Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:30:09 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Space-saving of UFS1 Message-ID: <200606091330.10007.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4489ADC9.3090809@samsco.org> References: <20060609065656.31225.qmail@web30313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200606091313.04913.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4489ADC9.3090809@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:20, Scott Long написав: > The space savings you get from UFS1 is that the inodes are half the size > and the indorect blocks can hold more block pointers. I don't believe > that ACLs play a difference here. Aren't the ACLs recorded in the inodes -- which would explain, why those are twice larger in UFS2? Thanks! -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606091330.10007.mi%2Bmx>