Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:39:41 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <200708312039.43262.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <46D82649.20804@FreeBSD.org> References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <20070831142458.GE79097@dragon.NUXI.org> <46D82649.20804@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 31 August 2007 11:31:37 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > for instance. > > MACHINE_CPU is supposed to be a complete list of relevant CPU features > that ports can use to enable e.g. SSE2 asm optimizations if the CPUTYPE > supports it. A number of them exist that do this. > Sorry but I have some difficulties to understand how a port could enable CP= U=20 features if they are not enabled/recognized by the kernel =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708312039.43262.joao>