Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:37:00 +0100 From: Sascha Schumann <sas@schell.de> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html Message-ID: <19990316143700.A3066@schell.de> In-Reply-To: <19990315222619.A1238@titan.klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:26:19PM %2B0100 References: <19990315143602.A984@schell.de> <19990315191026.E3020@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <19990315212538.A15607@schell.de> <19990315222619.A1238@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:26:19PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 09:25:38PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps I repeat the test with an 2.2 kernel.... > > > > Yes, and please stop spreading FUD. It looks rather narrow-minded to be > > proud of such a comparison. > > Look at the new values ;-) Satisfied ?! ;-) > > -- > Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas > News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!! Well, the numbers have changed (^^^ not). But the method is still insane. You are comparing not the same process, because there are numerous things which differ (e.g. libraries, compiler version, toolchain). The only claim I would derive from such a test would be that "you can build your programs faster on FreeBSD." Sigh. Btw, SuSE 6.1 with kernel 2.2.3, KDE 1.1 and GNOME 1.0 will be shipped in April (international version will come out in May). -- Regards, Sascha Schumann | Consultant | finger sas@schell.de | for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990316143700.A3066>