From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 6 13:40:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA716A4CE; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:40:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCC143F3F; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:40:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB6LejRm084924; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:40:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB6LegV9084783; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:40:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:40:41 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20031206214041.GB9434@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <0F89A7EF-274F-11D8-B8AD-000502C708CB@sitetronics.com> <20031205135606.U87691@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031205160702.A71074@pooker.samsco.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031205160702.A71074@pooker.samsco.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org cc: "Devon H. O'Dell" cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New sparc64 5.2-BETA ISO images available X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 21:40:47 -0000 On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:09:16PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Yes, the U1e and U2 machines need the esp(4) driver from NetBSD. I'm in > the middle of porting it right now, but it will still take some time. > Netbooting these machines works very well for me at the moment; a > netbooted U2 builds world faster than an Alpha XP1000 with a local disk. eh? My 'make world' times on a Compaq XP1000 is faster than my Sun Blade 100 500mhz. I certainly won't believe a 300mhz diskless machine will beat that. What were the actual times?