Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:15:34 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
To:        Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention.
Message-ID:  <4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com>	<20101211215341.0000097c@unknown>	<AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com>	<20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> <4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 14/12/2010 05:10 Artem Belevich said the following:
> I've posted updated version of the patch here:
> https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace.patch.gz
> 
> This patch uses DTrace module field to specify syscall's compat
> variant in the syscall probe name.

If there are no objections and no pending reviews and comments, then I would
like to commit this shortly.

> The patch also adds syscall probe for linux32 binaries on amd64. I'll
> try to add i386 support soon, too, but I have no i386 box I could
> compile and test the changes on. I'll try to get one set up under
> VirtualBox later, but for now the patch is for 8-STABLE/amd64 only.

It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree.

Thanks!
-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D0F3AD6.9080002>