Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:15:34 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention. Message-ID: <4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com> <20101211215341.0000097c@unknown> <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com> <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> <4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 14/12/2010 05:10 Artem Belevich said the following: > I've posted updated version of the patch here: > https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace.patch.gz > > This patch uses DTrace module field to specify syscall's compat > variant in the syscall probe name. If there are no objections and no pending reviews and comments, then I would like to commit this shortly. > The patch also adds syscall probe for linux32 binaries on amd64. I'll > try to add i386 support soon, too, but I have no i386 box I could > compile and test the changes on. I'll try to get one set up under > VirtualBox later, but for now the patch is for 8-STABLE/amd64 only. It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree. Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D0F3AD6.9080002>