Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:00:17 -0400 From: Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> To: David Leimbach <dleimbac@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ule+preempt? Message-ID: <200504262200.17379.mistry.7@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <5bbfe7d405042618404e7a6521@mail.gmail.com> References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> <200504261135.07833.mistry.7@osu.edu> <5bbfe7d405042618404e7a6521@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:40 pm, David Leimbach wrote: > On 4/26/05, Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote: > > > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some > > > months. i am wondering if the waters have become relatively > > > safe to go to ule with preemption? > > > > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for > > now, but YMMV. > > Are you on an SMP box? I have a feeling it's pretty good on a UP > machine > I'm on on UP. Running on SMP will probably reveal the squishy underbelly to which Kris was referring. -- Anish Mistry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504262200.17379.mistry.7>