Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 09:50:33 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r221124 - in head: . sbin/mount sbin/mount_nfs sys/amd64/conf sys/fs/nfsclient sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/nfsclient sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf sys/sun4v/conf Message-ID: <86r58dsi0m.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <1310797810.1031067.1304558503327.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> (Rick Macklem's message of "Wed, 4 May 2011 21:21:43 -0400 (EDT)") References: <1310797810.1031067.1304558503327.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> writes: > "Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav" <des@des.no> writes: > > Ideally, both the old and the new NFS stack would use the same > > fstypes and sysctl names, but I don't know if there's any way we can > > prevent someone from compiling both into the kernel at the same > > time, or loading both modules. > If the scripts in /etc/rc.d are fixed to use the correct sysctl naming, > do you think it matters which one is "vfs.nfs."? Yes. There is a whole world outside the base system: munin, webmin, nagios etc. Are you going to change all of them as well? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r58dsi0m.fsf>