Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:10:13 +0100
From:      Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
To:        Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Eric Borisch <eborisch@gmail.com>, freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ZFS snapdir readability (Crosspost)
Message-ID:  <98FF3093-F510-4343-A6DA-26F58C978782@sarenet.es>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2iGweg-4mh11iT5q2iyddTsqh1iWXNR3oVqGO8_3JCeKw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20191107004635.c6d2e7d464d3d556a0d87465@magnetkern.de> <CAOtMX2huHZcXHH%2B=3Bx7hX_p9udJ2acOX%2BZL8vW=pjqbe6mOAA@mail.gmail.com> <e2eecef7-21b6-0ff2-b259-71421b7d097c@sentex.net> <9B22AD46-BE87-4305-9638-74D23AD4C8CA@sarenet.es> <cfcc12dd-e9eb-5a98-a031-ab18436a2dd3@sentex.net> <261FE331-EC5C-48C8-9249-9BCBF887CE38@sarenet.es> <913f7040-6e38-452d-6187-e17fae63b652@sentex.net> <20191120144041.7f916360dc0c69bf509c9bd1@magnetkern.de> <AEF4CA02-36B3-42FC-BE92-14DF0AF99540@sarenet.es> <20191120163437.691abd369ab9c0a6d7d45ff2@magnetkern.de> <CF38B478-3638-4C18-B69F-E589DE9BBB95@sarenet.es> <20191120175803.03401c3316fe756cc46f79f1@magnetkern.de> <3C5DC6DD-C44B-41EE-B7AB-6D8F94E43174@sarenet.es> <201911211259.xALCxShX008743@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <462E2C53-2490-4B8C-BB54-BCE8B75BAEB0@sarenet.es> <CAMsT2=nBEiaiBNMD9_j1JNBwDueq8anOa2rtO_jPFoRcm0_uDA@mail.gmail.com> <51805C8F-75D6-4DA1-A28E-68DAFC8A0276@sarenet.es> <CAOtMX2iGweg-4mh11iT5q2iyddTsqh1iWXNR3oVqGO8_3JCeKw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 21 Nov 2019, at 15:59, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> Thanks, so it=E2=80=99s a new feature from ZoL. I am running the stock =
ZFS.=20
>=20
> Is it really intended to work or just some misunderstanding?
>=20
> ZFS originally didn=E2=80=99t offer any mechanism to mount snapshots =
explicitly. Except by cloning.=20
>=20
> No, that is incorrect.  You've always been able to mount snapshots =
that way.  It's not a new feature.

Oops sorry! For some reason I was convinced it wasn=E2=80=99t possible.=20=


Still odd that =E2=80=9Czfs mount=E2=80=9D doesn=E2=80=99t support it.=20=


My apologies! Clearly I need more coffee today.



Borja.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?98FF3093-F510-4343-A6DA-26F58C978782>