Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:19:44 +0200 From: Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> To: pgollucci@freebsd.org, nivit@freebsd.org, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/150930: [UPDATE] databases/py-sqlalchemy to 0.6.4 Message-ID: <AANLkTimaxW9RYuKUfTiMC8=PoSTNs4oThNXRSeRWniq_@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201010112057.o9BKvbQ5054452@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201010112057.o9BKvbQ5054452@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I don't understand why to keep 'py-pysqlite23' for SQLite options, whereas this port is not up to date. On the Python Package Index (pypi) the last one is 2.6.0 [1]. Unfortunately, it does not compile with SQLite's version presents on the ports tree. It depends on 'sqlite-amalgamation' (see SQLite3 site). That's why I add the sqlite3 module, which is presents in standard library of Python. This =AB driver =BB is of course supported by SQLAlchemy [2]. Regards [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pysqlite/2.6.0 [2] http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/core/engines.html#supported-databases 2010/10/11 <pgollucci@freebsd.org>: > Synopsis: [UPDATE] databases/py-sqlalchemy to 0.6.4 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: pgollucci > State-Changed-When: Mon Oct 11 20:57:36 UTC 2010 > State-Changed-Why: > duplicate of ports/150845 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D150930 > --=20 olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimaxW9RYuKUfTiMC8=PoSTNs4oThNXRSeRWniq_>