Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:05:42 +0400 From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Dima Panov <fluffy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/cmake Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/cmake-gui Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <201005221405.42362.makc@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4BF6EB8A.6020005@freebsd.org> References: <200911291151.nATBpdsp044837@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100521170958.GA24679@FreeBSD.org> <4BF6EB8A.6020005@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:22:34 +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > Yeah, I've also had to explicitly provide path to wxgtk2-2.8-config for
> > my CMake-based ports as well. Probably some sort of hack we used to
> > employ for sdl12-config is in order; creating symlink seems bad since
> > target might be something other than wxgtk2-2.8-config, leading to
> > potential conflicts. We have a long record of dealing with local
> > differences from the rest of the [GNU/OSS] world in a sane ways. :-)
> >
> > ./danfe
> >
> I've sent a patch for this with ports/146805
With this patch cmake/wx-based ports will always try to build with wx-2.8 when
multiple wx ports are installed, disregarding what ports/user request.
Wouldn't better to pass ${WX_CONFIG} for CMAKE_ARGS in bsd.wx.mk, as it does
already for CONFIGURE_ARGS?
Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201005221405.42362.makc>