Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:39:41 -0300
From:      JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk
Message-ID:  <200708312039.43262.joao@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <46D82649.20804@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <20070831142458.GE79097@dragon.NUXI.org> <46D82649.20804@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 31 August 2007 11:31:37 Kris Kennaway wrote:

> >
> > for instance.
>
> MACHINE_CPU is supposed to be a complete list of relevant CPU features
> that ports can use to enable e.g. SSE2 asm optimizations if the CPUTYPE
> supports it.  A number of them exist that do this.
>


Sorry but I have some difficulties to understand how a port could enable CP=
U=20
features if they are not enabled/recognized by the kernel


=2D-=20

Jo=E3o







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708312039.43262.joao>