From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 16:23:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91C510656A9; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout017.mac.com (asmtpout017.mac.com [17.148.16.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0B78FC21; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Received: from macbook-pro.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by asmtp017.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.03 (built Aug 7 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0K99006DJ469MH10@asmtp017.mac.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5D27204C-0E14-4154-BBC5-AB90B1AC657D@mac.com> From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Sam Leffler In-reply-to: <4901F46D.8010906@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:56 -0700 References: <200810230151.m9N1ptUe044619@svn.freebsd.org> <20081023.190942.74668946.imp@bsdimp.com> <4901F173.2070701@freebsd.org> <37EC82F7-ECD8-4470-8406-084D7F839664@mac.com> <4901F46D.8010906@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, marcel@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: svn commit: r184193 - in head/sys: arm/conf conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:23:10 -0000 On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Sam Leffler wrote: >>> This is just wrong and clearly Marvel never discussed it with >>> anyone working on arm systems or he'd have gotten an earful. >> >> Get your facts straight. >> > I checked with folks and you never asked for review of this change. What you mean to say is: "Oops, sorry!" > As to not changing behaviour; the existing use of mbr+bsdlabels is > stopgap and I believe everyone actively working on these platforms > would like to ditch 'em. I am actively working on ARM and I need to ditch them myself. For that I chose to make them optional first so that people can keep the old behaviour if they want to. Stopgap or not, as ARM was before my change, those two were non-optional. -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com