Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Dec 2020 11:27:30 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 252057] lang/python38: 3.8.6_1 -> 3.8.7 strip issues
Message-ID:  <bug-252057-21822-UldbKqjhvz@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-252057-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-252057-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252057

--- Comment #8 from Dima Panov <fluffy@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7)
Yep, revert is noop here because new python releases of all branchel will
switch to this scheme unconditionally


> @Kai are there any ports failing that *aren't* due to hardcoded <filename=
.so> lines?

As I see in my poudriere, answer is 'no', all fails caused by strip/plist
issues

and if for pure py-ports with autoplist we simply can fix by use named
wildcard, ports like gobject-introspection or py-grpcio needs to use some h=
acks
depends on py version.
And it is an argument for my opinion, posted earliesr -- all python3* ports
should import the new naming scheme and all consumers will be adjusted with=
out
any extra .ifdefs

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-252057-21822-UldbKqjhvz>