Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:45:06 -0500
From:      Ryan Coleman <editor@d3photography.com>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        christopher-ml@telting.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com
Subject:   Re: Port dependencies
Message-ID:  <9BFF22F1-7559-4107-B149-94A79CA3ADB7@d3photography.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6+b5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org> <BANLkTinUz6DOMYhR7MHHtbMsK0UBNCwwBw@mail.gmail.com> <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6+b5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help


On Apr 2, 2011, at 7:07 PM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:

> Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting <christopher-ml@telting.org> wrote:
>>> One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.
>> 
>> I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone
>> who has spent hours struggling with rpm ... would never dare to
>> even think of such terms when using the Ports Collection.
> 
> Dependency purgatory?

Dantency Inferno. :)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9BFF22F1-7559-4107-B149-94A79CA3ADB7>