Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:32:42 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports.conf Message-ID: <20010824113242.B1095@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> In-Reply-To: <20010823192558.A6265@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:25:58PM -0700 References: <20010823210729.A95484@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010823135941.B4003@dragon.nuxi.com> <15237.37767.274325.945753@nomad.yogotech.com> <20010823192558.A6265@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@FreeBSD.ORG): > > Would something like /etc/ports.conf be acceptable? That way it can be > > modified separately from the configuration for the main /usr/src tree, > Yes. Not because it separates things from knobs for /usr/src, but > because it separates things logically. So, are you ok with: - share/mk/sys.mk only sucking in /defaults/make.conf and /etc/make.conf - bsd.port.mk sucking in $PORTSDIR/Mk/ports.conf and then overwriteable in /etc/ports.conf? (Don't bother about the location in the ports/ tree, which can change). I think this is the general agreement, isn't it? Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824113242.B1095>