From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 4 21:44:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD9216A4CE for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 21:44:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth03.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth03.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8F943D31 for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 21:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=[192.168.63.10]) by smtpauth03.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1DTRPI-0004mQ-SI; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:27:49 -0400 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Chuck Robey Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:27:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200505041522.25722.algould@datawok.com> <42792FC9.3070203@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <42792FC9.3070203@chuckr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200505041627.58250.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc7a87632189fb2f794224c9ce9e67c0df350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mixing IDE and SATA hard drives on a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 21:44:58 -0000 On Wednesday 04 May 2005 03:25 pm, Chuck Robey wrote: > Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > My AMD K6-2 computer is in the shop getting upgraded to AMD64. If > > FreeBSD 5.4 is released next week, the timing couldn't be better. > > > > I was thinking about putting FreeBSD and swap on the ATA100 IDE > > hard drive and installing a SATA hard drive for home and database > > data. Is there any reason I shouldn't mix hard drive types? (I've > > never messed with SATA before.) > > YMMV, but for myself, I notice that SATA is notably less reliable > than straight SCSI drives are. Less than Ide also. I don't know > why. > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew Thanks for the warning. I just did a google search on "sata reliability" with lots of interesting results. The expected lifespan (MTBF) of a sata is lower than the scsi; but I haven't found any comparisons to ide yet. Andrew