From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 25 00:22:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2E37B401 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DA143F85 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:22:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfi6b.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.200.203] helo=mindspring.com) by puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19fwuh-0006VG-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:22:52 -0700 Message-ID: <3F20DA91.4065447F@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:21:53 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <000001c3521a$7fa912c0$6bd4bfac@AlHindawi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4c4d372233ee633150cf3844f602e1b3ca8438e0f32a48e08350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Ahmed Al-Hindawi cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:22:55 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Well, the 5.0, old -CURRENT and 4.8 have never touch the swap, until 5.1- > CURRENT. My system has 256mb ram and it's always touch swap now. If I > compile some stuff, sometime it will get around 300mb swap. Current, I only > have Gnome 2.3.x and Opera running, so what my top looks like this: The new gcc is a pig. So is the new Gnome. What if you install the old Gnome from 5.0 on your system? You probably can't get away with the old gcc, since the binary format changed For No Good Reason(tm). -- Terry