From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 03:24:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97C316A403 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 03:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from hq.sectorb.msk.ru (petaflop.b.gz.ru [194.88.210.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DA443C9D for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 03:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinhngt@sectorb.msk.ru) Received: from it.local (it.local [172.16.10.61]) by hq.sectorb.msk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20662BE7; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 06:24:05 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 06:23:44 +0300 (MSK) From: Nguyen Tam Chinh X-X-Sender: chinhngt@it.hackers To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20061203022926.GA9253@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20061203062013.N12624@it.hackers> References: <20061203022926.GA9253@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6-STABLE Keywords: 216091683 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Update on X11BASE status X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 03:24:10 -0000 Hello, The patch for vietnamese/xvnkb port was commited today by rafan (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106020). Please check again if everything is okay with the port now. I'd like to have a look at 1 or two ports in the list, hope that I can do something with them. Thank you to Kris and the ports team for the heavy job. On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers > we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete > X11BASE compliance. > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-maintainer.html > > We're now down to fewer than 110 ports that need to be corrected to > deal with a non-standard X11BASE location (the rest are more general > port problems). By now only 17 of those broken ports are > unmaintained, so the majority of them are waiting on individual > maintainers to step up and/or approve fixes already submitted by other > users. > > Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that > hold us up?! You know who you are since you've already received email > about this, so let's push on and see how quickly we can get that > number down to 50! > > Kris > > > ----- With best regards, | The Power to Serve Nguyen Tam Chinh | http://www.FreeBSD.org Loc: sp.cs.msu.su |