogd is started up from? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:35:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B125F16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:35:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE8043D49 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:35:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i5UHZ0Wd007790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:35:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i5UHYxtZ007789; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:34:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:34:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Drew Tomlinson Message-ID: <20040630173459.GA7674@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Drew Tomlinson , Steve Bertrand , FreeBSD Questions References: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> <4769.209.167.16.15.1088615085.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <40E2F5B9.305@mykitchentable.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E2F5B9.305@mykitchentable.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:35:00 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Steve Bertrand Subject: Re: Perl Syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:35:32 -0000 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:17:45AM -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > On 6/30/2004 10:04 AM Steve Bertrand wrote: > >I know this works: > > > >if ($ARGV[0] eq '') { > > print "Debug Mode\n"; > >} > Thanks for your reply. I tried your suggestion and it seems to work but= =20 > I get this output: >=20 > Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./test.pl line 16. > You must include the file name. Unless you supply at least one argument to the script, $ARGV[0] won't exist. There's a difference in perl between 'not defined' and an empty string (or zero for numerical values). Try: if ( @ARGV < 1 ) { usage(); exit 1; } or unless ( defined $ARGV[0] ) { usage(); exit 1; } --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4vnDiD657aJF7eIRArvaAKCRs5J9QC5jx2FOBo0x8C8G5ixs2gCfZSDz zqo98419KZd2SFzmLDeCiDo= =vWtS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:46:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1949516A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB08143D5A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (localhost.cs.earlham.edu [127.0.0.1]) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5UHk7gW054793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:46:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: (from skylar@localhost) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i5UHk7QN054792; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:46:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: quark.cs.earlham.edu: skylar set sender to skylar@quark.cs.earlham.edu using -f Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:46:07 -0500 From: Skylar Thompson To: Kevin Stevens Message-ID: <20040630174607.GA54215@quark.cs.earlham.edu> References: <40DDA5EF.9090703@wcborstel.nl> <20040626194417.22752.qmail@gandalf.online.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Sender: "Skylar Thompson" X-Accept-Primary-Language: en X-Accept-Secondary-Language: es SMTP-Mailing-Host: quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-Uptime: 12:41PM up 12 days, 9:26, 14 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.16, 0.15 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2 (2003 Jun 1, compiled May 19 2004 13:14:50) X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Cable management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Skylar Thompson List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:46:11 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:38:55PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote: >=20 > If you're new to cable management, remember to tag both ends of the=20 > cables BEFORE running them through any conduit. Once they get bundled=20 > together in any way, that's all you have to go by. If you do get into a situation where you don't know which cable is which, you can always tone them. It's a PITA and works best wiht two people, but it works. It's not a bad idea to have a toner on hand, because even labeled cables can run into trouble. The ink might rub off, or you might accidentally cut off some excess slack without relableling. --=20 -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4vxfsc4yyULgN4YRAnyoAJwOBZ9+KJQpYw8nMXaMCOIIy2D94wCcCl3E MBGjt3X4Ds/+Xk/Pg+sYvss= =h7zz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:48:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2891216A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:48:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B625E43D31 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (localhost.cs.earlham.edu [127.0.0.1]) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5UHmPM0055052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:48:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: (from skylar@localhost) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i5UHmOwt055051; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:48:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: quark.cs.earlham.edu: skylar set sender to skylar@quark.cs.earlham.edu using -f Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:48:24 -0500 From: Skylar Thompson To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20040630174824.GB54215@quark.cs.earlham.edu> References: <40DF06A0.10801@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40DF06A0.10801@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Sender: "Skylar Thompson" X-Accept-Primary-Language: en X-Accept-Secondary-Language: es SMTP-Mailing-Host: quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-Uptime: 12:41PM up 12 days, 9:26, 14 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.16, 0.15 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2 (2003 Jun 1, compiled May 19 2004 13:14:50) X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: 3BSD cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forgot to add... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Skylar Thompson List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:48:48 -0000 --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:40:48PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > 3BSD wrote: > >One thing I forgot to add to be previous e-mail about hardware > >compatibility was that I'm using the DVI port of my graphics card, > >connected to an LCD display, will that pose any problems? >=20 > Generally not. To the extent that your configuration of video card and= =20 > monitor can be treated as a generic (s)VGA display, FreeBSD will be=20 > plug-and-play for text mode (booting, console), and will also work=20 > genericly under X11. >=20 > Getting 3D hardware support going for fast OpenGL stuff, and/or doing a= =20 > multimonitor display mode are more complicated questions, but generally o= ne=20 > can get such things working after more tweaking and time spent on your pa= rt. In the previous message, he mentioned using an nVidia geForce4. I've had good experiences with a geForce2 in my FreeBSD 5-RELEASE box. nVidia has a driver you can download from their website for FreeBSD, and I haven't had any problems with it. --=20 -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4vzosc4yyULgN4YRApoBAKCRL5MNJPMD9jRkbQbRdJ6bdk3dhACgr4iR VMQlAAz8hdh+3mDFi086O+U= =BT0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:49:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC4116A4D7 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:49:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E431243D46 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:49:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org) Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id A2E53BAE2; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:49:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:49:22 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel To: Drew Tomlinson Message-ID: <20040630174921.GA11187@ns1.tcbug.org> References: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> <4769.209.167.16.15.1088615085.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <40E2F5B9.305@mykitchentable.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E2F5B9.305@mykitchentable.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Steve Bertrand Subject: Re: Perl Syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:49:31 -0000 > >>I'm using perl 5.8.4 on a 4.9 machine. I want to add code a perl script > >>to check for value passed from command line. If it is null, I want to > >>exit with an error message. > >> > >>First I tried this and got "Use of uninitialized value in string eq at > >>./test.pl line 20." > >> > >>if ($ARGV[0] eq "") { > >> print "You must include the file name."; > >> exit 1; > >>} > >> > >>Next I tried this but get "Use of uninitialized value in length at > >>./test.pl line 20." > >> > >>if (length ($ARGV[0]) = "0") { > >> print "You must include the file name."; > >> exit 1; > >>} > >> > >>I've searched the web and all examples that I've found indicate that I'm > >>doing things correctly but obviously I'm not. What am I doing wrong? > >> > >> > >> > > > >I know this works: > > > >if ($ARGV[0] eq '') { > > print "Debug Mode\n"; > >} > > > >Cheers, > > > >Steve > > > Thanks for your reply. I tried your suggestion and it seems to work but > I get this output: > > Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./test.pl line 16. > You must include the file name. > > I have "use warnings;" and "use strict;" in the script. I assume the > error comes from the "use warnings;" but why does perl see "eq" as a > string and not an operator? Or am I misinterpreting the message? > > Thanks, > > Drew > #!/usr/bin/perl -w if (!ARGV[0]) { print "no arguements\n"; } else { print "found an arguement\n"; } Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 17:51:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2573916A4CF for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:51:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE60E43D2D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: (qmail 13105 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 17:51:03 -0000 Received: from 67-51-112-35.dsl1.elk.ca.frontiernet.net (HELO blacklamb.mykitchentable.net) ([67.51.112.35]) (envelope-sender )SMTP for ; 30 Jun 2004 17:51:03 -0000 Received: from [165.107.42.177] (unknown [165.107.42.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846813BF422; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40E2FD88.9030605@mykitchentable.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:51:04 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <40E2EF7E.3000901@mykitchentable.net> <4769.209.167.16.15.1088615085.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <40E2F5B9.305@mykitchentable.net> <20040630173459.GA7674@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040630173459.GA7674@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Steve Bertrand Subject: Re: Perl Syntax -- SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:51:17 -0000 On 6/30/2004 10:34 AM Matthew Seaman wrote: >On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:17:45AM -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > >>On 6/30/2004 10:04 AM Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> > > > >>>I know this works: >>> >>>if ($ARGV[0] eq '') { >>> print "Debug Mode\n"; >>>} >>> >>> > > > >>Thanks for your reply. I tried your suggestion and it seems to work but >>I get this output: >> >>Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./test.pl line 16. >>You must include the file name. >> >> > >Unless you supply at least one argument to the script, $ARGV[0] won't >exist. There's a difference in perl between 'not defined' and an >empty string (or zero for numerical values). Try: > > if ( @ARGV < 1 ) { > usage(); > exit 1; > } > >or > > unless ( defined $ARGV[0] ) { > usage(); > exit 1; > } > > Thank you very much for the explanation. Now I understand why I was getting the error message. I didn't quite understand how to use "usage();" but replaced it with a print statement. It works perfectly! Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 18:01:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750BD16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:01:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hestia.sjsu.edu (hestia.sjsu.edu [130.65.7.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA4643D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iscan@email.sjsu.edu) Received: from hestia.sjsu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by hestia.sjsu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5UI0KwT010582 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@localhost)i5UI0KTT010581 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200406301800.i5UI0KTT010581@hestia.sjsu.edu> From: iscan@email.sjsu.edu To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.339 () NO_REAL_NAME X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: Virus Alert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:01:06 -0000 The mail message (file: message.scr) you sent to contains a virus (WORM_NETSKY.P). The message has been deleted, so you may want to resend it without the virus payload. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 18:13:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8913516A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:13:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0154343D53 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5UIDHIZ026892 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:13:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000201c45ecc$8dc45490$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> <40E27656.4040607@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:03:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:13:20 -0000 Hello, Alright, i am still having this issue, and now another has cropped up. I am getting an error: "server dropped connection before sending the initial smtp greeting." The only thing i can think of is i changed some setting trying to get this working. However like before that is the only message i'm getting in my maillog. If anyone has any suggestions i've posted my configs for postfix and amavisd at: http://www.davemehler.com/postfix Any suggestions welcome. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 18:13:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7DD16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:13:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEF043D3F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:13:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i5UIDWrT009948; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i5UIDVTv002831; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:13:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040629230817.0f6d230e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040629153855.300b3888.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1133CD52-CA07-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040629230817.0f6d230e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <31116F58-CAC1-11D8-9B33-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:13:30 -0400 To: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:13:33 -0000 On Jun 29, 2004, at 11:08 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > Charles Swiger wrote: >> Well, that does tend to rule out a bunch of issues. Have you tried >> changing the MTU of the FreeBSD box down to 1400 or so (or even 512), >> just to see whether that does anything? > > OK. I've had a bit of success here ... > > By setting the MTU down to ~650, I get the best performance I've seen > with this setup (about 27k/sec ... which isn't too bad) I set > "SocketOptions maxseg 650" in the proftpd.conf file for now, which > seems > to help a good bit. Bingo, found something! All should be easy from here on out... :-) > But I'm really confused. Why does reducing the MTU improve > performance? > I would have thought it would hurt performance by increasing the # of > packets, thus increasing overhead. Using a smaller MTU normally does hurt performance, as you have to send more packets (as you've said) and because the overhead (ratio of packet header size to data size) becomes larger. However, using an MTU which is too big means packets have to be fragmented and reassembled, which slows things down a lot, too. Anyway, it is likely that one of the networks involved in the connection has a smaller MTU than normal, which means large data packets get fragmented, resulting in delays. FTP data connections tend to show this more than scp does, as the latter seems to vary the packet size more: perhaps a result of using compression/encryption within the SSH protocol. > I did some captures using Ethereal, and I'm seeing a weird pause (with > the MTU at the default) where the client will send three packets, > there'll > be a pause, then the ack comes back, then three packets, pause, ack ... That rings a bell. Are you using path MTU discovery? Is some firewall in place that might be blocking ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG messages (ICMP type 3, subtype 4)? You should try doing a traceroute which can do pMTU testing; I'm not sure whether the stock FreeBSD traceroute can do this, but a search ought to dig up something. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 18:23:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5676D16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:23:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD5543D1D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8233110687D; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:22:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E304EE.4000209@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:22:38 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> <40E27656.4040607@elvandar.org> <000201c45ecc$8dc45490$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <000201c45ecc$8dc45490$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:23:03 -0000 dave wrote: > Hello, > Alright, i am still having this issue, and now another has cropped up. I > am getting an error: "server dropped connection before sending the initial > smtp greeting." > The only thing i can think of is i changed some setting trying to get > this working. However like before that is the only message i'm getting in my > maillog. If anyone has any suggestions i've posted my configs for postfix > and amavisd at: > http://www.davemehler.com/postfix > Any suggestions welcome. > Thanks. > Dave. > As far as i can see they look okay (but since it involves a lot of lines i might overlooked something) Again the question: What does the postfix mention when you add smtpd -v in the master.cf (The upper smtpd option that is) Since that gives verbose information it might tell you _what_ is wrong. Please try that ;-) Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 18:26:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE43E16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:26:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688BB43D39 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238E9487C1; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:25:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i5UIPu012756; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:25:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:25:56 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: Peter Risdon Message-ID: <20040630182555.GA12142@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , Peter Risdon , FreeBSD Question List References: <40E27567.8060506@circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E27567.8060506@circlesquared.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD Question List Subject: Re: make clean all installed ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:26:27 -0000 On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:10:15AM +0100, Peter Risdon wrote: > I'm sure I saw recently on this list that it's possible to: > > #cd /usr/ports > #make clean somethingorother > > and clean just installed ports. A straight make clean in the root of the > ports tree takes rather a long time. > > But I can't seem to find the post anywhere. If this isn't the product of > my feverish imagination, I'd be grateful for a reminder. Matthew Seaman recently posted this: make clean -DNOCLEANDEPENDS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 18:36:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2422016A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:36:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail2.cableone.net [24.116.0.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14E243D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:36:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.191]) by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 7534331 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:22:50 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:36:07 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040630133607.598c60ed@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040628161012.82589.qmail@web53406.mail.yahoo.com> <20040628121353.4bd1dc41@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628171756.GC83630@spamcop.net> <20040628132232.74fabcfa@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040628185304.GA68724@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040629122910.GB7543@lori.mine.nu> <20040629230522.GA1391@lori.mine.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: WinKey doesn't work in X.org? (was Re: Guide to x.org update?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:36:39 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:05:22 +0200 Geert Hendrickx wrote: > One difference I noticed, after switching to X.org, is that my > WinKey doesn't work anymore. I used it a lot for custom keybindings > in IceWM. > > Any clue, anyone? Check and make sure the kb is set correctly in the Xconfig or possible IceWM bug? I don't use IceWM, but fluxbox-devel... and mod4 works fine in both xorg and xfree86 /me has not noticed any differces between them yet other than xorg refuses to compile on his 4x box From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 19:06:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3BC16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:06:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C46743D2F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:06:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i5UJ5Tlo005486; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000401c45ed3$d8622e80$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: "Remko Lodder" References: <001301c45d82$54257890$0200a8c0@satellite> <9cd98d1204062920367ba89108@mail.gmail.com> <40E27656.4040607@elvandar.org> <000201c45ecc$8dc45490$0200a8c0@satellite> <40E304EE.4000209@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:55:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd-new postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:06:04 -0000 Hello, Thanks, i did that. The adding of the -v option isn't giving me any additional information, it's just saying what it said before, smtpd is dying with exit status 1, and now the error "server did not send an smtp greeting. I think my next move is to try a complete reinstall. I didn't want to do this, but i'm not seeing the problem and as i said -v isn't really helping. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 19:06:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754F316A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:06:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FCB43D48 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:06:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i5UJ6pn6021427 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id i5UJ6dgQ018754 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <200406301500.18611@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> References: <200406291822.25914@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> <200406301500.18611@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9D6E84AE-CAC8-11D8-9B33-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:06:39 -0400 To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: Re: Using syslog(3) after chroot-ing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:06:51 -0000 On Jun 30, 2004, at 3:00 PM, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > =What happens if you set TZ in the environment which syslogd is started > =up from? > > That's an idea. Can I just call tzset() (or tzsetwall()?) prior to > chroot-ing? I suspect that you could indeed. Again, just to be clear: the timestamps are produced by syslogd, not by the program doing the logging, so you'd have to change syslogd itself. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 19:22:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DB416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:22:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server.tcslea.org (server.tcslea.org [205.238.132.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D1343D1F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdnewbie@coolarrow.com) X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's FindAttachments (free) X-Antivirus: clamav via cgpav Received: from [205.238.178.46] (HELO system) by server.tcslea.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b6) with ESMTP id 362207 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:22:16 -0500 Message-ID: <200406301422070520.23DED6BA@coolarrow.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:22:07 -0500 From: "Chris" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: port upgrades X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:22:42 -0000 *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* 5.2.1-RELEASE I've started using 'portupgrade' to update several ports to the latest= versions, but have an odd problem when it comes to certain ports. For example: server# pkg_version -v | grep Spam bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63 < needs updating (port has 2.63_2) server# portupgrade bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin ---> Skipping 'mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin' because it is held by user= (specify -f to force) server# portupgrade -f bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin So I use the -f flag to force, and get several errors like: =3D=3D=3D> p5-MIME-Base64-3.01 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of= converters/p5-MIME-Base64 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/converters/p5-MIME-Base64. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/p5-Digest. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/p5-Digest-SHA1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/p5-Digest-HMAC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/dns/p5-Net-DNS. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa= /tmp/portupgrade64155.0 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin (bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63)= (unknown build error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed I can successfully "install Mail::SpamAssassin" using cpan, but it never= seems to show up as the latest version (always seems to need upgrading= when looking at pkg_version). Are there are two different ways to install (for example) SpamAssassin (and= other perl related ports)? I can use cpan OR the pkg_add / portupgrade commands but not both? Thanks, Chris _________________________________________________________ Email harvesters eat this: sendjunkmailhere@coolarrow.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 19:31:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682A716A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:31:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08DA43D39 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:31:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:32:29 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:34:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: 'Tom Parquette' , Michael Clark Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:34:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2004 19:32:29.0880 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB828B80:01C45ED8] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: em0 Intel Gigabit card, rc.conf processing on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:31:46 -0000 Still having frustrating problems with em0 intel card. Here is a copy of the dmesg. I have tried adding sleep statements to the rc files, with no success. The card still becomes active after the rc.conf processing. Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #0: Wed Jun 30 11:25:22 CDT 2004 root@monitor.nemschoff.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc09e3000. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (601.37-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 268419072 (255 MB) avail memory = 251097088 (239 MB) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00f0e70 pcib0: at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci_cfgintr: 0:4 INTD BIOS irq 5 pci_cfgintr: 0:9 INTA BIOS irq 5 pci_cfgintr: 0:10 INTA BIOS irq 10 pci_cfgintr: 0:11 INTA BIOS irq 11 agp0: mem 0xe4000000-0xe7ffffff at d evice 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb80f at device 4.1 on pci 0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata0: [MPSAFE] ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ata1: [MPSAFE] uhci0: port 0xb400-0xb41f irq 5 at dev ice 4.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ums0: Logitech Optical USB Mouse, rev 2.00/3.40, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. piix0: port 0xe800-0xe80f at device 4.3 on pci0 Timecounter "PIIX" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 0 fxp0: port 0xb000-0xb03f mem 0xe1800000-0xe181fff f,0xe2000000-0xe2000fff irq 5 at device 9.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:07:e9:1b:a3:34 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp1: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xe0800000-0xe081fff f,0xe1000000-0xe1000fff irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:07:e9:1b:a2:c4 miibus1: on fxp1 inphy1: on miibus1 inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto em0: port 0xa400-0xa43f mem 0xdf800000-0xdf81ffff,0xe0000000-0xe001ffff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A orm0: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "HWCursor" # [] #Option "SWCursor" # [] #Option "ShadowFB" # [] #Option "Rotate" # [] #Option "UseBIOS" # [] #Option "LCDClock" # #Option "ShadowStatus" # [] #Option "CrtOnly" # [] #Option "TvOn" # [] #Option "PAL" # [] #Option "ForceInit" # [] Option "NoUseBIOS" # WB: needed! Identifier "Card0" Driver "savage" VendorName "S3 Inc." BoardName "[ProSavageDDR]" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" EndSection -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 11:37:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4159E16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:37:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fep6.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74BE43D58 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:37:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.murphy@cogeco.ca) Received: from earth.upton.net (d141-23-108.home.cgocable.net [24.141.23.108]) by fep6.cogeco.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 56434C8F; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:36:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:36:38 -0400 From: Paul Murphy To: "Darkbackwardz co. ltd." Message-Id: <20040701073638.561c8789@earth.upton.net> In-Reply-To: <40E3E5C8.5070303@netscape.net> References: <40E3E5C8.5070303@netscape.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) X-Face: -Q/~XHbe$z/a List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:37:05 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__1_Jul_2004_07_36_38_-0400_G6.jaF4Txso34=PE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:22:00 -0400 "Darkbackwardz co. ltd." wrote: > I have just installed FreeBSD version 4.10 along with KDE and the > X-Window system on my x86 PC, unfortunately, when I type "startx" at > the command line I get this error message: > > "XFree86 Version 4.3.0 > Release Date: 27 February 2003 > X Protocol version II Revision 0 Release 6.6 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.10 i386 [ELF] > Build Date: 29 April 2004 > > Before reporting problems check http://www.XFree86.Org to make sure > you have the latest version > > Module loader present > Markers: (--)probed, (**) from config file, (= =) default setting, (+ > +) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, > (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > > > (= =) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed June 30 23:43:12 > 2004(= =) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" > > (WW) SAVAGE: chipset "ProSavage DDR" in device section "VIA > ProSavage8" isn't valid for this driver > > (EE) No devices detected > > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > > When reporting a problem related to server crash, please send the full > server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the > lof file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log. Please report problems to > xfree86@xfree86.org. > > X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown) > X auth: creating new authority file /root/.Xauthority > xauth: (argv) :1: bad display name ":0" in remove command > xauth: (argv) :1: bad display name ":0" in remove command > #" > > > > I'm quite sure that I've chosen the wrong video driver during setup, > my computer runs on a VIA KM266 chipset with an integrated S3 > ProSavage8 DDR video card (Seen here: > http://www.via.com.tw/en/ProSavage%20Chipsets/km266.jsp ) > Which BSD driver would best suit this card? So far I've tried > selecting > the ProSavageK category and the driver labled "savage", as well as the > "generic-vga" category and "vga" driver in the XFree86 setup. > If my card isn't supported by BSD, which one of the drivers on > http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=296 would I use and how would I > install it from a floppy disc? I've already installed the > compatibility packages for Linux binaries, but I don't know which > version would be best accepted. > > > Any help would be appreciated! > -Melinda Coates > > > > I have a similar setup and this is the Device section I use: Section "Device" Option "NoUseBIOS" Identifier "ProSavageDDR" Driver "savage" VendorName "S3 Inc." BoardName "[ProSavageDDR K4M266]" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" EndSection -- Cogeco ergo sum --Signature=_Thu__1_Jul_2004_07_36_38_-0400_G6.jaF4Txso34=PE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA4/dN2Ev+mfbss0wRAvSFAJsFi2HhoTsR9wpIs71YY2eBxrEYGQCfdY82 WeqZAk9L9OznGU63l6kTFlc= =YD7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__1_Jul_2004_07_36_38_-0400_G6.jaF4Txso34=PE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 06:05:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AC516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:05:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smart-serv.net (smart-serv.net [64.251.71.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45C143D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremy@smart-serv.net) Received: (qmail 5368 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 2004 06:05:11 -0000 Received: from jeremy@smart-serv.net by smart-serv.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(24.71.219.0):. Processed in 0.114975 secs); 01 Jul 2004 06:05:11 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jeremy@smart-serv.net via smart-serv.net X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(24.71.219.0):. Processed in 0.114975 secs) Received: from s01060020af2604cf.ek.shawcable.net (HELO comp-1.ca.cvs.freeworld.nu) (jeremy@24.71.219.0) by smart-serv.net with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 06:05:10 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:04:09 -0700 From: SmartServ Hosting To: questions@lists.freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040630230409.3f35b73b@comp-1.ca.cvs.freeworld.nu> Organization: SmartServ Hosting X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:27:54 +0000 Subject: Re: Reading regular DVD's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:05:16 -0000 dmesg | grep acd acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT When I insert a DVD movie /dev/acd0c doesn't register therefore I cannot use mplayer or anything to view the DVD. -- Jeremy Johnston (President / Developer) SmartServ Hosting Email: jeremy@smart-serv.net Phone: 1-250-428-5465 Cell: 1-250-402-9583 Fax: 1-250-428-2602 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 12:40:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDE516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:40:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from melexc01.stateautomation.com (bytecr.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.142.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130C543D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:40:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@stateautomation.com) Received: by MELEXC01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) id ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:45:49 +1000 Message-ID: From: freebsd@stateautomation.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:45:38 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: FTP server will not initiate DATA connection back to client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:40:42 -0000 I am running FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE running the standard ftpd. I can act as an ftp client from the console OK, however when I try to ftp from a client PC to the server running ftpd (which is running ipfw) the ftp server receives the packet sent to port 21 and replies however it will not initiate a DATA connection back to the client from port 20. I had my client configured to use ACTIVE FTP. I have also tried PASSIVE without any difference. I do not have a firewall on the client and can successfully FTP to another FreeBSD box. None of the rules on my firewall that deny packets coming back from the ftp servers ipfw firewall are being hit. Does anyone have any ideas? Regards, J.S From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 13:11:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C942F16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:11:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D22A43D2F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:11:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuc@ttsg.com) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (ool-44c09852.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.152.82]) (authenticated bits=128)i61DBBCf077421; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:11:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1])id i61DBAw8008832; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tuc@ttsg.com) Received: (from tuc@localhost)i61DBA2W008831; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tuc) From: Tuc Message-Id: <200407011311.i61DBA2W008831@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: ryan@sasknow.com (Ryan Thompson) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040630182527.D615@localhost.my.domain> from "Ryan Thompson" at Jun 30, 2004 06:35:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk about to fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:11:58 -0000 > > Best? Get your data off the disk *yesterday*, in descending priority > order, and use the platters for wind chimes. > I'm doing rsyncs every few hours. The problem is that once it has a critical enough issue, I'll not be able to mount the volume (I'm not 100% sure its /var, I was hoping that by some way via the LBA I could track back to what filesystem and file it is. Sans this, when it does fail, how can I "reformat" it so that it does some sort of block checking and doesn't use bad spots? I can't find anything in newfs that will tell it to do this. Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 13:14:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9ED16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:14:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BA443D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:15:12 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:15:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: 'Perry Riggle' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:15:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2004 13:15:12.0913 (UTC) FILETIME=[713D4010:01C45F6D] Subject: RE: RDP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:14:40 -0000 This isn't a *BSD solution, but its works extremely well for me. http:\\thinstation.sourceforge.net Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -----Original Message----- From: Perry Riggle [mailto:priggle@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:47 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RDP I was wondering if there is a way to set FreeBSD up to replace a Windows 2000 server. The company I work for uses terminal services client to connect to the WIN2K server. When users connect they can log in and create documents, spreadsheets, etc. Currently I use rdesktop on FreeBSD at work to connect to the WIN2K. It would be nice to replace the Windows machine with a *BSD. Thanks -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 13:32:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED8916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:32:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1092143D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:32:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i61DWPXr011730; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:32:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i61DWPCN011727; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:32:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:32:25 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: freebsd@stateautomation.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040701092402.H11587@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP server will not initiate DATA connection back to client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:32:47 -0000 Does it work with ipfw disabled? If so, then it seems resonable that ipfw is causing the problem. One of the ftp modes (pasv or port) requires high level ports to be accessible on the server. I just started drinking coffee this moring, so i can't remember which one yet. :) If i remember right, the default ftpd is influenced by hosts.allow and hosts.deny too. On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 freebsd@stateautomation.com wrote: > > I am running FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE running the standard ftpd. I can act as an > ftp client from the console OK, however when I try to ftp from a client PC > to the server running ftpd (which is running ipfw) the ftp server receives > the packet sent to port 21 and replies however it will not initiate a DATA > connection back to the client from port 20. I had my client configured to > use ACTIVE FTP. I have also tried PASSIVE without any difference. I do not > have a firewall on the client and can successfully FTP to another FreeBSD > box. > None of the rules on my firewall that deny packets coming back from the ftp > servers ipfw firewall are being hit. Does anyone have any ideas? > Regards, J.S > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 13:43:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FCE16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:43:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E526743D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:43:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg1pr-0000vR-E3; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:42:43 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:43:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407010843.52503.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bc7496e5ac91c8fc863025997ae8f5fd1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd@stateautomation.com Subject: Re: FTP server will not initiate DATA connection back to client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:43:20 -0000 On Thursday 01 July 2004 07:45 am, freebsd@stateautomation.com wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE running the standard ftpd. I can > act as an ftp client from the console OK, however when I try to ftp > from a client PC to the server running ftpd (which is running ipfw) > the ftp server receives the packet sent to port 21 and replies > however it will not initiate a DATA connection back to the client > from port 20. I had my client configured to use ACTIVE FTP. I have > also tried PASSIVE without any difference. I do not have a firewall > on the client and can successfully FTP to another FreeBSD box. > None of the rules on my firewall that deny packets coming back from > the ftp servers ipfw firewall are being hit. Does anyone have any > ideas? Regards, J.S In /etc/services, I see the following lines related to ftp: ftp-data 20/tcp #File Transfer [Default Data] ftp-data 20/udp #File Transfer [Default Data] ftp 21/tcp #File Transfer [Control] ftp 21/udp #File Transfer [Control] Are all of these ports open in the firewall? Sending and receiving? (I don't know if all of the ports are needed or not.) Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 13:54:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ECC16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:54:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6FD43D53 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FDA69A39; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:53:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:53:41 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: User LAFFER1 Message-Id: <20040701095341.7265c53a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040701092402.H11587@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <20040701092402.H11587@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd@stateautomation.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP server will not initiate DATA connection back to client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:54:11 -0000 User LAFFER1 wrote: > Does it work with ipfw disabled? If so, then it seems resonable that ipfw > is causing the problem. One of the ftp modes (pasv or port) requires high > level ports to be accessible on the server. I just started drinking > coffee this moring, so i can't remember which one yet. :) Drink faster man! ;) Do these tests: 1) FTP active mode with firewall enabled 2) FTP active mode with firewall at allow all 3) FTP passive mode with firewall enabled If 2 & 3 succeed and 1 doesn't ... then it's your firewall. Other combinations indicate other problems which may be more complex. FTP active mode requires that the server can make a connection _back_ to the client. This fails over NAT boundries and many different firewall configs. Passive mode causes the client to make a _second_ connection to the server on a high, random port. This traverses NAT pretty well, but requires proper rules in the server's packet filter to allow the connections to succeed. I believe the man page on ftpd has more detail. The "random, high" ports that can be used is configurable. I believe these two sysctls control it: net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152 net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535 > If i remember right, the default ftpd is influenced by hosts.allow and > hosts.deny too. > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 freebsd@stateautomation.com wrote: > > > > > I am running FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE running the standard ftpd. I can act as an > > ftp client from the console OK, however when I try to ftp from a client PC > > to the server running ftpd (which is running ipfw) the ftp server receives > > the packet sent to port 21 and replies however it will not initiate a DATA > > connection back to the client from port 20. I had my client configured to > > use ACTIVE FTP. I have also tried PASSIVE without any difference. I do not > > have a firewall on the client and can successfully FTP to another FreeBSD > > box. > > None of the rules on my firewall that deny packets coming back from the ftp > > servers ipfw firewall are being hit. Does anyone have any ideas? > > Regards, J.S > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 14:16:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BCB16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:16:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC59A43D2F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i61EGFh26491; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:16:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407011416.i61EGFh26491@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: priggle@sbcglobal.net (Perry Riggle) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:16:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Perry Riggle" at Jul 01, 2004 12:47:16 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RDP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:16:53 -0000 Hi, > I was wondering if there is a way to set FreeBSD up to replace a Windows > 2000 server. The company I work for uses terminal services client to > connect > to the WIN2K server. When users connect they can log in and create > documents, spreadsheets, etc. Currently I use rdesktop on FreeBSD at work > to > connect to the WIN2K. It would be nice to replace the Windows machine with > a *BSD. Take a look at samba /usr/ports/net/samba and see if it helps you. ////jerry > > Thanks > > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 14:42:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948E316A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:42:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxc.rambler.ru (mxc.rambler.ru [81.19.66.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFA243D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from twistfire@rambler.ru) Received: from mail2.rambler.ru (mail2.rambler.ru [81.19.66.21]) by mxc.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359DFCDBD1 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:41:23 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [81.19.66.146] (account twistfire@rambler.ru) by mail2.rambler.ru (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.6) with HTTP id 148396650 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:41:23 +0400 From: "=?windows-1251?Q?=C0=EB=E5=F1=E5=E9_=C7=E8=E2=E5=ED=EA=EE?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:41:23 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: How to fix??? boot bug?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:42:16 -0000 Hi all. I have one question. Just reinstalled FreeBSD 4.9 on my new hardware. I had 845 - 1700, now I have 865 - P4 2600, same hard. But now I cannot load FreeBSD - ??? Why??? It writes - BTX halted - ......... many registers... PS I have just installed 4.6 on this machine - all is beautiful, but I have not my hardware support Maby it's a hardware problem?? Can you help me?? sorry for my english From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 14:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D88416A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cenedra.walrond.org (host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com [213.160.108.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C94443D53 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@walrond.org) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=bob.mobile) by cenedra.walrond.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg2xH-00051n-NX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:27 +0100 From: Andrew Walrond To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:32:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:55:28 -0000 I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing bootloader, grub. Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would look like, or point me to an FAQ? Andrew Walrond From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 15:19:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4F516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:19:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2798443D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:19:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i61FIkYG060105; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:18:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:18:46 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Andrew Walrond Message-ID: <20040701151845.GB6574@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:19:28 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 01), Andrew Walrond said: > I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing > bootloader, grub. > > Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would > look like, or point me to an FAQ? All I do with grub is chainload the FreeBSD partition's bootblock. root(hd0,1) chainloader +1 -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 15:48:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E4916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:48:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23E743D1D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (pcp02025587pcs.plsntv01.nj.comcast.net[68.44.29.50]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004070115160701400o71qpe>; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:16:07 +0000 Message-ID: <40E42C1A.8070600@atopia.net> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:22:02 -0400 From: Matt Juszczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040526) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 4.0 with ipnat/ipfw2 1:1 NAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:48:07 -0000 Hello all, Was just wondering everyone's opinion on this subject.... Got a FreeBSD box ... 2.4 ghz Xeon with 1 gig RAM and two gb nic cards. This box's job is to do a 1:1 NAT for about 2000 workstations. In everyone's opinion, is IPNAT and IPFW2 a good solution for this? Also, will that box handle that (I'm pretty sure it will), and if so, any security recommendations? (other than custom kernel, local firewall, and securelevel 2). Thanks! -Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 15:51:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0AF16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:51:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-dav17.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.184.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEBA43D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:51:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b1henning@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:41:21 -0700 Received: from 192.216.212.193 by bay15-dav17.bay15.hotmail.com with DAV; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:41:21 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [192.216.212.193] X-Originating-Email: [b1henning@hotmail.com] X-Sender: b1henning@hotmail.com From: "Brian Henning" To: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:41:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2004 15:41:21.0915 (UTC) FILETIME=[DBF8C4B0:01C45F81] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: mounting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:59 -0000 Greetings: Currently i have 2 drives ad1 (10 gig) and ad2 (10gig) on my bsd system = that I would like to use for file storage. I want to create a mounting = point, /files_area, that could treat the two drives as one. So when I = add files to /files_area it treats it like one big 20 gig drive. is = this possible? can someone point me to some docs on howto do it? thanks, Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 15:52:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C9016A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:52:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED4A43D45 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:52:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:53:09 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:53:11 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: "'Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:53:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2004 15:53:09.0260 (UTC) FILETIME=[81950CC0:01C45F83] Subject: Gigabit Adaptors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:52:26 -0000 After my recent disagreements with the em0 Intel MT adaptor, I have decided to order something else for my FreeBSD use. Anyone have any good suggestions for cards that they prefer to use in 5.x? Thank you everyone for the suggestions with the em0 card. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 15:54:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871E616A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:54:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from danu.intersiege.com (dsl092-163-205.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.163.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F51A43D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:54:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reed@intersiege.com) Received: from [192.168.2.147] (unknown [192.168.2.147]) by danu.intersiege.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40E1147E; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40E42C7E.2030502@intersiege.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:23:42 -0400 From: "Reed L. O'Brien" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Walrond References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> In-Reply-To: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:47 -0000 in grub.conf # if it is default default 0 # how long to wait usually with default timeout 5 #title title FreeBSD #root location first on my disk here root (hd0,0,e) #kernel kernel /boot/loader # or if grub already exists and is working for WXP and Linux... # I last did it like so # FSBD 4.5 with (I think) title FBSD 4.5 rootnoverify (hd0,1) # map w/o linux checks makeactive # set chainloader +1 #hand off luck, reed Andrew Walrond wrote: >I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing >bootloader, grub. > >Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would look like, >or point me to an FAQ? > >Andrew Walrond >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- 4.6692016090 'cmVlZEBpbnRlcnNpZWdlLmNvbQ==\n'.decode('base64') From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:06:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC3316A4D0 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:06:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D87A43D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:06:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i61G0qZ26940; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:00:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407011600.i61G0qZ26940@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: b1henning@hotmail.com (Brian Henning) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:59:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Brian Henning" at Jul 01, 2004 10:41:17 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mounting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:06:08 -0000 > > Greetings: > > Currently i have 2 drives ad1 (10 gig) and ad2 (10gig) on my bsd system that I would like to use for file storage. I want to create a mounting point, /files_area, that could treat the two drives as one. So when I add files to /files_area it treats it like one big 20 gig drive. is this possible? can someone point me to some docs on howto do it? Start by studying up on vinum(8). The FreeBSD handbook and man pages and then some searches should tell you what you need to know. Also, please break your message lines at abou 70 characters length. It makes it easier for many of us to read and to make responses. ////jerry > > thanks, > > Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:11:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3253116A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FDD443D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from bsd.billschoolcraft.com ([63.204.157.14]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:10:34 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:10:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@bsd.billschoolcraft.com To: Andrew Walrond In-Reply-To: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> Message-ID: <20040701090748.N52759@bsd.billschoolcraft.com> References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> System-ID: [en] (I; FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0 x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:11:55 -0000 At Thu, 1 Jul 2004 it looks like Andrew Walrond composed: > I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing > bootloader, grub. > > Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would look like, > or point me to an FAQ? > > Andrew Walrond > _______________________________________________ Here is one that worked for me with FreeBSD on the 4th primary partition. It was a while ago when I had RedHat-7.2 as the controller of GRUB. ################################ # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this # file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd0,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/hda3 # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/hda default=0 timeout=10 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz title Red Hat Linux (2.4.7-10) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 ro root=/dev/hda3 initrd /initrd-2.4.7-10.img title FreeBSD-4.2 root (hd0,4,a) kernel /boot/loader ################################### -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 -o) San Francisco CA 94121 /\ "UNIX, A Way Of Life." _\_v http://billschoolcraft.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:13:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C5916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:13:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from danu.intersiege.com (dsl092-163-205.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.163.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BEA43D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reed@intersiege.com) Received: from [192.168.2.147] (unknown [192.168.2.147]) by danu.intersiege.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A511480; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:12:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40E437B8.7060708@intersiege.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:11:36 -0400 From: "Reed L. O'Brien" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Reed L. O'Brien" References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> <40E42C7E.2030502@intersiege.com> In-Reply-To: <40E42C7E.2030502@intersiege.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with Grub (correction) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:13:17 -0000 I shouldlspecify that AFAIK the first listing is the 'old' way which still works and with multiple *BSD the second is the 'new' way that works with FBSD and maybe OBSD IIRC. cheersm reed Reed L. O'Brien wrote: > in grub.conf > > # if it is default > default 0 > # how long to wait usually with default > timeout 5 > #title > title FreeBSD > #root location first on my disk here > root (hd0,0,e) > #kernel > kernel /boot/loader > > # or if grub already exists and is working for WXP and Linux... > # I last did it like so > # FSBD 4.5 with (I think) > title FBSD 4.5 > rootnoverify (hd0,1) # map w/o linux checks > makeactive # set > chainloader +1 #hand off > > luck, > reed > > Andrew Walrond wrote: > >> I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing >> bootloader, grub. >> >> Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would >> look like, or point me to an FAQ? >> >> Andrew Walrond >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > -- 4.6692016090 'cmVlZEBpbnRlcnNpZWdlLmNvbQ==\n'.decode('base64') From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:33:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3755F16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:33:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.myhealthcarefirst.com (mail.myhealthcarefirst.com [66.119.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D722043D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Chad.Albert@myhealthcarefirst.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:13:35 -0500 Message-ID: <433CEE75B1339547BBB373B3406653840EE655@hfmail01.sgf.healthcarefirst.med> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RDP thread-index: AcRfL6csT+7ClTD1RTGgw553PHPPPQAUoQ9A From: "Chad Albert" To: "Perry Riggle" , Subject: RE: RDP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:33:57 -0000 This is for Linux, but it is a project to replace Windows Terminal Services, I have not used it, but I have seen it around. It uses X11 so it will be less friendly in low bandwidth environments. http://www.ltsp.org=20 -- Chad -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Perry Riggle Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:47 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RDP I was wondering if there is a way to set FreeBSD up to replace a Windows 2000 server. The company I work for uses terminal services client to connect to the WIN2K server. When users connect they can log in and create documents, spreadsheets, etc. Currently I use rdesktop on FreeBSD at work to connect to the WIN2K. It would be nice to replace the Windows machine with a *BSD. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:36:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DA216A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:36:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3654943D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:36:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (52.80-202-129.nextgentel.com [80.202.129.52]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4213928; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:02:58 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <40E4B459.4030701@broadpark.no> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:03:21 -0700 From: Henrik W Lund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: nb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Henning References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mounting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:36:07 -0000 Brian Henning wrote: >Greetings: > >Currently i have 2 drives ad1 (10 gig) and ad2 (10gig) on my bsd system that I would like to use for file storage. I want to create a mounting point, /files_area, that could treat the two drives as one. So when I add files to /files_area it treats it like one big 20 gig drive. is this possible? can someone point me to some docs on howto do it? > >thanks, > >Brian > > Greetings!! Check out this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum-vinum.html I'm pretty sure this will work for you. -Henrik W Lund From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:37:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB4816A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:37:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raptor.cigb.edu.cu (raptor.cigb.edu.cu [200.55.134.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F183A43D1F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu) Received: from atlas.cigb.edu.cu ([172.16.1.12]) by raptor.cigb.edu.cu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:35:59 -0400 Received: from Unknown [172.16.1.4] by atlas.cigb.edu.cu - SurfControl E-mail Filter (4.6); Thursday, 01 July 2004, 12:35:52 Message-ID: From: "Osmany Guirola Cruz" To: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:35:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: mod_mono Thread-Index: AcRfiXjc3E7JdPrsTCSbP+3Ce8lcXw== X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2004 16:35:59.0052 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D4C30C0:01C45F89] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: mod_mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:37:16 -0000 I have installed 4.10 release and mono 0.30.1 mod_mono 10 xsp 0.9 when i try to view http://mysite/demos =20 nothing happens the browser keep loading the page forever when i do a top i see that mono is using 97.80% of CPU=20 with the xsp server the problem is the same what should i do From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 16:46:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1FF16A4D0 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:46:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cenedra.walrond.org (host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com [213.160.108.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520C143D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:46:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@walrond.org) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=bob.mobile) by cenedra.walrond.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg4fx-0005H8-LC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:44:41 +0100 From: Andrew Walrond To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:22:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> In-Reply-To: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407011722.16428.andrew@walrond.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Re: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:46:51 -0000 Thanks all Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 17:04:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BF016A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:04:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omega.surenet.net (omega.surenet.net [216.94.255.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D954A43D1F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterp@surenet.net) Received: from localhost (delta.surenet.net [216.94.255.13]) by omega.surenet.net (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id i61H3WhW041706 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:03:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from peterp@surenet.net) Message-Id: <200407011703.i61H3WhW041706@omega.surenet.net> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: peterp@surenet.net Cc: Content-type: text/plain Mime-version: 1.0 X-sender-x: 231363e29343e2235353e2235303 X-mailer: Netbula AnyEMail(TM) 5.1 Subject: rdist problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:04:31 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:01 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:04:31 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to rdist some files from a FreeBSD 4.9 machine to a new 5.2.1 p9 server. On the 5.2.1 server I enabled rsh, added the 4.9 server to root's .rhosts file, and kept getting a login denied message. I added the following to the /etc/pam.d/rsh file on the 5.2.1 box: auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn account required pam_unix.so I can now rsh from the 4.9 box to the 5.2.1 box, but rdist shows the following: #rdist updating host wfv1 rdist: connection failed: version numbers don't match rdist: got unexpected input:rdist: rrdist: drdist: irdist: srdist: trdist: :rdist: rdist: Crdist: ordist: mrdist: mrdist: ardist: nrdist: drdist: rdist: nrdist: ordist: trdist: rdist: frdist: ordist: urdist: nrdist: drdist: .rdist: updating host wfv1 rdist: connection failed: version numbers don't match rdist: got unexpected input:rdist: rrdist: drdist: irdist: srdist: trdist: :rdist: rdist: Crdist: ordist: mrdist: mrdist: ardist: nrdist: drdist: rdist: nrdist: ordist: trdist: rdist: frdist: ordist: urdist: nrdist: drdist: .rdist: updating host wfv1 rdist: connection failed: version numbers don't match rdist: got unexpected input:rdist: rrdist: drdist: irdist: srdist: trdist: :rdist: rdist: Crdist: ordist: mrdist: mrdist: ardist: nrdist: drdist: rdist: nrdist: ordist: trdist: rdist: frdist: ordist: urdist: nrdist: drdist: .rdist: Running rdist -D shows: updating host wfv1 port = 514, luser = root, ruser = root buf = rdist -Server local user = root remote user = root Remote command = 'rdist -Server' I am root, therefore direct rcmd rdist: connection failed: version numbers don't match rdist: got unexpected input:rdist: rrdist: drdist: irdist: srdist: trdist: :rdist: rdist: Crdist: ordist: mrdist: mrdist: ardist: nrdist: drdist: rdist: nrdist: ordist: trdist: rdist: frdist: ordist: urdist: nrdist: drdist: .rdist: closeconn() doarrow(0x805b690, wfv1, 0x805b650) makeconn(wfv1) I've spent all morning looking at this and have run out of ideas. As part of the same rdist file, i'm update 3 other 4.10 server and they work fine. Does anyone have any sugestions? Yes, I know rdist is a little out of date, i've got a bunch of legacy stuff and scripts to convert before I can migrate off of rdist. Thanks Peter Parker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 17:05:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CB516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:05:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C7E43D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq69-157.dial.allstream.net [216.123.142.125]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 778E3B481C; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:37 -0400 From: epilogue To: Aaron Walker Message-Id: <20040701120337.07a0b8d7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <40E3EFCF.9040507@butsugenjitemple.org> References: <1088645947.32566.8.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040630234845.2f8002b0@localhost> <75f3f705040630211863661ddc@mail.gmail.com> <40E3EFCF.9040507@butsugenjitemple.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome installing Mozilla by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:05:44 -0000 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:04:47 -0400 Aaron Walker wrote: > Roop Nanuwa wrote: > > > I'll join in on the praise for Opera. It really is the best web browser > > that's extremely light but still has all the "modern day" features > > one would expect from a web browser and then some. I will warn you > > about a couple of things, though. > > > > 1] The native FreeBSD version is not going to run Flash. I've pulled > > out many, many hairs about this but have never gotten the two to > > work together. If you want to view Flash, then install the linux-opera > > port. > > 2] You'll be spoiled after using Opera for any length of time. I've > > been using Opera for a long time and I simply can't tolerate any other > > browsers. The feature set it provides is so expansive that other > > browsers will seem utterly gutted in comparison. Ever use vi for a > > while and then notice that random ':w' or ':wq' start appearing in > > places where they shouldn't because you've gotten so used to the > > commands? Same idea here. 3] The default interface is not for everyone. > > Just realize that the interface is highly configurable so don't let it > > turn you off if it's not to your liking. > > > > --roop > > Just curious, but which version of flash are you using with Opera? I > did a search of the ports tree and found quite a few flash ports and was > confused on which one to install. > um, this one... ~> pkg_info | grep -i flash linux-flashplugin-7.0r25 The official Macromedia Flash Player for Linux Mozilla and hth, epi > Thanks > -- > Save energy: Drive a smaller shell. > > /* Aaron Walker > * http://butsugenjitemple.org/~ka0ttic/ > */ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 17:27:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A802516A4CF for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bingo.yandex.ru (bingo.yandex.ru [213.180.200.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FD743D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freeman-666@yandex.ru) Received: from www.mitridat.com.ua ([213.160.132.26]:39442 "EHLO FREEMAN" smtp-auth: "freeman-666") by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:26:27 +0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:26:50 +0300 From: freeman X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1876158975.20040701202650@yandex.ru> To: 'Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: problem when installing php-4.3.7 with Image Magic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freeman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:27:43 -0000 Hello ALL, I'm have a problem when install php-4.3.7 with Image Magic #uname -a FreeBSD unix.mitridat.com.ua 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 8 15:28:01 EET 2003 root@king.mitridat.com.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Update ports. I'm build php-4.3.7 from ports with good result. But me need compiled with image magic. Step by instruction: 1. phpize, aclocle (in ext\imagick) 2. buildconf --force 3. './configure' '--enable-versioning' '--enable-memory-limit' '--with-layout=GNU' '--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--disable-all' '--with-regex=php' '--with-pear' '--enable-bcmath' '--with-bz2=/usr' '--enable-calendar' '--with-crack=/usr/local' '--enable-ctype' '--with-curl=/usr/local' '--enable-dba' '--with-dom=/usr/local' '--with-dom-xslt=/usr/local' '--with-dom-exslt=/usr/local' '--enable-exif' '--enable-ftp' '--with-gd' '--enable-gd-native-ttf' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/local' '--with-t1lib=/usr/local' '--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/local' '--with-png-dir=/usr/local' '--with-xpm-dir=/usr/X11R6' '--with-gettext=/usr/local' '--with-hyperwave' '--with-iconv-dir=/usr/local' '--with-iconv=/usr/local' '--with-inifile' '--enable-mbstring' '--with-mcal=/usr/local' '--with-mcve=/usr/local' '--with-mcrypt=/usr/local' '--with-mhash=/usr/local' '--with-mime-magic=/usr/share/misc/magic.mime' '--with-ming=/usr/local' '--with-mnogosearch=/usr/local' '--with-mssql=/usr/local' '--with-ldap=/usr/local' '--with-openssl-dir=/usr/local' '--with-openssl=/usr/local' '--enable-overload' '--with-pcre-regex=yes' '--enable-posix' '--with-pgsql=/usr/local' '--enable-session' '--enable-sockets' '--enable-tokenizer' '--with-unixODBC=/usr/local' '--with-expat-dir=/usr/local' '--enable-xml' '--with-xmlrpc' '--enable-xslt' '--with-xslt-sablot=/usr/local' '--with-zip=/usr/local' '--with-zlib=yes' '--with-apxs=/usr/local/sbin/apxs' '--with-imap=/usr/local' '--with-imap-ssl=/usr/local' '--with-ncurses=/usr' '--with-snmp=/usr/local' '--enable-ucd-snmp-hack' '--x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib' '--x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include' '--prefix=/usr/local' 'i386-portbld-freebsd4.9' '--with-imagick' 4. make libtool: link: cannot find the library `' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.7. _ It's all ... :-( But before outputs: /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.7/libtool --silent --preserve-dup-deps --mode=link gcc -export-dynamic -g -O2 -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -R /usr/local/lib -R /usr/X11R6/lib ext/ctype/ctype.lo ext/imagick/imagick.lo ext/mysql/php_mysql.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/libmysql.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/errmsg.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/net.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/violite.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/password.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_init.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_lib.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_static.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_malloc.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_realloc.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_create.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_delete.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_tempnam.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_open.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_casecnv.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_read.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_write.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/errors.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_error.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_getwd.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_div.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_pack.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_messnc.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_dirname.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_fn_ext.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_wcomp.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/typelib.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/safemalloc.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_alloc.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_format.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_path.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_unixpath.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_fopen.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mf_loadpath.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_pthread.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_thr_init.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/thr_mutex.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/mulalloc.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/string.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/default.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_compress.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/array.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_once.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/list.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/my_net.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/dbug.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strmov.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strxmov.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strnmov.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strmake.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strend.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strfill.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/is_prefix.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/int2str.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/str2int.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strinstr.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strcont.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strcend.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/bchange.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/bmove.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/bmove_upp.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/longlong2str.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strtoull.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/strtoll.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/charset.lo ext/mysql/libmysql/ctype.lo ext/overload/overload.lo ext/pcre/pcrelib/maketables.lo ext/pcre/pcrelib/get.lo ext/pcre/pcrelib/study.lo ext/pcre/pcrelib/pcre.lo ext/pcre/php_pcre.lo ext/posix/posix.lo ext/session/session.lo ext/session/mod_files.lo ext/session/mod_mm.lo ext/session/mod_user.lo regex/regcomp.lo regex/regexec.lo regex/regerror.lo regex/regfree.lo ext/standard/array.lo ext/standard/base64.lo ext/standard/basic_functions.lo ext/standard/browscap.lo ext/standard/crc32.lo ext/standard/crypt.lo ext/standard/cyr_convert.lo ext/standard/datetime.lo ext/standard/dir.lo ext/standard/dl.lo ext/standard/dns.lo ext/standard/exec.lo ext/standard/file.lo ext/standard/filestat.lo ext/standard/flock_compat.lo ext/standard/formatted_print.lo ext/standard/fsock.lo ext/standard/head.lo ext/standard/html.lo ext/standard/image.lo ext/standard/info.lo ext/standard/iptc.lo ext/standard/lcg.lo ext/standard/link.lo ext/standard/mail.lo ext/standard/math.lo ext/standard/md5.lo ext/standard/metaphone.lo ext/standard/microtime.lo ext/standard/pack.lo ext/standard/pageinfo.lo ext/standard/parsedate.lo ext/standard/quot_print.lo ext/standard/rand.lo ext/standard/reg.lo ext/standard/soundex.lo ext/standard/string.lo ext/standard/scanf.lo ext/standard/syslog.lo ext/standard/type.lo ext/standard/uniqid.lo ext/standard/url.lo ext/standard/url_scanner.lo ext/standard/var.lo ext/standard/versioning.lo ext/standard/assert.lo ext/standard/strnatcmp.lo ext/standard/levenshtein.lo ext/standard/incomplete_class.lo ext/standard/url_scanner_ex.lo ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.lo ext/standard/http_fopen_wrapper.lo ext/standard/php_fopen_wrapper.lo ext/standard/credits.lo ext/standard/css.lo ext/standard/var_unserializer.lo ext/standard/ftok.lo ext/standard/aggregation.lo ext/standard/sha1.lo ext/tokenizer/tokenizer.lo ext/xml/xml.lo ext/xml/expat/xmlparse.lo ext/xml/expat/xmlrole.lo ext/xml/expat/xmltok.lo TSRM/TSRM.lo TSRM/tsrm_strtok_r.lo TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.lo main/main.lo main/snprintf.lo main/spprintf.lo main/php_sprintf.lo main/safe_mode.lo main/fopen_wrappers.lo main/alloca.lo main/php_scandir.lo main/php_ini.lo main/SAPI.lo main/rfc1867.lo main/php_content_types.lo main/strlcpy.lo main/strlcat.lo main/mergesort.lo main/reentrancy.lo main/php_variables.lo main/php_ticks.lo main/streams.lo main/network.lo main/php_open_temporary_file.lo main/php_logos.lo main/output.lo main/memory_streams.lo main/user_streams.lo Zend/zend_language_parser.lo Zend/zend_language_scanner.lo Zend/zend_ini_parser.lo Zend/zend_ini_scanner.lo Zend/zend_alloc.lo Zend/zend_compile.lo Zend/zend_constants.lo Zend/zend_dynamic_array.lo Zend/zend_execute_API.lo Zend/zend_highlight.lo Zend/zend_llist.lo Zend/zend_opcode.lo Zend/zend_operators.lo Zend/zend_ptr_stack.lo Zend/zend_stack.lo Zend/zend_variables.lo Zend/zend.lo Zend/zend_API.lo Zend/zend_extensions.lo Zend/zend_hash.lo Zend/zend_list.lo Zend/zend_indent.lo Zend/zend_builtin_functions.lo Zend/zend_sprintf.lo Zend/zend_ini.lo Zend/zend_qsort.lo Zend/zend_multibyte.lo Zend/zend_execute.lo sapi/cgi/libfcgi/fcgi_stdio.lo sapi/cgi/libfcgi/fcgiapp.lo sapi/cgi/libfcgi/os_unix.lo sapi/cgi/cgi_main.lo sapi/cgi/getopt.lo main/internal_functions.lo -lcrypt -lcrypt -lWand -lm -lMagick -ljbig -llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljasper -ljpeg -lpng -lfpx -ldpstk -ldps -lXext -lXt -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lm -lfreetype -lz -lcrypt -lcrypt -o sapi/cgi/php What is problem? -- Best regards, freeman mailto:freeman-666@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 17:54:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8019716A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:54:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DE2943D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:54:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhrider@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x71so1463174cwb for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.98.7 with SMTP id v7mr119019cwb; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ceee70407011046277dabe8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:46:04 -0700 From: Dan Finn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040701120337.07a0b8d7@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1088645947.32566.8.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040630234845.2f8002b0@localhost> <75f3f705040630211863661ddc@mail.gmail.com> <20040701120337.07a0b8d7@localhost> Subject: Re: Gnome installing Mozilla by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:54:52 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:37 -0400, epilogue wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:04:47 -0400 > Aaron Walker wrote: > > > Roop Nanuwa wrote: > > > > > I'll join in on the praise for Opera. It really is the best web browser > > > that's extremely light but still has all the "modern day" features > > > one would expect from a web browser and then some. I will warn you > > > about a couple of things, though. > > > > > > 1] The native FreeBSD version is not going to run Flash. I've pulled > > > out many, many hairs about this but have never gotten the two to > > > work together. If you want to view Flash, then install the linux-opera > > > port. > > > 2] You'll be spoiled after using Opera for any length of time. I've > > > been using Opera for a long time and I simply can't tolerate any other > > > browsers. The feature set it provides is so expansive that other > > > browsers will seem utterly gutted in comparison. Ever use vi for a > > > while and then notice that random ':w' or ':wq' start appearing in > > > places where they shouldn't because you've gotten so used to the > > > commands? Same idea here. 3] The default interface is not for everyone. > > > Just realize that the interface is highly configurable so don't let it > > > turn you off if it's not to your liking. > > > > > > --roop > > > > Just curious, but which version of flash are you using with Opera? I > > did a search of the ports tree and found quite a few flash ports and was > > confused on which one to install. > > > > um, this one... > > ~> pkg_info | grep -i flash > > linux-flashplugin-7.0r25 The official Macromedia Flash Player for Linux > Mozilla and > > hth, > epi > all this talk of opera got me interested so I thought I would go ahead and install it. a "make install" of /usr/ports/www/linux-opera seemed to work fine. I get this when I try and run it: [ dfinn @ stewie : ~] : linux-opera opera: Could not initialize spell checker interface. File not found or could not be opened (-7) Segmentation fault (core dumped) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 18:00:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2452416A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:00:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F7343D1F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i61HkaYn081862; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:46:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <40E44DFC.7080202@circlesquared.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:46:36 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perry Riggle References: <433CEE75B1339547BBB373B3406653840EE655@hfmail01.sgf.healthcarefirst.med> In-Reply-To: <433CEE75B1339547BBB373B3406653840EE655@hfmail01.sgf.healthcarefirst.med> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RDP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:00:56 -0000 Chad Albert wrote: > This is for Linux, but it is a project to replace Windows Terminal > Services, [snip] > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Perry Riggle > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:47 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RDP > > I was wondering if there is a way to set FreeBSD up to replace a Windows > 2000 server. The company I work for uses terminal services client to > connect to the WIN2K server. When users connect they can log in and > create documents, spreadsheets, etc. Currently I use rdesktop on FreeBSD > at work to connect to the WIN2K. It would be nice to replace the Windows > machine with a *BSD. I read the OP as an interest in replacing the Windows 2000 server, not anything client-side. Assuming that's right... If you replace this W2K box with a FreeBSD server, you can provide replacements for pretty much everything the Windows box can do (*full* Exchange functionality being a possible exception), and add some new stuff. You can certainly give users the ability to bring up a remote desktop on the server and do work, including creating (word processing) documents and spreadsheets. VNC is perhaps the best option for Windows clients, you could carry on using rdesktop. In fact, while Windows was designed as a single user system, and terminal services is a sort of bolt-on afterthought, FreeBSD is a multi-user environment from the ground up. But they'll be using a FreeBSD desktop. You can provide a nice window manager and a full office suite. It won't be the Windows GUI and it won't be MS Office. There may be retraining issues and also probs with backwards compatibility with previously created documents - depends how many Office features the users are taking advantage of. Simple documents are fine. Complicated, Visual Basic-ridden stuff won't work well or at all. Having said that, it would be a step into a brighter future to make this replacement :-) Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 18:33:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3CA16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7061243D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@toyingwithfate.com) Received: from toyingwithfate.com (66-108-61-89.nyc.rr.com [66.108.61.89]) i61IXBS6023456 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:33:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toyingwithfate.com (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i61IDQl2048165 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:13:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@toyingwithfate.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:13:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200407011813.i61IDQl2048165@toyingwithfate.com> From: Will McCutcheon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on toyingwithfate.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Serial console stopping startup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:33:56 -0000 I've been having some trouble with a new server I just installed FreeBSD onto for the first time. I stick "-h" into /boot.config as I've done on other machines so as to get it to start up with an accessable serial console. However, while I get the following messages: /boot.config: -h BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 That comes out the screen, and nothing more. Nothing ever comes out the serial console. Furthermore, the system doesn't seem to boot up. There isn't any heavy disk activity after this and it never binds to its IP address. I've tinkered some with the serial port settings in the BIOS, suspecting it to be a BIOS issue, but wasn't able to figure anything out. I was able to use the serial ports for the same purpose under Red Hat 8 before I wiped it and stuck FreeBSD on there. Any ideas? Clues? Thanks so much! W From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 18:51:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB0516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:51:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it (vsmtp3alice.tin.it [212.216.176.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B72143D55 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:51:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drizzt@freesbie.org) Received: from [192.168.150.2] (80.117.35.131) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.0.027) id 40CF29D700491F1E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:50:47 +0200 From: Timothy Redaelli To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-37L0JzKjO0s88QDBNaIo" Message-Id: <1088707846.25904.2.camel@athlonxp2100.drizzt.thc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:50:46 +0200 Subject: Cannot make distribution on 5.2.1-p9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:51:39 -0000 --=-37L0JzKjO0s88QDBNaIo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # make distribution DESTDIR=3D/usr/local/livefs [cut] cd /usr/src/etc/pam.d; make install install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 README=20 /usr/local/livefs/etc/pam.d/README install -C -o root -g wheel -m 644 ftpd gdm imap kde login other passwd pop3 rexecd rsh sshd su system telnetd xdm /usr/local/livefs/etc/pam.d /usr/local/livefs/etc/pam.d/ftp -> /usr/local/livefs/etc/pam.d/ftpd cd /usr/src/etc; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 644 =20 /usr/local/livefs/etc/ssl line 179 usage: install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2 install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... *** Error code 64 Stop in /usr/src/etc. Is it only a my problem or is it a src problem? Cheers --=20 Timothy Redaelli Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG key: http://www.drizzt.it/drizzt.asc --=-37L0JzKjO0s88QDBNaIo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA5F0G2vF8pagnT1gRAiuHAJ0dGEnfVnFfE21Xw5jFuapqK87QxwCfVb2n O6I0QXrgvv/KYckAWeRT5XI= =o+7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-37L0JzKjO0s88QDBNaIo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 19:04:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F9316A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:04:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DEA43D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:04:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg6pz-0003Uq-W4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:03:12 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088708561.44259.0.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:02:41 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Linux-Opera problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:04:05 -0000 When I try and run linux-opera, i get this error. flipnode@solid# rehash flipnode@solid# linux-opera ELF binary type "0" not known. ELF binary type "0" not known. /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected what does that mean? What should I do? Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 19:06:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2844116A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:06:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B976843D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:06:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i61I7EnM011971; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:07:14 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF1C752364; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:07:11 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: peterp@surenet.net Message-ID: <20040701180711.GA29988@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200407011703.i61H3WhW041706@omega.surenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407011703.i61H3WhW041706@omega.surenet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rdist problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:06:19 -0000 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:01:00PM +0100, peterp@surenet.net wrote: ^^^^ The 20th century called, they want their year back :-) > Hi, >=20 > I'm trying to rdist some files from a FreeBSD 4.9 machine to a new > 5.2.1 p9 server. On the 5.2.1 server I enabled rsh, added the 4.9 > server to root's .rhosts file, and kept getting a login denied > message. I added the following to the /etc/pam.d/rsh file on the > 5.2.1 box: What version of rdist are you running? Is it the same version on both systems? Kris P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so that your emails may be eas= ily read. --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5FLPWry0BWjoQKURAlzcAJ4gPSHx99zzQBcAdjTYgAf9R3ZA/QCgzBra DnpKCqtTQCIgHwZj6naEPyE= =UVBz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 19:42:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABC016A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate-internal1.sri.com (mailgate-internal1.SRI.COM [128.18.84.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 732EA43D3F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:42:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hogsett@csl.sri.com) Received: (qmail 28938 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 19:34:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mailgate-internal1.SRI.COM) (127.0.0.1) by mailgate-internal1.sri.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 19:34:23 -0000 Received: from quarter.csl.sri.com ([130.107.1.30]) M2004070112342303175 ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:23 -0700 Received: from beast.csl.sri.com (beast.csl.sri.com [130.107.2.57]) by quarter.csl.sri.com (8.12.9/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i61JYNmi027990; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:34:23 -0700 Received: from beast.csl.sri.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by beast.csl.sri.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i61JYNAc003500; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:34:23 -0700 Received: from beast.csl.sri.com (hogsett@localhost)i61JYNfC003496; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:34:23 -0700 Message-Id: <200407011934.i61JYNfC003496@beast.csl.sri.com> To: Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: Message from Bruce Hunter <1088708561.44259.0.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:23 -0700 From: Mike Hogsett cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux-Opera problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:42:45 -0000 > When I try and run linux-opera, i get this error. > > flipnode@solid# rehash > flipnode@solid# linux-opera > ELF binary type "0" not known. > ELF binary type "0" not known. > /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected > > what does that mean? What should I do? Try doing (as root of course) ; kldload linux From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 19:54:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F4616A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:54:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749E843D45 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg7cc-0007cO-Kq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:53:27 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088711580.682.4.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:53:01 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: pkg_deinstall problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:54:04 -0000 hello, I ran the #pkg_deinstall -vrR then I reboot and root no longer had a password, and my only user 'flipnode' was no longer a user. Also, it seemed to delete the main .cshrc file. Also, it seemed to delete or overwrite my /etc/fstab file. Basically, I was trying to remove xfce-4 and everything for it, but leave stuff/libs for other packages needing them. Only if other packages were needing them. What did I do wrong? Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 19:55:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6543416A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:55:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4427743D1D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:55:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg7e4-0007kb-Ot; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:57 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: Mike Hogsett , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200407011934.i61JYNfC003496@beast.csl.sri.com> References: <200407011934.i61JYNfC003496@beast.csl.sri.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088711670.682.6.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:31 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Linux-Opera problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:55:37 -0000 On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:34, Mike Hogsett wrote: > > When I try and run linux-opera, i get this error. > > > > flipnode@solid# rehash > > flipnode@solid# linux-opera > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected > > > > what does that mean? What should I do? > > Try doing (as root of course) > > ; kldload linux > I tried what you asked: This is what happened.. flipnode@solid% su Password: solid# kldload linux solid# linux-opera Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authentication failed cannot open file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XftConfig" Segmentation fault (core dumped) Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:08:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639ED16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:08:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146F643D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:08:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532BA4AC36 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:09:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Cordula's Web To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE Message-Id: <20040701200940.532BA4AC36@fw.farid-hajji.net> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: BOINC SETI Version for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:08:00 -0000 Hi, any chance to see a port of the BOINC version of setiathome in the future? Source code to both boinc and seti boinc is available, but no port yet... Could a ports guru please have a look? Thanks. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:12:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44BC16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:12:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [206.51.1.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957A743D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) Received: from borg (borg.dilkie.com [206.51.1.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by spock.dilkie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i61KBL7r052160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) From: "Lee Dilkie" To: "Freebsd-Questions (E-mail)" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:20 -0400 Message-ID: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:12:06 -0000 Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here. running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU to get an up to = date index. Bunch of ports needed updating, including portupgrade so I upgraded = portupgrade first. That seemed to work fine (it reports version 1.8.1). Now, every port I try to upgrade fails when uninstalling the old = version. I've tried to upgrade clamav, isc-dhcp3-server and a couple of = others. All report "undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass". [snip preamble] sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e = "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.conf.5 >dhcpd.conf.man5 nroff -man dhcpd.conf.man5 >dhcpd.conf.cat5 sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e = "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.leases.5 >dhcpd.leases.man5 nroff -man dhcpd.leases.man5 >dhcpd.leases.cat5 ---> Build of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:15 = -0400 (consumed 00:04:10) ---> Updating dependency info ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 started at: Thu, 01 = Jul 2004 15:51:30 -0400 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version ---> Deinstalling 'isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3' ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 (undefined method `each' for = nil:NilClass) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 ended at: Thu, 01 = Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:00:14) ---> Upgrade of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 = 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:04:40) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! net/isc-dhcp3-server (isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3) = (uninstall error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Session ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:49 -0400 (consumed = 00:05:02) [root@spock:/root] uname -a FreeBSD spock.dilkie.com 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 19 = 15:16:03 EDT 2004 root@spock.dilkie.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPOCK = i386 Any ideas??? Does anyone need more info? -lee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:15:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87BD16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:15:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7326543D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4570610687D; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:14:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E47091.3000107@elvandar.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:14:09 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cpghost@cordula.ws References: <20040701200940.532BA4AC36@fw.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20040701200940.532BA4AC36@fw.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BOINC SETI Version for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:15:01 -0000 Hey Cordula's web Cordula's Web wrote: > Hi, > > any chance to see a port of the BOINC version of setiathome > in the future? Source code to both boinc and seti boinc is > available, but no port yet... Could a ports guru please have > a look? I very recently (yesterday?) saw somone who almost ported it over. Checkout the freebsd-ports archive for more information.. Cheers > > Thanks. > -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:23:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CD416A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:23:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuf.mingrone.org (fuf.mingrone.org [204.251.2.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D5B443D2F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:23:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: (qmail 30136 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 20:23:00 -0000 Received: from fuf.mingrone.org (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (204.251.2.34) by fuf.mingrone.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 20:23:00 -0000 From: Joey Mingrone To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:22:54 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> In-Reply-To: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407011723.00220.joey@mingrone.org> cc: Lee Dilkie Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:23:53 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD systems. Joey On July 1, 2004 17:11, Lee Dilkie wrote: > Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here. > > running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU to get an up to > date index. > > Bunch of ports needed updating, including portupgrade so I upgraded > portupgrade first. That seemed to work fine (it reports version 1.8.1). > > Now, every port I try to upgrade fails when uninstalling the old version. > I've tried to upgrade clamav, isc-dhcp3-server and a couple of others. > > All report "undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass". > > [snip preamble] > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.conf.5 >dhcpd.conf.man5 nroff -man > dhcpd.conf.man5 >dhcpd.conf.cat5 > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.leases.5 >dhcpd.leases.man5 nroff -man > dhcpd.leases.man5 >dhcpd.leases.cat5 > ---> Build of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:15 > -0400 (consumed 00:04:10) ---> Updating dependency info > ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 started at: Thu, 01 > Jul 2004 15:51:30 -0400 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a > package > ---> Backing up the old version > ---> Uninstalling the old version > ---> Deinstalling 'isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3' > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 (undefined method `each' for > nil:NilClass) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 > failed ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 ended at: Thu, > 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:00:14) ---> Upgrade of > net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed > 00:04:40) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / > !:failed) ! net/isc-dhcp3-server (isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3) =20 > (uninstall error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped > and 1 failed ---> Session ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:49 -0400 > (consumed 00:05:02) [root@spock:/root] uname -a > FreeBSD spock.dilkie.com 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 19 > 15:16:03 EDT 2004 root@spock.dilkie.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPOCK=20 > i386 > > Any ideas??? Does anyone need more info? > > -lee > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5HKe0NQPEWppBZsRAqkTAKCVOvSu5XRmiWzq43XJqno8WA74WQCgya0v z2tAApWFeRHlS7u2ebSWJAQ=3D =3DPPox =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:27:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0564316A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9302F43D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:27:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg88s-0001kd-IB; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:26:46 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: Joey Mingrone , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200407011723.00220.joey@mingrone.org> References: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200407011723.00220.joey@mingrone.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088713580.682.9.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:26:20 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:27:52 -0000 Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? I'm running portupgrade rev.1.225 with no problems. On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Joey Mingrone wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD systems. > > Joey > > On July 1, 2004 17:11, Lee Dilkie wrote: > > Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here. > > > > running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU to get an up to > > date index. > > > > Bunch of ports needed updating, including portupgrade so I upgraded > > portupgrade first. That seemed to work fine (it reports version 1.8.1). > > > > Now, every port I try to upgrade fails when uninstalling the old version. > > I've tried to upgrade clamav, isc-dhcp3-server and a couple of others. > > > > All report "undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass". > > > > [snip preamble] > > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.conf.5 >dhcpd.conf.man5 nroff -man > > dhcpd.conf.man5 >dhcpd.conf.cat5 > > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.leases.5 >dhcpd.leases.man5 nroff -man > > dhcpd.leases.man5 >dhcpd.leases.cat5 > > ---> Build of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:15 > > -0400 (consumed 00:04:10) ---> Updating dependency info > > ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 started at: Thu, 01 > > Jul 2004 15:51:30 -0400 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a > > package > > ---> Backing up the old version > > ---> Uninstalling the old version > > ---> Deinstalling 'isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3' > > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > > ! isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 (undefined method `each' for > > nil:NilClass) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 > > failed ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 ended at: Thu, > > 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:00:14) ---> Upgrade of > > net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed > > 00:04:40) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / > > !:failed) ! net/isc-dhcp3-server (isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3) > > (uninstall error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped > > and 1 failed ---> Session ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:49 -0400 > > (consumed 00:05:02) [root@spock:/root] uname -a > > FreeBSD spock.dilkie.com 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 19 > > 15:16:03 EDT 2004 root@spock.dilkie.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPOCK > > i386 > > > > Any ideas??? Does anyone need more info? > > > > -lee > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFA5HKe0NQPEWppBZsRAqkTAKCVOvSu5XRmiWzq43XJqno8WA74WQCgya0v > z2tAApWFeRHlS7u2ebSWJAQ= > =PPox > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:34:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318D916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [206.51.1.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B3043D2F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) Received: from borg (borg.dilkie.com [206.51.1.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by spock.dilkie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i61KYenx064933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:34:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) From: "Lee Dilkie" To: "'Bruce Hunter'" , "'Joey Mingrone'" , Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:34:39 -0400 Message-ID: <015e01c45faa$d5b95af0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1088713580.682.9.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: RE: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' fornil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:34:57 -0000 > > >Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? >I'm running portupgrade rev.1.225 with no problems. yes. I saw from portversion that portupgrade was bumped so i ran=20 "portupgrade -rv portupgrade" first. > >On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Joey Mingrone wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >>=20 >> You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD systems. >>=20 >> Joey >>=20 >> On July 1, 2004 17:11, Lee Dilkie wrote: >> > Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here. >> > >> > running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU=20 >to get an up to >> > date index. >> > >> > Bunch of ports needed updating, including portupgrade so I upgraded >> > portupgrade first. That seemed to work fine (it reports=20 >version 1.8.1). >> > >> > Now, every port I try to upgrade fails when uninstalling=20 >the old version. >> > I've tried to upgrade clamav, isc-dhcp3-server and a=20 >couple of others. >> > >> > All report "undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass". >> > >> > [snip preamble] >> > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e >> > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.conf.5 >dhcpd.conf.man5 nroff -man >> > dhcpd.conf.man5 >dhcpd.conf.cat5 >> > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e >> > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.leases.5 >dhcpd.leases.man5=20 >nroff -man >> > dhcpd.leases.man5 >dhcpd.leases.cat5 >> > ---> Build of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul=20 >2004 15:51:15 >> > -0400 (consumed 00:04:10) ---> Updating dependency info >> > ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3=20 >started at: Thu, 01 >> > Jul 2004 15:51:30 -0400 ---> Fixing up dependencies=20 >before creating a >> > package >> > ---> Backing up the old version >> > ---> Uninstalling the old version >> > ---> Deinstalling 'isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3' >> > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) >> > ! isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 (undefined method=20 >`each' for >> > nil:NilClass) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored,=20 >0 skipped and 1 >> > failed ---> Uninstallation of=20 >isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 ended at: Thu, >> > 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:00:14) ---> Upgrade of >> > net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45=20 >-0400 (consumed >> > 00:04:40) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored /=20 >*:skipped / >> > !:failed) ! net/isc-dhcp3-server (isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3) =20 >> > (uninstall error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0=20 >ignored, 0 skipped >> > and 1 failed ---> Session ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004=20 >15:51:49 -0400 >> > (consumed 00:05:02) [root@spock:/root] uname -a >> > FreeBSD spock.dilkie.com 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE=20 >#0: Sat Jun 19 >> > 15:16:03 EDT 2004 =20 >root@spock.dilkie.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPOCK=20 >> > i386 >> > >> > Any ideas??? Does anyone need more info? >> > >> > -lee >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) >>=20 >> iD8DBQFA5HKe0NQPEWppBZsRAqkTAKCVOvSu5XRmiWzq43XJqno8WA74WQCgya0v >> z2tAApWFeRHlS7u2ebSWJAQ=3D >> =3DPPox >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >>=20 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:35:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C7516A4D7 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:35:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuf.mingrone.org (fuf.mingrone.org [204.251.2.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D88F843D46 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: (qmail 30247 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 20:34:51 -0000 Received: from fuf.mingrone.org (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (204.251.2.34) by fuf.mingrone.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 20:34:51 -0000 From: Joey Mingrone To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:34:49 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200407011723.00220.joey@mingrone.org> <1088713580.682.9.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> In-Reply-To: <1088713580.682.9.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407011734.51038.joey@mingrone.org> cc: Bruce Hunter Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:35:03 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote: > Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701. I'm guessin= g=20 there will be another update shortly. Joey > I'm running portupgrade rev.1.225 with no problems. > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Joey Mingrone wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD systems. > > > > Joey > > > > On July 1, 2004 17:11, Lee Dilkie wrote: > > > Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here. > > > > > > running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU to get an up > > > to date index. > > > > > > Bunch of ports needed updating, including portupgrade so I upgraded > > > portupgrade first. That seemed to work fine (it reports version 1.8.1= ). > > > > > > Now, every port I try to upgrade fails when uninstalling the old > > > version. I've tried to upgrade clamav, isc-dhcp3-server and a couple = of > > > others. > > > > > > All report "undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass". > > > > > > [snip preamble] > > > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > > > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.conf.5 >dhcpd.conf.man5 nroff -man > > > dhcpd.conf.man5 >dhcpd.conf.cat5 > > > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > > > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.leases.5 >dhcpd.leases.man5 nroff -man > > > dhcpd.leases.man5 >dhcpd.leases.cat5 > > > ---> Build of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:= 15 > > > -0400 (consumed 00:04:10) ---> Updating dependency info > > > ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 started at: Thu, > > > 01 Jul 2004 15:51:30 -0400 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creati= ng > > > a package > > > ---> Backing up the old version > > > ---> Uninstalling the old version > > > ---> Deinstalling 'isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3' > > > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > > > ! isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 (undefined method `each' for > > > nil:NilClass) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped > > > and 1 failed ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 end= ed > > > at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:00:14) ---> Upgrade > > > of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 > > > (consumed 00:04:40) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / > > > *:skipped / !:failed) ! net/isc-dhcp3-server > > > (isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3) (uninstall error) ---> Packages > > > processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Session > > > ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:49 -0400 (consumed 00:05:02) > > > [root@spock:/root] uname -a > > > FreeBSD spock.dilkie.com 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sat Jun = 19 > > > 15:16:03 EDT 2004 root@spock.dilkie.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPOCK > > > i386 > > > > > > Any ideas??? Does anyone need more info? > > > > > > -lee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) > > > > iD8DBQFA5HKe0NQPEWppBZsRAqkTAKCVOvSu5XRmiWzq43XJqno8WA74WQCgya0v > > z2tAApWFeRHlS7u2ebSWJAQ=3D > > =3DPPox > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5HVp0NQPEWppBZsRAueQAJwPhx0kz9mrZiqYRzW4PQEILf03WACfXPAd HEMHU09aUEtd4JzSrzCH4oQ=3D =3DSrVj =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:46:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D2116A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:46:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [206.51.1.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5834543D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) Received: from borg (borg.dilkie.com [206.51.1.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by spock.dilkie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i61KiwNu064986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:44:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) From: "Lee Dilkie" To: "'Joey Mingrone'" , Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:44:57 -0400 Message-ID: <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200407011734.51038.joey@mingrone.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: 'Bruce Hunter' Subject: RE: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' fornil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:46:31 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joey Mingrone >Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:35 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Cc: Bruce Hunter >Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' >fornil:NilClass > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote: >> Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? > >Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701.=20 > I'm guessing=20 >there will be another update shortly. > >Joey > Then the fun of trying to upgrade portupgrade when it won't uninstall = will begin... Anticipating that I'll need some directions on how to do this manually. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:51:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F9516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:51:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net (starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFA943D45 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:51:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by starling.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg8V3-0001WO-Kp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:49:41 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:50:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> In-Reply-To: <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407011550.52282.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b2579edd0b4a118c6d56ef50958a62b1c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' fornil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:51:30 -0000 On Thursday 01 July 2004 03:44 pm, Lee Dilkie wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joey > > Mingrone Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:35 PM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Cc: Bruce Hunter > >Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method > > 'each' fornil:NilClass > > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote: > >> Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? > > > >Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701. > > I'm guessing > >there will be another update shortly. > > > >Joey > > Then the fun of trying to upgrade portupgrade when it won't uninstall > will begin... > > Anticipating that I'll need some directions on how to do this > manually. > You can always pkg_delete an installed port. Good luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:52:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F5E16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:52:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuf.mingrone.org (fuf.mingrone.org [204.251.2.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E35343D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: (qmail 30388 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 20:50:40 -0000 Received: from fuf.mingrone.org (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (204.251.2.34) by fuf.mingrone.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 20:50:40 -0000 From: Joey Mingrone To: "Lee Dilkie" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:50:38 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> In-Reply-To: <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407011750.39943.joey@mingrone.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Bruce Hunter' Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' fornil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:52:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade make deinstall make install should do it. You might try looking at /usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade as well. Joey On July 1, 2004 17:44, Lee Dilkie wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joey Mingrone > >Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:35 PM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Cc: Bruce Hunter > >Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' > >fornil:NilClass > > > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote: > >> Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? > > > >Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701. > > I'm guessing > >there will be another update shortly. > > > >Joey > > Then the fun of trying to upgrade portupgrade when it won't uninstall will > begin... > > Anticipating that I'll need some directions on how to do this manually. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5Hke0NQPEWppBZsRAogIAJ9ma9y8DhfUCIMKpprNf3+riRe7JwCfSt71 093AVCOKmtcjYycxfcO1g/Y= =G5sP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:53:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CB916A4CE; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:53:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64ABA43D1D; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i61KkBco004332; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:46:11 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Akinori MUSHA Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:46:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <1088713580.682.9.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <200407011734.51038.joey@mingrone.org> In-Reply-To: <200407011734.51038.joey@mingrone.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407011346.41585.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Joey Mingrone cc: Bruce Hunter Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:53:01 -0000 On Thursday 01 July 2004 01:34 pm, Joey Mingrone wrote: > On July 1, 2004 17:26, Bruce Hunter wrote: > > Did you both upgrade 'portupgrade' and then the problem started? > > Yeah, problems stared after upgrading to portupgrade-20040701. I'm > guessing there will be another update shortly. > I haven't seen any comments to knu@ about the problem. I can repeat portupgrading portupgrade from the source and create a package. When I try to portupgrade using the package, I get # portupgrade -Puf portupgrade ---> Checking for the latest package of 'sysutils/portupgrade' ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! sysutils/portupgrade (portupgrade-20040701) (undefined method `>' for #) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed It also failed to delete devel/libtool-1.4.3_3, which was just moved into the Attic. Kent > Joey > > > I'm running portupgrade rev.1.225 with no problems. > > > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Joey Mingrone wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > You're not alone. I'm seeing the same problem on my FreeBSD > > > systems. > > > > > > Joey > > > > > > On July 1, 2004 17:11, Lee Dilkie wrote: > > > > Well, I'm at a bit of a loss here. > > > > > > > > running 4.10, did a cvsup this morning, then portsdb -uU to get > > > > an up to date index. > > > > > > > > Bunch of ports needed updating, including portupgrade so I > > > > upgraded portupgrade first. That seemed to work fine (it > > > > reports version 1.8.1). > > > > > > > > Now, every port I try to upgrade fails when uninstalling the > > > > old version. I've tried to upgrade clamav, isc-dhcp3-server and > > > > a couple of others. > > > > > > > > All report "undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass". > > > > > > > > [snip preamble] > > > > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > > > > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.conf.5 >dhcpd.conf.man5 nroff > > > > -man dhcpd.conf.man5 >dhcpd.conf.cat5 > > > > sed -e "s#ETCDIR#/usr/local/etc#g" -e "s#DBDIR#/var/db#g" -e > > > > "s#RUNDIR#/var/run#g" < dhcpd.leases.5 >dhcpd.leases.man5 nroff > > > > -man dhcpd.leases.man5 >dhcpd.leases.cat5 > > > > ---> Build of net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 > > > > 15:51:15 -0400 (consumed 00:04:10) ---> Updating dependency > > > > info ---> Uninstallation of isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 > > > > started at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:30 -0400 ---> Fixing up > > > > dependencies before creating a package > > > > ---> Backing up the old version > > > > ---> Uninstalling the old version > > > > ---> Deinstalling 'isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3' > > > > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > > > > ! isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 (undefined method > > > > `each' for nil:NilClass) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 > > > > ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Uninstallation of > > > > isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3 ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 > > > > 15:51:45 -0400 (consumed 00:00:14) ---> Upgrade of > > > > net/isc-dhcp3-server ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:45 -0400 > > > > (consumed 00:04:40) ---> Listing the results (+:done / > > > > -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! net/isc-dhcp3-server > > > > (isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.1.r12_3) (uninstall error) ---> Packages > > > > processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> > > > > Session ended at: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:51:49 -0400 (consumed > > > > 00:05:02) [root@spock:/root] uname -a > > > > FreeBSD spock.dilkie.com 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: > > > > Sat Jun 19 15:16:03 EDT 2004 > > > > root@spock.dilkie.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPOCK i386 > > > > > > > > Any ideas??? Does anyone need more info? > > > > > > > > -lee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) > > > > > > iD8DBQFA5HKe0NQPEWppBZsRAqkTAKCVOvSu5XRmiWzq43XJqno8WA74WQCgya0v > > > z2tAApWFeRHlS7u2ebSWJAQ= > > > =PPox > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:55:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE2516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:55:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F5543D45 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:55:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i61KrnLZ006485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:53:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i61Krn9w006472; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:53:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:53:48 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Lee Dilkie Message-ID: <20040701205348.GA81989@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Lee Dilkie , 'Joey Mingrone' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Bruce Hunter' References: <200407011734.51038.joey@mingrone.org> <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <016401c45fac$46065410$c10133ce@dilkie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:53:49 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: 'Joey Mingrone' cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Bruce Hunter' Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' fornil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:55:38 -0000 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:44:57PM -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote: > Then the fun of trying to upgrade portupgrade when it won't uninstall wil= l begin... >=20 > Anticipating that I'll need some directions on how to do this manually. It isn't difficult: # pkg_delete portupgrade-20040701 # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade # make install Now, all we need is the fixed version of portupgrade. Cheers Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5HnciD657aJF7eIRAgpnAJ49XSBSqPcqYruCBKLZ4Ct3qpJoKACgj8w5 ol6S9r6VzAjDrS6LJ3UiJKw= =9Omm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 21:05:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33A316A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:05:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.intercaf.ru (mailhub.intercaf.ru [195.96.167.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4EB43D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lesha@intercaf.ru) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ppp83-237-11-4.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [83.237.11.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhub.intercaf.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i61L4TMG016236 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:04:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from lesha@intercaf.ru) From: Alex K Organization: InterCAF To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:04:32 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407020104.32927.lesha@intercaf.ru> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' Subject: du -k VS ls -l (what I'm missing?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:05:45 -0000 Hello, all! (sorry for not wraping text, it messes up) what do I miss here? sum of individual file sizes is much more than "total" in ls and more than = du -k reports bash-2.05b$ ls -l total 354112 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 98490960 1 =C9=C0=CC 12:29 88479E51B1D77190= A2A8C882 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 299376716 25 =C9=C0=CE 15:20 F445555AA5CA2D90= =4633EE0F1 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 540729348 1 =C9=C0=CC 19:01 0C859D601337F1D2= 6D68BA90 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 125204414 30 =C9=C0=CE 18:12 50922168AB8D4CB7= 3FA39063 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 365164364 1 =C9=C0=CC 12:06 CBB789334BF480B9= ED153EA8 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 209031053 30 =C9=C0=CE 19:05 B2AFAA6C8C68575B= A97476F4 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 336457988 29 =C9=C0=CE 17:43 200DCA96AFFAF2FB= 08E3E279 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 40714776 1 =C9=C0=CC 18:16 6E30F671D9F30545= 8A093617 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 209945132 25 =C9=C0=CE 15:29 A515D96BFAD85C29= 4D4A9BB7 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 114632620 1 =C9=C0=CC 18:25 7868FE483F37D653= 109E67B3 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 242241614 1 =C9=C0=CC 19:02 75B7DC03642E00CE= 564C1FF6 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 42681134 25 =C9=C0=CE 15:29 F9C3246915327E44= B9B0FD2C =2Drw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 165569384 30 =C9=C0=CE 18:54 4FCA6EC8E3AB33B3= 3E3E5011 bash-2.05b$ du -k 354114 . bash-2.05b$ Cheers,=20 AL. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 21:09:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2576A16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:09:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3E6E43D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thatha@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d78so388470rnf for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.71.2 with SMTP id t2mr27826rna; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:01:46 +1000 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: <1088708561.44259.0.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1088708561.44259.0.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux-Opera problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:09:31 -0000 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:02:41 -0400, Bruce Hunter wrote: > > When I try and run linux-opera, i get this error. > > flipnode@solid# rehash > flipnode@solid# linux-opera > ELF binary type "0" not known. > ELF binary type "0" not known. > /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected Maybe you can try brandelf(1) Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 21:14:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FB016A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:14:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b.smtp.taconic.net (outgoing-1.taconic.net [205.231.144.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 860D043D53 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:14:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfranks214@taconic.net) Received: (qmail 12412 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 21:13:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO taconic.net) (jfranks214@taconic.net@205.231.31.80) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 21:13:22 -0000 Message-ID: <40E47E69.7040609@taconic.net> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:13:13 -0400 From: Jonathan Franks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040628 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Walrond References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> In-Reply-To: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:14:42 -0000 Andrew Walrond wrote: >I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing >bootloader, grub. > >Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would look like, >or point me to an FAQ? > >Andrew Walrond >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > I'm actually using a GRUB floppy, but this is what I type in to boot freeBSD (it's on the second IDE drive in my system) GRUB> root (hd1,0) GRUB> chainloder +1 GRUB> boot in the first line, (hd1,0) refers to the HDD and the partition, in that order. So if you have only one drive, and BSD is on the second partiton, for example, you'd use "root (hd0,1)" Hope this helps... Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 21:16:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2C816A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:16:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE5F43D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:16:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq69-157.dial.allstream.net [216.123.142.125]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 15591B49B0; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:55:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:55:19 -0400 From: epilogue To: Bruce Hunter Message-Id: <20040701165519.641b5796@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1088711670.682.6.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> References: <200407011934.i61JYNfC003496@beast.csl.sri.com> <1088711670.682.6.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Mike Hogsett cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux-Opera problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:16:18 -0000 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:31 -0400 Bruce Hunter wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:34, Mike Hogsett wrote: > > > When I try and run linux-opera, i get this error. > > > > > > flipnode@solid# rehash > > > flipnode@solid# linux-opera > > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > > /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: 1: Syntax error: "(" > > > unexpected > > > > > > what does that mean? What should I do? > > > > Try doing (as root of course) > > > > ; kldload linux > > > I tried what you asked: > This is what happened.. > > flipnode@solid% su > Password: > solid# kldload linux > solid# linux-opera > Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the > authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based > authentication failed > cannot open file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XftConfig" > Segmentation fault (core dumped) i don't have /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XftConfig either, but my linux-opera runs just fine. i'm not sure that this is the problem. do you have one of the linux_base ports installed? -- if no, you'll need one. -- if yes, give pkgdb -Fu a try and see if that clears anything up. also try running opera as a normal user. your root account may not have the same 'environment variables' set as you regular account. (a problem i've run into in the past which gave me curious X related error messages) good luck, epi > > Bruce > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 21:37:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB7616A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:37:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573EF43D1D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carlos.lizana@ericsson.com) Received: from eamrcnt734.exu.ericsson.se (eamrcnt734.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.32]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i61Lawou007382; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:36:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by eamrcnt734.exu.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:35:08 -0500 Message-ID: <76607B16842EBB4CBA942CABDB46D67C0251B1C5@eamspnt709.br.am.ericsson.se> From: "Carlos Lizana (CH/CEC)" To: "'Peter Risdon'" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:37:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: RE: Question about HP drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:37:52 -0000 Peter, but my FreeBSD Version is this: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE #7 -----Original Message----- From: Peter Risdon [mailto:peter@circlesquared.com] Sent: Martes, 22 de Junio de 2004 16:42 To: Carlos Lizana (CH/CEC) Cc: 'Lucas Holt'; 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org' Subject: Re: Question about HP drivers I sent this off-list, but it would be better here. Carlos Lizana (CH/CEC) wrote: > FreeBSD 4.5 > > > Is the ethernet chipset listed as supported on freebsd.org? What > version of freebsd are you using? > > > On Jun 22, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Carlos Lizana (CH/CEC) wrote: > > >>Hi Folks, we have installed two FreeBSD, is been used as firewall, but >>own equipment were upgraded and now have HP Compaq d530C/P2 It's probably a Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet PCI Adapter, and you should be OK with FreeBSD 5.2.1 I gather this driver appeared with 5.1 so earlier releases will not support it. Out of interest, the first half-dozen results when you google for *FreeBSD HP Compaq d530C/P2* reveal this. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 21:50:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A0916A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:50:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9DD43D31 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:50:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i61Lmxmg075060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:48:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i61LmxUn075059; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:48:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:48:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Alex K Message-ID: <20040701214859.GA74742@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Alex K , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200407020104.32927.lesha@intercaf.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407020104.32927.lesha@intercaf.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:48:59 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: du -k VS ls -l (what I'm missing?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:50:28 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:04:32AM +0400, Alex K wrote: > what do I miss here? > sum of individual file sizes is much more than "total" in ls and more tha= n du -k reports >=20 > bash-2.05b$ ls -l > total 354112 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 98490960 1 ??? 12:29 88479E51B1D77190A2A8C8= 82 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 299376716 25 ??? 15:20 F445555AA5CA2D90F33EE0= F1 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 540729348 1 ??? 19:01 0C859D601337F1D26D68BA= 90 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 125204414 30 ??? 18:12 50922168AB8D4CB73FA390= 63 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 365164364 1 ??? 12:06 CBB789334BF480B9ED153E= A8 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 209031053 30 ??? 19:05 B2AFAA6C8C68575BA97476= F4 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 336457988 29 ??? 17:43 200DCA96AFFAF2FB08E3E2= 79 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 40714776 1 ??? 18:16 6E30F671D9F305458A0936= 17 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 209945132 25 ??? 15:29 A515D96BFAD85C294D4A9B= B7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 114632620 1 ??? 18:25 7868FE483F37D653109E67= B3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 242241614 1 ??? 19:02 75B7DC03642E00CE564C1F= F6 > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 42681134 25 ??? 15:29 F9C3246915327E44B9B0FD= 2C > -rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 165569384 30 ??? 18:54 4FCA6EC8E3AB33B33E3E50= 11 > bash-2.05b$ du -k > 354114 . > bash-2.05b$ The 'total' figure from ls(1) and the number shown by du(1) is the total disk usage in blocks of 1024 bytes (if BLOCKSIZE=3Dk is set in your environment, which is the default) -- in this case, about a factor of 7 smaller than the total of the file sizes. Files can have 'holes' -- parts of the file that have never been written to, although later parts of the file have. Disk blocks are not allocated for those unwritten areas. If you use hexdump(1) on the file, the holes will show up as a sequence of null bytes. The way to tell if a file is holey is to compare the size of the file against the number of blocks allocated for it using: % stat -f "%10z %6b %N" * [ or % ls -ls * where the 1st column is the number of blocks, the 6th is the filesize in bytes] If the filesize is significantly greater than the number of blocks multiplied by the block size (stat(1) shows 512 byte blocks, ls(1) shows 1024 byte blocks) then those files have holes in them. It's quite common to see this, for example, in files that are the backing stores for databases. Having holey files is not a problem, although some broken backup software will tend to fill in all of the gaps with zeros, meaning that occasionally you can't restore a file back onto the same partition it was backed up from. You can quite easily have a file whose apparent size is larger than the partition holding it. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5IbLiD657aJF7eIRAmgnAKCWfCalUrdueaQ1F3+RqNTYOw/OTACfbu4p qmdioOjMSsW+j9voteGGbmk= =3kGP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 22:04:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23A016A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:04:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6FA43D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:04:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from c_ranchhod@breathe.com) Received: from mk-webmail-2.b2b.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.112.92]:4862) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bg9e4-0004HA-Oc for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:03:04 +0100 Received: from exim by mk-webmail-2.b2b.uk.tiscali.com with local (Exim 4.24) id 1Bg9eE-0001qY-N1 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:03:14 +0100 From: c_ranchhod@breathe.com To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:03:14 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Subject: Newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:04:21 -0000 Hi, I am new to this, just wandering if I could get some pointers in right direction into learning this software from basics to gaining intermidiate skills. I am a cisco engineer however want to learn the unix/linux too. any advice you can give me or what will help in learning BSD. Regards Chintan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 22:29:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DFB16A4CF for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:29:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6567343D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:29:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg9zw-0002yJ-O3; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:25:40 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: epilogue , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040701165519.641b5796@localhost> References: <200407011934.i61JYNfC003496@beast.csl.sri.com> <1088711670.682.6.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040701165519.641b5796@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088720711.1046.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:25:11 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Linux-Opera problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:29:04 -0000 On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:55, epilogue wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:31 -0400 > Bruce Hunter wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:34, Mike Hogsett wrote: > > > > When I try and run linux-opera, i get this error. > > > > > > > > flipnode@solid# rehash > > > > flipnode@solid# linux-opera > > > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > > > /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: 1: Syntax error: "(" > > > > unexpected > > > > > > > > what does that mean? What should I do? > > > > > > Try doing (as root of course) > > > > > > ; kldload linux > > > > > I tried what you asked: > > This is what happened.. > > > > flipnode@solid% su > > Password: > > solid# kldload linux > > solid# linux-opera > > Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the > > authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based > > authentication failed > > cannot open file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XftConfig" > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > i don't have /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XftConfig either, but my linux-opera > runs just fine. i'm not sure that this is the problem. > > do you have one of the linux_base ports installed? > > -- if no, you'll need one. > -- if yes, give pkgdb -Fu a try and see if that clears anything up. > > also try running opera as a normal user. your root account may not have > the same 'environment variables' set as you regular account. (a problem > i've run into in the past which gave me curious X related error messages) > > > good luck, > epi > > I ran linux-opera as a normal user and it ran, I really don't understand why it won't run for root. Not like I should be running it as root. hmm.. Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 22:31:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787C516A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:31:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E02743D2D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33824ACA4; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:33:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Cordula's Web To: remko@elvandar.org In-reply-to: <40E47091.3000107@elvandar.org> (message from Remko Lodder on Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:14:09 +0200) X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE References: <20040701200940.532BA4AC36@fw.farid-hajji.net> <40E47091.3000107@elvandar.org> Message-Id: <20040701223304.F33824ACA4@fw.farid-hajji.net> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:33:04 +0200 (CEST) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BOINC SETI Version for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:31:44 -0000 Remko Lodder: > Cordula's Web wrote: > > any chance to see a port of the BOINC version of setiathome > > in the future? Source code to both boinc and seti boinc is > > available, but no port yet... Could a ports guru please have > > a look? > > I very recently (yesterday?) saw somone who almost ported it over. > Checkout the freebsd-ports archive for more information.. Ah yes, there it is: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=624105+0+current/freebsd-ports I must have missed it. Silly me. Many thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 22:43:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA2E16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:43:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from delicious.stderror.at (stdin.stderror.at [213.229.63.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C3A43D41 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:43:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pinhead@delicious.stderror.at) Received: by delicious.stderror.at (Postfix, from userid 501) id BD35A102053; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:13:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:13:42 +0200 From: Toni Schmidbauer To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20040701161342.GH17653@stderror.at> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <200406302146.31818.algould@datawok.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406302146.31818.algould@datawok.com> Phone: +43 664 3502198 X-WWW-Home-Page: http://stderror.at X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53F2 28AE 8070 83E0 AFEC 0ABC BBF9 A34A 3ED1 3287 X-Operating-System: Darwin User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [OT] fetchmail, procmail and mutt (oh my!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: toni@stderror.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:43:37 -0000 --3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:46:31PM -0500, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > If I put 'mda /usr/local/bin/procmail' in the .fetchmailrc lines,=20 > procmail puts the emails in the correct mbox files; but mutt complains=20 > that the files are not valid email files and refuses to read them. i've this line in my .fetchmailrc: poll with proto imap user "username" pass "pass" mda '/usr/bin= /procmail -d %T' ssl i believe it's important to invoke procmail with the -d option, but read procmail(1). works like a charm for me. hth, toni --=20 Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert | Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | --3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA5Dg2u/mjSj7RMocRAnnuAJ9YAb/dAI3o12sp1TAG84QzLVge7QCcCahk ecoKlw5GHNCMvxtrTWac+hA= =zDsD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 22:43:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAD516A4CF for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:43:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from delicious.stderror.at (stdin.stderror.at [213.229.63.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7901543D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:43:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pinhead@delicious.stderror.at) Received: by delicious.stderror.at (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2ACFE102092; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:21:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:21:16 +0200 From: Toni Schmidbauer To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20040701162116.GI17653@stderror.at> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <1088634627.2465.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1088634627.2465.3.camel@localhost> Phone: +43 664 3502198 X-WWW-Home-Page: http://stderror.at X-PGP-Fingerprint: 53F2 28AE 8070 83E0 AFEC 0ABC BBF9 A34A 3ED1 3287 X-Operating-System: Darwin User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: mini itx X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: toni@stderror.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:43:37 -0000 --yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:30:27PM +0100, arden wrote: > has anyone used these boards with bds? using a via epia cl6000e with 5.2.1, it's running my home firewall and mailserver, no problems so far. hth, toni --=20 Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert | Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | --yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA5Dn8u/mjSj7RMocRAmKGAJwLzoKw/2bZknoosiXWMqDif4zcGACdGD6/ ZRX1IcEIS30dwqu647PEEzw= =zIIQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yr/DzoowOgTDcSCF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 23:17:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6FD16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:17:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mercury.is.co.za (mercury.is.co.za [196.4.160.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C41C43D39 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grantg@xsinet.co.za) Received: from grant-home (c9-ctn-35.dial-up.net [196.39.101.35]) by mercury.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161EAC8775 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:15:38 +0200 (SAST) From: grantg@xsinet.co.za Organization: Home user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:18:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407020118.37110.grantg@xsinet.co.za> Subject: DataTraveler 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:17:22 -0000 Hi there I am currently having trouble with this compact flash card. It's a Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 and everytime I plug it in I get theses errors popping up. umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT this repeats about five times. any suggest on a solutions or any ideas on where I can start looking for answers? Thanks Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 23:59:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C622616A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:59:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from webone.nobletechnology.net (mail.nobletechnology.net [209.69.10.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFEA43D45 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@stenchmaster.com) Received: from webone.nobletechnology.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i61NdhbF094348; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:39:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@stenchmaster.com) Received: (from www@localhost)i61NdgxJ094347; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:39:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@stenchmaster.com) X-Authentication-Warning: webone.nobletechnology.net: www set sender to chris@stenchmaster.com using -f Received: from 69.14.76.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user stenchmaster) by webmail.nobletechnology.net with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:39:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <60673.69.14.76.6.1088725182.squirrel@webmail.nobletechnology.net> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:39:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Strzelczyk" To: c_ranchhod@breathe.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@stenchmaster.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:59:56 -0000 First off susbscribe to newbies@freebsd.org. Second, there are a number of books out there for complete newbies and even for seasond professionals. I personally recommand AbsoluteBSD by Michael Lucas. Cheers -chris > Hi, > > I am new to this, just wandering if I could get some pointers in right > direction into learning this software from basics to gaining intermidiate > skills. > > I am a cisco engineer however want to learn the unix/linux too. > > any advice you can give me or what will help in learning BSD. > > Regards > > Chintan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -cs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:17:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610EB16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:17:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D279F43D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:17:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i620FdYC071669 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:15:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:44:43 -0500 Message-ID: <001f01c45fc5$652f6f20$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [WAAAY OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:17:10 -0000 Anyone know what the ACTUAL definition/word for I in Ohm's Law is? I know: E= Electromotive Force R= Resistance I= ? (I know it's amperage, but what does I mean?) Thanks. Sorry for being so far OT. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:38:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB4C16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:38:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B0343D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:38:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BgC3C-000593-Us for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:37:11 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:36:44 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: tar problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:38:31 -0000 I am trying to archive this directory for backup purposes. I am getting this error when trying to create a new tar file. Solisix/ flipnode@solid$ su Password: flipnode@solid# tar -c Solisix/ tar: /dev/sa0: Cannot open: Operation not supported tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now What is wrong? Permissions? I am root.. Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:38:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28D616A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:38:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9359F43D2D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so3718595cwb for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.118.71 with SMTP id q71mr1793cwc; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f705040701172828026e3e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:28:53 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Eric Crist In-Reply-To: <001f01c45fc5$652f6f20$6501a8c0@Nomad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001f01c45fc5$652f6f20$6501a8c0@Nomad> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [WAAAY OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:38:46 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:44:43 -0500, Eric Crist wrote: > > Anyone know what the ACTUAL definition/word for I in Ohm's Law is? I > know: > > E= Electromotive Force > R= Resistance > I= ? (I know it's amperage, but what does I mean?) > I = Current. --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:41:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E010B16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:41:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A86543D2D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:41:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.drews@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m69so6757rne for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.68 with SMTP id m68mr23645rne; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb27cbf04070117337ccbad6f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:33:21 -0500 From: Jon Drews To: "c_ranchhod@breathe.com" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:41:30 -0000 Hello Chintan: In addition to Chris' advice I heartily recommend the tutorials at FreeBSD basics: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/ct/15 I also find Greg Lehey's "The Complete FreeBSD" to be a very good reference book. On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:03:14 +0100, c_ranchhod@breathe.com wrote: > > I am a cisco engineer however want to learn the unix/linux too. > > any advice you can give me or what will help in learning BSD. > > Regards > > Chintan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:55:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E669616A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D022143D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:55:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I0700K0194IJD@asu.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:53:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) with ESMTP id <0I0700KMI94I8A@asu.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:53:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i620r4Qw018301 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:53:04 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2A38ABC7; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:53:06 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:53:06 -0700 From: David Bear To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20040702005306.GQ28322@asu.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: device hints issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.Bear@asu.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:55:17 -0000 I just completed a cvsup make buildworld, buildkernel cycle for freebsd 4.10. I cvsup'ed to releng_4_10. when attempting to make installkernel I get the following error: /i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make KERNEL=kernel install You must set up a /boot/device.hints file first. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 ... this seems stranges since according the handbook device.hints is a feature of 5.x. It does not exist in /boot anywhere. should I touch /boot/device.hints and just let it go? -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax: 480-965-9189 College of Public Programs/ASU Wilson Hall 232 Tempe, AZ 85287-0803 "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:57:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C9A16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:57:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84F143D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i620uRGQ071845; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:56:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'Baron Fujimoto'" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:43:18 -0500 Message-ID: <005201c45fcd$93c32270$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [WAAAY OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:57:17 -0000 That's it! Reason for my question was that a buddy asked me as a trivia question. Bet me $50 I couldn't figure it out (we both agreed any method I could use was OK) by the time he left for Vancouver, WA tomorrow morning. Thanks guys. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 > -----Original Message----- > From: Baron Fujimoto [mailto:baron@lava.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:45 PM > To: Eric Crist > Subject: RE: [WAAAY OT] > > > ahh, I didn't realize that's what you were asking. I've seen > at least one reference that speculates that "I" was for > Intensity, though even there they acknowledge dispute over > the etymology. I always just assumed it was a standard > chosen to minimize ambiguity with many other common physical > properties. > http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_2/1.html On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Eric Crist wrote: : Thanks for all your responses, but I still don't have the information : I'm seeking. The letter I in Ohm's Law is short for an english word, : such as E is short for Electromotive Force (or Voltage), and R is short : for Resistance. : : : > -----Original Message----- : > From: Luke [mailto:luked@pobox.com] : > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:24 PM : > To: Eric Crist : > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : > Subject: Re: [WAAAY OT] : > : > : > : > > Anyone know what the ACTUAL definition/word for I in Ohm's : > Law is? I : > > know: : > > : > > E= Electromotive Force : > > R= Resistance : > > I= ? (I know it's amperage, but what does I mean?) : > : > Impedance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 01:05:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF85B16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:05:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.vagner.com (ns1.vagner.com [65.39.87.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFBB43D2D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:05:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from george@vagner.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.vagner.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6213hsL036770; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:03:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from george@vagner.com) Received: from ns1.vagner.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.vagner.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 36719-01; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:03:36 -0700 (MST) Received: from amd2000 (c-65-97-24-21.va.client2.attbi.com [65.97.24.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.vagner.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6213YYp036764; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:03:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from george@vagner.com) Message-Id: <200407020103.i6213YYp036764@ns1.vagner.com> From: "george vagner" To: , Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:03:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040701162116.GI17653@stderror.at> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 thread-index: AcRfvPapTNP8htaXQES6rhs+89bn8gAEum+A X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vagner.com Subject: RE: mini itx X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:05:02 -0000 On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:30:27PM +0100, arden wrote: > has anyone used these boards with bds? using a via epia cl6000e with 5.2.1, it's running my home firewall and mailserver, no problems so far. hth, toni -- Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert | Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | I was using an epia M1000 for my main webserver until it died With the hard drive controller reporting my disk as -68 megs. Also some of the capacitors were leaking. Noticed that Perl would regularly signal 10 while scanning mail messages For virii. Its on RMA now. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.713 / Virus Database: 469 - Release Date: 6/30/2004 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 01:12:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FC316A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:12:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp25.singnet.com.sg (smtp25.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD6043D45 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:12:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@allservers.net) Received: from astral (bb-203-125-28-246.singnet.com.sg [203.125.28.246]) by smtp25.singnet.com.sg (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i621BG9n009750 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:11:16 +0800 Message-ID: <0a8d01c45fd1$7b0ade90$fa10fea9@astral> From: "John Lee" To: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:11:18 +0800 Organization: AllServers SG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: IP bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Lee List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:12:03 -0000 dear all, i'm using a freebsd 4.10-stable server with 50 IP addresses. Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me: - how much bandwidth (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using? trafcount seems to count total traffic only, any idea? thanks. John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 01:37:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2811C16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:37:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.visp.com.au (gw.visp.com.au [202.6.158.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6076843D45 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:37:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Received: from bofh.spyderweb.com.au (202-6-150-37.ip.visp.com.au [202.6.150.37] (may be forged)) by gw.visp.com.au (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i621amqU040750 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:06:48 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Received: from spyderweb.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])i621afkO001462 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:06:42 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:06:41 +0930 From: Tim Aslat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040702110641.12f5fa24@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> In-Reply-To: <0a8d01c45fd1$7b0ade90$fa10fea9@astral> References: <0a8d01c45fd1$7b0ade90$fa10fea9@astral> Organization: Spyderweb Consulting X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: IP bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:37:41 -0000 In the immortal words of "John Lee" ... > i'm using a freebsd 4.10-stable server with 50 IP addresses. > Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me: > > - how much bandwidth (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using? > > trafcount seems to count total traffic only, any idea? Try using the log functions of the ipfw system ipfw add log ip from any to an entry for each address would log all traffic to/from that address Cheers Tim -- Tim Aslat Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au Phone: +61 0401088479 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 01:42:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A2216A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:42:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447E643D41 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq69-157.dial.allstream.net [216.123.142.125]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 4A7CC1EC480; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:45:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:45:26 -0400 From: epilogue To: Dan Finn Message-Id: <20040701164526.61f2f7cb@localhost> In-Reply-To: <89ceee70407011046277dabe8@mail.gmail.com> References: <1088645947.32566.8.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040630234845.2f8002b0@localhost> <75f3f705040630211863661ddc@mail.gmail.com> <20040701120337.07a0b8d7@localhost> <89ceee70407011046277dabe8@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome installing Mozilla by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:42:27 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:46:04 -0700 Dan Finn wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:37 -0400, epilogue > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:04:47 -0400 > > Aaron Walker wrote: > > > > > Roop Nanuwa wrote: > > > > > > > I'll join in on the praise for Opera. It really is the best web > > > > browser that's extremely light but still has all the "modern day" > > > > features one would expect from a web browser and then some. I will > > > > warn you about a couple of things, though. > > > > > > > > 1] The native FreeBSD version is not going to run Flash. I've > > > > pulled out many, many hairs about this but have never gotten the > > > > two to work together. If you want to view Flash, then install the > > > > linux-opera port. > > > > 2] You'll be spoiled after using Opera for any length of time. I've > > > > been using Opera for a long time and I simply can't tolerate any > > > > other browsers. The feature set it provides is so expansive that > > > > other browsers will seem utterly gutted in comparison. Ever use vi > > > > for a while and then notice that random ':w' or ':wq' start > > > > appearing in places where they shouldn't because you've gotten so > > > > used to the commands? Same idea here. 3] The default interface is > > > > not for everyone. Just realize that the interface is highly > > > > configurable so don't let it turn you off if it's not to your > > > > liking. > > > > > > > > --roop > > > > > > Just curious, but which version of flash are you using with Opera? I > > > did a search of the ports tree and found quite a few flash ports and > > > was confused on which one to install. > > > > > > > um, this one... > > > > ~> pkg_info | grep -i flash > > > > linux-flashplugin-7.0r25 The official Macromedia Flash Player for Linux > > Mozilla and > > > > hth, > > epi > > > > all this talk of opera got me interested so I thought I would go ahead > and install it. > > a "make install" of /usr/ports/www/linux-opera seemed to work fine. I > get this when I try and run it: > > [ dfinn @ stewie : ~] : linux-opera > opera: Could not initialize spell checker interface. File not found or > could not be opened (-7) > Segmentation fault (core dumped) well, i've never run into this problem before, but the ports have a tendency to change from day to day and funny things can happen. my guess is that the linux-aspell (ports/textproc) dependency wasn't installed. try adding that and see what happens. also, just to be certain, do you have one of the linux-base ports installed and linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf? if not, this will definitely cause you all sorts of grief. if you end up installing a linux-base and adding that setting to rc.conf, just be aware that it will take a reboot (or some other less drastic wizardry that i don't know) in order for the new rc.conf setting to take effect. for the record, i'm using linux_base-8 and haven't had any problems whatsoever. some ports (acroread, for example) will ask for a different linux_base version but will install anyway. after the install of any such program, you just pkgdb -Fu and tell it to depend upon the version you have installed. give all this a shot and let us know what comes of it. i'm not sure that i've hit upon 'your' problem, but i've got my fingers crossed. cheers, epi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 01:47:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913F216A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:47:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3708D43D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tscheng@ic.sunysb.edu) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ool-18b9101b.dyn.optonline.net [24.185.16.27]) by mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I0700FOABKH6P@mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:46:16 -0400 (EDT) From: tscheng@ic.sunysb.edu X-X-Sender: tfcheng@192.168.0.13 To: freebsd-questions Message-id: <20040701214311.G63291@192.168.0.13> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: sshd: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:47:28 -0000 I exec /usr/sbin/sshd, but got "Privilege separation user sshd does not exist" but I do have, in the /etc/group: sshd:*:22: and with vipw: sshd:*:22:22::0:0:Secure Shell Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin is there anything I missed? Eureka! Best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:19:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0A516A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:19:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A570543D1D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg3Qu-0000Yd-KN; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 08:25:04 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:26:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> In-Reply-To: <200407011532.03043.andrew@walrond.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407011026.14264.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b34cb089444b31bb4a1e681213826c468350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: Andrew Walrond Subject: Re: Booting with Grub X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:19:41 -0000 On Thursday 01 July 2004 09:32 am, Andrew Walrond wrote: > I have installed 5.2.1 into a partition and I want to use my existing > bootloader, grub. > > Can anyone tell me what the required grub configuartion line would > look like, or point me to an FAQ? > > Andrew Walrond I found the url below by searching for GRUB and FreeBSD on google. http://geodsoft.com/howto/dualboot/grub.htm#freebsd Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:29:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FB816A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:29:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762C443D54 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BgDnG-00058w-5Z; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:28:50 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: Roop Nanuwa , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <75f3f7050407011923279dc72@mail.gmail.com> References: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <75f3f7050407011923279dc72@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088735303.4072.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:28:23 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: tar problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:29:32 -0000 On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 22:23, Roop Nanuwa wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:36:44 -0400, Bruce Hunter wrote: > > > > I am trying to archive this directory for backup purposes. I am getting > > this error when trying to create a new tar file. > > > > Solisix/ > > flipnode@solid$ su > > Password: > > flipnode@solid# tar -c Solisix/ > > tar: /dev/sa0: Cannot open: Operation not supported > > tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now > > > > What is wrong? Permissions? I am root.. > > > > You need to specify the 'f' option to tell tar where to write the tar > to, it's defaulting > to /dev/sa0 which probably doesn't exist on your system. > > Run: > tar -cf Solisix.tar Solisix/ > > --roop Thanks, I got it to work. How would I include the current system date like this. #tar -cvf Solisix-$USER.tar Solisix/ <--- with current user.. I want the date instead.. #tar -cvf Solisix-$date.tar Solisix/ <-- doesn't work I'm still learning.. sorry Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:31:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AB216A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:31:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95EE943D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:31:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so3793146cwb for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.116.8 with SMTP id o8mr12443cwc; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f7050407011923279dc72@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:23:53 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tar problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:31:27 -0000 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:36:44 -0400, Bruce Hunter wrote: > > I am trying to archive this directory for backup purposes. I am getting > this error when trying to create a new tar file. > > Solisix/ > flipnode@solid$ su > Password: > flipnode@solid# tar -c Solisix/ > tar: /dev/sa0: Cannot open: Operation not supported > tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now > > What is wrong? Permissions? I am root.. > You need to specify the 'f' option to tell tar where to write the tar to, it's defaulting to /dev/sa0 which probably doesn't exist on your system. Run: tar -cf Solisix.tar Solisix/ --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:42:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3076E16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:42:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E261943D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BgDyd-000677-Be; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:40:35 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: epilogue , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040701164526.61f2f7cb@localhost> References: <1088645947.32566.8.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040630234845.2f8002b0@localhost> <75f3f705040630211863661ddc@mail.gmail.com> <20040701120337.07a0b8d7@localhost> <89ceee70407011046277dabe8@mail.gmail.com> <20040701164526.61f2f7cb@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088736008.4072.5.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:40:08 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Gnome installing Mozilla by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:42:12 -0000 On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:45, epilogue wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:46:04 -0700 > Dan Finn wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:37 -0400, epilogue > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:04:47 -0400 > > > Aaron Walker wrote: > > > > > > > Roop Nanuwa wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'll join in on the praise for Opera. It really is the best web > > > > > browser that's extremely light but still has all the "modern day" > > > > > features one would expect from a web browser and then some. I will > > > > > warn you about a couple of things, though. > > > > > > > > > > 1] The native FreeBSD version is not going to run Flash. I've > > > > > pulled out many, many hairs about this but have never gotten the > > > > > two to work together. If you want to view Flash, then install the > > > > > linux-opera port. > > > > > 2] You'll be spoiled after using Opera for any length of time. I've > > > > > been using Opera for a long time and I simply can't tolerate any > > > > > other browsers. The feature set it provides is so expansive that > > > > > other browsers will seem utterly gutted in comparison. Ever use vi > > > > > for a while and then notice that random ':w' or ':wq' start > > > > > appearing in places where they shouldn't because you've gotten so > > > > > used to the commands? Same idea here. 3] The default interface is > > > > > not for everyone. Just realize that the interface is highly > > > > > configurable so don't let it turn you off if it's not to your > > > > > liking. > > > > > > > > > > --roop > > > > > > > > Just curious, but which version of flash are you using with Opera? I > > > > did a search of the ports tree and found quite a few flash ports and > > > > was confused on which one to install. > > > > > > > > > > um, this one... > > > > > > ~> pkg_info | grep -i flash > > > > > > linux-flashplugin-7.0r25 The official Macromedia Flash Player for Linux > > > Mozilla and > > > > > > hth, > > > epi > > > > > > > all this talk of opera got me interested so I thought I would go ahead > > and install it. > > > > a "make install" of /usr/ports/www/linux-opera seemed to work fine. I > > get this when I try and run it: > > > > [ dfinn @ stewie : ~] : linux-opera > > opera: Could not initialize spell checker interface. File not found or > > could not be opened (-7) > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > well, i've never run into this problem before, but the ports have a > tendency to change from day to day and funny things can happen. > > my guess is that the linux-aspell (ports/textproc) dependency wasn't > installed. try adding that and see what happens. > > also, just to be certain, do you have one of the linux-base ports installed > and linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf? if not, this will definitely > cause you all sorts of grief. if you end up installing a linux-base and > adding that setting to rc.conf, just be aware that it will take a reboot > (or some other less drastic wizardry that i don't know) in order for the > new rc.conf setting to take effect. > > for the record, i'm using linux_base-8 and haven't had any problems > whatsoever. some ports (acroread, for example) will ask for a > different linux_base version but will install anyway. after the install of > any such program, you just pkgdb -Fu and tell it to depend upon the version > you have installed. > > give all this a shot and let us know what comes of it. i'm not sure that > i've hit upon 'your' problem, but i've got my fingers crossed. > > I got linux-opera installed and working. Then I installed linux-flashplugin-7.0r25, and opera shows it in its plugin list, but when I go to view a flash site, the flash is a blank area. I no longer get the message telling me I haven't got flash installed. Ideas? Thanks guys Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:56:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AC116A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:56:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D046E43D45 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:56:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i622st9U072084; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:54:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: "'Mike Jeays'" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:27:56 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c45fdc$33086ad0$6501a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <1088731833.51017.10.camel@chaucer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [WAAAY OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:56:24 -0000 > I am afraid it doesn't stand for impedance. It is the symbol > used for current throughout electromagnetic theory, and I > don't think it does stand for an English word. > > Your are right it is off topic! > Actually, it does stand for Intensity, according to the 1812 papers published by Ohm himself. This is the word I was looking for. Thanks. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:56:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09816A4EA for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blair.epifora.com (blair.epifora.com [207.139.168.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CE843D4C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drvince@anonymnet.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.epifora.com [127.0.0.1]) by blair.epifora.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED2B165939 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:55:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.anonymnet.net ([205.205.52.19]) by localhost (blair.epifora.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27730-05 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:55:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.anonymnet.net (mail.anonymnet.net [205.205.52.19]) by mail.anonymnet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F48165931 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:55:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "DrVince" To: "freebsd-questions" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:55:50 -0500 Message-Id: <20040702025453.M7496@anonymnet.net> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.30 20040131 X-OriginatingIP: 205.205.52.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: GBDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:56:33 -0000 Hi everyone, is there an ETA for GBDE to move in the stable branch? Thanks, DrVince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 02:57:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A294E16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:57:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9554C43D2D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:57:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so3807149cwb for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.118.71 with SMTP id q71mr16668cwc; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f705040701194931a284f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:49:28 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Bruce Hunter In-Reply-To: <1088735303.4072.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <1088735303.4072.2.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tar problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:57:11 -0000 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:28:23 -0400, Bruce Hunter wrote: > > Thanks, I got it to work. How would I include the current system date > like this. > > #tar -cvf Solisix-$USER.tar Solisix/ <--- with current user.. > > I want the date instead.. > > #tar -cvf Solisix-$date.tar Solisix/ <-- doesn't work > > I'm still learning.. sorry > What you're doing when you do $USER is bringing in one of the environment variables. If you type 'env' at a command prompt, you'll see the ones currently defined. The date isn't one of them. There might be an easier/better way but I would suggest running the 'date' command inline with the ` character as so: tar -cvf Solisix-`date '+%d%m%Y'`.tar Solisix That runs the 'date' command with a particular formatting string and then puts that result into the tar command. --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 03:24:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D4116A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:24:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from toman.time.net.my (pop.time.net.my [203.121.16.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F5AC43D4C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:24:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tonylth@pd.jaring.my) Received: (qmail 72876 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 03:22:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pd.jaring.my) (211.24.130.170) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 03:22:05 -0000 Message-ID: <40E4D519.20605@pd.jaring.my> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:23:05 +0800 From: Tony Liew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Problem with gateway and ipfw in FreeBSD 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 03:24:33 -0000 Hi, Currently I am trying out FreeBSD 5.2. SDSL modem | | | | | | FreeBSD Router | | | | Internal network My problem, from FreeBSD I can ping outside and inside network. from Internal network, I can ping internal interface and external interface of FreeBSD Router. But I cannot ping the modem IP address so goes public DNS server on the internet. I have in my KERNEL: options BRIDGE options DIVERT options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT rc.conf gateway_enable="YES" defaultrouter="" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="OPEN" natd_interface="" natd_enable="YES" router_enable="YES" sysctl.conf net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1 net.link.ether.bridge.config=external interface, internal interface net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1 client on the internal network cannot connect to the internet. Any suggestion? Thanks a lot. Regards, Tony Liew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 03:29:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B991B16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:29:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5984043D54 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.206] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BgEhf-0002GO-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 05:27:07 +0200 Received: from [217.1.218.134] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BgEhe-0007S2-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 05:27:07 +0200 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i623R2hI006847verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:27:02 +0200 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i623Lrvi006674 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:21:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:21:52 +0200 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040702032152.GA5911@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1088728604.849.1.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: Re: tar problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 03:29:01 -0000 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004, Bruce Hunter wrote: > I am trying to archive this directory for backup purposes. I am getting > this error when trying to create a new tar file. > > Solisix/ > flipnode@solid$ su > Password: > flipnode@solid# tar -c Solisix/ > tar: /dev/sa0: Cannot open: Operation not supported > tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now > > What is wrong? Permissions? I am root.. Hi, you have to change the tar -f option: man tar: [...] -f [hostname:]file --file [hostname:]file Read or write the specified file (default is /dev/sa0). If a hostname is specified, tar will use rmt(8) to read or write the specified file on a remote machine. ``-'' may be used as a file- name, for reading or writing to/from stdin/std- out. [...] For example: tar -cvzf /home/me/backup/solisix.baktar.gz /Solasix/files Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 03:56:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AA616A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:56:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5AF43D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:56:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i623sMa7054003; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:54:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:54:22 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: DrVince Message-ID: <20040702035421.GF6574@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040702025453.M7496@anonymnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040702025453.M7496@anonymnet.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: GBDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 03:56:27 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 01), DrVince said: > Hi everyone, > is there an ETA for GBDE to move in the stable branch? GBDE is based on GEOM, which is too large of a subsystem to be backported to 4.x. It'll be available in -STABLE when the stable tag gets shifted to the 5.x branch :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 04:46:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA3516A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 04:46:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.musha.org (daemon.musha.org [210.189.104.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F6043D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 04:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knu@iDaemons.org) Received: from archon.local.idaemons.org (archon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.1.32]) by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1177913855; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:44:47 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:44:47 +0900 Message-ID: <86k6xnuif4.knu@iDaemons.org> From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: Kent Stewart In-Reply-To: <200407011346.41585.kstewart@owt.com> References: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <1088713580.682.9.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <200407011734.51038.joey@mingrone.org> <200407011346.41585.kstewart@owt.com> Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 081D 099C 1705 861D 4B70 B04A 920B EFC7 9FD9 E1EE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: Joey Mingrone cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bruce Hunter Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 04:46:07 -0000 Hi, I have just committed a fix against the "undefined method `each' for nil:NilClass" error that occurs typically when BEFORE_DEINSTALL is not defined in pkgtools.conf. Add "BEFORE_DEINSTALL = {}" to your pkgtools.conf and pkg_deinstall will start working again. For the "undefined method `>' for #" error, I still have no idea. Could you try again with a vanilla pkgtools.conf? -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "It seems to me as we make our own few circles 'round the sun We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 05:26:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E8F16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:26:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dime54.dizinc.com (dime54.dizinc.com [66.194.239.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9573443D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:26:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@solisix.com) Received: from c-67-172-98-39.client.comcast.net ([67.172.98.39] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by dime54.dizinc.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BgGUb-0000pu-SZ; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:21:46 -0400 From: Bruce Hunter To: epilogue , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040701235014.092567b4@localhost> References: <1088645947.32566.8.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040630234845.2f8002b0@localhost> <75f3f705040630211863661ddc@mail.gmail.com> <20040701120337.07a0b8d7@localhost> <89ceee70407011046277dabe8@mail.gmail.com> <20040701164526.61f2f7cb@localhost> <1088736008.4072.5.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> <20040701235014.092567b4@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Solisix Software Message-Id: <1088745679.727.3.camel@solid.solisixoffice.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:21:19 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: bhunter@solisix.com,freebsd@solisix.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dime54.dizinc.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - solisix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Gnome installing Mozilla by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 05:26:12 -0000 On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 23:50, epilogue wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:40:08 -0400 > Bruce Hunter wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:45, epilogue wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:46:04 -0700 > > > Dan Finn wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:03:37 -0400, epilogue > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:04:47 -0400 > > > > > Aaron Walker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Roop Nanuwa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll join in on the praise for Opera. It really is the best web > > > > > > > browser that's extremely light but still has all the "modern > > > > > > > day" features one would expect from a web browser and then > > > > > > > some. I will warn you about a couple of things, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1] The native FreeBSD version is not going to run Flash. I've > > > > > > > pulled out many, many hairs about this but have never gotten > > > > > > > the two to work together. If you want to view Flash, then > > > > > > > install the linux-opera port. > > > > > > > 2] You'll be spoiled after using Opera for any length of time. > > > > > > > I've been using Opera for a long time and I simply can't > > > > > > > tolerate any other browsers. The feature set it provides is so > > > > > > > expansive that other browsers will seem utterly gutted in > > > > > > > comparison. Ever use vi for a while and then notice that random > > > > > > > ':w' or ':wq' start appearing in places where they shouldn't > > > > > > > because you've gotten so used to the commands? Same idea here. > > > > > > > 3] The default interface is not for everyone. Just realize that > > > > > > > the interface is highly configurable so don't let it turn you > > > > > > > off if it's not to your liking. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --roop > > > > > > > > > > > > Just curious, but which version of flash are you using with > > > > > > Opera? I did a search of the ports tree and found quite a few > > > > > > flash ports and was confused on which one to install. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > um, this one... > > > > > > > > > > ~> pkg_info | grep -i flash > > > > > > > > > > linux-flashplugin-7.0r25 The official Macromedia Flash Player for > > > > > Linux Mozilla and > > > > > > > > > > hth, > > > > > epi > > > > > > > > > > > > > all this talk of opera got me interested so I thought I would go > > > > ahead and install it. > > > > > > > > a "make install" of /usr/ports/www/linux-opera seemed to work fine. > > > > I get this when I try and run it: > > > > > > > > [ dfinn @ stewie : ~] : linux-opera > > > > opera: Could not initialize spell checker interface. File not found > > > > or could not be opened (-7) > > > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > > > well, i've never run into this problem before, but the ports have a > > > tendency to change from day to day and funny things can happen. > > > > > > my guess is that the linux-aspell (ports/textproc) dependency wasn't > > > installed. try adding that and see what happens. > > > > > > also, just to be certain, do you have one of the linux-base ports > > > installed and linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf? if not, this will > > > definitely cause you all sorts of grief. if you end up installing a > > > linux-base and adding that setting to rc.conf, just be aware that it > > > will take a reboot(or some other less drastic wizardry that i don't > > > know) in order for the new rc.conf setting to take effect. > > > > > > for the record, i'm using linux_base-8 and haven't had any problems > > > whatsoever. some ports (acroread, for example) will ask for a > > > different linux_base version but will install anyway. after the install > > > of any such program, you just pkgdb -Fu and tell it to depend upon the > > > version you have installed. > > > > > > give all this a shot and let us know what comes of it. i'm not sure > > > that i've hit upon 'your' problem, but i've got my fingers crossed. > > > > > > > > I got linux-opera installed and working. Then I installed > > linux-flashplugin-7.0r25, and opera shows it in its plugin list, but > > when I go to view a flash site, the flash is a blank area. I no longer > > get the message telling me I haven't got flash installed. > > hello again, > > well, jsyk, the flash plugin doesn't work 100% of the time. so far, i > haven't bumped into too many problematic sites, however ymwv. > > please send me the URL you're visiting. i'll give it a whirl on my end > and let you know what kind of results i get. if it doesn't work on my end, > we'll probably both have to wait for the next version of flash from > macromedia (not opera's fault and should give the same poor results in > firefox, moz, galeon, etc). if it does work on my end, i'll help you to > determine the problem as best i can. > > ep > http://www.mlcompany.net is the url Hmm.. Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 05:44:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B591516A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:44:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E18C43D53 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:44:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:29908 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BgGpK-000HuV-Nj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 05:43:10 +0000 Message-ID: <40E4F5EE.8030001@zonnet.nl> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 07:43:10 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040628 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <005201c45fcd$93c32270$6501a8c0@Nomad> In-Reply-To: <005201c45fcd$93c32270$6501a8c0@Nomad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [WAAAY OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 05:44:42 -0000 Hi Eric, > Reason for my question was that a buddy asked me as a trivia > question. Bet me $50 I couldn't figure it out... [snip] So I guess the FreeBSD Foundation has a donation coming their way? ;-) Bye... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 05:48:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6715716A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:48:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poczta.wup-katowice.pl (wup.katowice.pik-net.pl [213.216.66.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7877D43D46 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arek@wup-katowice.pl) Received: from poczta.wup-katowice.pl (localhost.wup-katowice.pl [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.wup-katowice.pl (Postfix) with SMTP id CE3387E85B; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wup-katowice.pl (arek.wup-katowice.pl [213.216.67.82]) by poczta.wup-katowice.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E197E860; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E4F6FE.8040504@wup-katowice.pl> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 07:47:42 +0200 From: Arek Czereszewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040219 X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0a8d01c45fd1$7b0ade90$fa10fea9@astral> In-Reply-To: <0a8d01c45fd1$7b0ade90$fa10fea9@astral> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: John Lee Subject: Re: IP bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: arek@wup-katowice.pl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 05:48:11 -0000 John Lee wrote: > dear all, > > i'm using a freebsd 4.10-stable server with 50 IP addresses. > Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me: > > - how much bandwidth (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using? > > trafcount seems to count total traffic only, any idea? > I.e. ipfw + rrdtools or mrtg from ports (net-mgnt): netramet, bandwidthd Arek -- Arek Czereszewski | jid: aro(at)chrome.pl arek(at)wup-katowice.pl | gg: 1349941 "*nix is like a wigwam: no windows, no gates, apache inside." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 06:29:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF8916A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:29:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3F2E43D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 11543 invoked by uid 513); 2 Jul 2004 06:33:18 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.485362 secs); 02 Jul 2004 06:33:18 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 06:33:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:28:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040702080837.S17792@pukruppa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Problems with UDMA harddisks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:29:04 -0000 Hi! I hope somebody on this list has another good idea, I haven't thought of yet: I have a machine that came with two Excel Stor 40 GB ("Ganymede") UDMA/100 harddisks. To install FreeBSD 4.10 I had to disable UDMA in the BIOS, otherwise they wouldn't have booted (some complaint about ata0). Of course I wish to get UDMA working, since this is said to improve perfomance significantly. I checked if the UDMA cable is plugged into the correct places for mainboard, master and slave - this is o.k. . Are there any other things (bios settings, kernel modules, magic chants,...) I could try? Thanks, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 06:34:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DE116A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:34:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (Hawat.CC.UBBCluj.Ro [193.226.40.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC2343D48 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Received: from hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (hawat [127.0.0.1]) by hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i626b8FY007954; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:37:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Received: from localhost (taipan@localhost)i626b8AN007951; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:37:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:37:08 +0300 (EEST) From: Radu MOLNAR To: Arek Czereszewski In-Reply-To: <40E4F6FE.8040504@wup-katowice.pl> Message-ID: <20040702093430.N7935@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro> References: <0a8d01c45fd1$7b0ade90$fa10fea9@astral> <40E4F6FE.8040504@wup-katowice.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: John Lee Subject: Re: IP bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:34:45 -0000 > John Lee wrote: > >> dear all, >> >> i'm using a freebsd 4.10-stable server with 50 IP addresses. >> Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me: >> >> - how much bandwidth (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using? >> >> trafcount seems to count total traffic only, any idea? >> > > I.e. > ipfw + rrdtools or mrtg > from ports (net-mgnt): > netramet, bandwidthd Any of these make real time statistics like iptraf under linux. I also need something like this for both general interface (realtime) statistics and for traffic monitorring (i can use tcpdump for this but it would be nice to have both caracteristics in one program). Radu > > > Arek > > -- > Arek Czereszewski | jid: aro(at)chrome.pl > arek(at)wup-katowice.pl | gg: 1349941 > "*nix is like a wigwam: > no windows, no gates, apache inside." > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 06:41:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A257316A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:41:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hydrogen.systemloop.com (pcp03074635pcs.csouth01.va.comcast.net [68.57.47.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F221343D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:41:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from limited7@hydrogen.systemloop.com) Received: from hydrogen.systemloop.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i622dpoJ000914 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:39:51 GMT (envelope-from limited7@hydrogen.systemloop.com) Received: (from limited7@localhost) by hydrogen.systemloop.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i622dpce000913 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:39:51 GMT (envelope-from limited7) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:39:51 +0000 From: ray To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040702023951.GA904@systemloop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: ttyin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:41:24 -0000 when i enabled xdm for graphical login , in my eterm window, i can su - root fine locally, but when i ssh to my other machine and su to root i am gettin: cmd: su 10097 [ttyin] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 1204k load: 0.08 cmd: su 10097 [ttyin] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 1204k i tried in aterm and xterm and it works fine when i try to su root , i googled and i think it's in stty issue but i dont have any clues. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 06:48:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC0F16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:48:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C753343D4C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 06:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i626lCJW012572 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001301c45fff$10a38e70$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:37:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: solved amavisd-new and postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:48:04 -0000 Hello, My thanks to everyone who has helped me over these past few days. I did a total reinstall and clean configuration of postfix and amavisd-new, i did not get the error about the dictionaries again, but this time i got a message from amavisd: denied access to 192.168.0.3 for some reason amavisd likes it when postfix is bound to all IP's, switched the inet_interfaces parameter and it appears to be working. I'm going to give it a day or two before doing anything else with it, i want to ensure everything works before i start doing more and catch up on some other projects gone neglected over the past couple of days. As for the original dictionary problem i don't have a clue, a fluke, an extra space? Or just my luck? Anyway, my thanks to everyone. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 07:41:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE2416A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:41:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E04F43D48 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:41:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])i627ee41009414; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:40:40 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09399-01; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:40:39 +1000 (EST) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4])i627eZAF009407; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:40:36 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Not Verified[10.0.0.3]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5,0,3,78) id ; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 17:40:34 +1000 Received: from [10.0.17.42] (wstaylorm.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com [10.0.17.42]) by wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C683F0F; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:40:32 +1000 (EST) From: Murray Taylor To: Eric Crist In-Reply-To: <005201c45fcd$93c32270$6501a8c0@Nomad> References: <005201c45fcd$93c32270$6501a8c0@Nomad> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Bytecraft Systems Message-Id: <1088754032.20582.311.camel@wstaylorm.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 17:40:32 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsdquestions cc: 'Baron Fujimoto' Subject: RE: [WAAAY OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 07:41:33 -0000 Asked my father (who used to work for the standards lab at the Electricity Trust of South Australia) and .. He had no hesitation is saying it was Intensity. He said the P was originally for Pressure and the I for Intensity. He also said that some early PMG instruments, we would call them watt meters or Volt Amp meters, used to have two meters, one labelled Pressure and the other Intensity. Thats one for the trivia nights! mjt On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 10:43, Eric Crist wrote: > That's it! Reason for my question was that a buddy asked me as a trivia > question. Bet me $50 I couldn't figure it out (we both agreed any > method I could use was OK) by the time he left for Vancouver, WA > tomorrow morning. > > Thanks guys. > Eric F Crist > President > AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc > (612) 998-3588 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Baron Fujimoto [mailto:baron@lava.net] > > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:45 PM > > To: Eric Crist > > Subject: RE: [WAAAY OT] > > > > > > ahh, I didn't realize that's what you were asking. I've seen > > at least one reference that speculates that "I" was for > > Intensity, though even there they acknowledge dispute over > > the etymology. I always just assumed it was a standard > > chosen to minimize ambiguity with many other common physical > > properties. > > > http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_2/1.html > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Eric Crist wrote: > > : Thanks for all your responses, but I still don't have the information > : I'm seeking. The letter I in Ohm's Law is short for an english word, > : such as E is short for Electromotive Force (or Voltage), and R is > short > : for Resistance. > : > : > : > -----Original Message----- > : > From: Luke [mailto:luked@pobox.com] > : > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:24 PM > : > To: Eric Crist > : > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > : > Subject: Re: [WAAAY OT] > : > > : > > Anyone know what the ACTUAL definition/word for I in Ohm's > : > Law is? I > : > > know: > : > > > : > > E= Electromotive Force > : > > R= Resistance > : > > I= ? (I know it's amperage, but what does I mean?) > : > > : > Impedance > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Murray Taylor Special Projects Engineer --------------------------------- Bytecraft Systems & Entertainment P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 M: +61 417 319 256 E: murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com or visit us on the web http://www.bytecraftsystems.com http://www.bytecraftentertainment.com --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. **************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 07:47:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296EF16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:47:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47DA43D46 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:47:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j0sh@cableone.net) Received: from bleh (unverified [24.119.44.23]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 26015761 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:31:28 -0700 Message-ID: <000e01c46008$94b1c660$1100000a@bleh> From: "j0sh" To: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:45:44 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Question reguarding /etc/hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 07:47:33 -0000 I have a quake 1 server installed on my 4.9 release box. it works when I = disable UDP support, but it core dumps when its enabled. I was told to = check the /etc/hosts and make sure there is an entry ther for my machine = and its there. any reccomendations? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 09:40:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6410216A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:40:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyclone.emea.mci.com (cyclone.wcom.co.uk [193.131.254.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FF343D1F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip.payne@uk.mci.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=cyclone.emea.mci.com) by cyclone.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BgKVs-0004wR-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:39:20 +0100 Received: from ocampa.emea.mci.com (borasco [170.127.64.31]) by cyclone.emea.mci.com (4.7.0.120) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:39:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from [170.127.79.25] (helo=gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com) by ocampa.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BgKVq-0003rz-3C; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:39:18 +0000 Received: by gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:42:51 +0100 Message-ID: From: Philip Payne To: whizkid@ValueDJ.com, Steve Bertrand Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:42:50 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) MIME-Version: 1.0 (Generated by NET-TEL Mailguard SMTP version 4.0.1.40) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Score: -201.7 (------------------------------------------) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1BgKVs-0004wR-00*EBHfKY3KyP6* cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPFW acting weird OR invalid ruleset? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:40:26 -0000 > steve, > Yes everything else seems to work fine. There are > currently 2 PCs > with this issue. 1 is XP the other is Win2k. This ruleset worked > fine on FreeBSD 5.1, but I reformatted the box, and install 5.2.1 > uploaded the rc.firewall.rules and natd.conf files, since the network > interfaces where the same I didn't really have to change anything. Ok... so reading the ruleset the traffic will behave (referring to your rc.firewall): Outgoing FTP session is passed first by rule 04109 (with a keep-state) and then by 61001 (without a keep-state). So, will the returning traffic get passed by the check-state on the way back in?... I'm not sure, possibly. Also, funny that it works for 5.1 and not 5.2.1, which implies bugs. The general consensus from my & Steve's response is we don't understand the ruleset. Using skipto just to divert to natd and pass outgoing traffic does seem overly complicated and I've not seen anyone else use that approach. Maybe I am missing some advantage that it gives you. I figure you have two approaches to solve this: 1) If you want to debug the current ruleset add logging to the deny rules and check where the traffic is being dropped. If it is the ruleset at fault then the traffic MUST be being dropped by it on one of the rules. Remember.... logging is your friend. Or 2) There may be some benefit to re-writing the ruleset in a format you personally understand rather than using a template. Your general approach to firewall ruleset should be: a) First section contains any anti-spoofing and then rules to divert traffic going via the outside interface to natd and to check-state b) Second section to allow/deny traffic directly to the firewall. c) Then a section to allow the incoming services to your site. You should then end this section with something like "deny all traffic coming in via my external interface" as unless you specifically want the traffic you should drop it d) Then a section to permit the required traffic out from your site. You should end this section with something like "deny & log all traffic" as if you haven't specified it to pass, it shouldn't. Then you can refine this approach by adding deny rules without logging to only log what's required and pick up on traffic that you should be passing but you are not. I'm afraid it's very difficult to be specific on writing firewall policy as it will be unique to your needs but I hope that general approach will help. Tools like /usr/ports/security/fwbuilder (home www.fwbuilder.org) can help in generating policy but the install features for IPFW are not quite working. I have posted a script to help with this previously. Thanks, Phil. > I found these rules on this website: > > http://www.lugbe.ch/lostfound/contrib/freebsd_router/ > > here is the sample I used from the website: > > # be quiet and flush all rules on start > -q flush > > # allow local traffic, deny RFC 1918 addresses on the outside > add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > add 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > add 00120 deny ip from any to any not verrevpath in > add 00301 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via ep0 > add 00302 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via ep0 > add 00303 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via ep0 > > # check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, > allow through > if yes > add 01000 divert natd ip from any to me in via ep0 > add 01001 check-state > > # allow some traffic from the local net to the router > # SSH > add 04000 allow tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port 22 > in via ep1 > setup keep-state > # ICMP > add 04001 allow icmp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me in via ep1 > # NTP > add 04002 allow tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port > 123 in via ep1 > setup keep-state > add 04003 allow udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port > 123 in via ep1 > keep-state > # DNS > add 04006 allow udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to me dst-port 53 > in via ep1 > > # drop everything else > add 04009 deny ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to me > > # pass outgoing packets (to be natted) on to a special NAT rule > add 04109 skipto 61000 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any in via ep1 > keep-state > > # allow all outgoing traffic from the router (maybe you > should be more > restrictive) > add 05010 allow ip from me to any out keep-state > > # drop everything that has come so far. This means it > doesn't belong > to an > established connection, don't log the most noisy scans. > add 59998 deny icmp from any to me > add 59999 deny ip from any to me dst-port 135,137-139,445,4665 > add 60000 deny log tcp from any to any established > add 60000 deny log ip from any to any > > # this is the NAT rule. Only outgoing packets from the > local net will > come here. > # First, nat them, then pass them on (again, you may > choose to be more > restrictive) > add 61000 divert natd ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via ep0 > add 61001 allow ip from any to any > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 09:42:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA48916A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:42:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyclone.emea.mci.com (cyclone.wcom.co.uk [193.131.254.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A417743D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:42:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip.payne@uk.mci.com) Received: from borg ([166.59.191.249] helo=borg.emea.mci.com) by cyclone.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BgKVw-0004xA-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:39:24 +0100 Received: from [170.127.79.25] (helo=gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com) by borg.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BgKVw-0002hV-3y; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:39:24 +0000 Received: by gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:42:51 +0100 Message-ID: From: Philip Payne To: Radu MOLNAR , Arek Czereszewski Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:42:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Score: -201.7 (------------------------------------------) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1BgKVw-0004xA-00*7nMtK5RZ6FU* cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: John Lee Subject: RE: IP bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:42:35 -0000 > > John Lee wrote: > > > >> dear all, > >> > >> i'm using a freebsd 4.10-stable server with 50 IP addresses. > >> Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me: > >> > >> - how much bandwidth (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using? > >> > >> trafcount seems to count total traffic only, any idea? > >> > > > > I.e. > > ipfw + rrdtools or mrtg > > from ports (net-mgnt): > > netramet, bandwidthd > > Any of these make real time statistics like iptraf under > linux. I also > need something like this for both general interface > (realtime) statistics > and for traffic monitorring (i can use tcpdump for this but > it would be > nice to have both caracteristics in one program). I've used /usr/ports/net-mgmt/darkstat in the past on my home network. Its pretty simplistic but it might be of use. Phil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 09:43:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E6C16A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:43:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E526243D1F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:43:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i629fkNC083880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:41:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i629fku0083879; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:41:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:41:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Frank Altpeter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040702094146.GB83255@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Frank Altpeter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040702083214.GA26226@murphy.planlos.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040702083214.GA26226@murphy.planlos.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:41:46 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Converting crypted passwords X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:43:45 -0000 --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Frank Altpeter wrote: > Given is a system with md5 style passwords like that: >=20 > $1$d61CkkOZ$BE/TofmL5h9gtfxKI6Vcy1 >=20 > (This can be generated by "openssl passwd -1 -salt d61CkkOZ test") >=20 > Without knowing the password, i need to convert it to base64 encoded > binary md5 digest style for using with ProFTP+mod_sql: >=20 > {md5}CY9rzUYh03PK3k6DJie09g=3D=3D >=20 > (This can be generated by "printf '{md5}' ; printf 'test' | openssl dgst = -binary -md5 | openssl enc -base64"). >=20 >=20 > The problem i have to solve is, how to convert the first encryption > type into the second encryption type without having the plaintext > password in between. I don't think that's actually possible without knowing the plaintext of the password. Besides, the standard system password is the md5 hash of a different quantity to the other md5 hash -- since the system md5 password style includes that extra random salt and the other apparently doesn't. That means that one encrypts 'salt + password' and the other encrypts just 'password', so there isn't some sort of mechanical format translation you can do to go from one to the other. One alternative you might want to look at is if ProFTP+mod_sql supports a {crypt} style of password. Now, that will probably default to the old style DES password crypttext, but supposing that it passes everything through to the system crypt(3) function, you might just be able to use an md5 style crypt in there, which you can simply cut'n'paste from the master.passwd file. You'll have to experiment. Cheers, Matthew=09 --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5S3aiD657aJF7eIRAupOAKCn+gGl2fj8xqh/Cnkz/FGRf7S7ewCgmzgw DcIHP7+PQx4i/Tv6Gzr9iLs= =uA/L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 10:07:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6316D16A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:07:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1F543D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i62A4Ico031101; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:04:19 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: "Akinori MUSHA" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:04:49 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <015501c45fa7$9382b350$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200407011346.41585.kstewart@owt.com> <86k6xnuif4.knu@iDaemons.org> In-Reply-To: <86k6xnuif4.knu@iDaemons.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407020304.49756.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Joey Mingrone cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bruce Hunter Subject: Re: portupgrade fails on every port, undefined method 'each' for nil:NilClass X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:07:58 -0000 On Thursday 01 July 2004 09:44 pm, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > Hi, > > I have just committed a fix against the "undefined method `each' for > nil:NilClass" error that occurs typically when BEFORE_DEINSTALL is > not defined in pkgtools.conf. Add "BEFORE_DEINSTALL = {}" to your > pkgtools.conf and pkg_deinstall will start working again. > > For the "undefined method `>' for #" error, I still > have no idea. Could you try again with a vanilla pkgtools.conf? It didn't change the package upgrade [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 326 packages found (-0 +1) . done] ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/automake14 (automake-1.4.6_1) (undefined method `>' for #) ---> Packages processed: 2 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed or ruby# portupgrade -Puf portupgrade ---> Checking for the latest package of 'sysutils/portupgrade' ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! sysutils/portupgrade (portupgrade-20040701_1) (undefined method `>' for #) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 10:48:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF5A16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:48:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53706.mail.yahoo.com (web53706.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BCA443D4C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from you2bepie@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040702104630.23428.qmail@web53706.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.218.213.21] by web53706.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 03:46:30 PDT Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 03:46:30 -0700 (PDT) From: a k To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: xconq in ports doesn't work under freebsd 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:48:16 -0000 Has anyone gotten xconq to work ? Under 4.9 (actually 4.10-stable) it requires tk84.1 which does not exist. If i muck with the makefile to use tk84 (which turns out to be tk84.6) it builds fine but then it fails to because the args it pass to tk are incorrect. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 10:49:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9190B16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:49:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.jbhosting.de (mailgate1.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4B643D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:49:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de) Received: from jbhosting.de (007.ports.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.7] (may be forged))i62AuNKl010493 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:56:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de) Received: (qmail 10489 invoked by uid 545); 2 Jul 2004 10:56:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.42?) (jonsonn@jbhosting.de@213.155.74.126) by mx010.jbhosting.de with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 10:56:23 -0000 From: Jonas Sonntag Organization: JB Hosting To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:47:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406251500.20839.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> In-Reply-To: <200406251500.20839.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407021247.39585.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> X-Spam-Score: 0 (not scanned because domain is not listed for scanning) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Subject: Re: strange pw behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:49:51 -0000 Hi list, must ask again... I'm still stuck with this. It's pretty weird. I have 10 directories each owned by a unique group. All 10 directories are set 750. The groups have been added using pw and user www has been made a member of every group by using pw. This has worked a hundred times. Information is correct in /etc/group. When I open a session as user www by using su and try to list those 10 directories by using 'ls -l *' I get 6 times the directory contents and 4 times 'Permission denied'. ...All directories are 750 and user www is a member of all groups... Looking at 'strings /usr/sbin/pw' I see four CVS tags, the newest three years old. So i don't suspect a bug there. Now what could cause behaviour like this? Where should I keep looking for the problem? Please see the original post too. It seems I'm either missing something here or something is very broken with my jails. On Friday 25 June 2004 15:00, Jonas Sonntag wrote: > Any hints would be appreciated. Any comments, too.. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 11:02:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A62116A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:02:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bilbo.otenet.gr (bilbo.otenet.gr [195.170.0.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516E043D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) i628Xpdd023503; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:33:53 +0300 Received: by orion (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C601334D38; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:35:23 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:35:23 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: j0sh Message-ID: <20040702083523.GA15412@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <000e01c46008$94b1c660$1100000a@bleh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000e01c46008$94b1c660$1100000a@bleh> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question reguarding /etc/hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:02:17 -0000 On 2004-07-02 01:45, j0sh wrote: > I have a quake 1 server installed on my 4.9 release box. it works when > I disable UDP support, but it core dumps when its enabled. I was told > to check the /etc/hosts and make sure there is an entry ther for my > machine and its there. any reccomendations? Let's see if I got what you said correctly. It works when you disable UDP support in the quake server configuration, right? - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 11:09:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E7416A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:09:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes87.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C63F43D41 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:09:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from systick@method-x.net) Received: from naiad.method-x.net ([142.59.63.118]) by priv-edtnes87.telusplanet.netESMTP <20040702110634.PCXI8915.priv-edtnes87.telusplanet.net@naiad.method-x.net> for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:06:34 -0600 Received: by naiad.method-x.net (Postfix, from userid 1012) id 0169D29A9A; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:04:51 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 05:04:51 -0600 From: buuyou@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040702110451.GA66704@method-x.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Nearly empty port directories and README.html. Esp. relating to GTK themes and engines. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:09:11 -0000 Hello. I'm a bit confused as to the function of the README.html files located in otherwise empty ports directories from a cvsup from only a few minutes ago (Fri Jul 2 04:45:00 MDT 2004). Of particular interest to me are the gtk engine and theme ports such as x11-toolkits/gtk-engines-collection or x11-toolkits/gtk-zenith-theme. At this point I haven't found a gtk theme or engine port that has anything but a README.html in it. Would someone please clarify the function of these nearly empty port directories for me, and detail what steps I can take to install a port such as x11-toolkits/gtk-zenith-theme which exhibits this format? -- Accident, n.: A condition in which presence of mind is good, but absence of body is better. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 11:31:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F57516A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:31:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maze.meitech.com (maze.meitech.com [69.33.133.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FC443D4C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:31:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tjg@meitech.com) Received: from ripley.meitech.com (ripley.meitech.com [192.168.100.12]) by maze.meitech.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i62BUAF3058628; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:30:11 GMT (envelope-from tjg@meitech.com) Received: by RIPLEY with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:34:55 -0400 Message-ID: <86ECB35C998DCC49AD435A099AFACCD1E8DB50@RIPLEY> From: "Gustafson, Tim" To: "'Sergey Zaharchenko'" , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:34:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on maze.meitech.com Subject: RE: vi / EAGAIN Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:31:47 -0000 Sergey, I have submitted the problem to FreeBSD using the send-pr program, as Jonathan Chen asked me to. I will follow up here with some details for you though. Once the problem starts happening, it seems that I have to log off the system and log back in again to fix it. This usually (95% of the time) fixes the problem. It also only happens when I press a key - if I let vi sit there with a file loaded into it, it will not get the error no matter how long I wait. The problem only happens when I press a key, and not always the first one. I can usually work in vi for 10-15 seconds before the error comes up. Anyhow, I have submitted the bug report and the link to my ktrace is still up, so if anyone has any ideas about what could be causing this, I would love to hear from you. For now, my work-around is to just log off and back in again when it happens, but as you can imagine, that gets annoying in a big hurry. Tim Tim Gustafson MEI Technology Consulting, Inc tjg@meitech.com (516) 379-0001 Office (516) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergencies http://www.meitech.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 11:35:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2974D16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:35:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D187943D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:35:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i62BYF8Q084712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:34:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i62BYFt6084711; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:34:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:34:15 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: buuyou@gmail.com Message-ID: <20040702113415.GA84639@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , buuyou@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040702110451.GA66704@method-x.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040702110451.GA66704@method-x.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:34:15 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nearly empty port directories and README.html. Esp. relating to GTK themes and engines. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:35:18 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 05:04:51AM -0600, buuyou@gmail.com wrote: > I'm a bit confused as to the function of the README.html files located in > otherwise empty ports directories from a cvsup from only a few minutes ago > (Fri Jul 2 04:45:00 MDT 2004). Of particular interest to me are the gtk > engine and theme ports such as x11-toolkits/gtk-engines-collection or > x11-toolkits/gtk-zenith-theme. At this point I haven't found a gtk theme > or engine port that has anything but a README.html in it. >=20 > Would someone please clarify the function of these nearly empty port > directories for me, and detail what steps I can take to install a port > such as x11-toolkits/gtk-zenith-theme which exhibits this format? Those README.html files don't necessarily have any useful function. They aren't part of the ports cvsup collections at all, so cvsup(1) won't delete them. That means that their presence in any moved or deleted port will prevent cvsup(1) deleting the directory cleanly. You don't need the README.html files during normal usage of the ports tree -- only if you want to access via a web browser. If you delete all of the README.html files: # find /usr/ports -name README.html -print0 | xargs -0 rm then cvsup(1) will clean up those otherwise empty directories. As for the gtk-zenith-theme, you can tell from /usr/ports/MOVED that it's now to be found in the x11-themes directory: % grep gtk-zenith-theme MOVED=20 x11-toolkits/gtk-zenith-theme|x11-themes/gtk-zenith-theme|2004-06-02|ne= w category Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5Ug3iD657aJF7eIRAlmkAKC4d8Wj0h3sjjkd/jx/B57ryeALNACdG4q/ zcddIBcM9JPjAhLexvtPeks= =jT2T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 11:59:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E918E16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:59:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B94A43D1D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AA369A39; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 07:58:01 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Jonas Sonntag Message-Id: <20040702075801.7d3e7109.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200407021247.39585.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> References: <200406251500.20839.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <200407021247.39585.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange pw behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:59:45 -0000 Jonas Sonntag wrote: > Hi list, > > must ask again... I'm still stuck with this. It's pretty weird. I have 10 > directories each owned by a unique group. All 10 directories are set 750. > The groups have been added using pw and user www has been made a member of > every group by using pw. This has worked a hundred times. Information is > correct in /etc/group. > > When I open a session as user www by using su and try to list those 10 > directories by using 'ls -l *' I get 6 times the directory contents and 4 > times 'Permission denied'. ...All directories are 750 and user www is a > member of all groups... > > Looking at 'strings /usr/sbin/pw' I see four CVS tags, the newest three years > old. So i don't suspect a bug there. > Now what could cause behaviour like this? Where should I keep looking for the > problem? > Please see the original post too. It seems I'm either missing something here > or something is very broken with my jails. I saw your previous post, and I'm not sure what's going wrong, but I thought I'd chime in with some guesses, since you're not getting other input. Did you add the users/groups to the jail, or to the host system? Make sure that the group file you added this to is the same group file that is being used by the program. For example, on one of my jail systems, I have /etc/group, which is pretty stock, and /jail/cgi-jail/etc/group, which has special groups for CGI clients, and /jail/frontpage/etc/group which has groups for clients who use frontpage ... etc. Make sure that ownerships show up properly in the environment you're using. For example, if you have a user "wmoran" with uid 1501 in the host system, then a user "wmoran" in the jail with uid 1427, you're going to find that the permissions don't work out right, because file permissions are based on uid, and the user name is just displayed to make it human-readable. Group IDs are similar. Administratively, it seems smarter to keep jailed filesystems completely seperate from host filesystems, as it makes filesystem permissions easier to not mess up. Don't access jailed filesystems from the host unless you're confident in your ability not to get confused. Have you looked at /etc/group (or whatever file is applicable) in a text editor to make sure everything is correct? The format is described in "man group" and is pretty easy to eye parse. HTH. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 12:13:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACD916A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:13:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8098643D39 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FB969A39; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:12:18 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Charles Swiger Message-Id: <20040702081218.22bb997b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <31116F58-CAC1-11D8-9B33-003065ABFD92@mac.com> References: <20040629140231.7b57dedf.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1187B403-C9FC-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040629153855.300b3888.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1133CD52-CA07-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <20040629230817.0f6d230e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <31116F58-CAC1-11D8-9B33-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: REPOST: Performance problems with FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:13:15 -0000 Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jun 29, 2004, at 11:08 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > > Charles Swiger wrote: > >> Well, that does tend to rule out a bunch of issues. Have you tried > >> changing the MTU of the FreeBSD box down to 1400 or so (or even 512), > >> just to see whether that does anything? > > > > OK. I've had a bit of success here ... > > > > By setting the MTU down to ~650, I get the best performance I've seen > > with this setup (about 27k/sec ... which isn't too bad) I set > > "SocketOptions maxseg 650" in the proftpd.conf file for now, which > > seems > > to help a good bit. > > Bingo, found something! All should be easy from here on out... :-) > > > But I'm really confused. Why does reducing the MTU improve > > performance? > > I would have thought it would hurt performance by increasing the # of > > packets, thus increasing overhead. > > Using a smaller MTU normally does hurt performance, as you have to send > more packets (as you've said) and because the overhead (ratio of packet > header size to data size) becomes larger. However, using an MTU which > is too big means packets have to be fragmented and reassembled, which > slows things down a lot, too. > > Anyway, it is likely that one of the networks involved in the > connection has a smaller MTU than normal, which means large data > packets get fragmented, resulting in delays. FTP data connections tend > to show this more than scp does, as the latter seems to vary the packet > size more: perhaps a result of using compression/encryption within the > SSH protocol. > > > I did some captures using Ethereal, and I'm seeing a weird pause (with > > the MTU at the default) where the client will send three packets, > > there'll > > be a pause, then the ack comes back, then three packets, pause, ack ... > > That rings a bell. Are you using path MTU discovery? Is some firewall > in place that might be blocking ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG messages (ICMP > type 3, subtype 4)? > > You should try doing a traceroute which can do pMTU testing; I'm not > sure whether the stock FreeBSD traceroute can do this, but a search > ought to dig up something. Well ... this has turned up the weirdest stuff I've seen in a while! Seems like you're right about PMTU ... but the problem is pretty complex overall. The max PMTU seems to change periodically. It was around 800bytes early yesterday when I checked it. Then, late yesterday, when I was going to track down exactly where the problem was, the PMTU went up to the same MTU my cable connection uses, thus I couldn't use this connection for testing as I couldn't get packets out of it without them fragmenting. (on the flip side, it seems to be _my_ ISP that's rejecting ICMP packets, so I'll have to complain to them) Anyway ... your advice, in addition to a number of resource I found on the web by searching for PMTU, has isolated the problem. Figuring out how to fix it will be another thing altogether. Thanks. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 12:34:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C9016A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:34:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.agni1.net (mail.agni1.net [202.53.160.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46FF43D1F for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:34:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subzero@agnionline.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.agnionline.com) by mail.agni1.net with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1BgM36-000GVg-Ga for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 17:17:44 +0600 Received: from 69.88.3.74 (proxying for 172.16.10.2) (SquirrelMail authenticated user subzero) by mail.agnionline.com with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:17:44 +0600 (BDT) Message-ID: <44613.69.88.3.74.1088767064.squirrel@mail.agnionline.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:17:44 +0600 (BDT) From: "Muhammad Moinur Rahman" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: subzero@agnionline.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:34:48 -0000 Sir, I am FreeBSD fan. I was looking for some kinda graphics for FreeBSD like "Powered By FreeBSD" or such. Can you provide me with some such links. Thanking you. -- Muhammad Moinur Rahman Network Support Specialist Bass Computronics Ltd House#405(3rd fl), Road#27(old) Dhanmomdi,Dhaka - 1209 Office - (880) 2 81197977 8115033 9145776 Fax - (880) 2 9145777 Cell - (880)18 9250971 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 12:44:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0AA16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:44:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Shenton.org (23.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FD4343D46 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@Shenton.Org) Received: (qmail 19154 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Jul 2004 12:43:09 -0000 To: arden References: <1088634627.2465.3.camel@localhost> From: Chris Shenton Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:43:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1088634627.2465.3.camel@localhost> (arden@nildram.co.uk's message of "Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:30:27 +0100") Message-ID: <86oemyk2aq.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: mini itx X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:44:06 -0000 arden writes: > im collecting some bits to start a mini itx project > http://www.mini-itx.com/projects.asp > i have the need for a small silent pc > > has anyone used these boards with bds? I'm using an EPIA 6000 as a workstation in the kitchen. I boot FreeBSD-5.2 diskless so it's silent. Since there is no disk heat, I can also unplug the CPU fan. Totally silent. Very nice. Not a speed demon, but plenty fast for surfing and such. I'll probably do the same for the next machine I buy for my office: I find it a lot easier to code and think without fan and disk noise. (The server's in the basement with a bunch of RAID disk). I had X11 working on the built-in chipset with an older snapshot port, but the recent one doesn't work for me. I haven't tried heavy duty multimedia stuff nor decss and such on it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 12:52:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF00316A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:52:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.jbhosting.de (mailgate1.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E430443D48 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:52:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de) Received: from jbhosting.de (007.ports.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.7] (may be forged))i62CwnKZ039125 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:58:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de) Received: (qmail 39119 invoked by uid 545); 2 Jul 2004 12:58:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.42?) (jonsonn@jbhosting.de@213.155.74.126) by mx010.jbhosting.de with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 12:58:49 -0000 From: Jonas Sonntag Organization: JB Hosting To: Bill Moran Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:50:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406251500.20839.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <200407021247.39585.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <20040702075801.7d3e7109.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040702075801.7d3e7109.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407021450.05509.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> X-Spam-Score: 0 (not scanned because domain is not listed for scanning) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange pw behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:52:45 -0000 Hi Bill, first of all, thanks for the input! On Friday 02 July 2004 13:58, Bill Moran wrote: > Did you add the users/groups to the jail, or to the host system? Make sure > that the group file you added this to is the same group file that is being > used by the program. For example, on one of my jail systems, I have > /etc/group, which is pretty stock, and /jail/cgi-jail/etc/group, which has > special groups for CGI clients, and /jail/frontpage/etc/group which has > groups for clients who use frontpage ... etc. I'm within the jail only. I'm using pw from the host system, as you can see from the -V switch to pw, but from thereon I'm logging on to the sshd running inside the jail. So I'm talking about user www inside the jail and /etc/group inside the jail. > Make sure that ownerships show up properly in the environment you're using. > For example, if you have a user "wmoran" with uid 1501 in the host system, > then a user "wmoran" in the jail with uid 1427, you're going to find that > the permissions don't work out right, because file permissions are based on > uid, and the user name is just displayed to make it human-readable. Group > IDs are similar. I don't have any of the groups on the host system, all of them are inside the jail. Within the jail: All group names are displayed right, according to the entries in /etc/group. User www is a member of all 10 groups. User www can list 6 directories and gets Permission denied on 4 directories. > Have you looked at /etc/group (or whatever file is applicable) in a text > editor to make sure everything is correct? The format is described in > "man group" and is pretty easy to eye parse. The format is correct, since all modification is done by pw. The text editor part is the funny one: As soon as I move one of my problematic group entries to another position inside the file using vi, it might work and eventually it might break one of the other groups. I just reordered the file so that the entries are sorted by group id which resulted in 7 directories showing and only 3 showing Permission denied. Sounds weird, right? Still I have no indication what's wrong with the other 3... I would suspect it might be a host/jail issue, but since I have none of the groups on the host while some _do_ work this is not it. Also, I'm really only working inside the jail enviroment and everything looks like it should there. As a sidenote: I have null-mounted the directory in which those 10 directories are located to another jail on the same host system where I have the same problem (showing 5, permission denied on 5 here). Since I don't suspect a bug in pw, maybe someone could enlighten me which other programs might be involved here and I could recompile those before I reinstall the whole world to those jails (not that I think reinstalling something will help, but I'm lost here). Thanks again for the input, Best regards Jonas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:05:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4F16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:05:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF11543D58 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:05:00 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:05:02 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: 'Philip Payne' , Radu MOLNAR , Arek Czereszewski Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:05:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2004 13:05:00.0017 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E567E10:01C46035] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: John Lee Subject: RE: IP bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:05:52 -0000 Bandwithd and IPaudit do a good job. I use both. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -----Original Message----- From: Philip Payne [mailto:philip.payne@uk.mci.com] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 4:43 AM To: Radu MOLNAR; Arek Czereszewski Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; John Lee Subject: RE: IP bandwidth > > John Lee wrote: > > > >> dear all, > >> > >> i'm using a freebsd 4.10-stable server with 50 IP addresses. > >> Is there any program i can install that will be able to tell me: > >> > >> - how much bandwidth (ie. kbps) each individual IP is using? > >> > >> trafcount seems to count total traffic only, any idea? > >> > > > > I.e. > > ipfw + rrdtools or mrtg > > from ports (net-mgnt): > > netramet, bandwidthd > > Any of these make real time statistics like iptraf under > linux. I also > need something like this for both general interface > (realtime) statistics > and for traffic monitorring (i can use tcpdump for this but > it would be > nice to have both caracteristics in one program). I've used /usr/ports/net-mgmt/darkstat in the past on my home network. Its pretty simplistic but it might be of use. Phil. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:11:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B3916A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:11:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6E443D48 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6205F69A39; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:09:50 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Jonas Sonntag Message-Id: <20040702090950.2ff78999.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200407021450.05509.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> References: <200406251500.20839.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <200407021247.39585.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <20040702075801.7d3e7109.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200407021450.05509.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange pw behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:11:17 -0000 Jonas Sonntag wrote: > Hi Bill, > > first of all, thanks for the input! > > On Friday 02 July 2004 13:58, Bill Moran wrote: > > Did you add the users/groups to the jail, or to the host system? Make sure > > that the group file you added this to is the same group file that is being > > used by the program. For example, on one of my jail systems, I have > > /etc/group, which is pretty stock, and /jail/cgi-jail/etc/group, which has > > special groups for CGI clients, and /jail/frontpage/etc/group which has > > groups for clients who use frontpage ... etc. > > I'm within the jail only. I'm using pw from the host system, as you can see > from the -V switch to pw, but from thereon I'm logging on to the sshd running > inside the jail. So I'm talking about user www inside the jail and /etc/group > inside the jail. > > > Make sure that ownerships show up properly in the environment you're using. > > For example, if you have a user "wmoran" with uid 1501 in the host system, > > then a user "wmoran" in the jail with uid 1427, you're going to find that > > the permissions don't work out right, because file permissions are based on > > uid, and the user name is just displayed to make it human-readable. Group > > IDs are similar. > > I don't have any of the groups on the host system, all of them are inside the > jail. > Within the jail: All group names are displayed right, according to the entries > in /etc/group. User www is a member of all 10 groups. User www can list 6 > directories and gets Permission denied on 4 directories. > > > Have you looked at /etc/group (or whatever file is applicable) in a text > > editor to make sure everything is correct? The format is described in > > "man group" and is pretty easy to eye parse. > > The format is correct, since all modification is done by pw. The text editor > part is the funny one: As soon as I move one of my problematic group entries > to another position inside the file using vi, it might work and eventually it > might break one of the other groups. > I just reordered the file so that the entries are sorted by group id which > resulted in 7 directories showing and only 3 showing Permission denied. > > Sounds weird, right? > > Still I have no indication what's wrong with the other 3... I would suspect it > might be a host/jail issue, but since I have none of the groups on the host > while some _do_ work this is not it. > Also, I'm really only working inside the jail enviroment and everything looks > like it should there. > > As a sidenote: I have null-mounted the directory in which those 10 directories > are located to another jail on the same host system where I have the same > problem (showing 5, permission denied on 5 here). > > Since I don't suspect a bug in pw, maybe someone could enlighten me which > other programs might be involved here and I could recompile those before I > reinstall the whole world to those jails (not that I think reinstalling > something will help, but I'm lost here). Well, I tried ... The only other thought I have is that you might have some invalid user names? (I'm really reaching here ...) Can you attach the group file so we can verify the syntax. Beyond that, I'm at a loss. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:14:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE4516A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:14:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beastie.flncs.com (ns1.flncs.com [204.0.142.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9298C43D1D for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:14:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from moti@flncs.com) Received: (qmail 17041 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2004 12:13:20 -0000 Received: from localhost.flncs.com (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (moti@flncs.com@127.0.0.1) by beastie.flncs.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 12:13:20 -0000 Message-ID: <40E55F40.70106@flncs.com> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:12:32 -0400 From: Moti Levy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44613.69.88.3.74.1088767064.squirrel@mail.agnionline.com> In-Reply-To: <44613.69.88.3.74.1088767064.squirrel@mail.agnionline.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:14:38 -0000 Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote: >Sir, >I am FreeBSD fan. I was looking for some kinda graphics for FreeBSD like >"Powered By FreeBSD" or such. Can you provide me with some such links. > >Thanking you. > > > comes in any apache install on your freebsd box ... http://beastie.flncs.com/icons/freebsd.gif From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:20:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEA816A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:20:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1929243D45 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:20:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from server2.messagingengine.com (server2.internal [10.202.2.133]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320F3C0D5BD; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by server2.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 65BD683E81; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.4 (F2.72; T1.001; A1.62; B3.01; Q3.01) References: <20040702080837.S17792@pukruppa.net> In-Reply-To: <20040702080837.S17792@pukruppa.net> To: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:21:56 -0400 From: "Jud" X-Sasl-Enc: +e0bUNZ/eUf5GgU7hq088w 1088770916 Message-Id: <1088770916.21143.199618251@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: Problems with UDMA harddisks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:20:58 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:28:12 +0200 (CEST), "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" said: > Hi! > > I hope somebody on this list has another good idea, I haven't > thought of yet: > > I have a machine that came with two Excel Stor 40 GB ("Ganymede") > UDMA/100 harddisks. > To install FreeBSD 4.10 I had to disable UDMA in the BIOS, > otherwise they wouldn't have booted (some complaint about ata0). > Of course I wish to get UDMA working, since this is said to > improve perfomance significantly. > I checked if the UDMA cable is plugged into the correct places > for mainboard, master and slave - this is o.k. . > > Are there any other things (bios settings, kernel modules, magic > chants,...) I could try? I've been using DragonFly so I am not absolutely certain 4.10 still uses /boot/loader.conf, but if it does, then inserting the following line in that file may help: hw.ata.ata_dma="1" Jud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:42:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF3A16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.jbhosting.de (mailgate1.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC7643D48 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:42:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de) Received: from jbhosting.de (007.ports.jbhosting.de [80.190.201.7] (may be forged))i62DnNKZ047454 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:49:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de) Received: (qmail 47448 invoked by uid 545); 2 Jul 2004 13:49:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.42?) (jonsonn@jbhosting.de@213.155.74.126) by mx010.jbhosting.de with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 13:49:23 -0000 From: Jonas Sonntag Organization: JB Hosting To: Bill Moran Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:40:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406251500.20839.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <200407021450.05509.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> <20040702090950.2ff78999.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040702090950.2ff78999.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407021540.39869.jonas.sonntag@jbhosting.de> X-Spam-Score: 0 (not scanned because domain is not listed for scanning) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange pw behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:42:42 -0000 On Friday 02 July 2004 15:09, Bill Moran wrote: > The only other thought I have is that you might have some invalid user > names? (I'm really reaching here ...) > > Can you attach the group file so we can verify the syntax. I really don't think so... all entries come from pw and pw get's called the same way every time (from a script) here is a part of the /etc/group file: u186:*:2119:www u188:*:2121:www u189:*:2122:www u197:*:2130:www u192:*:2125:www 'ls -l' as user www shows: drwxr-x--- 4 u186 u186 512 Apr 23 21:56 u186 drwxr-x--- 9 u188 u188 1024 Jul 2 12:32 u188 drwxr-x--- 5 u189 u189 512 Jun 25 14:28 u189 drwxr-x--- 3 u192 u192 512 Jun 6 20:21 u192 drwxr-x--- 11 u197 u197 1024 Jul 2 14:15 u197 'ls -l *' as user www shows something like: u186: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 6 u186 u186 512 Jun 5 16:33 some_dir drwxr-xr-x 4 u186 u186 512 May 11 21:36 another_dir u188: total 16 drwxr-xr-x 12 u188 u188 512 Jul 1 17:17 dir1 drwxr-xr-x 17 u188 u188 1024 Jul 1 17:17 dir2 -rw-r--r-- 1 u188 u188 280 Jun 30 21:59 file.txt u189: ls: u189: Permission denied u192: ls: u192: Permission denied u197: ls: u197: Permission denied > Beyond that, I'm at a loss. Me too... I have been using pw to manage user accounts within different jails for quite some time now but never had issues like these.. Thanks anyway. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:49:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F4C16A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:49:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eagle.fgcu.edu (eagle.fgcu.edu [150.104.224.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2678B43D31 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:49:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dbkorink@eagle.fgcu.edu) Received: from eagle.fgcu.edu (eagle.fgcu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.fgcu.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i62DrUxF029230 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:53:30 GMT From: "Douglas Korinke" To: "FreeBSD Help" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:53:30 -0500 Message-Id: <20040702133952.M7220@eagle.fgcu.edu> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.30 20040103 X-OriginatingIP: 67.8.39.28 (dbkorink) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Wireless client problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:49:08 -0000 Hi, I'm currently running fbsd 4.9 on a Toshiba Satellite 2405-S221. The problem I am having is that after I install and configure the wireless card, I observe no activity between the card and the cpu. I know for certain that my pccard slots are fully functional and that fbsd is loading the appropriate drivers, but I am puzzled with the lack of activity. To setup the client I used the example from the FBSD handbook, 20.3.3.4.1 minus all the WEP encryption crap: ifconfig wi0 ssid inet netmask I choose the IP right off the top of my head, I simply make sure that the IP is not being used by any other machines on the network. Here is my output from dmesg: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Tue Jun 29 09:10:13 EST 2004 root@doug.swfla.rr.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.60GHz (1594.84-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 Features=0x3febf9ff real memory = 268238848 (261952K bytes) avail memory = 255270912 (249288K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0597000. Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00f01a0 apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 uhci0: port 0xefe0-0xefff irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 fxp0: port 0xdf40-0xdf7f mem 0xff9ff000-0xff9fffff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci2 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:00:39:c9:38:ad inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci_cfgintr_linked: linked (6b) to hard-routed irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 2:10 INTA routed to irq 11 pcic0: irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci2 pcic0: PCI Memory allocated: 0x88000000 pcic0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [pwr save][pci only] pccard0: on pcic0 pci_cfgintr_linked: linked (60) to hard-routed irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 2:11 INTA routed to irq 11 pcic1: irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci2 pcic1: PCI Memory allocated: 0x88001000 pccard1: on pcic1 pci_cfgintr_linked: linked (61) to hard-routed irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 2:11 INTB routed to irq 11 pcic2: irq 11 at device 11.1 on pci2 pcic2: PCI Memory allocated: 0x88002000 pccard2: on pcic2 pci2: (vendor=0x1179, dev=0x0805) at 13.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xcfa0-0xcfaf,0xcfe4-0xcfe7,0xcfe8-0xcfef,0xcff4-0xcff7,0xcff8-0xcfff irq 11 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pcm0: port 0xcdc0-0xcdff,0xce00-0xceff irq 11 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2486) at 31.6 irq 11 orm0: